|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:116-123
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Cardiothoracic Transplantation |
a Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
b Sick Children's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Received for publication October 9, 2005; revisions received December 16, 2005; accepted for publication December 22, 2005. * Address for reprints: Stephen R. Large, Consultant Cardiothoracic Surgeon, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB3 8RE, UK. (Email: Stephen.Large{at}papworth.nhs.uk).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Patients with and without brain death were enrolled. A total of 33 consecutive heart donors (5 live, "domino" donors) and 10 patients undergoing coronary surgery (coronary artery bypass graft controls) were studied with pressure-volume loops in the right ventricle. Contractile reserve was measured with dopamine stimulation.
RESULTS: Brain-dead donors had a higher mean cardiac index than coronary artery bypass graft controls (3.3 vs 2.8 L/min/m2), but impaired load-independent indices. Despite increased right ventricle stroke volume, the ejection fraction and slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship were significantly reduced in brain-dead donors compared with controls. Diastolic abnormalities were also manifest as increased end-diastolic volume index and prolonged Tau (P < .05). Dopamine improved cardiac output, but without influencing end-systolic pressure-volume relationship, or Tau, and at the expense of further increased right ventricle end-diastolic volume. Before explantation, a significantly higher diastolic volume was also seen in hearts that developed postoperative dysfunction compared with organs without this complication (114.4 vs 77.2 mL/m2, P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Brain death leads to right ventricle dysfunction, which may go undetected with conventional techniques. Right ventricle dilatation could represent an early marker of failure. Refinement of selection criteria to include load-independent indices of performance may be desirable to help expand the donor pool.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The complex hemodynamic milieu in the donor and imprecise methods of evaluation confound accurate assessment of donor heart function. We have advocated the use of the pulmonary catheter for donor resuscitation,
2
currently incorporated in the recommended algorithm of donor management that includes echocardiography.
4
However, ventricular parameters obtained by thermodilution or echocardiography are load-dependent, and because of its geometry, the RV is even more difficult to assess by conventional echocardiography than the left ventricle.
5
Furthermore, the relationship between load and intrinsic contractility is complex, and this interaction is particularly difficult to evaluate in the RV. Major changes in both contractility and load do occur, and there is ample evidence that the RV is predominantly affected.
6-9
Hours after brain death there is a decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance and an increase in pulmonary blood flow, predisposing to "neurogenic" edema.
6
Simultaneously, the preload recruitable stroke work decreases in both ventricles.
7
Others argued that the ventricular dysfunction seen in the brain-dead donor is partly adaptive and that its adverse effects can be reduced by judicious control of loading conditions.
8,9
Ventricular pressure-volume loop measurement by conductance catheter technology is relatively load-independent and represents the gold standard for contractile evaluation. Understanding how the RV adapts after brain death and to what extent the adverse changes are compensatory would help in donor selection and, perhaps, improve donorrecipient physiologic matching. We designed a study aimed to measure load-independent RV systolic and diastolic function in brain-dead, optimized human donors in comparison with domino (live) donors and nontransplant patients undergoing coronary surgery (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] controls). In limited subgroup analyses we also compared usable and unused hearts, according to current Swan-Ganz catheter selection criteria, and donor hearts with and without subsequent early dysfunction in the recipient.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
1 of the following: intra-aortic balloon pulsation, pulmonary vasodilators,
3 inotropes). Global graft dysfunction was diagnosed in the presence of borderline hemodynamics (cardiac index < 2.5 L/min/m2, wedge pressure > 15 mm Hg) and the need for special therapies as defined above.
Pressure-Volume Loops Acquisition
Load-independent indices were measured by a technique described in detail elsewhere.
10
All studies were performed with patients under general anesthesia after donor optimization and before the institution of cardiopulmonary bypass in the CABG and domino groups. Because of time and logistical constraints a recipient study was only possible in 6 heart recipients, all of whom were recipients of brain-dead donors.
Cardiac output in brain-dead and domino donors was measured by thermodilution, whereas in controls a flow probe was applied around the pulmonary artery. For pressure-volume loops a 7F catheter with an incorporated solid-state pressure transducer (Millar Instruments Inc, Houston, Tex) was inserted through a small sheath in the RV infundibulum. Pressure-volume loops were recorded at steady state, during parallel conductance determination, and during preload variation, achieved by transient inferior caval snaring over at least 5 consecutive cardiac cycles. All results were averaged from at least 2 measurements. The conductance signal was generated and processed in a Sigma-5 DF unit (Leycom, Leiden, The Netherlands). Parallel conductance was calculated from the intersection of end-systolic and end-diastolic points after injection of 7 mL of 10% saline at steady-state conditions (apnea). All volume measurements were corrected for the gain constant
calculated from the thermodilution or flow probe cardiac output. End diastole was defined by the R wave of the electrocardiogram, and end systole was defined by the maximum pressure/volume for each cardiac cycle. Data were analyzed off-line to obtain systolic and diastolic indices and the maximal (dp/dtmax) and minimal (dp/dtmin) rate of ventricular pressure change. End-systolic pressure-volume relationships (ESPVR) and end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (EDPVR) pressure-volume relationships were produced by linear regression of consecutive points in families of pressure-volume loops obtained during caval occlusion. The slopes of these relationships are presented and expressed in millimeters of mercury per milliliter. The time constant of pressure decay (Tau), describing early active relaxation, was derived by the half-pressure method. Cardiac output, end-diastolic volume, stroke volume, and preload recruitable stroke work were indexed by body surface area.
Contractile reserve was assessed using dopamine, the most common inotrope in donor management in the United Kingdom, infused at 5 µg/kg/min over 7 minutes. Testing was done in usable donors after optimization, infusing dopamine over and above any preexisting inotropic load. This protocol was not instituted in 2 brain-dead donors and 1 domino because of time constraints. The stress protocol was not performed in the historical CABG-control group either.
Statistics
Because pressure-volume loop indices are typically normally distributed, parametric statistical methods were used. Results are summarized as mean (standard deviation) in Tables 1 and 2,
and mean with 95% confidence intervals in Figures 1 to 3.
We used 1-way analysis of variance for comparisons between 2 or more independent groups. Where analysis of variance was significant we compared pairs of groups, adjusting for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni correction. Outcome measurements from pre- to postdopamine and pre- to posttransplantation were compared using paired Student t tests. Because this study is exploratory and all cardiac indices measured are important, each variable was assessed independently and no further adjustments for multiple comparison tests were made.
|
|
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brain-Dead Donors, Domino Donors, and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Group
Brain-dead donors had a higher mean cardiac index than the CABG group; the ejection fraction was lower, but the stroke volume and heart rate were higher (Table 1, Figure 2, A). However, when volumetric parameters derived with the conductance catheter were included, donor hearts were significantly more dilated (end-diastolic volume index [EDVI] 89.6 mL/m2 in brain-dead donors compared with 55.9 mL/m2 in CABG group, P = .02). ESPVR was also significantly lower in brain-dead donors, reflecting a reduced contractile state. Tau, an index of isovolumic relaxation, was lower in brain-dead donors than in the CABG group (58.8 vs 87.5 ms, P = .06). EDPVR describes late diastole and was elevated in brain-dead donors, meaning increased chamber stiffness, but the parameter had a large variability. The 5 domino hearts faced a higher pulmonary vascular resistance before retrieval and had a higher resting rate than cadaveric organs. Mean load-dependent indices were increased compared with the CABG group: stroke volume index, 23%; dp/dtmax, 55%; dp/dtmin, 179%; and preload recruitable stroke work index, 28%. Mean load-independent parameters showed a 20% reduction in ESPVR compared with the CABG group, a mean EDVI greater by 56%, and reduced early and late measures of diastole (Tau 36% lower and EDPVR 64% higher than average values in the CABG group).
Contractile Reserve in Brain-Dead Donors
After dopamine stimulation the cardiac index increased in brain-dead donors through higher heart rate and stroke volume, leading to a better preload recruitable stroke work index (Table 1, Figure 3). The ventricular chamber was more dilated, but the contractile indices ESPVR, EDPVR, and Tau were not improved.
Usable Versus Unused Hearts from Brain-Dead Donors
With the exception of Tau, none of the parameters studied were significantly different between these 2 groups of patients (Table 2). ESPVR showed marked variability in hearts with poor function (see "Discussion"). Unused hearts had a trend toward lower EDPVR.
Donor Organ Dysfunction
Table 2 shows donor studies from the 19 brain-dead donors, classified according to allograft dysfunction in the recipient. Before explantation, hearts that went on to develop posttransplant dysfunction were significantly more dilated than organs not associated with this complication (EDVI 114.4 vs 77.2 mL/m2, P = .02). There were no other important findings in this comparison, so the subdivision of right versus global allograft failure was not investigated further.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brain-Dead Donors, Domino Donors, and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Group
Systole
Both the domino and brain-dead donors had impaired RV contractility, although likely for different reasons. Loss and even reversal of the normal force-frequency relationship
13
may be a manifestation of the chronic RV dysfunction seen in cystic fibrosis, which can be demonstrated subclinically.
11
All of the domino donors were symptomatic from end-stage lung disease, a situation associated with progressive pulmonary hypertension and overt RV failure. This is compatible with the findings of an increased intraoperative pulmonary vascular resistance, RV dilatation, and reduced contractility. A higher ejection phase index dp/dtmax seen in domino donors is in keeping with the known adaptation imposed by chronic pulmonary hypertension and should not be interpreted as "superior" systolic function.
11,14
We lacked pulmonary vascular resistance data in the CABG group, so this comparison with controls was not possible.
The mechanisms for reduced RV contractility seen in brain-dead donors may be more complex. The process of brain death itself is associated with marked ventricular dysfunction,
1,6-9
there are multiple potential secondary effects of resuscitation in the donor, and there is a variably prolonged period of ischemia between harvest and implantation. In animal experiments pulmonary vascular resistance after brain death is an unresolved issue, partly because of various study methods used. Bittner and colleagues
6
showed that brain death leads to decreased afterload, with no change in the transvascular pulmonary efficiency of the RV, whereas Szabo and colleagues
8
did not replicate these findings in the presence of a tighter control of loading conditions. It is therefore possible that the reduced ESPVR seen in brain-dead donors in this study represents RV adaptation to decreased afterload. This would be an illustration of the Anrepp effect (homeometric autoregulation), which is also at work in the left ventricle of brain-dead animals exhibiting decreased systemic vascular resistance,
9
and in newborn lambs whose RV is subjected to an acute increase in afterload.
15
Even if ejection fraction and stroke volume index are comparable in our 3 groups, the impact of brain death on RV function is most apparent when EDVI is observed. Brain-dead donors with an average age of 39.2 years have end-diastolic volumes higher than in domino donors with chronic pulmonary hypertension and significantly higher than in older patients in the CABG group. More research is needed to determine beyond what level the RV dilatation after brain death is maladaptive and favors organ failure.
Diastole
The difference in isovolumic relaxation between the 3 groups, described by dp/dtmin, is difficult to interpret given their markedly different loading conditions. Our findings are comparable to other published results correlating dp/dtmin and contractile indices in lambs
16
and in humans with ischemic heart disease.
17
Although diastolic compliance, as measured by EDPVR, was not significantly different between the 2 groups, dp/dtmin was higher and Tau was shorter in donor hearts compared with controls. This pattern of diastolic response is in keeping with the known load and heart-rate dependence of the relaxation indices,
16
and is likely therefore to represent secondary adaptive phenomena. Primary abnormalities of diastolic performance do not seem to provide an explanation for the abnormal donor physiology described in our patients. It must be emphasized that the open chestopen pericardium nature of our investigations mitigates against demonstrating more subtle disturbances, or ventricular-ventricular interactions that could be manifest with the chest closed.
Contractile Reserve in Brain-Dead Donors
Inotropic stimulation increased cardiac output as a product of higher heart rate and increased stroke volume (Figure 3). The pattern of response to dopamine was highly abnormal, however. There was no change in ESPVR, and the increased stroke volume was achieved not by a reduction in end-systolic volume, but by a paradoxic increase in RV end-diastolic volume. This is a manifestation of pump failure, with the RV dilating in response to the increased preload, presumably from increased left heart output. Again, the open chest preparation precludes further analysis, but our data support the tenuous nature of cardiac function in transplanted hearts from brain-dead donors. It is easy to see how modest changes in RV preload as a result of volume transfusion, or even as paradoxic result of inotropic stimulation, could lead to RV failure and subsequent allograft dysfunction. Indeed, we previously showed that isolated right heart dilatation may have adverse effects on left ventricular contractile efficiency, which is amplified when the pericardium is closed.
18
The relationship between inotropic usage and donor organ outcomes was analyzed elsewhere, using both thermodilution
19
and the conductance catheter.
20
Until more research is available in donorrecipient risk matching, clinicians should be cautious in using cadaveric donor hearts with high doses of inotropes.
Usable Versus Unused Hearts from Brain-Dead Donors
"Usability" was defined in terms of the extended criteria currently operating at Papworth.
19
The unused hearts were no different, in terms of objective measurements of RV contractility, compared with the hearts that were transplanted. The number of unusable hearts was small, so it is impossible to comment on the potential of the conductance catheter to expand the donor pool. Our data suggest that further cross-sectional studies should be performed to assess the utility of this technique in selecting viable hearts. It is conceivable that, similar to high-energy phosphates when used as a descriptor of function,
21
abnormal donor hearts already fail the "usability" test of a new technology on conventional criteria or simply reflect the fluid or inotropic load. For example, 1 of the unused donors was receiving dopamine, noradrenaline, and adrenaline (in doses of 8, 0.07, and 0.01 µg · kg · min, respectively) and exhibited a markedly outlying ESPVR at 1.99 mm Hg/mL, also accounting for the high variability of this parameter.
Donor Organ Dysfunction
This complication is notoriously multifactorial, and, although it was not an objective of the study, we have been unable to identify a predictive contractile index. Variables associated with donor organ failure can be reasonably classified as related to the donor, operation, and recipient. An example in each category would be brain death, long ischemic time, and pulmonary hypertension, respectively, each of these being implicated in posttransplant function. Despite the cumbersome technology involved, another group used the conductance catheter in the left ventricle of 14 human donors and showed that ventriculoarterial coupling in the systemic circulation is a predictor of posttransplant performance,
22
in keeping with subsequent experimental work by Szabo and colleagues.
8,9
It is remarkable that in this study hearts with posttransplant dysfunction were significantly more dilated at the baseline, a possible early marker of failure (Table 2). The fact that the EDVI in hearts turned down on functional grounds (by conventional criteria) was not particularly elevated makes EDVI a questionable marker of organ quality (Table 2). It seems that other factors, some still unknown, related to ischemic time, reperfusion, and recipient came into play. Of these we only compared ischemic time and transpulmonary gradient between the 2 groups, with no significant difference (Table 2). It is difficult to separate the true effect of transplantation because cardiopulmonary bypass per se transiently impairs systolic and diastolic pressure-volume indices.
10
In regard to posttransplant adaptation, in a separate limited analysis we previously showed that dp/dtmax is able to increase in the recipient despite implantation in a circulation with a much higher pulmonary vascular resistance.
21
Less invasive, load-independent studies of contractility, now possible with tissue Doppler technology,
23
may permit these issues to be studied further in larger patient groups.
Limitations
This was a pragmatic exploratory study of consecutive donor hearts in humans, which necessarily lacks the controls of an experimental preparation. Thus, the effects, type, and time interval from brain death were all variable. Although this work provides unique insights into RV contractile responses, it also has some deficiencies. Because of logistic constraints we could not obtain data on the left ventricle and septum. Measurements with the pericardium closed and ventriculoarterial coupling data are also lacking. Nonetheless, our data clearly demonstrate abnormal RV physiology and inotropic responses in donor hearts compared with controls. The use of data from patients with ischemic heart disease who undergo CABG, although not ideal, was also based on pragmatism. It is clearly unethical to obtain comparative open-chest conductance, catheter-derived data concerning RV function in entirely healthy subjects. It should be emphasized that although the control patients were hemodynamically stable with no overt ischemia at the time of study, we cannot exclude some intrinsic abnormalities of function in this group. However, any dysfunction would likely obviate differences by comparison with donor hearts, and therefore do not undermine our conclusions. Finally, the number of patients studied represent one of the largest subjected to such detailed hemodynamic assessment, but cannot be expected to provide information regarding the utility of these measurements in patient selection. Larger cross-sectional studies using conductance catheter-derived criteria would be required to answer such questions. A bigger study, specifically focused on posttransplant dysfunction, would be able to account better for the multiple competing factors leading to this complication. In addition, for many of the comparisons there was sufficient power to identify only major differences; more moderate effects may become evident in larger studies.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| See related editorial on page 10.
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Rudd and G. P. Dobson Toward a new cold and warm nondepolarizing, normokalemic arrest paradigm for orthotopic heart transplantation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2009; 137(1): 198 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Large Invited commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 58 - 59. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Harken Brain death leads to abnormal contractile properties of the human donor right ventricle J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2006; 132(1): 10 - 11. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |