JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Abeel A. Mangi
David F. Torchiana
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mangi, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Torchiana, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mangi, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Torchiana, D. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:771-772
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Brief communication

A technique for repair of mitral paravalvular leak

Abeel A. Mangi, MDa, David F. Torchiana, MDa,*

a Cardiac Surgical Unit and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, USA

Received for publication March 18, 2004; revisions received April 14, 2004; accepted for publication April 26, 2004.

* Address for reprints: David F. Torchiana, MD, Bullfinch 208, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
dtorchiana{at}partners.org

The incidence of paravalvular leak 15 years after mitral valve replacement (MVR) approximates 17%.1,2 Its relative incidence after mechanical and bioprosthetic replacement is debated.1 Running monofilament suture techniques3 and MVR for endocarditis4 have been implicated in the development of paravalvular leaks. Twenty-two percent of patients with paravalvular leaks are diagnosed in the first week after MVR, and another 52% are diagnosed within the first postoperative year. Patients requiring operative repair are older, have symptomatic heart failure, hemolytic anemia, and larger leaks. Surgical intervention to repair the leak improves symptoms of congestive heart failure, augments the hematocrit value, decreases the need for blood transfusion, and is an independent predictor of long-term survival when compared with medical therapy.4 Choice of operation involves either direct suture repair of the leak site, which carries a failure rate of 13%; or replacement of the valve, which carries a failure rate of up to 35% and poses a technical challenge. Here we propose a simple technique for repair of selected mitral paravalvular leaks that incorporates healthy, full-thickness autologous tissue into the repair and has promising durability.

Technique

The operation is conducted during continuous intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and commences with standard ascending aortic and bicaval cannulation. After the heart is arrested with antegrade intermittent cold blood cardioplegia, a standard superior septal incision is made. If both atria are significantly enlarged, the prosthesis can be approached solely through the interatrial septum. This approach yields excellent exposure of the anterior part of the mitral prosthesis that abuts the interatrial septum and is proximate to the posteromedial commissure of the native mitral valve. In our experience this location accounts for 38% of mitral paravalvular leaks.5 Although TEE accurately identifies 88% of mitral paravalvular leaks,5 clear communication between the surgeon and echocardiographer is essential to ensure that the location and number of leaks are accurately defined, especially because nomenclature in this area can be confusing. As an example, the location that we are discussing is on the anterior aspect of the mitral prosthesis but also is proximate to the posteromedial commissure of the native mitral valve. It is therefore critical that the echocardiographer and the surgeon refer to standardized reference points. Depending on the extent of the leak, the first pledget-supported, braided polyester stitch is placed as a horizontal mattress stitch through a fold of the left atrial wall and is then brought directly into the sewing ring at the most posterior aspect of the leak near the coronary sinus. The remaining sutures are placed in similar fashion through the interatrial septum from the right side to the left and then directly though the sewing ring (Figure 1). Up to 5 sutures might be needed to completely obliterate the leak. The left atrium is closed with a continuous 4-0 Prolene suture (Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ) starting on the atrial dome and suturing caudad onto the interatrial septum. The right atrium is closed after removal of the aortic clamp.



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Demonstration of suture technique incorporating healthy atrial septal tissue adjacent to the sewing ring for repair of mitral paravalvular leak. RA,..Right atrium; LV,..left ventricle; LA,..left atrium.

 
Discussion

We have performed this operation on 2 patients with anterior paraprosthetic leaks after MVR. The first patient is a 50-year-old man who had undergone aortic valve replacement and MVR at age 14 years. At age 32 years, his valves were replaced with Starr-Edwards prostheses (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Edwards Division, Santa Ana, Calif) for endocarditis. He had congestive heart failure 15 years later and was found to have a large paravalvular leak and a severely calcified mitral annulus. Attempted treatment with a percutaneously delivered clamshell device marginally improved the degree of regurgitation but caused worse hemolysis. The second patient is a 78-year-old woman who had undergone placement of a St Jude Medical prosthesis (St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, Minn) 12 years before for rheumatic mitral stenosis and regurgitation. She presented in New York Heart Association class III heart failure with a hemolytic anemia. At the time of operation in both cases, the majority of the prosthesis was endothelialized, and the sewing ring appeared to be largely incorporated into the atrial endocardium. However, approximately 25% of the sewing ring was bare. This area corresponded to the paravalvular leak seen on TEE, as described above. Repair of the leak was undertaken in both cases with the apposition of healthy, full-thickness, atrial septal tissue against the denuded sewing ring of the valve by using the technique described. Both patients remain free of paravalvular leak and mitral regurgitation 4 and 5 years after repair, respectively. This simple strategy appears to offer a durable solution to the clinical problem of paravalvular leak in select instances in which the leak is located anteriorly near the interatrial septum.

References

  1. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Grover FL, Oprian C, Rahimtoola SH. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veteran's Affairs Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Cardio.. 2000;36(4):1152–1158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Jindani A, Neville EM, Venn G, Williams BT. Paraprosthetic leak: a complication of cardiac valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Sur.. 1992;32:503–508
  3. Dhasmana JP, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Kouchoukos NT. Factors associated with periprosthetic leakage following primary mitral valve replacement: with special consideration of the suture technique. Ann Thorac Sur.. 1983;35:170–178
  4. Genoni M, Franzen D, Vogt P, Seifert B, Jenni R, Kunzli A, et al. Paravalvular leak after mitral valve replacement: improved long-term survival with aggressive surgery? Eur J Cardiothorac Sur.. 2000;17:14–19[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Foster GP, Isselbacher EM, Rose GA, Torchiana DF, Akins CW, Picard MH. Accurate localization of mitral regurgitant defects using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. Ann Thorac Sur.. 1998;65(4):1025–1031



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
I. E. Konstantinov
A new technique for repair of mitral paravalvular leak?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 614 - 615.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Abeel A. Mangi
David F. Torchiana
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mangi, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Torchiana, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mangi, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Torchiana, D. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS