|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:1236-1242
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
General Thoracic Surgery |
a Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Coswig Specialised Hospital, Center for Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center, Coswig/Dresden, Germany
b Department of Informatics, Carl Gustav Carus University, Dresden, Germany.
Received for publication June 20, 2005; revisions received November 17, 2005; accepted for publication November 28, 2005. * Address for reprints: Axel Rolle, MD, PhD, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Coswig Specialised Hospital, Center for Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated to the Carl Gustav Carus University Dresden, Neucoswiger Straße 21, D-01640 Coswig/Dresden, Germany (Email: dr.rolle{at}fachkrankenhaus-coswig.de).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1996 to December 2003, a total of 3267 nodules (10/patient) were removed from 328 patients (164 men/164 women, mean age 61 years). Criteria for eligibility were expanded to any primary tumors with no upper limit of metastases given. All parenchymal resections were performed with a new 1318-nm Nd:YAG laser whose effect on lung tissue differs significantly from that of the 1064-nm wavelength owing to a 10-fold higher absorption in water and one-third extinction in blood. In 93%, precision laser resection was achieved. The lobectomy rate was only 7%.
RESULTS: Pathologic examination revealed 2546 metastases (8/patient) and lymph node disease in 19%. Complete resections (R0) were achieved in 93% of 177 patients undergoing unilateral procedures with a mean of 3 metastases (range 1%-29%) and 75% of 151 patients having bilateral operations with a mean of 13 metastases (range 2-124). The 5-year survival after R0 was 55% for solitary nodules, 41% for all patients, 28% for 10 metastases, and 26% for 20 or more metastases resected. Outcome was significantly poorer after incomplete resection (7%). No 30-day mortality was observed. Major postoperative complications included prolonged air leaks (n = 2), intrapleural bleeding (n = 2), and late pneumothorax (n = 2); all were treated successfully with a chest tube.
CONCLUSION: This new 1318-nm Nd:YAG laser facilitates complete resection of multiple bilateral centrally located metastases and thus is lobe sparing. Resection of 20 or more metastases is reasonable because long-term survival was significantly better than that observed with incomplete resection.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The therapeutic value of pulmonary metastasectomy has been gradually accepted and nowadays this operation is routinely performed in many departments, but only in carefully selected cases and commonly for 5 or fewer metastases.
1-4
So that a more extensive database would be available for areas of major controversy (the selection of patients, the maximum number of resectable metastases, the role of bilateral surgery, the significance of secondary lymph node metastases, and surgical techniques), the International Registry of Lung Metastases (IRLM) was launched in 1990 and the results of 5206 cases were reported in 1997.
4
The study confirmed that metastasectomy in general is a potentially curative treatment, even for patients having redo surgery and for those with higher numbers of metastases. However, despite these encouraging results, a classification of prognostic groups was offered, leading again to more restricted selection of patients.
With the results of our institution's study we want to report on a new 1318-nm wavelength Nd:YAG laser system that we have developed. This laser facilitates lobe-sparing precision resection of a large number of metastases and thus improves complete resection, which is the most important prognostic factor after surgery. As a result of systematic lymph node dissection in all patients, we can offer additional results for metastasectomy with concomitant lymph node disease in patients with epithelial primary tumors in a clinical setting previously considered to have a poor prognosis. Furthermore, we want to encourage progressive expansion of eligibility of patients for salvage surgery and strengthen the role of pulmonary metastasectomy in the interdisciplinary treatment of metastatic disease.
| Patients and Method |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Indications for Laser Metastasectomy
Criteria for progressively expanded eligibility for laser metastasectomy are indicated in Table 1, whereas exclusion criteria are the same as for thoracic surgery generally. After evaluation for complete resection of the original tumor and other extrathoracic metastases, we accepted any primary malignancy with single or multiple, synchronous or bilateral lung metastases. No limit to the number of metastases was given, but assessment of functional and technical resectability by a thoracic surgeon experienced with this special laser technique was mandatory as well as routine examination with a flexible bronchoscope. Furthermore, patients with suspected N2 lymph node disease in their preoperative computed tomographic scans had transtracheal, transbifurcal, or transesophageal biopsy of lymph nodes with combined rigid and flexible bronchoscopy or endosonography. Only patients with unilateral N2 disease and suspected resectability were included. In case of subcarinal lymph nodes, only solitary nodules were accepted.
|
Systematic lymph node sampling according to Naruke's classification
11a
was mandatory; in cases of N2 disease, mediastinal dissection was performed. Resection was considered complete if no macroscopic chest disease remained in situ and resection margins were negative for tumor. In the presence of lymph nodes, they had to be resected with no gross or microscopic capsular escape.
Demographics and Procedures
From January 1996 to December 2003, a total of 328 patients, 164 men and 164 women with a mean age of 61 years (range 20-80 years) were eligible for enrollment in this single center and institutional review boarded retrospective study. They underwent 484 thoracotomies. A mean hospital stay of 10 days was observed, comparable with that of German thoracic departments. Complete follow-up (mean 31 months, range 1-198 months, median 22.5 months) was achieved for all patients. In only 23 patients (7%) were we unable to clarify whether the recurrence of metastases was pulmonary or extrathoracic (or both) and thus the differentiation of recurrence remained unclear. A total of 3267 nodules (10/patient) were removed. Despite the 40% central location of metastases, in 93% precision sublobar laser resection was achieved. In only 7% a lobectomy or a bronchoangioplastic procedure was necessary. Pathologic examination revealed 2546 metastases (8/patient), 20% benign lesions, and simultaneous lymph node metastases in 19%. Under these conditions, complete resection was achieved in 93% of 177 patients undergoing unilateral procedures with a mean of 3 metastases resected per patient (range 1-29) and 75% of 151 patients having bilateral operations with a mean of 13 metastases removed per patient (range 2-124). Causes of incomplete resections in 50 patients (15%) were unexpected intraoperative miliary spread of metastases, unresectable lymph node disease, or pleural dissemination of the tumor excluding the patients from further surgery. For 22 patients, incomplete resection was the result after the first surgery and the operation for the second side was not performed. Ninety-one percent of the primary tumors were epithelial tumors (carcinoma), with kidney cancer as the leading primary tumor (n = 112) followed by colorectal (n = 91) and breast cancer (n = 35). Sarcoma and melanoma were found in only 6% and 3%, respectively. Table 2
shows the distribution of primary tumors.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Overall survival for all cell types was 81%, 53%, and 35% for 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. The most important prognostic factor for survival was completeness of resection (Figure 1). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals for patients having complete resection, with a mean of 8 metastases removed per patient, were 85%, 59%, and 41% versus 60%, 23%, and 7% for those having incomplete resection (P < .0001). No statistical significance (P = .2) was found when complete resections including regional lymph nodes (R0 N1/2) were compared with complete resections without lymph node disease (R0 N0) (Figure 2).
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Complete resection is the most important prognostic factor and thus functional and technical resectability should be the central criteria of eligibility. When complete resection is gained, a 5-year survival of 41% is observed, all cell types included, and no significantly poorer outcome was seen for associated lymph node disease and bilateral resections. In contrast to many other studies, our study found no significance for the outcome between patients with solitary and multiple (up to 9) metastases.
1-4
Patients with a disease-free interval greater than 36 months showed significantly better survivals (55%), but patients with a mean of 8 synchronous metastases (<12 months) who underwent complete resection still had 5-year survival of 34%. In summary, we want to assert that the prognostic value of traditional factors (solitary, disease-free interval, number) is diminished if the technical ability to perform a complete resection can be improved. We found these arguments further confirmed with a 5-year survival of 36% for patients with 4 or more, 28% for 10 or more, and finally 26% for 20 or more metastases completely resected.
We conclude that this new 1318-nm laser system improves any kind of lung parenchymal resection, facilitates complete resection of multiple bilateral and centrally located metastases, and thus is lobe sparing. Owing to our results, we believe that these resections are reasonable and worthwhile. For the immediate future we expect to have a sufficient number of patients enrolled in our study to allow us to evaluate results according to cell type. And because a growing number of centers having taken over this technology, we should be able to start a prospective randomized trial analyzing the value of multimodality treatment in combination with a laser metastasectomy.
| Limitations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
I was surprised and impressed that the rate of lobectomy was 3-fold less than what was seen in the international registry. Do you find that your need to perform a lobectomy is now based more on the central location of the lesion or is it based more on the fact that there are so many lesions in a given lobe that you in fact have to perform a lobectomy?
Dr Rolle. The lobectomy rate could be lowered as much as 7% in this series compared with other series, in which the lobectomy rate is 20% to 25%. The cases in which we have to do a lobectomy involve very great metastases located with the central vessels. These are the only cases in which we have to perform lobectomy or bronchoplastic surgery.
Dr Jones. Part of the premise of using the 1318-nm laser is that you are actually preserving lung parenchyma. Do you have any pulmonary function data on these patients before and then after metastasectomy? Were you able to make a retrospective comparison between an older group of patients who had staples used for their metastasectomy and your current, laser-treated group to see whether you actually are preserving lung parenchyma?
Dr Rolle. That is a very interesting question. We had measurements of all ventilatory parameters preoperatively and postoperatively. I don't have the statistical analysis yet, but we will do it. We could see that after 3 months and 6 months, most of the patients who have had resection of more than 30 or 40 metastases returned to a lung function between 80% and 90% of the preoperative value.
Dr Jones. Finally, how do you handle the more central aspect of this "sculpted" resection, if you will, of the metastatic lesions as you begin to approach the larger vessels centrally in the segmental bronchi?
Dr Rolle. If we have to operate very close to the central vessels, we secure it by vessel-loop. However, with some experience, we can approach very close even to the hilar structures. For example, if we have a resection with metastases of a diameter of 6 or 7 cm, then we come to the segmental level and we finally resign ourselves to suturing the segmented bronchus and segmented artery. This is necessary. But the advantage is that one can oncologically safely go around the parenchymal tissue and come up to this level within the lobe.
Dr Joseph Zwischenberger (Galveston, Tex). When I first heard of Dr Rolle's work on the new laser 4 years ago in Germany, I said to myself, this is important, if true. Since that time I have evaluated this technology in my own laboratory, Dr Tom Daniels presented work at this meeting validating this technology, and now Dr Rolle is presenting 5-year follow-up on metastasectomy. What I can say is that this work is important and true. What I ask Dr Rolle is, how do you plan on allowing distribution of this new technology?
Dr Rolle. We have some progress in Europe. In the meantime, more than 35 centers have taken over this technology in Germany and Austria and Italy and so on. The next step for this country is approval by the Food and Drug Administration. I hope that the company will come over with this in the near future.
Dr Zwischenberger. Excellent work.
Dr Adelheid End (Vienna, Austria). Do you perform mediastinal lymphadenectomy in all patients and how does it influence your strategy of adjuvant therapy?
Dr Rolle. We did systematic lymphadenectomy. I think all these metastasectomies should go through the same techniques then with bronchocarcinoma. We did systematic lymph node resection in every patient. I will give you the numbers: 14% of those having complete resections had lymph node disease and 85%, N2 disease. We were surprised that the results were very good with complete resections. So we extended the indication and included patients with unilateral N2 disease, not with bilateral disease. They are not operated on.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-C. Chung, C.-C. Hsieh, H.-C. Lee, M.-H. Wu, M.-H. Huang, W.-H. Hsu, and H.-S. Hsu Accuracy of helical computed tomography in the detection of pulmonary colorectal metastases J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2011; 141(5): 1207 - 1212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Welter, D. Theegarten, T. Trarbach, F. Maletzki, G. Stamatis, and M. Totsch Safety distance in the resection of colorectal lung metastases: A prospective evaluation of satellite tumor cells with immunohistochemistry J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2011; 141(5): 1218 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schramm, D. Wormanns, G. Leschber, and J. Merk Reliability of a computer-aided detection system in detecting lung metastases compared to manual palpation during surgery, Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, January 1, 2011; 12(1): 20 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pennathur, G. Abbas, I. Qureshi, M. J. Schuchert, Y. Wang, S. Gilbert, R. J. Landreneau, and J. D. Luketich Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Pulmonary Metastases Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2009; 87(4): 1030 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Treasure Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: weak evidence and no randomised trials Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, February 1, 2008; 33(2): 300 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Treasure Editorial comment: Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, August 1, 2007; 32(2): 354 - 355. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pfannschmidt, H. Dienemann, and H. Hoffmann Surgical Resection of Pulmonary Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Published Series Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 84(1): 324 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |