|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:1179-1180
© 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Brief Communications |
Department of General and Transplant Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Received for publication August 24, 2004; accepted for publication September 27, 2004. * Address for reprints: Hermann Nehoda, MD, PhD, Department of General and Transplant Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria (E-mail: hermann.nehoda{at}uibk.ac.at).
Impalement injuries are caused by elongated objects, such as metal or wooden stakes, that penetrate and remain in the human body. We here describe the case of a 44-year-old male Jehovahs Witness who survived a most unusual triple abdominothoracic impalement injury.
Clinical summary
A 44-year-old man sustained a triple impalement injury after a backward fall of 3 m onto metal reinforcement rods. Two of these iron rods entered the patients left side just above the gluteus muscle. The third iron hit the patient somewhat higher up.
On arrival at the emergency department of our hospital, the patients pulse rate was 100 beats/min, and his blood pressure was 130/85 mm Hg. A computed tomographic scan of the thorax and abdomen showed the 3 iron rods: 2 had penetrated the gluteal region and entered the left side of the chest, with a massive fluid collection in the thoracic cavity (Figure 1). The third rod, having penetrated the lumbal region, seemed to pass through the 12th vertebral body and the spinal cord and further into the right thoracic cavity. Hematothorax was also visible on the right side. Three chest tubes were inserted, 2 into the left thoracic cavity and 1 into the right side of the chest. Because the tubes drained 1.5 L of blood from the left thoracic cavity, the patient was immediately taken to the operating room. At that time, his hemoglobin level was 5.5 g/dL, but no blood was given in accordance with the patients wish.
|
|
A second chest tube had to be placed to treat a recurrent hematothorax on the right side. After draining 1 L blood, bleeding stopped spontaneously.
At the intensive care unit, no blood was given, not even on postoperative day 5, when the hemoglobin level reached its lowest value of 3.4 g/dL because the patient still refused any blood or blood products. Crystalloid solutions and Ringer lactate were given instead. Various factors had to be given to normalize clotting, and the patient also received 10,000 IE erypo (JANSSEN-CILAG Pharma, Vienna, Austria) daily.
Unfortunately, direct damage of the spinal cord at the level of the 10th thoracic vertebra resulted in complete paraplegia. The patient was extubated on postoperative day 3 and transferred to his home town on day 7.
Discussion
Impalement injuries usually occur at construction sites or in motor vehicle crashes or are caused by falling objects. It is crucial to leave the impaling object in situ and remove it under controlled conditions in the hospital. Careful extraction with minimal movement of the impaling object prevents further tissue damage and blood loss. Therefore most authors advise removal under direct vision.13
In our case a computed tomographic scan revealed a bilateral hematothorax. Chest tubes were inserted to drain both sides, and 1.5 L of blood was removed from the left side within a few minutes. The patient was immediately taken to the operating room with the aim of controlling bleeding and removing the iron rods from the left thoracic cavity under direct vision. The situation was rendered even more dramatic because the patient had refused to receive blood under any circumstances. The rapid loss of more than 40% of blood volume is usually life-threatening.4 For acutely anemic patients, the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Blood Component Therapy has advised that transfusion is almost always indicated when hemoglobin concentration decreases to less than 6 g/dL.5
Our patient, however, survived a much lower concentration without organ damage apart from paraplegia caused by one of the impaling rods. His survival is certainly not a common clinical experience.
The lesson we learned from this case is that an otherwise healthy subject can tolerate the loss of more blood than is commonly believed.
Rapid assessment of the injury with careful hemostasis after removal of the impaling objects under direct vision together with appropriate fluid replacement was able to save a patient with an extremely unusual and severe impalement injury.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |