JTCS KCI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert James Cerfolio
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cerfolio, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cerfolio, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer
Right arrow Lung - other

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:1423-1424
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Letter to the Editor

Reply to the Editor

Robert James Cerfolio, MD

Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1900 University Blvd, THT 712, Birmingham, AL 35294

We appreciate the letter from Dr Maniwa and colleagues. The authors have tried to confirm our results in their own study. The authors have retrospectively, I believe, compared the pain scores in patients using a "6-point scale pain score." My understanding from their letter is that they assessed the pain for "4 hours after lung surgery." If I understand their study correctly, and I apologize if I do not, I invite them to perform a prospective randomized study between 2 similar groups and to compare the patients' pain several days, weeks, and even months after the operation by using an objective reproducible scale. As for their explanation as to why they found no difference, I would cite the methodology difference between our 2 studies. Importantly, we strongly disagree that cutting the rib leads to less pain. There is no data for that concept, and our opinion is that, if anything, it might lead to more pain because the intercostal nerve might be injured when the rib is shingled. We used to perform our thoracotomies in this manner but changed our technique in 1997. Finally, the authors also decided to analyze the blood loss difference between the patients who had an intercostal muscle flap harvested compared with that in the group that did not have a flap. In our experience there is almost no blood loss during the harvesting of an intercostal muscle flap. As described in our article, we do it using the Bovie and hug the undersurface of the top rib so as to avoid the neurovascular bundle. The bundle is very close, and it is not uncommon to have small side branches that have to be bovied, but the amount of bleeding is negligible. In this respect our studies have similar findings. We thank Dr Maniwa and his colleagues for their interest in our article and wish them well.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert James Cerfolio
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cerfolio, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cerfolio, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer
Right arrow Lung - other


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS