|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:179-180
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Brief Communication |
a Service des Cardiopathies Congénitales, Centre chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
b Département d'imagerie Médicale, Centre chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
c Département d'ORL Pédiatrique, Hôpital d'enfants Armand Trousseau, Université Paris VI, Paris, France
Received for publication December 2, 2005; accepted for publication January 13, 2006. * Address for reprints: Emmanuel Le Bret, MD, PhD, Service des Cardiopathies Congénitales, Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, 133 avenue de la Résistance, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France. (Email: e.lebret{at}ccml.fr).
Slide tracheoplasty was first described in 1989 by Tsang and colleagues
1
and has now become the gold standard to treat long-segment tracheal stenosis. This technique presents several advantages: no graft material is required, it allows satisfactory enlargement of the trachea, and it does not hinder the functional growth of the trachea.
2,3
Recently, our team has reported the association of tracheal resection and slide tracheoplasty to manage an infant presenting with tracheal hypoplasia associated to a partial critical stenosis.
4
However, surgical management of a tracheal hypoplasia extending up to the cricoid is still quite challenging.
5
We therefore describe a variant of the slide tracheoplasty that allowed us to treat this difficult case.
Clinical Summary
A 3-month-old infant weighting 4.8 kg was primarily referred for critical tracheal stenosis. The child was intubated, but satisfactory ventilation was difficult despite a high peak airway pressure. Endoscopy and computed tomographic scan analysis showed complete tracheal hypoplasia starting at the cricoid level and extending to the carina (Figure 1). The carina was preserved.
|
|
Discussion
A case of cricoid stenosis associated to partial tracheal stenosis was reported in 2002 by Han and coworkers.
5
In his case the stenotic segment was found to extend from the cricoid cartilage to the upper fifth tracheal cartilage, with maximum stenosis at the cricoid level. The technique used to treat this association consisted of splitting the anterior surface of the cricoid up to the cricothyroid membrane, splitting the anterior wall of the upper trachea, and then sliding the lower segment anterior to the cricoid. In this technique a portion of the anterior cricoid arc was resected.
In our case of extended tracheal hypoplasia associated to cricoid stenosis, we preferred to slide the lower part of the trachea posterior to the cricoid and to open and resect partially the posterior part of the cricoid. We think this technique allows a better vascularization by avoiding a large posterior dissection of the lower trachea. However, the dissection of the posterior part of the cricoid is more dangerous for the recurrent nerves.
Conclusion
Extended slide tracheoplasties achieved successful tracheal reconstruction, even when the cricoid was involved in the hypoplasia. Use of the patient's own tracheal tissues and avoidance of foreign materials should allow good cricotracheal growth in the same way that slide tracheoplasty allows good tracheal growth.
| See related brief communication on page 181.
|
References
Related Article
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |