JTCS KCI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Federico Venuta
Daniele Diso
Tiziano De Giacomo
Marco Anile
Erino A. Rendina
Giorgio F. Coloni
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Venuta, F.
Right arrow Articles by Coloni, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Venuta, F.
Right arrow Articles by Coloni, G. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer
Right arrow Lung - other

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:422-423
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Brief Communication

Use of a polymeric sealant to reduce air leaks after lobectomy

Federico Venuta, MD * , Daniele Diso, MD, Tiziano De Giacomo, MD, Marco Anile, MD, Erino A. Rendina, MD, Giorgio F. Coloni, MD

University of Rome "La Sapienza," Department of Thoracic Surgery, Rome, Italy

Received for publication March 8, 2006; accepted for publication March 23, 2006.

* Address for reprints: Federico Venuta, MD, Cattedra di Chirurgia Toracica, Policlinico Umberto I, University of Rome "La Sapienza," V.le del Policlinico, Rome 00100, Italy (Email: sofed{at}libero.it).

Air leakage is a relatively frequent complication after lobectomy 1 Go; it can be expected in up to 15% of the patients, independently from the type of surgical approach (open or thoracoscopic). The risk increases when interlobar fissures are incomplete and in patients with emphysema; in nearly all series it contributes to increase the length of hospitalization and thus the costs.

Prolonged air leaks is defined as a leakage persisting 7 or more days. 2 Go Ideally, treatment begins with prevention: when fissures are incomplete, meticulous attention should be given to the anatomic planes of interlobar dissection. Several strategies can be employed to reduce the incidence of this complication 3 Go: staplers and reinforcement materials could be used; a pleural tent or pneumoperitoneum could be performed if at the end of the operation the lung is not likely to reach the chest wall and fill the pleural space; also the use of surgical sealants and glues have been repeatedly proposed with encouraging results. 4 Go However, none of these methods have definitively contributed to solve the problem and randomized studies are extremely rare.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of Coseal (Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL) (a polymeric sealant) to reduce postoperative air leaks and hospital stay.

Clinical Summary

Fifty consecutive patients undergoing standard pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer and with incomplete or absent fissures that needed to be opened both anteriorly and posteriorly were prospectively enrolled in this study. The project was approved and partially supported by the University of Rome "La Sapienza." Patients with anatomically well-defined fissures were excluded as well as patients with lesions already treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or who previously underwent thoracic operations, patients with T3 tumors with chest wall involvement, and patients with extensive pleural adhesions. All interlobar fissures were completed with a GIA 75 or/and an EndoGia 45 stapler (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). Patients were intraoperatively randomized into 2 groups: group I (25 patients; 15 men; mean age 61.3 ± 12.6 years) patients received Coseal over the newly designed fissure; group II (25 patients; 19 men; mean age 61.6 ± 12.5 years) patients were closed without any sealant.

For each patient we recorded age and gender, preoperative functional parameters, type of lobectomy, presence of air leakage during the first 5 days after the operation, duration of the air leaks, and duration of postoperative stay. Follow-up for morbidity and mortality lasted 1 month after the operation.

The differences in duration of air leaks were compared with the Yates corrected {chi}2 test; differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), duration of air leakage, chest tube drainage, and length hospitalization were assessed with the Student t test.

Results

The preoperative functional parameters, type of lobectomy, and postoperative variables are reported in Table 1. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for gender, age, functional variables, and type of surgical resection. Differences in terms of duration of drainage (P = .03), hospital stay (P = .009), and presence of air leakage during the first 5 days (day 1: P = .05; day 2: P = .009; day 3: P = .002; day 4: P = .0005; day 5: P = .01) were observed. A prolonged air leak (more than 7 days) was present in 2 (8%) and 5 (20%) patients, respectively, in groups I and II.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables
 
Discussion

Various methods have been proposed to close or seal lung parenchyma. Sealant materials need to be sufficiently strong and adherent to withstand pressures of 30 to 40 cm of water, but also elasticity once polymerized is an important issue to accomplish lung movements during respiration. They also need to be locally nonirritating, systematically nontoxic, without antigenicity, and bacteriostatic.

Many studies have reported the use of sealants and glues to reinforce the parenchymal suture line at risk for air leak, but no one has report on the use of Coseal. In our study Coseal seemed to reduce the duration of postoperative air leaks and hospitalization. It is easy to use and it did not induce any morbidity. However, although reduced in incidence, air leaks were still present in a small group of patients and in 2 (8%) of them they persisted for more than 7 days, requiring a blood patch to definitively close. The use of this sealant in selected cases could contribute to reduce the incidence of this complication; if it occurs, the duration is certainly shorter. 5 Go

References

  1. Rice TW, Kirby TJ. Prolonged air leak. Chest Surg Clin N Am 1992;2:803-811.
  2. Kirsh MM, Rotman H, Behrendt DM, Orringer MB, Sloan H. Complications of pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg 1975;20:215-236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Venuta F, Rendina EA, De Giacomo T, et al. Technique to reduce air leaks after pulmonary lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:361-364.
  4. Wain JC, Kaiser LR, Johnston DW, et al. Trial of a novel synthetic sealant in preventing air leaks after lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1623-1629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Fleishner AG, Evans KG, Nelems B, Finley RJ. Effect of routine fibrin glue use on the duration of an air leak after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:133-134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
F. Venuta, M. Anile, T. de Giacomo, and G. F. Coloni
Prevention of middle lobe torsion after right upper lobectomy with a polymeric sealant
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2012; 143(1): 240 - 241.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. Hashimoto, M. Kuwabara, Y. Hirasaki, H. Tsujimoto, T. Torii, T. Nakamura, and A. Hagiwara
Reduction of air leaks in a canine model of pulmonary resection with a new staple-line buttress
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2011; 142(2): 366 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
A. D'Andrilli, C. Andreetti, M. Ibrahim, A. M. Ciccone, F. Venuta, U. Mansmann, and E. A. Rendina
A prospective randomized study to assess the efficacy of a surgical sealant to treat air leaks in lung surgery
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, May 1, 2009; 35(5): 817 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Federico Venuta
Daniele Diso
Tiziano De Giacomo
Marco Anile
Erino A. Rendina
Giorgio F. Coloni
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Venuta, F.
Right arrow Articles by Coloni, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Venuta, F.
Right arrow Articles by Coloni, G. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer
Right arrow Lung - other


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS