JTCS Click here to go to SJM website.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ott, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ott, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery
Right arrow Transplantation - heart

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:170-173
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Brief Communication

Robotic minimally invasive cell transplantation for heart failure

Harald C. Ott, MD a , Johannes Brechtken, MD b , Cory Swingen, PhD c , Tanya M. Feldberg, BS a , Thomas S. Matthiesen, BS a , Samuel A. Barnes, BS a , Wendy Nelson, PhD a , Doris A. Taylor, PhD a , *

a Center for Cardiovascular Repair, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
b Division of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn
c Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn

Received for publication November 19, 2005; revisions received February 1, 2006; accepted for publication February 21, 2006.

* Address for reprints: Doris A. Taylor, PhD, Center for Cardiovascular Repair, University of Minnesota, 312 Church St SE, BSBE 7, Minneapolis, MN 55455. (Email: dataylor{at}umn.edu).


Figure 1
Drs Swingen, Matthiesen, Nelson, Ott, Taylor, and Brechten (left to right)


Cardiac cell transplantation offers new opportunities as a potent therapeutic tool to improve left ventricular (LV) function and reverse postinfarction remodeling in ischemic heart disease. Skeletal myoblasts (SKMBs) engraft within infarcted myocardium, form myotubes, induce angiogenesis, and improve both diastolic and systolic LV function. 1 Go Bone marrow–derived mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) likewise engraft, increase angiogenesis, and improve myocardial perfusion. 2 Go Both cell types have moved to clinical testing, and preclinical studies suggest that they could have synergistic functional benefits that argue for combined transplantation. 3,4 Go Intramyocardial injections are currently performed either percutaneously through an endoventricular or transvenous approach or surgically through a thoracotomy or sternotomy. We recently reported a video-assisted thoracoscopic technique to reduce invasiveness and perioperative risk of surgical cell delivery that was tested in uninjured swine hearts. 5 Go In the setting of heart failure (HF), mechanical manipulation of the left ventricle both by means of stabilization and cell injection must be minimized to prevent hemodynamic compromise, arrhythmia, and ventricular perforation. Robotically assisted cardiac surgery combines the advantages of minimal invasiveness and thoracoscopic access but adds a 3-dimensional view and 7 degrees of freedom that requires less cardiac manipulation than with the 2-dimensional view and limited freedom of motion of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. 6 Go We therefore propose a robot-assisted, beating-heart cell transplantation technique for use in severe HF to increase safety, optimize targeting, and reduce procedural time.

Procedure Description

Eleven injured swine in which HF was previously induced by means of coronary occlusion and coronary embolism (left anterior descending coronary artery, n = 9; circumflex artery, n = 2) underwent robot-assisted cell (n = 7) or vehicle (n = 4) injection by using the daVinci robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, Calif). During right single-lung ventilation and antiarrhythmic prophylaxis (amiodarone, 3 mg/kg; lidocaine, 1 mg/kg), we inserted the camera port, 2 instrument ports, and an auxiliary port (Figure 1, A). After removal of the pericardial fat pad, we incised the pericardium along the sternal border, dissected pericardial adhesions, and created a triangular pericardial flap. We inserted the prefilled injection needle (27-gauge needle attached to 12-inch tubing; Saf-T E-Z Set, BD, Sandy, Utah) through the auxiliary port and injected a 7-mL cell suspension containing a combination of 2.9 x 108 ± 5.9 x 107 autologous SKMBs and 1.1 x 108 ± 6.8 x 106 autologous BM-MNCs (Figure 1, B) at 6 to 10 sites. SKMBs were iron oxide labeled, as previously described. 5 Go Viability at the time of injection was greater than 85%, and CD56 expression was greater than 80%. BM-MNCs were acutely isolated from bone marrow aspirate through Ficoll density gradient centrifugation. Injections were performed tangentially to minimize perforation risk and injectate backflow, covering a target area of 15 to 20 cm2. After cell delivery, the pericardial flap was readapted, all instrument ports were removed, and the left lung was expanded under visual control. We inserted a chest tube through the inferior instrument port, closed the port sites in 3 layers, and flushed the left thoracic cavity with 0.9% saline (200 mL). After removal of the chest tube, animals were extubated and recovered according to postoperative standards. Baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed 5 weeks after myocardial injury. Follow-up MRI was repeated at 4 and 7 weeks after cell/vehicle transplantation.


Figure 1
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Schematic of robotic cell transplantation using the daVinci surgical robot. Swine are placed in the supine position and slightly rotated to the right, with elevated shoulders to expand the intercostal spaces. The camera port (a) is placed in the fifth, instrument ports (b) are placed in the third and seventh, and the auxiliary port is placed in the sixth (c) intercostal spaces. The 27-gauge winged injection needle (d) is inserted through the auxiliary port, allowing multiple tangential injections into the target area (shown in purple). B, Intrathoracic view of the injection device before and during intramyocardial injection. During injection, the rubber wings of the needle allow safe guidance but minimize the mechanical force applied to the left ventricular wall during slow injection.

 
Results

Cell transplantation was completed successfully in 6 of 7 cases. Intractable ventricular fibrillation occurred in one animal during cell injection. No conversion to open chest surgery was necessary, and no other procedure-related complications occurred. Over the course of the study, single-lung ventilation time was reduced to a minimum of 23 minutes, and total anesthesia time was reduced to a minimum of 44 minutes. Cells were successfully transplanted into the apical, anterior, and lateral target regions of the left ventricle, including into thinned sections of the scar (target region wall thickness, 3-14 mm), without ventricular perforation. Postoperative MRI studies confirmed retention of iron oxide–labeled cells in the apex (Figure 2, A) and lateral wall (Figure 2, B) up to 7 weeks after injection. Prussian blue staining of tissue sections showed engraftment of iron oxide–labeled myotubes in treated areas (Figure 2, C). Immunofluorescent staining for slow skeletal myosin confirmed the skeletal muscle phenotype (Figure 2, D). Functional data are shown in Table 1.


Figure 2
View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Upper panels, Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cine images showing long-axis views of 2 cell-treated hearts. Cells are visible as signal voids (black dots) in the contrast-enhanced (shown in white) apical region (A) and the lateral wall (B) of the left ventricle (white arrows). LV, Left ventricle; LA, left atrium. Lower panels, Corresponding histologic sections of a cell-treated region at low and high magnification. C, Engrafted iron oxide–labeled myoblasts within the fibrotic infarction scar stain with Prussian blue (black arrows and arrowheads). D, Immunofluorescent staining for slow skeletal myosin (shown in green) shows the expression of skeletal muscle proteins in engrafted cells (white arrows and arrowheads), suggesting cell differentiation. Nuclei within the section are evidenced by fluorescent blue 4',6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Functional measurements from contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging studies performed 5 weeks after myocardial injury (baseline) and 4 and 7 weeks after cell or vehicle transplantation
 
Discussion

Within the past few years, robot-assisted surgery has revolutionized minimally invasive cardiac surgery, allowing complex procedures to be performed on the beating heart. Its major advantages are increased degrees of freedom, 3-dimensional vision, and magnification of the operating field. Furthermore, it combines minimally invasive access with improved targeting and a decreased risk of hemodynamic compromise and ventricular perforation, making it amenable to patients with severely impaired LV function and remodeling who are not necessarily amenable to endoscopic procedures. In the present study the robot-assisted technique allowed controlled cell delivery to the anterior, apical, and lateral regions of the left ventricle, with minimal requirement for stabilization and mechanical manipulation. In contrast to current catheter-based transventricular approaches, safe treatment of target segments with a wall thickness of less than 5 mm was achievable. Although efficacy was a secondary end point of the present study, the improved LV function after cell delivery reinforces the feasibility of this procedure. A more thorough investigation, including larger experimental groups, will be necessary to clarify whether the herein proposed combination of autologous SKMBs and BM-MNCs is superior to the isolated transplantation of each cell type. If this is the case, as suggested by other preclinical studies, 3,4 Go our proposed protocol would offer a streamlined option to provide patients with HF a combination of autologous SKMBs and BM-MNCs in one minimally invasive procedure.

In summary, this new method might provide a feasible option for patients who are currently not eligible for surgical cell transplantation. It combines the benefits of a surgical approach with the reduction of perioperative risk associated with a minimally invasive procedure. Further investigation is required to clarify whether the efficacy of robotic cell transplantation equals direct surgical and catheter-based injection.

Acknowledgments

We thank experimental surgical services and research animal resources at the University of Minnesota for diligent and expert assistance in animal anesthesia and perioperative care.

Footnotes

This work was supported in part by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/National Institutes of Health awards to Dr Taylor (R-01 HL-63346, HL-63703).

References

  1. Taylor DA, Atkins BZ, Hungspreugs P, Jones TR, Reedy MC, Hutcheson KA, et al. Regenerating functional myocardium. improved performance after skeletal myoblast transplantation. Nat Med 1998;4:929-933.[Medline]
  2. Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, Jakoniuk I, Anderson SM, Li B, et al. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature 2001;410:701-705.[Medline]
  3. Ott HC, Bonaros N, Marksteiner R, Wolf D, Margreiter E, Schachner T, et al. Combined transplantation of skeletal myoblasts and bone marrow stem cells for myocardial repair in rats. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:627-634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Memon IA, Sawa Y, Miyagawa S, Taketani S, Matsuda H. Combined autologous cellular cardiomyoplasty with skeletal myoblasts and bone marrow cells in canine hearts for ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:646-653.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Thompson RB, Parsa CJ, van den Bos EJ, Davis BH, Toloza EM, Klem I, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic transplantation of myoblasts into the heart. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:303-307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ott HC, Bonatti J, Mueller DL, Chevtchik O, Riha M, Danzmeyr M, et al. Robotically enhanced cardiac surgery. Eur Surg 2002;34:183-189.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. L. Herrmann, A. M. Abarbanell, B. R. Weil, Y. Wang, M. Wang, J. Tan, and D. R. Meldrum
Cell-based therapy for ischemic heart disease: a clinical update.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 88(5): 1714 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Ota, N. A. Patronik, D. Schwartzman, C. N. Riviere, and M. A. Zenati
Minimally Invasive Epicardial Injections Using a Novel Semiautonomous Robotic Device
Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14_suppl_1): S115 - S120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ott, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ott, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery
Right arrow Transplantation - heart


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS