|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:719-723
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Cardiothoracic Transplantation |
a Hannover Thoracic Transplant Program, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
b Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Received for publication June 27, 2005; revisions received September 22, 2005; accepted for publication October 10, 2005. * Address for reprints: Martin Strueber, MD, Director, Hannover Thoracic Transplant and Cardiac Assist Program, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany (Email: strueber{at}thg.mh-hannover.de).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Between March 2003 and March 2005, 176 lung transplantations were performed, of which 60% were high-urgency lung transplantations. Twelve of the high-urgency recipients had severe ventilation-refractory hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis. These patients were connected to the novel pumpless interventional lung assist NovaLung for bridge to lung transplantation.
RESULTS: The length of interventional lung assist NovaLung support was 15 ± 8 days (4-32 days). PaO 2, pH, and PaCO 2 levels in arterial blood prior to interventional lung assist NovaLung implantation were 71 ± 27 mm Hg, 7.121 ± 0.1, and 128 ± 42 mm Hg, respectively. Six hours after interventional lung assist NovaLung implantation, PaO 2, pH, and PaCO 2 levels had changed to 83 ± 17 mm Hg (ns), 7.344 ± 0.1 (P < .05), and 52 ± 5 mm Hg (P < .05), respectively. Four patients died of multiorgan failure, 2 patients before and 2 after lung transplantation. Thus, 10 out of 12 patients were successfully bridged to lung transplantation, and 8 are still alive (1-year survival, 80%).
CONCLUSIONS: This report suggests that interventional lung assist NovaLung implantation is an effective bridge to lung transplantation strategy in patients with ventilation-refractory hypercapnia.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the EuroTransplant environment, patients who are listed for LTx might be listed for high-urgency (HU) LTx if they fulfill defined criteria of progressing end-stage lung failure. According to the guidelines, these patients have to be hospitalized in the transplant center and often require noninvasive or even invasive ventilatory support. Evidence exists that mechanical ventilation before LTx is a significant risk factor for mortality after LTx
3
and certainly needs to be avoided. It carries a high risk of infection, muscle fatigue, ventilation-associated lung injury, and, ultimately, remote organ dysfunction, as previously shown by the Toronto group.
4
Currently, patients have to wait up to several months for an HU LTx in the EuroTransplant region. As a consequence, approximately 25% of the HU patients at The Hannover Thoracic Transplant Program require mechanical ventilation before LTx.
5
Some of these patients, however, might have further life-threatening ventilation-refractory hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis, despite maximal ventilatory support. The only treatment option for these patients is extracorporeal gas exchange. Until now, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been the only technical option, but it can be applied for a very limited period of time only and has side effects, such as hemolysis (>80%), infection (20%-25%), renal insufficiency (30%-40%), and bleeding complications (50%-60%). Moreover, the outcome of LTx after pre-LTx ECMO implantation is poor, with a perioperative mortality of up to 60%.
6
The interventional lung assist NovaLung (iLA; NovaLung GmbH, Hechingen, Germany) is a low-resistance lung assist device designed for pulsatile blood flow with tight diffusion membranes and a protein matrix coating.
7
It is driven by the cardiac output and therefore does not require extracorporeal pump assistance. In the clinical setting the iLA has been applied in a variety of clinical situations, such as severe chest trauma, pneumonia, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and airway obstruction. Furthermore, it has been helpful in the weaning process from mechanical ventilation in a single case.
7
However, the role of iLA in LTx has not been investigated yet. Here we report on our initial experience with the iLA as a bridge to LTx in patients with end-stage pulmonary failure.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The iLA was CE certified in Europe in 2003 as an extracorporeal gas exchange device to allow protective mechanical ventilation and as a rescue device in patients with ventilation-refractory lung failure. This study was a prospective observational study approved by the ethics committee of the Hannover Medical School. All patients were sedated and ventilated at maximum levels at the time of the decision for device implantation, and therefore patients' advocates consented to participate in the study.
Twelve of the HU recipients had severe ventilation-refractory hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis and were screened for iLA implantation. After exclusion of all potential contraindications for iLA, which include low cardiac output, cardiogenic shock, and advanced peripheral atherosclerosis,
8
venoarterial cannulation for device connection in a femorofemoral position was performed. In all patients arterial blood samples were taken for blood gas analysis immediately before iLA implantation. Further arterial blood gas samples were taken 6, 24, and 72 hours and 7 days after iLA implantation. Because of clinical constraints, the available values closest to the previously listed time points were used for the analysis. In addition, systemic arterial blood pressure, peak ventilatory pressure, fraction of inspired oxygen, and positive end-expiratory pressure were prospectively recorded and retrospectively analyzed, and the PaO
2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio was calculated.
Implantation Technique
Before iLA implantation, all patients received an intravenous single dose of heparin of 10,000 IU. Implantation of the cannulas was performed under sterile conditions in the intensive care unit. An arteriovenous shunt was instituted by using 2 low-resistance cannulas. First, the left femoral artery was punctured, and a guide wire was introduced (Seldinger's technique). The puncture hole was then dilated to the diameter of the cannula (15F) with a dilator kit provided by the manufacturer. The cannula was introduced into the artery and clamped. Next the right femoral vein was also punctured transcutaneously, and a wire was introduced, which guided a 17F cannula into the femoral vein. The lung assist device and the short tubing system were completely deaired with normal saline solution by a perfusionist. Finally, the tubes were connected to the cannulas, and the clamps were removed. Immediately, blood flows through the arterial line into the device and returns through the venous cannula. A gas tube that provides the oxygen is connected to the device. A flow probe can be connected to the tubing line to monitor the circulating blood volume through the device. All patients received continuous intravenous heparin administration according to the activated clotting time, which was kept at 160 to 180 seconds and measured in 4-hour intervals. Accidental clotting of the membrane can be detected by continuous iLA blood flow monitoring. However, if this probe is not available, blood gas analyses from the venous line can also indicate malfunction of the iLA. In our patients proper function of the device was tested by using repeated blood gas analyses from the venous line in 8-hour intervals. We tried to keep mean arterial blood pressure greater than 80 mm Hg to achieve adequate blood flow through the iLA. If necessary, patients received continuous low-dose norepinephrine administration. Figure 1 depicts the interventional lung assist after femoral arteriovenous insertion. It is noteworthy that the device is placed in a stabile position between the patient's legs for proper function. In all patients the blood supply to the lower extremities was frequently checked by the physician in charge using clinical examination or Doppler ultrasonography.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The iLA is a low-gradient device designed to operate without the help of an external pump. On the basis of this principle, adequate mean arterial blood pressure is mandatory. This device is attached to the systemic circulation and receives only part of the cardiac output for extracorporeal gas exchange. This allows complete CO2 removal, which can be controlled by varying sweep gas flow. Oxygenation, however, depends on shunt, arterial oxygenation saturation, and other variables. The native lung in this situation also contributes. The limited increase in oxygenation, as seen in the early postimplantation period in our patients, might potentially be life saving in some patients with oxygenation deficiency. However, patients with a primary oxygenation disorder might not necessarily benefit from iLA.
7
Important technical details of the iLA are depicted in Table 2.
|
The Novalung has been applied in approximately 500 cases worldwide, including trauma, lung infection, adult respiratory distress syndrome, airway obstruction, and others, as reported by Matheis.
7
In the majority of cases reported, the iLA was an adjunct to mechanical ventilation that allowed use of optimized lung-protective ventilation strategies, with the objective of giving the lung time to heal while attempting to minimize ventilation-induced lung injury. Moreover, in single cases the iLA was used without mechanical ventilation in the awake and nonsedated patient.
7
This is the first report on the application of the iLA as a bridge to LTx. Patients with end-stage lung failure in whom maximal conventional ventilatory support fails are a very high-risk population. Nevertheless, 10 of 12 patients were successfully bridged to LTx, of whom 8 are still alive. The 2 patients who died before LTx died of severe infection. The other 2 patients, who died after LTx, had remote organ failure before transplantation and died of multiorgan failure after LTx. In these cases it is possible that iLA implantation should have been performed at an earlier point in time. On the basis of these promising results, we have changed our approach toward earlier implantation of this lung assist device in mechanically ventilated patients who require advanced ventilatory support. This strategy provides the unique ability to separate ventilation from oxygenation and therefore likely will help to prevent additional ventilation-associated lung injury, which is becoming increasingly recognized as a contributor to remote organ failure.
4
We acknowledge the following limitations of this study. We decided to assess device function by blood gas analysis on samples taken from the venous outflow cannula. Therefore, we have not measured device flow. Another parameter that would reflect the efficiency and efficacy of the iLA better would be the
PO
2 and
PCO
2 calculated from the corresponding gas pressures in the arterial inflow and the venous outflow cannulas. We have also not assessed hemodynamic changes in the pulmonary vasculature or the cardiac output, but we underscore that these measures are affected by a variety of other confounding synchronous factors, such as nitric oxide inhalation, prostaglandin nebulization, PaCO
2 levels, catecholamine support, ventilatory setup, primary lung disease, and others. Furthermore, the number of patients in this study is small.
In conclusion, our initial experience demonstrates the applicability of the iLA as a bridge to LTx in patients with end-stage lung failure. There are unique strategies to this device, such as its pumpless character and its ability to effectively remove CO2. Thereby it normalized the pH in our patients. The interventional lung assist is our favored treatment for patients with ventilation-refractory lung failure with predominant hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis. Future studies should investigate further some of the theoretic potential advantages of iLA, such as whether the iLA can be used to reduce intracranial pressure by keeping CO2 levels low or to prevent ventilation-induced lung injury and remote organ failure. We are currently examining the role of the iLA in the management of posttransplantation complications, such as severe acute rejection and acute graft failure.
Likely the spectrum of indications for the application of the iLA will increase as we further study the capabilities and limitations of this device.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The authors have no financial interest in any products presented in this article.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Muller, M. Lubnow, A. Philipp, T. Bein, A. Jeron, A. Luchner, L. Rupprecht, M. Reng, J. Langgartner, C. E. Wrede, et al. Extracorporeal pumpless interventional lung assist in clinical practice: determinants of efficacy Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2009; 33(3): 551 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Hoeper and T. Welte Extracorporeal lung assist: more than kicking a dead horse? Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2008; 32(6): 1431 - 1432. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Florchinger, A. Philipp, A. Klose, M. Hilker, R. Kobuch, L. Rupprecht, A. Keyser, T. Puhler, S. Hirt, K. Wiebe, et al. Pumpless Extracorporeal Lung Assist: A 10-Year Institutional Experience Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 410 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Iglesias, P. Jungebluth, O. Sibila, I. Aldabo, M. P. Matute, C. Petit, A. Torres, and P. Macchiarini Experimental safety and efficacy evaluation of an extracorporeal pumpless artificial lung in providing respiratory support through the axillary vessels J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 339 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |