JTCS Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jesús Herreros
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gavira, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Prósper, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gavira, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Prósper, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive Heart Failure
Right arrow Molecular biology
Right arrow Myocardial infarction

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:799-804
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Cardiopulmonary Support and Physiology

Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation in patients with nonacute myocardial infarction: 1-year follow-up

Juan J. Gavira, MD a , Jesús Herreros, MD a , Ana Perez, PhD b , María José Garcia-Velloso, MD c , Joaquín Barba, MD a , Francisco Martin-Herrero, MD d , Consuelo Cañizo, MD e , Ana Martin-Arnau, MD a , Josep M. Martí-Climent, MD c , Milagros Hernández, MD b , Natalia López-Holgado, PhD e , José María González-Santos, MD d , Cándido Martín-Luengo, MD d , Eduardo Alegria, MD a , Felipe Prósper, MD b , *

a Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Clínica Universitaria, Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
b Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy Area, Clínica Universitaria, Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
c Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universitaria, Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
e Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
d Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

Received for publication August 4, 2005; revisions received November 14, 2005; accepted for publication November 16, 2005.

* Address for reprints: Felipe Prósper, MD, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Clínica Universitaria, Avda Pío XII 36, Pamplona 31008, Spain. (Email: fprosper{at}unav.es).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and safety of skeletal myoblast transplantation in patients with chronic myocardial infarction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS: Twelve patients with a previous myocardial infarction and ischemic coronary artery disease underwent treatment with coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and intramyocardial injection of autologous skeletal myoblasts cultured with autologous serum. Global and regional cardiac function was assessed by echocardiogram. Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose and nitrogen 13–ammonia positron emission tomography studies were used to determine cardiac viability and perfusion. A group of historical control patients (n = 14) treated with coronary artery bypass grafting surgery without myoblast transplantation was analyzed.

RESULTS: The left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 35.5% ± 2.3% (mean ± SEM) before surgery to 55.1% ± 8.2% at 12 months (P < .01) in the myoblast group and from 33.6% ± 9.3% to 38.6% ± 11% in the control group. Regional contractility also improved in the myoblast group, particularly in cardiac segments treated with skeletal myoblasts (wall motion score index: 3.02 ± 0.17 at baseline vs 1.36 ± 0.14 at 12 months; P < .0001). Quantitative fluorine 18–fluorodeoxyglucose and nitrogen 13–ammonia positron emission tomography showed an increase in viability and perfusion 12 months after surgery both globally and in segments treated with myoblasts (P = .012 and P = .004). Skeletal myoblast implantation was not associated with adverse events or an increased incidence of cardiac arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with previous myocardial infarction, treatment with skeletal myoblasts in conjunction with coronary artery bypass is safe and feasible and is associated with an increased global and regional left ventricular function, improvement in viability, and perfusion of cardiac tissue and no significant incidence of arrhythmias.



Abbreviations and Acronyms CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; 18F-FDG = fluorine 18–fluorodeoxyglucose; LV = left ventricle; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; MI = myocardial infarction; PET = positron emission tomography; WMSI = wall motion score index



    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cardiac failure due to ischemic cardiomyopathy is one of the major health problems in the world because of its high prevalence and the high mortality and morbidity associated with it. 1 Go Myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with an irreversible loss of cardiomyocytes that leads to a process of cardiac remodeling with left ventricular (LV) enlargement and abnormal contractility that eventually results in cardiac failure. 2 Go Although in the last few years several studies have suggested that the heart may have a certain capacity for regeneration, this is by no means enough to restore a normal function after MI. 3,4 Go

Cell therapy has emerged as a potential alternative to heart transplantation for patients with end-stage cardiac disease. 5 Go With the aim of replacing necrotic tissue, cells from different sources have been implanted in animal models of MI, including embryonic stem cells, 6 Go fetal cardiomyocytes, 7 Go skeletal myoblasts, 8 Go hematopoietic stem cells, 9 Go mesenchymal stem cells, 10 Go or endothelial progenitor cells. 11 Go Most of these studies have invariably shown engraftment of donor cells and reconstitution of heart structures, ie, cardiomyocytes and blood vessels, and most of them have been associated with improved heart function. The results from clinical trials of intramyocardial cell transplantation with bone marrow mononuclear cells 12,13 Go or bone marrow–derived AC133-positive cells 14 Go for cardiac regeneration have been recently reported.

Among the different cell types used, skeletal myoblasts have several advantages: increased resistance to ischemia, autologous origin, ready access to the cell source, and the feasibility of ex vivo expansion of progenitor cells. 15,16 Go However, the initial clinical studies have suggested that transplantation of skeletal myoblasts in patients with MI may be associated with an increased incidence of cardiac arrhythmias. 17,18 Go

In this study, we have analyzed the results at 1 year in a group of patients with a history of MI treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and skeletal myoblast transplantation. The safety of the procedure and its functional results were assessed by echocardiography, whereas perfusion and viability were determined by nitrogen 13 (13N)-ammonia and fluorine 18–fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) studies and compared with a historical control group of patients treated with bypass surgery alone.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient Population and Study Design
A total of 12 patients were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were (1) a history of MI greater than 4 weeks previously with akinetic or dyskinetic nonviable scar tissue, as demonstrated by a lack of metabolic activity on 18F-FDG PET; (2) indication for elective CABG; (3) age 30 to 80 years; and (4) a LV ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than 25%. Exclusion criteria included (1) an inability to obtain a myoblast cell culture, (2) a positive serologic test for human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis, (3) a history of malignant arrhythmia or muscular dystrophy, and (4) abnormal liver or kidney function tests. The protocol and all the procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Studies and Ethics Committee, the Regional Review Board for Clinical Trials With Human Subjects, and the Spanish Health Authorities. All patients signed an informed consent before entering the study.

Before surgery, all patients underwent 13N-ammonia and 18F-FDG PET scanning, echocardiography, and 24-hour Holter monitoring to determine the functioning and viability of the heart muscle. Laboratory studies included cardiac and liver enzymes and C-reactive protein. Studies were repeated 3 and 12 months after surgery. The preliminary results at 3 months have been reported previously. 19 Go

A control group of 14 matched patients who met the same inclusion criteria and received the same treatment, including bypass surgery, but who did not receive skeletal myoblast transplants were analyzed. This group underwent the same functional studies except for PET analysis.

Echocardiography Studies
Global and regional myocardial contractility was measured by 2-dimensional echocardiography by using a Sonos 5500 ultrasound system (Philips Medical Systems, Irvine, Calif). Regional LV wall motion analysis was performed as described by the Committee on Standards of the American Society of Echocardiography, 20 Go by dividing the LV into 16 segments and scoring wall motion for each segment as 1 (normal), 2 (hypokinesis), 3 (akinesis), or 4 (dyskinesis). The wall motion score index (WMSI) was calculated as the sum of the scores of the segments divided by the number of segments evaluated. WMSI was calculated for segments treated and not treated with cell implantation. LVEF was also calculated by using an automatic border detection system. 21 Go Regional contractility was also assessed by color kinesis and tissue Doppler imaging for each segment. All studies were performed by 2 different observers. Reproducibility values within studies were 2.8 ± 6.4 mL (variation coefficient, 5.5%) for LV end-diastolic volume and 0.3 ± 4.6 (variation coefficient, 6.6%) for LVEF.

Tissue viability was assessed by low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography for which dobutamine was given intravenously at an initial dose of 5 µg · kg–1 · min–1 that was incremented every 3 minutes at 5 µg · kg–1 · min–1 until a maximal dose of 10 µg · kg–1 · min–1 was achieved. A continuous electrocardiogram was recorded, and semiquantitative regional function was blindly analyzed.

PET Studies
Myocardial blood flow and glucose metabolism were measured by PET scans before treatment and 3 and 12 months after treatment. The perfusion and metabolism studies were performed with a whole-body PET (ECAT EXACT HR+; Siemens/CTI, Knoxville, Tenn) as previously described. 19 Go

Autologous Skeletal Myoblast Cell Culture
Three to 4 weeks before CABG surgery, a muscle biopsy was obtained from the vastus lateralis under sterile conditions with the patient under local anesthesia (2% lidocaine hydrochloride) and processed immediately to obtain muscle progenitor cells as previously described. 8,19 Go All patients underwent a plasma exchange the day before muscle biopsy was performed by using heparin as an anticoagulant. Cell cultures were incubated at 37°C and 5% carbon dioxide, and passage of the culture was performed at subconfluence to prevent myotube formation. During the first passage, preplating was applied to eliminate contamination of myoblasts with fibroblasts. Myoblasts were harvested after 3 to 4 passages for implantation. Myoblast purity was measured by flow cytometry after staining with monoclonal antibodies against human N-CAM (CD56), CD45, and desmin. 22 Go

CABG Surgery and Cell Implantation
Three to 4 weeks after muscle biopsy, all patients underwent conventional aortocoronary bypass surgery. During cardiopulmonary bypass and after the conclusion of all graft anastomoses, immediately before removing extracorporeal circulation and while the heart was initiating spontaneous heartbeats, muscle progenitor cells (myoblasts) were injected subepicardially by multiple injections with an angled needle (Steriseal Opthalmic canula, 23 gauge; Maersk Medical Ltd Redditch, UK) that allows tangential injection of cells under the epicardium. Myoblasts were implanted in segments previously identified by echocardiography as akinetic or dyskinetic in and around the infarct. Areas receiving cells were identified before surgery by echocardiogram, and these same areas were analyzed during follow-up to determine changes in regional contractility. Before myoblast implantation, a sample of the harvested myoblasts was used for microbiology cultures, including Gram staining to determine culture contamination. All patients were monitored with continuous telemetry throughout their hospital stay.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 10.0 for Windows software package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). The normal distribution of quantitative variables was examined with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with the Lilliefors correction. Comparisons were performed with the paired t test for dependent variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test, depending on the normality test. Differences between groups were analyzed with the {chi}2 test (qualitative variables) or the t test for independent samples (quantitative variables). Comparisons for repeated measurements were performed with analysis of variance or the Friedman test. Descriptive analysis is presented as mean (SEM) for quantitative variables or median (interquartile range) for categorical variables.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A total of 12 patients (11 men and 1 woman) with a mean age of 64.5 years (3.2 years) were included. Two patients were excluded from the analysis according to the criteria defined by the protocol (in 1 patient, myoblasts could not be cultured, and in another patient, the Gram staining before implantation was positive). The control group included 14 patients who had undergone CABG. There were no statistically significant differences between the characteristics of both groups (Tables E1 and E2). Go


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE E1. Baseline characteristics of patients and controls
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE E2. Surgical data of patients and controls
 
All patients underwent CABG as scheduled. The infarct area was documented as nonviable by dobutamine echocardiography and 18F-FDG PET in patients undergoing myoblast transplantation (viability was assessed only by dobutamine echocardiography in the control group). The mean size of the muscle biopsy was 9.45 g (5.5-14 g), and the mean volume of autologous serum obtained was 1.735 mL (800-2.135 mL). After a median of 23 days (18-26 days) in culture, a mean of 221 x 106 (105-390 x 106) myoblasts were obtained with a purity of 65.6% (48%-92%; percentage of CD56+ cells/CD45 cells). An average of 5 mL (3.5-6 mL) of solution containing skeletal myoblasts was injected by multiple injections as previously described. 19 Go The average concentration of myoblasts was 50 x 106/mL, and the number of injections varied between 5 and 15. The median number of segments treated with myoblasts was 7 (4-10): anterior wall, n = 6; inferior wall, n = 3; and apical region, n = 1. No significant differences were found between patients and controls regarding the surgical procedure (Table E2).

Adverse Events
In the group of patients treated with myoblasts, 2 patients were readmitted to the hospital with heart failure: 1 at 5 months after surgery and 1 at 12 months after surgery, also having recurrence of angina. One patient had episodes of paroxystic third-degree atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation 5 months after surgery. Before surgery, nocturnal episodes of complete atrioventricular block were detected in this patient by Holter monitoring. Finally, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis developed in 1 patient 6 months after surgery. The median number of ventricular premature beats was 13 (309), 11 (23), and 34 (759) at baseline and 3 and 12 months, respectively (P = .386). No other malignant arrhythmias were detected, and no implantable defibrillators were required. Plasma exchange was not associated with adverse events. Muscle biopsy was associated with a minor local bleeding episode in 1 patient 12 hours after the biopsy.

In the control group, 4 patients experienced heart failure and were readmitted to the hospital. Two of them were treated with a resynchronization pacemaker, in 1 case with internal defibrillator capabilities.

Echocardiography Results
At 12 months after surgery, a significant increase in LVEF and a decrease in LV diameters and volumes were observed (Table E3). LVEF by automatic border detection increased from 40.38% (2.42%) at baseline to 54.33% (2.46%) and 60.83 (3.5%) at 3 and 12 months after surgery, respectively (P < .001). Both at 3 and 12 months, there was a significant improvement in regional contractility assessed by WMSI in the group of patients treated with myoblast implantation. A statistically significant improvement was observed when we analyzed segments treated with revascularization alone or with revascularization and skeletal myoblasts (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE E3. Echocardiographic results
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Regional contractility studies (WMSI)
 
In the control group, the increase in LVEF 12 months after surgery did not reach statistical significance, and no significant changes were detected in remodeling parameters or in the WMSI (Tables 1 and E3). The changes in LVEF and in LV diameters were significantly different between the group of patients treated with myoblasts and the control group (Figures 1 and 2). Go


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. LVEF before and 12 months after CABG in patients treated with myoblasts and in the control group. Results represent individual values for each patient as well as the mean (SEM). P < .001 between changes observed in the control group and patients treated with myoblasts.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Median percentage of change in LV diameters and volumes in the group of patients treated with myoblasts and in the control group. LVEDV, Left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter.

 
Myocardial Perfusion and Viability PET Studies
The 18F-FDG and 13N-ammonia PET were performed before surgery (1-5 days) and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. A global increase in 18F-FDG uptake was observed at 3 and 12 months after surgery compared with baseline values. This increase was more pronounced when only segments treated with myoblasts were analyzed. Perfusion studies with 13N-ammonia showed a statistically significant improvement at 12 months but not at 3 months. As described in the viability studies, the improvement was particularly observed in segments treated with myoblasts (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Myocardial viability and perfusion studies (PET)
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of our study indicate that transplantation of autologous skeletal myoblasts in patients with a history of MI as adjuvant therapy to bypass surgery is feasible and safe and is associated with an improvement in LVEF and an increase in the viability and perfusion of the nonviable myocardium. This improvement appears mainly in the area of implantation, as indicated by 18F-FDG and 13N-ammonia PET.

It has been demonstrated in small- and large-animal models of MI that skeletal myoblasts transplanted into the myocardium are able to engraft and differentiate into myofibers and, under certain circumstances, may acquire characteristics of cardiomyocytes (see review 15 Go). In the clinical setting, transplantation of skeletal myoblast results in cell engraftment and contributes to improvement of cardiac function in patients with MI. 17,18 Go However, despite a large number of studies, the mechanisms by which myoblasts contribute to cardiac function remain unknown. Some studies have suggested that myoblasts acquire certain characteristics of cardiac muscle after transplantation into the myocardium (presence of cardiac-specific myosin heavy chain and connexin 43). 23 Go Moreover, at least in vitro, skeletal fibers and cardiac muscle can form electromechanical junctions. 24 Go Nevertheless, overwhelming evidence indicates that skeletal myoblasts do not transdifferentiate into cardiomyocytes. 25,26 Go The elastic properties of implanted fibers and/or the secretion of certain growth or survival factors, contributing to remodeling or to recruitment of circulating or local cardiac stem cells, have been implicated as potential mechanisms involved in the observed benefit of myoblast transplantation in animal studies. 15 Go

The number of skeletal myoblasts transplanted in the different studies have varied from a few million to more than a billion cells. 17,18 Go On the basis of preclinical data suggesting that functional improvement is correlated with the number of cells 27 Go and the fact that myoblast retention after transplantation is less than 5%, 28 Go the number of cells injected in our study could be considered to be in the lower range. However, the number of cells injected in our patients was similar to the number of cells injected in 2 other studies in which engraftment of myoblasts was demonstrated. 18,29 Go Although proof of engraftment was not obtained in our patients, the results of these studies and the increase in 18F-FDG uptake in the area where the cells had been implanted suggest that probably enough cells were injected to obtain a successful engraftment.

The functional improvement observed in our patients is encouraging but is certainly overshadowed by the fact that patients underwent both skeletal myoblast transplantation and bypass surgery to the same area that received cells. This is a major limitation of our study. As we have described, several approaches have been used to try to differentiate the functional benefit derived from myoblast transplantation from the potential effect of bypass surgery. Although the value of using a control group for comparison is limited and only randomized trials can establish whether the improvement in cardiac function is due to cell therapy, the results of the comparison between patients and controls clearly suggest that transplantation of myoblasts is associated with an increase in LVEF for up to 1 year after surgery. Furthermore, the differences observed in end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters suggest that skeletal myoblasts could limit ventricular remodeling, probably by releasing molecules capable of altering the extracellular matrix. 30 Go The lack of uptake of 18F-FDG PET as an inclusion criterion excludes the possibility that improved cardiac function could be due to revascularization of hibernating tissue. Also, the increase in 18F-FDG uptake mainly in areas where myoblasts were injected, along with the improvement in WMSI in the same areas, suggests that the benefit observed is, at least in part, due to the injected myoblasts.

It is interesting to note that a statistically significant increase in the uptake of 13N-ammonia was observed 12 months after surgery and that this was more pronounced in areas where myoblasts had been implanted. As described previously, increased perfusion is associated with increased 13N-ammonia uptake, and this suggests an increase in vascularization of the infarct area. Although histological analysis would be required to demonstrate an increase in angiogenesis or vasculogenesis in patients who have undergone transplantation with myoblasts, these results suggest that this mechanism may underlie the benefit observed in our patients. In a recent study in patients receiving skeletal myoblast transplants at the time of LV assist device implantation, the morphological analysis suggested an increase in angiogenesis in the explanted heart at the time of heart transplantation. 18 Go

An important finding in our patients is the lack of cardiac arrhythmias observed—a finding that contrasted with other recent studies, 17,18 Go in which 4 of 10 patients with old MIs treated with CABG and intramyocardial injection of skeletal myoblasts required implantation of an automatic internal cardioverter-defibrillator. 17 Go The reason for these arrhythmias is at present unknown, but it could be related to electrical reentry circuits due to the lack of established gap junctions between skeletal myoblasts and cardiomyocytes, 25 Go to the number and/or volume of cells implanted, or to other currently unknown mechanisms. We cannot rule out that the absence of arrhythmias in our patients is not due to revascularization of the infarct area, to the use of autologous serum (the use of bovine serum in cell cultures has been associated with inflammation and/or killing of the cells 31 Go), or even to patient selection, because the baseline LVEF was better in our patients than in either of the previous studies. 17,18 Go In a very recent study, the finding that skeletal myoblasts do not establish gap junctions with cardiomyocytes has been hypothesized as a mechanism to prevent the generation of dangerous premature beats 26 Go: this is consistent with our own clinical observations.

In conclusion, our results suggest that cell transplantation with bypass surgery is associated with improved cardiac function, increased tissue viability, and lack of side effects, thus resulting in a promising therapy for patients with heart failure. These results warrant further clinical research, including randomized studies.


    Footnotes
 
Supported in part by grants from the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS) PI042125, Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia SAF2002-04575-C02-02, and FEDER (INTERREG IIIA).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Gheorghiade M, Bonow RO. Chronic heart failure in the United States. a manifestation of coronary artery disease. Circulation 1998;97:282-289.[Free Full Text]
  2. Cohn JN, Ferrari R, Sharpe N, International Forum on Cardiac Remodeling Cardiac remodeling—concepts and clinical implications. a consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:569-582.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Beltrami AP, Urbanek K, Kajstura J, Yan SM, Finato N, Bussani R, et al. Evidence that human cardiac myocytes divide after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1750-1757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Anversa P, Nadal-Ginard B. Myocyte renewal and ventricular remodelling. Nature 2002;415:240-243.[Medline]
  5. Perin EC, Geng YJ, Willerson JT. Adult stem cell therapy in perspective. Circulation 2003;107:935-938.[Free Full Text]
  6. Klug MG, Soonpaa MH, Koh GY, Field LJ. Genetically selected cardiomyocytes from differentiating embryonic stem cells form stable intracardiac grafts. J Clin Invest 1996;98:216-224.[Medline]
  7. Yokomuro H, Li RK, Mickle DA, Weisel RD, Verma S, Yau TM. Transplantation of cryopreserved cardiomyocytes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:98-107.
  8. Rajnoch C, Chachques JC, Berrebi A, Bruneval P, Benoit MO, Carpentier A. Cellular therapy reverses myocardial dysfunction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:871-878.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, Jakoniuk I, Anderson SM, Li B, et al. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature 2001;410:701-705.[Medline]
  10. Toma C, Pittenger MF, Cahill KS, Byrne BJ, Kessler PD. Human mesenchymal stem cells differentiate to a cardiomyocyte phenotype in the adult murine heart. Circulation 2002;105:93-98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kawamoto A, Tkebuchava T, Yamaguchi J, Nishimura H, Yoon YS, Milliken C, et al. Intramyocardial transplantation of autologous endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization of myocardial ischemia. Circulation 2003;107:461-468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Strauer BE, Brehm M, Zeus T, Kostering M, Hernandez A, Sorg RV, et al. Repair of infarcted myocardium by autologous intracoronary mononuclear bone marrow cell transplantation in humans. Circulation 2002;106:1913-1918.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Tse HF, Kwong YL, Chan JK, Lo G, Ho CL, Lau CP. Angiogenesis in ischaemic myocardium by intramyocardial autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell implantation. Lancet 2003;361:47-49.[Medline]
  14. Stamm C, Westphal B, Kleine HD, Petzsch M, Kittner C, Klinge H, et al. Autologous bone-marrow stem-cell transplantation for myocardial regeneration. Lancet 2003;361:45-46.[Medline]
  15. Menasche P. Skeletal muscle satellite cell transplantation. Cardiovasc Res 2003;58:351-357.[Medline]
  16. Taylor DA, Silvestry SC, Bishop SP, Annex BH, Lilly RE, Glower DD, et al. Delivery of primary autologous skeletal myoblasts into rabbit heart by coronary infusion. a potential approach to myocardial repair. Proc Assoc Am Physicians 1997;109:245-253.[Medline]
  17. Menasche P, Hagege AA, Vilquin J-T, Desnos M, Abergel E, Pouzet B, et al. Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation for severe postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1078-1083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Pagani FD, DerSimonian H, Zawadzka A, Wetzel K, Edge ASB, Jacoby DB, et al. Autologous skeletal myoblasts transplanted to ischemia-damaged myocardium in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:879-888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Herreros J, Prosper F, Perez A, Gavira JJ, Garcia-Velloso MJ, Barba J, et al. Autologous intramyocardial injection of cultured skeletal muscle-derived stem cells in patients with non-acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2003;24:2012-2020.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, et al. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on StandardsSubcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989;2:358-367.[Medline]
  21. Perez JE, Waggoner AD, Barzilai B, Melton Jr HE, Miller JG, Sobel BE. On-line assessment of ventricular function by automatic boundary detection and ultrasonic backscatter imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:313-320.[Abstract]
  22. Menasche P, Hagege AA, Scorsin M, Pouzet B, Desnos M, Duboc D, et al. Myoblast transplantation for heart failure. Lancet 2001;357:279-280.[Medline]
  23. Taylor DA, Atkins BZ, Hungspreugs P, Jones TR, Reedy MC, Hutcheson KA, et al. Regenerating functional myocardium. improved performance after skeletal myoblast transplantation. Nat Med 1998;4:929-933.[Medline]
  24. Reinecke H, MacDonald GH, Hauschka SD, Murry CE. Electromechanical coupling between skeletal and cardiac muscle. Implications for infarct repair. J Cell Biol 2000;149:731-740.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Reinecke H, Poppa V, Murry CE. Skeletal muscle stem cells do not transdifferentiate into cardiomyocytes after cardiac grafting. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2002;34:241-249.[Medline]
  26. Leobon B, Garcin I, Menasche P, Vilquin JT, Audinat E, Charpak S. Myoblasts transplanted into rat infarcted myocardium are functionally isolated from their host. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:7808-7811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Pouzet B, Vilquin JT, Hagege AA, Scorsin M, Messas E, Fiszman M, et al. Factors affecting functional outcome after autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:844-850discussion 50-1.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Suzuki K, Murtuza B, Beauchamp JR, Smolenski RT, Varela-Carver A, Fukushima S, et al. Dynamics and mediators of acute graft attrition after myoblast transplantation to the heart. FASEB J 2004;18:1153-1155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Smits PC, van Geuns RJ, Poldermans D, Bountioukos M, Onderwater EE, Lee CH, et al. Catheter-based intramyocardial injection of autologous skeletal myoblasts as a primary treatment of ischemic heart failure. clinical experience with six-month follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:2063-2069.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Spinale FG, Coker ML, Krombach SR, Mukherjee R, Hallak H, Houck WV, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition during the development of congestive heart failure. effects on left ventricular dimensions and function. Circ Res 1999;85:364-376.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Martin MJ, Muotri A, Gage F, Varki A. Human embryonic stem cells express an immunogenic nonhuman sialic acid. Nat Med 2005;11:228-232.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. J. Gavira, E. Nasarre, G. Abizanda, M. Perez-Ilzarbe, A. de Martino-Rodriguez, J. A. Garcia de Jalon, M. Mazo, A. Macias, I. Garcia-Bolao, B. Pelacho, et al.
Repeated implantation of skeletal myoblast in a swine model of chronic myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., August 22, 2009; (2009) ehp342v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DMMHome page
K. D. Boudoulas and A. K. Hatzopoulos
Cardiac repair and regeneration: the Rubik's cube of cell therapy for heart disease
Dis. Model. Mech., July 1, 2009; 2(7-8): 344 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Menasche
Stem Cell Therapy for Heart Failure: Are Arrhythmias a Real Safety Concern?
Circulation, May 26, 2009; 119(20): 2735 - 2740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. Macia and P. A. Boyden
Stem Cell Therapy Is Proarrhythmic
Circulation, April 7, 2009; 119(13): 1814 - 1823.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Q. Ly and S. Nattel
Stem Cells Are Not Proarrhythmic: Letting the Genie out of the Bottle
Circulation, April 7, 2009; 119(13): 1824 - 1831.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
F. Nicolini and T. Gherli
Alternatives to transplantation in the surgical therapy for heart failure
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2009; 35(2): 214 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Q. Zhao, Y. Sun, L. Xia, A. Chen, and Z. Wang
Randomized Study of Mononuclear Bone Marrow Cell Transplantation in Patients With Coronary Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2008; 86(6): 1833 - 1840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
J. J. Gavira, G. Abizanda, M. Perez-Ilzarbe, D. Martinez-Caro, E. Nasarre, A. Perez-Ruiz, and F. Prosper
Skeletal myoblasts for cardiac repair in animal models
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2008; 10(suppl_K): K11 - K15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
M. Perez-Ilzarbe, O. Agbulut, B. Pelacho, C. Ciorba, E. S. Jose-Eneriz, M. Desnos, A. A. Hagege, P. Aranda, E. J. Andreu, P. Menasche, et al.
Characterization of the paracrine effects of human skeletal myoblasts transplanted in infarcted myocardium
Eur J Heart Fail, November 1, 2008; 10(11): 1065 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
M. Mazo, V. Planat-Benard, G. Abizanda, B. Pelacho, B. Leobon, J. J. Gavira, I. Penuelas, A. Cemborain, L. Penicaud, P. Laharrague, et al.
Transplantation of adipose derived stromal cells is associated with functional improvement in a rat model of chronic myocardial infarction
Eur J Heart Fail, May 1, 2008; 10(5): 454 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Menasche, O. Alfieri, S. Janssens, W. McKenna, H. Reichenspurner, L. Trinquart, J.-T. Vilquin, J.-P. Marolleau, B. Seymour, J. Larghero, et al.
The Myoblast Autologous Grafting in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (MAGIC) Trial: First Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study of Myoblast Transplantation
Circulation, March 4, 2008; 117(9): 1189 - 1200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
L. W. van Laake, R. Hassink, P. A. Doevendans, and C. Mummery
Heart repair and stem cells
J. Physiol., December 1, 2006; 577(2): 467 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
K. H. Wu, Y. L. Liu, B. Zhou, and Z. C. Han
Cellular therapy and myocardial tissue engineering: the role of adult stem and progenitor cells
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 30(5): 770 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jesús Herreros
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gavira, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Prósper, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gavira, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Prósper, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive Heart Failure
Right arrow Molecular biology
Right arrow Myocardial infarction


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS