JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yasir Abu-Omar
David P. Taggart
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Omar, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Omar, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, D. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - physiology

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:1194-1195
© 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Letters to the Editor

Reply to the Editor

Yasir Abu-Omar, MRCSa, Paul M. Matthews, MD, DPhil, FRCPb, David P. Taggart, MD, PhD, FRCSa

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
b Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom

We thank Motallebzadeh and Jahangiri for their interest in our article.

The advantages of multirange, multifrequency transcranial Doppler technique are, respectively, rejection of artifacts and differentiation between gaseous and solid microemboli. This is of particular relevance because automatic rejection of artifacts significantly reduces bias in the interpretation of high-intensity transient signals and avoids interobserver variability, whereas discrimination between solid and gaseous microemboli may have important pathophysiologic, therapeutic, and prognostic implications.

The limitation of undercounting showers of microemboli (such as during removal of crossclamps and side clamps) was, in fact, discussed in our article. Although Motallebzadeh and Jahangiri suggest that this limitation may be responsible for a large difference in embolic count relative to previous reports, a review of the literature reveals that there is already wide variability among different studies (Table 1) because of differences in detection characteristics among various transcranial Doppler systems. Furthermore, the phenomenon of "undercounting" may actually serve to underestimate the benefits of off-pump surgery with a "no touch" aortic technique, where such showers are not seen.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Variation in microembolic counts among different studies
 
At the time of our study, it was not our routine practice in Oxford to use arterial line filters. We now do so, although evidence for this is still not compelling. Others have reported an abundance of microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass despite the use of 40-µm arterial filtration,1 and leukocyte-depleting arterial line filters have reportedly failed to improve neurocognitive outcome.2 On the other hand, the use of a cell saver in place of cardiotomy suction can potentially reduce the number of lipid microemboli. Although a combination of these techniques is likely to reduce microembolization during cardiopulmonary bypass, it is still unlikely to reach the levels seen in off-pump surgery with a "no touch" aortic technique.

References

  1. Fearn SJ, Pole R, Wesnes K, Faragher EB, Hooper TL, McCollum CN. Cerebral injury during cardiopulmonary bypass. emboli impair memory. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:1150-1160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Whitaker DC, Newman SP, Stygall J, Hope-Wynne C, Harrison MJ, Walesby RK. The effect of leucocyte-depleting arterial line filters on cerebral microemboli and neuropsychological outcome following coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:267-274.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Abu-Omar Y, Balacumaraswami L, Pigott DW, Matthews PM, Taggart DP. Solid and gaseous cerebral microembolization during off-pump, on-pump, and open cardiac surgery procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1759-1765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Motallebzadeh R, Kanagasabay R, Bland M, Kaski JC, Jahangiri M. S100 protein and its relation to cerebral microemboli in on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:409-414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Scarborough JE, White W, Derilus FE, Mathew JP, Newman MF, Landolfo KP. Combined use of off-pump techniques and a sutureless proximal aortic anastomotic devise reduces cerebral microemboli generation during coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:1561-1567.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lund C, Hol PK, Lundblad R, Fosse E, Sundet K, Tennoe B, et al. Comparison of cerebral embolization during off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:765-770discussion 770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Lee JD, Lee SJ, Tsushima WT, Yamauchi H, Lau WT, Popper J, et al. Benefits of off-pump bypass on neurologic and clinical morbidity. a prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:18-25discussion 25-6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Mullges W, Franke D, Reents W, Babin-Ebell J, Toyka KV. Reduced rate of microembolism by optimized aortic cannula position does not influence early postoperative cognitive performance in CABG patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;15:192-198.[Medline]
  9. Bowles BJ, Lee JD, Dang CR, Taoka SN, Johnson EW, Lau EM, et al. Coronary artery bypass performed without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with reduced cerebral microemboli and improved clinical results. Chest 2001;119:25-30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Diegeler A, Hirsch R, Schneider F, Schilling LO, Falk V, Rauch T, et al. Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1162-1166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Borger MA, Taylor RL, Weisel RD, Kulkarni G, Benaroia M, Rao V, et al. Decreased cerebral emboli during distal aortic arch cannulation. a randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:740-745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Taylor RL, Borger MA, Weisel RD, Fedorko L, Feindel CM. Cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. increased emboli during perfusionist interventions. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:89-93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yasir Abu-Omar
David P. Taggart
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Omar, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Omar, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, D. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - physiology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS