|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:687-692
© 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Cardiopulmonary Support and Physiology |
a Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
b Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
Received for publication October 19, 2004; revisions received January 26, 2005; accepted for publication February 6, 2005. * Address for reprints: Hendrick B. Barner, MD, 6125 Clayton Ave, Suite 430, St Louis, MO 63139. (Email: hendrick.barner{at}tenethealth.com).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing coronary artery bypass with all arterial conduits in which the radial artery was used as a T-graft were randomly assigned to receive intravenous infusions of normal saline (n = 10); nitroglycerin, 0.5 µg · kg · min (n = 11); or nicardipine, 0.5 µg · kg · min (n = 9), beginning early in the operation. After discontinuation of cardiopulmonary bypass and achievement of stable hemodynamics, control measurements were obtained, and this was followed by phenylephrine infusion to achieve a 20% increase in mean arterial pressure, after which the measurements were repeated.
RESULTS: Mean radial artery flow increased similarly in all groups: normal saline, 40% ± 25%; nicardipine, 37% ± 27%; nitroglycerin, 48% ± 36% (P = .533). Comparable changes occurred in arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance, whereas the cardiac index remained unchanged.
CONCLUSION: Radial artery blood flow increases when the mean arterial pressure is increased with phenylephrine. There was no evidence of a conduit vasoconstrictive effect, which could limit or reduce conduit flow. Vasocontriction with phenylephrine is appropriate to provide adequate perfusion pressure for radial artery grafts.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is frequently necessary to use vasoconstricting agents immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass to provide adequate perfusion pressure. Phenylephrine (PHE), a synthetic sympathomimetic agent chemically related to epinephrine and ephedrine, is often used for this purpose.
We evaluated the effect of PHE on the flow of the radial artery when used as a coronary artery bypass conduit in the presence or absence of a vasodilator drug.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients received their prescribed medications up until the morning of the operation. Morphine, lorazepam, and scopolamine in individualized doses were administered as premedication. All patients received a standardized general endotracheal anesthetic regimen based on opioids (fentanyl, 0.15-0.20 µg/kg) and supplemented with midazolam, 5 to 10 mg, and pancuronium. Inhaled isoflurane was administered at a maximum of 0.4% end-tidal concentration.
The patients were randomly allocated to 3 groups on the basis of a computer-generated table of random numbers. After baseline hemodynamic data had been obtained and before sternal split, one of the following infusions was started: NIC, 0.5-0.7 µg · kg·min; TNG, 0.5-0.7 µg · kg·min; or normal saline 0.9% (NS).
During cardiopulmonary bypass, systemic flows were kept at greater than 2.4 L · min1 · m2, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was maintained between 40 and 80 mm Hg, with pump flow adjustment and bolus doses of PHE or TNG. Blood gas analysis was performed every 30 minutes. During bypass, the patients' body temperature was kept at 33°C, and blood cardioplegia was administered at the same temperature.
At rewarming, after release of the aortic crossclamp, the isoflurane blended into the bypass circuit was switched off, so that at the time of weaning from bypass, the isoflurane end-tidal concentration was less than 0.1%. Inotropic support was instituted in those patients with poor preoperative systolic function, diastolic function, or both.
The radial artery was harvested without skeletonization. After conduit harvest, heparin (300 U/kg body weight) was administered, and the radial artery was anastomosed to the proximal left internal thoracic artery (T-graft). Both conduits were filled with heparinized blood containing papaverine (2 mg/mL) and were exposed to arterial pressure for 10 minutes during cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. No other graft interventions were attempted. This achieved relaxation of harvest spasm, as confirmed by means of inspection of conduits and assessment of free flow. During cardiopulmonary bypass, the left internal thoracic artery was anastomosed to the left anterior descending coronary artery and its branches, and the radial artery was anastomosed to the right coronary artery and/or the circumflex arteries and their branches.
After separation from cardiopulmonary bypass and achievement of hemodynamic stability, the heart was paced with epicardial atrial leads at 90 beats/min, and the experimental protocol was carried out. The surgeon measured the blood flow through the radial artery graft (QRA) by using a calibrated transonic flowmeter (Transonic Systems Inc, Ithaca, NY) while the anesthesiologist collected the hemodynamic data (control or pre-PHE measurements). The transonic flowmeter consists of an open ring that is placed around the grafted radial artery without skeletonization, distal to the T anastomosis, and proximal to the first distal anastomosis. Then MAP was increased by 20% with infusion of PHE. After the target MAP was obtained, the above measurements were repeated (after PHE). To eliminate physician bias and at the same time to ensure appropriate and ethical clinical care to all patients, the surgeon was blinded to the patient's group, as well as the hemodynamic measurements, and the anesthesiologist was blinded to the QRA measurements.
The following variables were measured: QRA, MAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure, central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, cardiac output in triplicate at end-expiration, and heart rate. Stroke volume (SV), cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and pulmonary vascular resistance were calculated by known formulas.
Statistical analysis was performed on Stata 4.0 software (Stata Corp, College Station, Tex). Categorical (binary) data were compared by the
2 test. Continuous data between groups were compared by analysis of variance with the Bonferroni correction where necessary. Continuous variables within the same group were compared by the Student t test, assuming where appropriate that the variance was unequal.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Graft flow is similar in venous and arterial coronary bypass grafts when there is occlusion or severe coronary stenosis and is primarily related to the size of the outflow bed (amount of viable myocardium). Arterial conduit flow will be less if there is competitive coronary flow usually caused by a less severe coronary stenosis or occasionally abundant collateral flow because of the similarity in diameter of the coronary and conduit arteries and the greater length of the conduit with correspondingly greater resistance to flow. This phenomenon does not usually prevail with vein grafts because of their much greater diameter and therefore flow capacity because the primary resistance to flow is the cross-sectional area of lumen according to the Poiseuille equation.
Baseline (pre-PHE) radial artery flow was similar in the saline-treated patients to that measured in 200 patients (88 ± 49 mL/min; MAP, 80 ± 10 mm Hg).
8
Graft flow was greater in the patients receiving NIC or TNG both before PHE and after PHE, but this did not achieve significance compared with the NS-treated patients. These agents could have dilated the conduit and the coronary vessels. However, the primary determinant of conduit flow, assuming there is no significant competitive flow, is the resistance of the coronary vascular bed, unless there is conduit spasm. A decrease in conduit diameter to less than its usual or optimal diameter could reduce conduit flow, and this has been a concern over the use of vasoconstrictors in the postbypass interval and was the primary reason for this study. Because we did not measure conduit diameter, we cannot exclude a PHE effect. Likewise, we cannot conclude that conduit diameter did not increase because of flow-mediated vasodilatation as MAP and conduit flow increased (after PHE). In another series from our center, we have found that radial artery free flow in the T-graft configuration was 161 ± 81 mL/min (n = 200) at a MAP of 78 ± 9 mm Hg,
8
which was less than the 182 ± 83 mL/min measured in the TNG group after PHE in the current study. This would suggest that TNG might have caused an increase in the grafted radial artery diameter, flow-mediated vasodilation took place, or both.
An additional concern is the anastomosis of the radial artery to the internal thoracic artery, suggesting that flow through the T-graft might be limited by the proximal segment of the internal thoracic artery. We have shown that the total T-graft free flow (both ends measured simultaneously) was 26% ± 14% less than the sum of each component's free flow (226 ± 84 mL/min vs 298 ± 101 mL/min, both at a MAP of 79 mm Hg).
8
Although the T-graft configuration can potentially limit total flow, experience indicates that the internal thoracic artery is not vulnerable to clinical use of vasoconstricting agents. Thus, on the basis of its known propensity for vasoconstriction, the radial artery becomes the potential flow-limiting component of the T-graft. Our observations indicate that PHE does not elicit this potential; however, that might not necessarily apply to other vasoconstrictors.
The flow pattern in the radial artery was similar before and after PHE and consisted of a small systolic wave and a wider, higher diastolic wave (Figure 2). This pattern is typical of the flow wave in the coronary artery or bypass grafts on the left side of the heart, as opposed to those supplying the right ventricle, where the systolic wave is greater and the diastolic component is reduced.
9
Restricted inflow results in flattening of the flow waves, and increased coronary vascular resistance prevents an increase in or could decrease radial artery flow, neither of which occurred after PHE.
We believe that our harvesting technique with clipping or ultrasonic coagulation of the radial artery branches and gentle traction on the radial artery results in minimal trauma to the conduit. In addition, the radial artery is maintained in room temperature blood for 5 to 20 minutes until the T-anastomosis is performed, followed by exposure of the conduits to arterial pressure in the presence of intraluminal papaverine. Atraumatic harvesting of the radial artery ensures excellent endothelial preservation and function, with basal production of nitric oxide, as well as flow-mediated shear stressstimulated nitric oxide release.
The small number of subjects is one of the limitations of the study. The free QRA depends on perfusion pressure, lumen area, and endothelial function, whereas the QRA depends additionally on the technique used to measure it (eg, electromagnetic vs transonic flowmeters and calibration). Assuming a QRA of 100 to 110 mL/min with a standard deviation of 50 to 60 mL/min, a sample size of 8 patients per group would have been adequate to show a 20% increase in QRA, excluding an
error of .05. The study was not designed to evaluate differences of QRA on the basis of the administration of a vasodilator. However, there was no statistical difference between the groups regarding the magnitude of QRA increase. We did not examine the reactivity of the radial artery to PHE either in the forearm (in situ) or as a conduit. The purpose of the study was to investigate the clinical effects of PHE on QRA, as measured with the flowmeter and demonstrated by the common clinical monitoring devices.
We have not found it necessary to use vasodilating drugs either in the perioperative interval or systemically afterward. Likewise, we have not avoided specific vasoconstricting drugs in patients receiving all arterial coronary revascularization because we believe that adequate blood pressure is required to maintain arterial conduit flow.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. H. Kiser, A. R. Oldland, and D. N. Fish Stability of phenylephrine hydrochloride injection in polypropylene syringes Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., May 15, 2007; 64(10): 1092 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Egi, R. Bellomo, C. Langenberg, M. Haase, A. Haase, L. Doolan, G. Matalanis, S. Seevenayagam, and B. Buxton Selecting a Vasopressor Drug for Vasoplegic Shock After Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): 715 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |