|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:792-798
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease |
a Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
c Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
d Division of Psychology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
e Division of Genetics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
f Division of Neurology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
g Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
h Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
b Department of Medicine (Medical Genetics), the University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
Received for publication October 10, 2005; revisions received December 6, 2005; accepted for publication December 12, 2005. * Address for reprints: Jonathan Kaltman, MD, Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th and Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104. (Email: kaltman{at}email.chop.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Children who underwent repair of a ventricular septal defect or single-stage repair of a ventricular septal defect with aortic arch obstruction at less than 6 months of age were assessed at 1 year of age by using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II, which yields the Mental Development Index and the Psychomotor Development Index, both with an expected mean of 100 ± 15.
RESULTS: At 1 year, 55 patients (ventricular septal defect alone = 36; ventricular septal defect with aortic arch obstruction = 19) returned for evaluation. The mean Mental Development Index was 92.6 ± 11.7, with 3 (5%) patients scoring 70 or less. The mean Psychomotor Development Index was 86.1 ± 16.4, with 10 (18%) patients scoring 70 or less. Patients with a suspected or confirmed genetic syndrome had both a lower Mental Development Index score (P = .011) and a lower Psychomotor Development Index score (P = .001). Mental Development Index and Psychomotor Development Index were independent of anatomic (specifically aortic arch obstruction) and intraoperative factors (specifically deep hypothermic circulatory arrest).
CONCLUSIONS: Neurodevelopmental outcome at 1 year of age was within the normal limits for most patients who underwent repair of a ventricular septal defect or a ventricular septal defect with aortic arch obstruction during infancy.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Important obstruction to systemic blood flow, either coarctation of the aorta or interruption of the aortic arch, coexists in a minority of patients with a VSD. However, arch obstruction carries significant implications for the child with a VSD because early circulatory collapse can occur in postnatally diagnosed patients in whom the ductus arteriosus closes, prostaglandin and other intensive care support might be necessary, and surgical intervention is required in the newborn period, rather than semielectively in later infancy. There remains some controversy regarding the optimal surgical approach, with some centers recommending simultaneous repair of the arch obstruction and VSD, whereas others recommend a lateral thoracotomy to repair the arch (with or without a pulmonary artery band), with closure of the VSD later in infancy. Although surgical mortality after single-stage repair has been shown to be acceptable,
5
no study has evaluated neurodevelopmental outcome after single-stage repair, and there is little in the literature reporting the neurodevelopmental outcome of children with isolated VSDs.
The purpose of this study was to describe the neurodevelopmental outcome at 1 year of age in children who had surgical repair of a VSD or single-stage repair of a VSD with aortic arch obstruction during infancy and to identify potential determinants of this outcome.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patient Population
Patients less than 6 months of age who were undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for repair of a VSD or a VSD with aortic arch obstruction (coarctation or interrupted aortic arch) were eligible. Exclusion criteria at the time of surgical intervention included (1) multiple congenital anomalies, (2) recognizable genetic or phenotypic syndrome at birth (other than chromosome 22q11 microdeletions), and (3) language other than English spoken in the home.
Five surgeons, with a dedicated team of cardiac anesthesiologists, performed the operations. Alpha-stat blood gas management was used. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) was used at the discretion of the surgeon. Before DHCA, patients underwent core cooling with topical hypothermia to a nasopharyngeal temperature of 18°C. Modified ultrafiltration was performed in all patients.
Neurodevelopmental Examination
The protocol for the neurodevelopmental examination has been previously described.
6
Briefly, children were evaluated at 12 months of age ± 2 weeks, adjusted for prematurity. Development was assessed by using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II, which yields scores in 2 areas. The Psychomotor Development Index (PDI) assesses control of gross motor function, fine motor skills, use of writing instruments, and imitation of hand movements. The Mental Development Index (MDI) evaluates memory, problem solving, early number concepts, generalization, vocalizations, and language and social skills. Both the PDI and MDI yield a standard score. The mean is 100, with a standard deviation of 15. Therefore a score of 70 or less is greater than 2 standard deviations below the mean. Evaluation also included a medical history, growth measurements, and detailed neurologic examination. The neurologic examination assessed active and passive tone, reflexes, gross motor skills, and visual and auditory responses. The results of the neurologic examination were classified as normal if no abnormalities or only mild abnormalities that did not affect motor skills were found, suspect when there was a moderate degree of abnormality, and abnormal when functionally significant abnormalities of tone, reflexes, or motor skills were present. Microcephaly was defined as a head circumference less than or equal to the 5th percentile for age. A genetic dysmorphologist evaluated the physical findings of every patient. Chromosome analysis and testing for microdeletions of chromosome 22q11 were performed as indicated. Results of the genetic evaluations were classified as normal, abnormal if a specific diagnosis was confirmed, or suspect if evidence of a genetic syndrome was present but confirmation was not possible. Because recognition of genetic syndromes in neonates can be difficult, some children with genetic abnormalities had been enrolled as infants. The genetic dysmorphologist was blinded to the findings of the developmental testing.
Statistical Analysis
Continuous data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (range). Discrete data are expressed as proportions. Independent t tests were used for comparison of continuous variables. Fisher exact and
2 tests were used for comparison of discrete variables as appropriate. Linear regression was used to assess associations between risk factors and MDI and PDI outcomes. Potential predictors included gestational age, ethnicity, socioeconomic status as determined by parental reporting, birth weight, birth length, birth head circumference, Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, preoperative intubation and prostaglandin use, aortic arch obstruction, presence of a confirmed or suspected genetic syndrome, apolipoprotein E polymorphism, age and weight at surgical intervention, total support time (duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and DHCA), number of bypass runs, and use of DHCA. Ethnic classification was used as a single categoric variable with 5 levels in the univariate analysis and was divided into 5 binary variables for the multivariate analysis. Because the presence of a confirmed or suspected genetic syndrome was such a strong univariate predictor of developmental score, the cohort was divided on the basis of whether a genetic syndrome was detected. Separate multivariable analyses were performed on each of these groups. Univariate predictors that were marginally significant at a P value of less than .10 were then evaluated by using multivariable linear regression models.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The baseline characteristics and intraoperative statistics of the study group are detailed in Table 1. In addition to the VSD, 19 (35%) patients (coarctation of the aorta, n = 14; interrupted aortic arch, n = 5) in the study group also had aortic arch obstruction. Twenty-eight (51%) patients in the study group received DHCA during their operations. Two patients in the study group had one additional operation requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline and intraoperative statistics between the study group and those enrolled patients who did not return for neurodevelopmental testing (Table 1). However, there was a trend toward longer total support time and total cardiopulmonary bypass time for the nonreturning patients.
|
Six (11%) patients had an abnormal neuromuscular examination, and 5 (9%) had a suspect examination. Varying degrees of hypotonia accounted for all abnormalities on the neurologic examination. Of these 11 patients, 9 (82%) had a confirmed or suspected genetic syndrome, and 5 (45%) had microcephaly.
For the entire study group, the mean MDI score was 92.6 ± 11.7 (range, 56-117), with 3 (5%) patients scoring 70 or less (Figure 1). The mean PDI score was 86.1 ± 16.4 (range, 50-121), with 10 (18%) patients scoring 70 or less (Figure 1). The MDI and PDI scores were significantly lower in patients with a known or suspected genetic syndrome compared with scores in those without (MDI score: 86.2 ± 14.5 vs 96.1 ± 8.1, P = .011; PDI score: 76.6 ± 18.3 vs 91.2 ± 12.9, P = .001; Figures 1 and 2).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite the more complex anatomy and surgical repair in patients with a VSD and coexisting arch obstruction, we could determine no difference in outcome at 1 year of age. This was a surprising finding because patients with coexisting arch obstruction have risk factors previously shown in other lesions to adversely affect neurodevelopmental outcomes, including abnormal fetal cerebral vascular resistance,
7
preoperative hemodynamic instability, exposure to cardiopulmonary bypass and DHCA in the neonatal period,
8
and a longer postoperative stay in the intensive care unit.
9
In addition, patients with a VSD and an interrupted aortic arch have a higher incidence of 22q11 deletion than those with isolated VSD.
10
The findings of the current report support the strategy of early complete repair of VSD with arch obstruction.
5,11-13
Previous studies have suggested that patients undergoing the 2-stage approach have lower mortality.
11
However, our group and others have recently shown excellent operative results after single-stage repair.
5,13
An important consideration of the single-stage approach is that the patient might be exposed to DHCA in the neonatal period, with potentially deleterious effects on neurocognitive development. This study demonstrates that despite being exposed more frequently to DHCA and to longer durations of DHCA, the patients undergoing aortic arch repair and VSD closure had 1-year neurodevelopmental outcomes similar to those of patients who underwent VSD closure alone as infants.
With the improved success of surgical intervention in patients with congenital heart disease, the research focus has shifted to understanding long-term morbidity, including neurodevelopmental outcome. Many of these studies have focused on outcome after surgical intervention for complex congenital heart disease, such as d-transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA)
2,14,15
and hypoplastic left heart syndrome.
3
Others have followed cohorts of patients in which various anatomic subtypes of heart disease have been grouped together.
4,16,17
Little is specifically known about neurodevelopmental outcome after surgical intervention for a VSD, despite the fact that VSDs are the most common congenital heart defect and one of the most common indications for surgical intervention.
Two studies have described neurodevelopmental outcome after surgical intervention for a VSD, although not as the primary goal of the study. Hesz and Clark
18
compared the cognitive development of children after the atrial switch operation for d-TGA with that of children who had undergone VSD repair (n = 8) and with that of healthy siblings. They showed that the children with VSDs scored higher on academic achievement and intelligence tests than those with d-TGA. The authors speculated that the cause of the developmental delay in the patients with TGA is related to decreased cardiac reserve, chronic hypoxemia, and parental restrictions on their debilitated child's activities. Bellinger and colleagues
19
compared preschool developmental outcome after randomization with different pH management strategies during deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass surgery for congenital heart disease in infancy. The authors reported a significantly worse MDI outcome for the subgroup of patients with a VSD (and common atrioventricular canal, n = 16) compared with that in patients with d-TGA. Patients with specific congenital anomalies and known genetic syndromes were excluded; however, formal genetic evaluation was not performed. The discrepancy in outcome was speculated to result from the chance occurrence of 22q11 microdeletion in the VSD subgroup. Both of these studies were limited by small sample size in the VSD subgroup.
Even after exclusion of children who had identifiable genetic syndromes at the time of surgical intervention, the most important predictor of neurodevelopmental outcome in this study was the presence of a confirmed or suspected genetic syndrome at 1 year of age. The most common confirmed genetic syndrome in the study cohort was chromosome 22q11 microdeletion syndrome. Gerdes and coworkers
20
demonstrated a range of developmental disabilities in children with the 22q11 deletion, with notable delays in speech and language development. The authors also showed that these disabilities were not explained by cardiac disease or cardiac surgery. In this subset of patients with a confirmed or suspected genetic syndrome, lower birth weight was an additional and independent predictor for lower PDI scores. Although the presence of 22q11 microdeletion syndrome and low birth weight are associated,
21
lower birth weight and decreased gestational age are recognized predictors of poor developmental outcome in otherwise healthy children.
22
Interestingly, MDI and PDI scores at 1 year were independent of intraoperative factors, such as cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest time. Intraoperative variables have been extensively investigated for their effect on neurodevelopmental outcome.
4,14,15,23
Duration of DHCA has been shown to have a negative effect on IQ and developmental testing scores. The effect of DHCA is most likely nonlinear, and neurodevelopmental disability is unlikely with shorter periods of DHCA (<41 minutes).
23
In our study the mean duration of DHCA was 38.5 minutes, and duration of DHCA was not a significant predictor of neurodevelopmental outcome. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously because this study was not primarily powered to evaluate the effects of DHCA duration on neurodevelopment.
In a large prospective trial assessing the effects of genetic polymorphisms on neurodevelopmental disabilities after infant cardiac surgery, which included the patients in this study, the apolipoprotein E
2 allele was found to be predictive of lower PDI scores at 1 year of age.
6
In the VSD cohort apolipoprotein E polymorphism was not predictive of neurodevelopmental outcome. This might also be related to insufficient sample size to address this issue.
| Limitations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S. Simons, R. Glidden, D. Sheslow, and C. Pizarro Intermediate Neurodevelopmental Outcome After Repair of Ventricular Septal Defect Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2010; 90(5): 1586 - 1591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Wernovsky Improving neurologic and quality-of-life outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: Past, present, and future J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2008; 135(2): 240 - 242. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Zeltser, G. P. Jarvik, J. Bernbaum, G. Wernovsky, A. S. Nord, M. Gerdes, E. Zackai, R. Clancy, S. C. Nicolson, T. L. Spray, et al. Genetic factors are important determinants of neurodevelopmental outcome after repair of tetralogy of Fallot J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2008; 135(1): 91 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Alsoufi, S. Cai, J. G. Coles, W. G. Williams, G. S. Van Arsdell, and C. A. Caldarone Outcomes of Different Surgical Strategies in the Treatment of Neonates with Aortic Coarctation and Associated Ventricular Septal Defects Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 84(4): 1331 - 1337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. McBride, P. M. Kirshbom, J. W. Gaynor, R. F. Ittenbach, G. Wernovsky, R. R. Clancy, T. B. Flynn, D. M. Hartman, T. L. Spray, R. E. Tanel, et al. Late cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal exercise performance after repair for total anomalous pulmonary venous connection during infancy J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1533 - 1539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |