|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:926-927
© 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Brief Communication |
Heart and Lung Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Received for publication December 30, 2004; accepted for publication February 3, 2005. * Address for reprints: Robert S. Bonser, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom (Email: Robert.Bonser{at}uhb.nhs.uk).
Cadaveric lung donors have a catecholamine storm of brain death, followed by proinflammatory cytokine response and subsequent pituitary failure. After the storm, a drop in circulating catecholamines and vasoparesis occur,
1
and exogenous catecholamines are often administered to support systemic vascular resistance and maintain organ perfusion before retrieval.
The exogenous administration of catecholamines (EAC) to organ donors appears to improve outcome after renal and possibly liver transplantation, but in heart transplantation EAC is associated with a worse prognosis.
2
EAC has been shown to increase alveolar fluid clearance after brainstem death,
3
but the impact on graft function and recipient outcome after lung transplantation is not known. We hypothesized that EAC might be beneficial in lung transplantation.
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from 60 consecutive lung transplant donors and recipients (June 1993 to September 2003). The PaO 2/inspired oxygen fraction (FIO 2) ratios at FIO 2 1.0 with 5 mm positive end-expiratory pressure immediately before retrieval were calculated. Donors were categorized according to catecholamine use from the time of referral for donation to surgery. No EAC was defined as the use of dopamine at less than 2.5 µg/(kg · min) and included those patients receiving vasopressin as a vasoconstrictor. Donors receiving dopamine at 2.5 µg/(kg · min) or greater, epinephrine, or norepinephrine during the retrieval period were categorized as recipients of EAC. We set a cutoff of less than 2.5 µg/(kg · min) dopamine use because many hemodynamically stable donors receive this dosage per donor hospital protocol.
All recipient operations were conducted with cardiopulmonary bypass. In bilateral lung transplants, reperfusion occurred simultaneously for both lungs. For recipients, similar demographic data were collected, together with diagnosis, ischemic time, reperfusion strategy, and the PaO 2/FIO 2 ratio at 6 hours postimplantation.
Means and SDs were calculated for data with a normal distribution, and medians were calculated for other data. Comparisons were made with paired and unpaired t tests, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the Fisher exact test.
Results
Sixty donors were evaluated, 29 with EAC and 31 without EAC (Table 1). Donors without EAC were older, but recipients were similarly aged (EAC 52 ± 10 years, range 19-63 years, no EAC 54 ± 7 years, range 39-63 years, P = .4). There were no differences in diagnostic category or procedure performed. Traumatic-cause donors were more likely to require catecholamine (P = .03). The predominant preservation technique in both groups was pulmonary arterial flush with blood-albumin solution. Controlled reperfusion (limited pulmonary artery pressure of <20 mm Hg for 15 minutes of initial perfusion) and nitric oxide inhalation at implantation (10-20 ppm for the first 6 hours) was nonsignificantly more frequent (P = .12) in the non-EAC group. Ischemic times were similar (P = .3).
|
|
This study clearly demonstrates that the process of lung retrieval, transportation, storage, and implantation results in a significant decline in gas exchange after transplantation. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, EAC was associated with worse gas exchange after lung transplantation. This difference was not related to ischemic time, preservation technique, or recipient diagnosis.
This finding is of interest, because we anticipated that EAC might have been protective, as in other noncardiac solid-organ transplantation. Catecholamines may reduce the impact of ischemia-reperfusion injury by modulation of leukocyte adhesion mechanisms
4
and might be expected to promote alveolar fluid clearance.
5
A number of possible explanations of our findings in this preliminary study can be proposed. First, it is possible that donors requiring EAC constitute a group with a more severe initial catecholamine storm, potentially resulting in greater direct pulmonary injury or proinflammatory cytokine activation. Alternatively, because EAC may have been required to support cardiac function, pulmonary injury may have been exacerbated by elevated left atrial pressure. These findings require confirmation from larger studies.
Conclusion
Impairment in early gas exchange is a uniform observation after lung procurement, preservation, and implantation. EAC in the donor was associated with worse posttransplantation gas exchange. Change from donor to 6-hour recipient PaO 2/FIO 2 may provide a useful summary assessment of early lung function after implantation.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Van De Wauwer, A. P. Neyrinck, N. Geudens, F. R. Rega, G. M. Verleden, T. E. Lerut, and D. E.M. Van Raemdonck The mode of death in the non-heart-beating donor has an impact on lung graft quality Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 36(5): 919 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Van Raemdonck, A. Neyrinck, G. M. Verleden, L. Dupont, W. Coosemans, H. Decaluwe, G. Decker, P. De Leyn, P. Nafteux, and T. Lerut Lung Donor Selection and Management Proceedings of the ATS, January 15, 2009; 6(1): 28 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. V. Venkateswaran, V. B. Patchell, I. C. Wilson, J. G. Mascaro, R. D. Thompson, D. W. Quinn, R. A. Stockley, J. H. Coote, and R. S. Bonser Early Donor Management Increases the Retrieval Rate of Lungs for Transplantation Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 278 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Ganesh, C. A. Rogers, N. R. Banner, R. S. Bonser, and Steering Group of the UK Cardiothoracic Transplant Does the method of lung preservation influence outcome after transplantation? An analysis of 681 consecutive procedures. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2007; 134(5): 1313 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |