|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:1531-1536
© 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease |
a Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
b the Center for Human Genetics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Received for publication April 19, 2005; revisions received June 17, 2005; accepted for publication August 8, 2005. * Address for reprints: Hans-H. Sievers, MD, Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Luebeck, Germany (Email: sievers{at}medinf.mu-luebeck.de).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Aortic valves were collected during surgery from 39 patients with bicuspid aortic valve (mean age 56.8 ± 18.1 years) and from 38 patients with tricuspid aortic valve (mean age 61.7 ± 16.1 years). Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed for detection of microdeletion, quantitative reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction to measure gene expression, and Western blotting to analyze the amount of UFD1L gene product.
RESULTS: No microdeletion was found in either group in the critical region of chromosome 22 containing the UFD1L gene. UFD1L gene expression, however, was significantly reduced in bicuspid aortic valve samples (median 787-fold) relative to tricuspid aortic valve samples (median 10,887-fold, P = .001). The amount of UFD1L gene product was also significantly diminished in bicuspid aortic valve samples (3.9 ± 2.6 vs 8.4 ± 4.8 optical density units, P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Bicuspid aortic valve was associated with downregulation of UFD1L gene expression, supporting the hypothesis that bicuspid aortic valve is a genetic disorder, with the UFD1L gene as a potential candidate gene.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Written, informed consent was obtained from each patient.
Microdeletion Analysis
For fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis, 3-mL samples of venous blood collected from 10 of the patients with BAV were compared with 3-mL samples of venous blood from 10 patients with TAV. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for the DiGeorge syndrome critical region on chromosome 22q11.2 was performed with a dual color probe (N25 LSI/ARSA; Vysis Inc, Downers Grove, Ill). Slides were prepared according to standard cytogenetic procedures. The dual color probe allows simultaneous identification of both number 22 chromosomes. For each patient, at least 10 metaphases were scored for possible deletions in the DiGeorge region. Aberrations of less than 10% in the normal signal pattern were regarded as artifacts.
UFD1L Gene Expression Analysis
For UFD1L gene expression studies, tissues from 27 patients with BAV were compared with tissues from 20 patients with TAV. Total RNA was prepared from 200-mg snap-frozen tissue with TRIzol (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). Reverse transcription was carried out with 1 µg total RNA with the GeneAmp PCR system 2700 (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany) in a reaction volume of 25 µl containing 7.5 µmol/L random hexamers, 1x reverse transcription buffer, 220 µmol/L of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 20 U ribonuclease inhibitor, and 50 U reverse transcriptase. A 2-µL portion of complementary DNA was used for final application to quantify UFD1L messenger RNA. TaqMan reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction was performed with fluorogenic probe and Universal Master mix on ABI PRISM 7000 SDS (Applied Biosystems) according to manufacturer instructions. Polymerase chain reaction products were measured at the threshold cycle at which fluorescence became detectable above the baseline. Levels of UFD1L messenger RNA were normalized to those of the reduced glyceraldehyde-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (GAPDH) and relative to a calibrator. The relative changes in the gene expression are given by 2
CT, where 
CT = (
CTSample) (
CTCalibrator). Amplification primers and detection probes were designed for the UFD1L gene in our laboratory with PrimerExpress software version 2.0 (Applied Biosystems) to cross intron/exon boundaries. Oligosequences are based on those retrieved from the GenBank database (U64444 for hUFD1L and BC029618 for hGAPDH). Forward primer 5'-TCC ACA CAG TAC CGC TGC TTC T-3', reverse primer 5'-TCA GAT GTG GAG AAA GGA GGG AA-3', and TaqMan FAM-MGB probe 5'-TAG CAT GGC CTA ATG ACA-3' were used to amplify and detect a 77base pair UFD1L fragment. The human GAPDH predeveloped TaqMan assay reagent VIC-MGB probe (part number 4326317E; Applied Biosystems) was used as endogenous control.
UFD1L Gene Product Analysis
Protein analysis was performed on 12 patients in each group. For the Western blot, 500 mg valve tissue was homogenized in 300 µl lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc, Beverly, Mass). sodium dodecylsulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed according to the method of Laemmli
11a
on an 18% polyacrylamide gel with 50 µg tissue-extracted protein loaded per lane. After electrophoresis, separated proteins were blotted onto an Immobilon membrane (Millipore [UK] Limited, Watford, United Kingdom). Nonspecific sites were blocked by a solution containing 5% fat-free milk powder in phosphate-buffered saline solution. Membranes were incubated with antibody solution containing 1 µg/mL antihuman ubiquitin overnight at 37°C (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn). After five washes with blocking buffer, membranes were incubated with the secondary antibody solution containing a 1:2000 dilution of horseradish peroxidaseconjugated goat antimouse antibodies. For detection of protein signals, peroxidase reaction was carried out by enzyme-linked chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH, Freiburg, Germany). The polypeptide bands were semiquantified by computerized blot scanning and measurement of optical density. A positive control of UFD1L gene product protein was used (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany). In addition we applied the ß-actin antibody (Abcam Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom) as a loading control antibody.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 9.0 (SPSS GmbH Software, Munich, Germany). Differences among groups were assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test. The changes in gene expression in the two groups were compared with analysis of variance. Bonferroni adjustment was applied for multiple tests.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BAV is the most common congenital cardiac malformation, affecting 1% to 2% of the general population.
1
BAV contributes significantly to the cardiovascular health burden. Comprehensive knowledge of the pathogenesis of BAV may be important for treatment strategies.
A number of mechanisms may be involved, either alone or combined, in the pathogenesis of BAV. Theoretically, epigenetic factors during cardiac morphogenesis, such as fluid forces, may contribute to BAV development in a manner similar to that of factors resulting in impaired valve function, valve stiffness, and opening abnormalities.
12
Several recent studies have demonstrated that BAV is inheritable as part of the whole spectrum of anomalies of the left ventricular outflow tract. Wessels and colleagues
2
even suggest that all left ventricular outflow tract anomalies, including BAV, may be caused by a single gene defect.
A number of studies have shown that 22q11.2 deletions cause a variety of cardiac outflow tract defects.
13-15
These cardiac defects are also seen after neural crest ablation, suggesting that certain genes controlling neural crest cells may be involved in the development of cardiac outflow tract malformations and may map to chromosome 22. The critical CATCH region of this chromosome consists of many genes, including the UFD1L and T-box 1 (TBX1) genes. Yamagishi and associates
10
detected the UFD1L gene in all 182 patients with 22q11.2 syndrome in their investigation.
During embryogenesis, the UFD1L gene is highly expressed in certain tissues. It encodes a component of a multienzyme complex involved in the degradation of ubiquitin fusion proteins. A downregulation of the UFD1L gene, hypothetically resulting from an anomalous behavior of neural crest cells, may lead to reduced degradation activities and thus explain in part the hypotheses of Sans-Coma and associates,
16
who demonstrated in Syrian hamsters the fusion of valve cushions as a key factor in the development of congenital BAV. Furthermore, mouse homolog Ufd1 gene expression was detected in the cardiac outflow tract at the same time as neural crest cell condensation, before these cells transformed into ectomesenchymal cells.
These observations highlight the important role of the UFD1L gene in the development of ectoderm-derived structures, including neural crest cells.
10,17
These cells have also been found in developing aortic leaflets,
18
pointing to the UFD1L gene as a candidate for the pathogenesis of BAV. In our study, no deletion of the critical CATCH region on chromosome 22, including the UFD1L gene, was found in any of the patients with BAV. This was not entirely unexpected, because a microdeletion would theoretically lead to more phenotypic abnormalities. We did find, however, downregulation of the UFD1L gene and consequently diminished amounts of its gene product. Our results accord with the finding that a functional attenuation of chick UFD1L in cardiac neural crest cells results in an increased incidence of conotruncal septation defects.
14
The exact mode of downregulation of the UFD1L gene and how it induces BAV in human beings remain unclear. Some findings implicate the transcription factor AP-2,
*
which is active as a regulator of gene expression during the differentiation and development of neural crest cells.
19,20
It is also involved in the regulation of transforming growth factor
,
21
estrogen receptor,
22
type IV collagenase,
23
insulinlike growth factor binding 5,
24
and many other genes. A systematic investigation is needed to elucidate the important biologic functions of AP-2 in the regulation of the UFD1L gene.
Another gene that maps to the CATCH region involved in 22q11.2 syndrome and may be involved in the pathogenesis of BAV is the TBX1 gene. We measured TBX1 gene expressions in 10 patients in each group (data not shown), but we did not find a significant difference between those with BAV and those with TAV. Whether this is because TBX1, unlike UFD1L, is not expressed in neural crest cells
25
remains to be studied.
Ranger and colleagues
26
and de la Pompa and coworkers
27
have reported that the targeted dysregulation of the transcription factor NF-ATc
resulted in selective absence of the aortic valves, leading to death in utero. A similar phenotype was observed in SRY (sex determining region Y)box 4 (SOX4)deficient mice.
28
Disorders of the latter transcription factors, however, do not lead to the characteristic phenotype of fused leaflets seen in BAV.
A limitation of this study is the fact that it demonstrates only an association, not a causal relationship, between BAV and UFD1L downregulation. Whether the relationship is causal must be determined by in vivo experiments targeting downregulation of the UFD1L gene in an animal model. Also, we did not show pedigree analysis of familial clustering explaining a genetic cause of BAV. Furthermore, only a few neural crest cells could be identified in late fetal aortic semilunar valves as a result of a reduction in their numbers caused by death or failure to divide.
29
This may have influenced our results, although the ages of our two groups were comparable, and we found no correlation between the age of patients with BAV and the degree of UFD1L gene expression. In addition, the two groups differed with regard to the underlying valvular etiology, with more aortic insufficiencies in the BAV group. Whether this influenced the gene expression remains unclear, but it seems rather unlikely because leaflet fusion was the basic pathology underlying both stenotic and insufficient valves. Although the genetic pathomechanism of BAV is probably far more complicated (regarding, for example, accompanying defects such as coarctation), our findings appear to take the first steps toward an understanding of the genetic basis of BAV.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
*
CATCH = cardiac defect, abnormal facies, thymic hypoplasia or aplasia and T-cell deficiency, cleft palate, hypoparathyroidism, and hypocalcemia. ![]()
*
AP-2 = activating enhancer-binding protein 2. ![]()
NF-ATc = activating enhancer-binding protein 2 ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. O. Caglayan and M. Dundar Inherited diseases and syndromes leading to aortic aneurysms and dissections Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 35(6): 931 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Tadros, M. D. Klein, and O. M. Shapira Ascending Aortic Dilatation Associated With Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Pathophysiology, Molecular Biology, and Clinical Implications Circulation, February 17, 2009; 119(6): 880 - 890. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-H. Sievers In vivo tissue engineering an autologous semilunar biovalve: Can we get what we want? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 20 - 22. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Aboulhosn and J. S. Child Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction: Subaortic Stenosis, Bicuspid Aortic Valve, Supravalvar Aortic Stenosis, and Coarctation of the Aorta Circulation, November 28, 2006; 114(22): 2412 - 2422. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |