JTCS Click here to go to SJM website.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Igor E. Konstantinov
William G. Williams
Jan M. Quaegebeur
Pedro J. del Nido
Thomas L. Spray
Christopher A. Caldarone
Eugene H. Blackstone
Brian W. McCrindle
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Konstantinov, I. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Konstantinov, I. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - acyanotic
Right arrow Great vessels

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:1136-1141
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease

Surgical management of aortopulmonary window associated with interrupted aortic arch: A Congenital Heart Surgeons Society study

Igor E. Konstantinov, MD, PhD a , Tara Karamlou, MD a , William G. Williams, MD a , Jan M. Quaegebeur, MD b , Pedro J. del Nido, MD c , Thomas L. Spray, MD d , Christopher A. Caldarone, MD b , Eugene H. Blackstone, MD e , Brian W. McCrindle, MD, MPH a , * Congenital Heart Surgeons Society

a Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
b Children's Hospital of New York, New York
c Children's Hospital of Boston, Boston, Mass
d Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
e Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Received for publication January 8, 2005; revisions received February 28, 2005; accepted for publication March 23, 2005.

* Address for reprints: Brian W. McCrindle, MD, The Hospital for Sick Children 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8 (Email: brian.mccrindle{at}sickkids.ca).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Data Collection
 Data Analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine outcomes and risk factors of surgical management of patients with aortopulmonary window associated with interrupted aortic arch.

METHODS: From 1987 to 1997, 472 neonates with interrupted aortic arch were enrolled prospectively from 33 institutions. Associated aortopulmonary window was present in 20 patients. Competing risk methodology determined the prevalence of reintervention for postrepair pulmonary artery and aortic arch obstruction.

RESULTS: Interrupted aortic arch was type A in 17 patients and type B in 3 patients. Aortopulmonary window morphology was type I (n = 10), type II (n = 5), and type III (n = 5). Associated cardiovascular anomalies were common, including atrial septal defect (n = 13) and systemic venous anomalies (n = 3). Overall survival after initial admission was 91%, 86%, and 84% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Fifteen patients underwent single-stage repair, and 4 patients underwent staged repair. There was an increased prevalence of patch augmentation of the interrupted aortic arch anastomosis in lower-weight infants (2.3 kg vs 3.1 kg, P = .07). Competing risk analysis estimated that 5 years after repair, 51% had initial arch reintervention, 6% had initial pulmonary artery reintervention, and 43% were alive without reintervention. Reintervention for arch obstruction was more likely for those with interrupted aortic arch type B (P = .08) and for those with higher weight at initial repair (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS: Complete correction of aortopulmonary window in the setting of interrupted aortic arch can be performed with low mortality in the neonatal period. Reinterventions for aortic arch obstruction are the most frequent complication after repair, but pulmonary artery stenosis also occurs. Use of patch augmentation may reduce the need for subsequent arch reintervention.



Abbreviations and Acronyms APW = aortopulmonary window; IAA = interrupted aortic arch



    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Data Collection
 Data Analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Aortopulmonary window (APW) is a communication between the ascending aorta and the pulmonary trunk, occurring above 2 normally formed semilunar valves. 1,2 Go Isolated APW occurs in 0.2% of cases of congenital heart disease 3,4 Go and is accompanied by other cardiac anomalies in 52% of cases. 5 Go Interrupted aortic arch (IAA) is the most frequently associated major lesion. The combination of APW and IAA is rare, and the cumulative experience with this combination of lesions is limited to isolated case reports. 3,4,6–10 Go The presence of IAA with APW is a risk factor for death among those with APW. 2 Go The surgical management of APW and IAA is necessarily complex, yet its rarity has precluded multivariable analysis from which therapeutic inferences could be derived. We sought to identify morphologic and procedural variables that are associated with mortality or reintervention for either aortic arch or pulmonary artery obstruction after definitive repair.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Data Collection
 Data Analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Between 1987 and 1997, 472 neonates with IAA were prospectively enrolled from 33 Congenital Heart Surgeons Society member institutions. Twenty neonates (4.2%) had associated APW. The number of patients enrolled with APW per institution ranged from 1 to 3, with 2 institutions enrolling 3 patients. All patients with IAA admitted to a Congenital Heart Surgeons Society institution within 30 days of birth were eligible for inclusion. Participation by member institution was voluntary and confidential, and ethical approval was obtained per local requirements. Ethics approval for the Congenital Heart Surgeons Society Data Center is obtained annually from the Research Ethics Board of the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto.

The Richardson classification was used in this report to classify APW types. 11 Go IAA was defined as either a complete discontinuity or a nonpatent fibrous strand in the transverse arch or aortic isthmus. The types of IAA were described using Celoria and Patten's classification 12 Go (Figure 1). Patients with right aortic arch and other associated aortic arch anomalies were identified and described individually.


Figure 1
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Morphologic subtypes of APW in IAA. Number of patients in each category (numbers in parentheses).

 
Type I APW defects are located just above the sinus of Valsalva, on the posteromedial wall of the ascending aorta. 11 Go Type II defects are more cephalad on the ascending aorta and involve the origin of the right pulmonary artery and the main pulmonary artery. Type III defects arise more laterally on the aorta, so that the right pulmonary artery takes anomalous origin from the posterior ascending aorta and is completely separated from the main pulmonary artery.


    Data Collection
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Data Collection
 Data Analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Data were abstracted from submitted copies of medical records requested for initial and subsequent assessments, admissions, and procedures. The most recent cross-sectional follow-up was performed between March and June 2004, with 3 deaths and follow-up completed for 11 (65%) of 17 presumed survivors.


    Data Analysis
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Data Collection
 Data Analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The goals of the analysis were to describe morphologic and procedural characteristics, and to determine incremental risk factors for time-related mortality and reintervention directed at relieving either arch obstruction or pulmonary arterial obstruction after definitive repair. Data are given as frequency, median with range, or mean ± standard deviation as appropriate, with the number of nonmissing values indicated. All data analyses were performed using SAS statistical software (version 9; SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). Multiphase parametric modeling of the hazard function and competing risks methodology were used to define rates of transition to mutually exclusive time-related events and incremental risk factors associated with subsequent aortic arch reintervention as previously described. 13,14 Go Variable selection was primarily performed by means of bootstrap bagging. 14 Go For the bootstrap step, randomly selected data sets (n = 500) of the same size as the original data set were analyzed by means of automated stepwise regression, with an inclusion criterion of a P value of .10 or less. For the aggregation step, cluster analysis was used to identify risk factors occurring in 50% of the analysis, with the most commonly occurring transformation (if applicable) selected. These factors were entered into a final model, and those with P values of .10 or less were retained. Frequency of identifying factors (reliability) according to bagging is reported.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Data Collection
 Data Analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient Characteristics
APW was found in 20 (4%) of 472 enrolled neonates with IAA. Patient and morphologic characteristics are shown in Tables E1 and E2, Go Appendix.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE E1. Patient characteristics at the time of admission (n = 20)
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE E2. Procedural characteristics at interrupted aortic arch and aortopulmonary window repair (n = 19)
 
Associated Anomalies
Associated cardiac anomalies were common, occurring in 15 (75%) of the cohort. Atrial septal defect was the most common associated anomaly, with a prevalence of 65% (n = 13). One patient had azygos continuation of the inferior vena cava, and 2 patients had a left superior vena cava draining to the coronary sinus. Anomalous origin of the right subclavian artery was present in 1 patient. Coronary artery anomalies were not found in our population.

Noncardiac anomalies were present in 4 patients. One had CHARGE syndrome, consisting of cleft lip and palate, imperforate anus, and concomitant rectovaginal fistula. Hydrocephalus was present in 1 patient, and 1 infant had associated tracheoesophageal fistula with esophageal atresia. One neonate presented with deletion of the long arm of chromosome 21.

Surgical Repair
Aortic arch repair
Nineteen patients underwent repair of the IAA, and 1 patient died without intervention. Fifteen patients underwent single-stage repair of both the IAA and APW, and 4 patients underwent staged repair. The aortic arch was repaired directly without patch augmentation in 15 patients, with pericardial patch augmentation in 2 patients, and end-to-end repair using a left subclavian artery flap in 2 patients. Patch augmentation in 1 patient with Type II APW and Type A IAA was performed through a left aortotomy to close a defect in the back wall of the ascending aorta created after detachment of the pulmonary arteries. In the other patient with Type I APW and Type A IAA, the aortotomy extended from the superior aspect of the APW to the origin of the left subclavian artery. The pericardial patch was sewn to within 6 to 7 mm proximal to the end of this incision, and the descending aorta (after division of the left subclavian artery) was then anastomosed to the enlarged ascending aorta. The mean weight at repair was lower in those in whom patch augmentation was used (2.3 kg vs 3.1 kg, P = .07).

APW repair
The repair technique for the APW varied according to surgeon preference and the underlying morphology (Table E2 Appendix). Twelve patients underwent closure through a transwindow approach (anterior approach of the APW with separation of both great arteries), and 7 patients underwent transaortic closure. Of those patients repaired using the transwindow approach, direct suture was used in 5, single patch technique was used in 5, and double patch closure was used in 2. A single patch without great vessel separation was used in the majority of neonates undergoing transaortic closure (n = 6), with 1 infant having single patch repair with complete separation of the aorta and pulmonary artery. One infant with anomalous origin of the right pulmonary artery from the ascending aorta (type III APW) underwent anterior translocation of the right pulmonary artery with anastomosis of the right pulmonary artery to the main pulmonary artery. A pericardial patch was used to augment this anastomosis, and the aortic defect was closed with a pericardial patch. Pericardial patches were most frequently used (n = 8), followed by a polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex; WL Gore Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, Ariz) patch (n = 5) and Dacron patch (n = 1) (Table E2 Appendix).

Staged repair was performed in 4 patients, consisting of initial IAA repair followed by APW repair after 4, 8, 24, and 35 days. Two patients with known complex APW presented with profound acidosis and therefore underwent IAA repair followed by APW closure after resuscitation in the neonatal intensive care unit. However, in 2 other patients, the presence of an APW was not recognized on preoperative echocardiography. The postoperative convalescence in these 2 neonates was complicated by the development of congestive heart failure and ventilatory dependence. In both cases, subsequent cardiac catheterization revealed the presence of APW.

Overall mortality
There were 3 deaths (15%) among the 20 patients. Two patients died after repair, and 1 patient with a complex chromosomal abnormality died without any intervention. Two deaths occurred early after IAA repair, including 1 patient who died within 2 months of IAA repair and 1 patient who died 5 months after repair. The death 5 months after repair followed balloon dilatation of residual aortic stenosis at the IAA repair site. Echocardiography 2 months before the patient's death demonstrated persistent aortic narrowing. The third death occurred 6 years after repair secondary to a seizure disorder. The time-related freedom from mortality after initial hospital admission is depicted in Figure 2. Survival from initial hospital admission was 91%, 86%, and 84% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Risk factors for overall mortality were not sought, owing to the small number of deaths.


Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Time-related freedom from mortality in 20 neonates with APW and IAA was characterized by an early hazard phase. All patients began at the time of initial admission to a Congenital Heart Surgeons Society member institution. Parametric point estimates (solid lines); 70% confidence interval (dashed lines); nonparametric estimates (circles with error bars); number of patients at risk (numbers in parentheses).

 
Reinterventions
Aortic arch reinterventions
Reintervention for arch obstruction or bronchial compression occurred in 10 patients and included surgical relief of residual arch obstruction in 2, balloon dilatation of a discrete obstructing shelf in 6, aortic mobilization for bronchial compression in 1, and placement of an aortic interposition graft for relief of bronchial compression in 1 (Table E3 Appendix). Additional percutaneous intervention for residual arch obstruction followed surgical relief of stenosis in 1 patient, and surgical repair of residual stenosis was required in 1 patient after balloon dilatation. One patient underwent 2 percutaneous interventions for relief of anastomotic narrowing at the IAA repair site.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE E3. Reinterventions on the aortic arch or pulmonary arteries
 
Bronchial compression occurred 1 month after definitive repair in 2 patients, and involved the left mainstem bronchus in both cases. Neither patient had patch augmentation at the time of the IAA anastomosis. Undue tension at the end-to-side aortic anastomosis was apparently responsible for the airway impingement. The diagnosis was made by bronchoscopy in 1 patient with prolonged ventilator dependence, and by magnetic resonance imaging in another in whom refractory left lower lobe collapse developed.

Pulmonary artery reintervention
The overall time-related freedom from any pulmonary artery reintervention was 78%, 75%, and 72% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively, after IAA repair (Figure E3 Appendix). Five patients underwent reintervention to relieve pulmonary artery stenosis. In 2 patients, pulmonary artery reintervention preceded aortic arch reintervention, and in 3 patients, pulmonary artery reintervention occurred concomitant with or after aortic arch reintervention. The pulmonary artery reinterventions that occurred before aortic arch reintervention consisted of balloon dilatation of the right pulmonary artery in 1 patient, and patch arterioplasty of right pulmonary artery stenosis in 1 patient (Table E3 Appendix). One patient underwent surgical repair of residual aortic stenosis and right pulmonary artery patch angioplasty. One patient underwent right pulmonary artery angioplasty and stent placement concomitant with balloon dilatation of residual aortic stenosis. The remaining patient underwent bilateral pulmonary artery patch angioplasties after aortic arch reintervention. Percutaneous right pulmonary arterioplasty was performed twice in 1 patient, and pacemaker implantation for iatrogenic heart block after surgical repair was required in 1 patient.


Figure 5
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure E3 (Appendix)

Overall time-related freedom from reintervention for pulmonary artery obstruction after repair of APW and IAA in 19 neonates. Five patients underwent reintervention after single-stage repair in infancy. In 3 patients, pulmonary artery reintervention occurred concomitant with or after aortic arch reintervention. Overall freedom from reintervention was 78% at 1 year, 75% at 5 years, and 72% at 10 years. Parametric point estimates (solid lines); 70% confidence interval (dashed lines); nonparametric estimates (circles with error bars); number of patients at risk (numbers in parentheses).

 
Five patients underwent 2 reinterventions, all after single-stage repair. One patient underwent 3 subsequent reinterventions after single-stage repair.

Competing risk methodology was used to determine the time-related freedom from initial aortic arch or pulmonary artery reintervention after IAA repair (Figure 3). These events are mutually exclusive; therefore, patients are censored at the time of either arch reintervention or pulmonary artery reintervention, whichever occurred first. For example, the 3 patients who underwent pulmonary artery reintervention concomitant with or after aortic arch reintervention are modeled within the aortic arch reintervention stream rather than the pulmonary artery reintervention stream. There were no deaths before reintervention, and therefore death was not considered as a competing end-state within the context of this analysis. The competing risk analysis estimated that at 5 years after definitive repair, 51% had received initial arch reintervention, 6% had received initial pulmonary artery reintervention, and 43% were alive without reintervention.


Figure 3
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Competing risk analysis estimated that 5 years after definitive repair, 51% underwent initial arch reintervention, 6% underwent initial pulmonary artery reintervention, and 43% were alive without further intervention. No deaths occurred without subsequent reintervention.

 
The time-related freedom from aortic arch reintervention for arch obstruction or bronchial compression after initial IAA repair was characterized by a steep early hazard phase, which predominated for 1 year after initial repair and was responsible for 10 events (Figure 4). Freedom from aortic arch reintervention was 56%, 48%, and 46% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively, post-IAA repair. Incremental risk factors from multivariable hazard modeling of arch reintervention without pulmonary artery intervention are higher birth weight (parameter estimate ± standard error: 0.26 ± 0.09; bootstrap reliability 72%; P = .004) and the presence of Type B IAA (parameter estimate ± standard error: 1.43 ± 0.82; bootstrap reliability 50%; P = .08).


Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Time-related reintervention for arch obstruction in 19 neonates with APW and IAA was characterized by a steep early hazard phase. All patients began at the time of initial repair of IAA, and therefore 1 patient who died without intervention is not included in this analysis. Reintervention was required in 10 patients. Freedom from aortic reintervention was 56% at 1 year, 48% at 5 years, and 46% at 10 years. Parametric point estimates (solid lines); 70% confidence interval (dashed lines); nonparametric estimates (circles with error bars); number of patients at risk (numbers in parentheses).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Data Collection
 Data Analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, morphologic and procedural characteristics, as well as outcomes, are described for the largest current cohort of neonates with APW in the setting of IAA. We also defined associated risk factors associated with aortic arch reintervention after definitive repair.

The presence of associated cardiovascular lesions, particularly left-sided heart obstructive lesions, convey an increased risk of mortality in those with APW. 2–4,15 Go IAA is the most frequently encountered lesion associated with APW and is an independent risk factor for mortality. 2 Go Outcomes in our cohort support this notion, because the clinical impact of concomitant IAA overshadowed that of the APW; that is, adverse outcomes, including reintervention and mortality, were directly related to the arch repair in most instances. Despite this unfavorable influence, 10-year survival in our cohort was similar to previously published reports of APW without concurrent complex anomalies, and significantly improved from those reported in preceding years. 2–4,15,16 Go McElhinney and colleagues 15 Go published their experience with 9 patients aged less than 6 months with APW in association with IAA who underwent operation between 1972 and 1995. Before 1984, the mortality rate was 33% in those with associated defects, whereas there were no reported deaths subsequent to this point. van Son and colleagues 16 Go reported a similar finding in their historical review of 19 patients with APW not associated with IAA, in which APW division before 1962 was a risk factor for death. All 3 deaths in our series also occurred early in the experience, before 1992.

Surgical repair of APW and IAA includes closure of the APW (either through a transpulmonary, transwindow, or transaortic approach), reconstruction of the arch, and interruption of the ductus arteriosus. 1–3,7–10,13,17 Go Selection of the method of APW repair is influenced in part by the underlying morphology. At present, the transpulmonary approach has been supplanted by the transaortic approach as the preferred technique 1–3,4,15 Go mainly because of a lower rate of reintervention for subsequent pulmonary artery stenosis. 1–3,15 Go In addition, the transaortic approach allows superior visualization of the semilunar valves and coronary artery orifices, especially in type I APW where the left coronary orifice lies in immediate vicinity to the defect, and thus may be intimately involved in the repair. 3,11,15 Go There is no uniform agreement regarding the superiority of either technique. 18,19 Go In 1 series of 14 patients aged more than 1 year, 18 Go adverse outcome was associated with transluminal repair. Others have likewise advocated a transwindow approach. 19 Go Furthermore, implantation of a single patch through a transaortic approach theoretically may increase the potential for recurrence, because complete arterial separation is not achieved. 1 Go Outcomes in our cohort were not associated with the method of APW closure, perhaps because the spectrum of options exercised was narrow. Indeed, the transpulmonary approach was never used.

Although mortality has improved in this population over time, the clinical course of patients after repair was dominated by a high rate of reintervention for both aortic arch and pulmonary artery obstruction. Previous reports have shown similar findings. 1–4,15 Go We identified higher weight at initial repair and type B as incremental risk factors for arch reintervention. This unexpected finding might be because type III APW, which necessitates a more complex repair, was present in 80% (n = 4) of patients with higher weight at initial repair. In addition, patients with higher mean repair weight, and presumptively larger aortic diameter, were less likely to have patch augmentation of their aortic anastomosis. We previously showed that avoidance of patch augmentation is associated with an increased risk of subsequent arch obstruction after IAA repair. 20 Go Reticence to perform patch augmentation likely also contributes to the incidence of bronchial compression, a not infrequent complication in this lesion set that is related to increased anastomotic tension. 1 Go Both patients in our series in whom airway compromise developed underwent direct aortic repair. Although type III APW, patch repair, and an interaction term between repair weight and patch augmentation were explored with multivariable analysis, the small number of events may have hampered our ability to demonstrate a statistical correlation between these variables and outcome.

Type B IAA was also associated with an increased prevalence of arch reintervention. Interruption of the arch proximal to the left subclavian artery increases the degree of aortic mobilization necessary to achieve a tension-free anastomosis. The higher rate of aortic arch obstruction in this morphologic subtype could therefore be related to inadequate mobilization of the descending aorta at the time of initial repair.

Single-stage reconstruction is currently the preferred approach, because early separation of the pulmonary and systemic circulations mitigates against the development of pulmonary hypertension, which can develop rapidly in the presence of uncorrected arterial level shunting. 1–4,21 Go The importance of adequate echocardiographic assessment has been emphasized elsewhere, 1,2,15,22 Go and is underscored in this report. A true degree of APW produces shunting that may be difficult to detect with Doppler, especially where flow may be further diminished by higher pulmonary resistance, or alternatively, by systemic hypotension in the setting of critical left-sided heart obstruction. APW was overlooked in 2 patients in our series who had inadvertent staged repair with the development of attendant postoperative complications secondary to inaccurate preoperative diagnosis.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Data Collection
 Data Analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Erez E, Dagan O, Georghiou GP, Gelber O, Vidne BA, Birk E. Surgical management of aortopulmonary window and associated lesions. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:484-487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bagtharia RI, Trivedi KR, Burkhart HM, et al. Outcomes of patients with an aortopulmonary window and the impact of associated cardiovascular lesions. Cardiol Young 2004;14:473-480.[Medline]
  3. Bagtharia R, Freedom RM, Yoo SJ. Aortopulmonary window. In: Freedom RM, Yoo SJ, Mikailian H, Williams WG, editors. The Natural and Modified History of Congenital Heart Disease. Blackwell, Mass; 2004. pp. 237-240.
  4. Hew CC, Bacha EA, Zurakowski D, del Nido PJ, Mayer JE, Jonas RA. Optimal surgical approach for repair of aortopulmonary window. Cardiol Young 2001;11:385-390.[Medline]
  5. Kutsche LM, Van Meirop LHS. Anatomy and pathogenesis of aorticopulmonary septal defect. Am J Cardiol 1987;59:443-447.[Medline]
  6. Carrel T, Pfammatter JP. Interrupted aortic arch, aorto-pulmonary window and aortic origin of the right pulmonary artery. single stage repair in the neonate. Eur J Cardiothrac Surg 1997;12:668-680.
  7. McMahon CJ, DiBardino DJ, Undar A, Fraser CD. Anomalous origin of left coronary artery from the right pulmonary artery in association with type III aortopulmonary window and interrupted aortic arch. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:919-921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chiu IS, Wang JK, Wang MJ, Wang CC. One-stage repair of aortopulmonary septal defect and interrupted aortic arch. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:1529-1532.[Abstract]
  9. Chiu IS, Wu SJ, Lee ML, et al. One stage repair of interrupted aortic arch and aortopulmonary window with an autologous arterial flap. J Card Surg 1999;14:306-309.[Medline]
  10. Hata H, Shiono M, Sezai Y, Sumitomo N, Otsuka M, Harada K. One-stege repair of interrupted aortic arch and aortopulmonary window. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:829-831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Richardson JV, Doty DB, Rossi NP, Ehrenhaft JL. The spectrum of anomalies of aortopulmonary septation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979;78:21-27.[Abstract]
  12. Celoria GC, Patton RB. Congenital absence of the aortic arch. Am Heart J 1959;58:407-413.[Medline]
  13. Blackstone EH, Naftel DC, Turner ME. The decomposition of time-varying hazard into phases, each incorporating a separate stream of concomitant information. J Am Stat Assoc 1986;81:615-624.
  14. Blackstone EH, Rice TW. Clinical-pathological conference. use and choice of statistical methods for the clinical study, "Superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagus". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:1063-1076.[Free Full Text]
  15. McElhinney DB, Reddy VM, Tworetzky W, Silverman NH, Hanley FL. Early and late results after repair of aortopulmonary septal defect and associated anomalies in infants < 6 months of age. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:195-201.[Medline]
  16. van Son JAM, Puga FJ, Danielson GK, et al. Aortopulmonary window. factors associated with early and late success after surgical treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68:128-133.[Medline]
  17. Doty DB, Richardson JV, Falkovsky GE, Gordonova MI, Burakovsky VI. Aortopulmonary septal defect. hemodynamics, angiography, and operation. Ann Thorac Surg 1881;32:243-250.
  18. Prasad TR, Valiathan MS, Shyamakrishnan KG, Venkitachalam CG. Surgical management of aortopulmonary septal defect. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:877-879.[Abstract]
  19. Tiraboschi R, Salmone G, Crupi G, et al. Aortopulmonary window in the first year of life. report on 11 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;46:438-441.[Abstract]
  20. McCrindle BW, Tchervenkov CI, Konstantinov IE, Neirott RA, Jacobs ML, Blackstone EH. Risk factors associated with mortality and reinterventions in 474 neonates with interruption of the aortic arch. a congenital heart surgeons society study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:343-350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bertolini A, Dalmonte P, Bava GL, et al. Aortopulmonary septal defects. a review of the literature and report of ten cases. J Cardiovasc Surg 1994;35:207-213.
  22. Di Bella I, Gladstone DJ. Surgical management of aortopulmonary window. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:768-770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Yoshida, M. Yamaguchi, Y. Oshima, S. Oka, T. Higuma, and Y. Okita
Single-stage repair of aortopulmonary window with interrupted aortic arch by transection of the aorta and direct reconstruction
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2009; 138(3): 781 - 783.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
P. K. Mishra
Management strategies for interrupted aortic arch with associated anomalies
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2009; 35(4): 569 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
A. Bhan, M. Gupta, S. Abraham, R. Sharma, S. S. Kothari, and R. Juneja
Surgical experience of aortopulmonary window repair in infants
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2007; 6(2): 200 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
I. E. Konstantinov and P. Pohlner
An approach to interrupted aortic arch associated with transposition of the great arteries
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2007; 133(1): 256 - 257.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Igor E. Konstantinov
William G. Williams
Jan M. Quaegebeur
Pedro J. del Nido
Thomas L. Spray
Christopher A. Caldarone
Eugene H. Blackstone
Brian W. McCrindle
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Konstantinov, I. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Konstantinov, I. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - acyanotic
Right arrow Great vessels


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS