|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:941-947
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Cardiopulmonary Support and Physiology |
a First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
b Department of Anesthesiology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
c Department of Cardiac Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Received for publication April 24, 2006; revisions received June 11, 2006; accepted for publication June 16, 2006. * Address for reprints: Teruhisa Kazui, MD, PhD, the First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan. (Email: tkazui{at}hama-med.ac.jp).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Human hepatocyte growth factor expression plasmid was combined with hemagglutinating virus of Japan envelope vector. Hemagglutinating virus of Japan envelope vector containing the hepatocyte growth factor gene was injected intrathecally into the experimental rabbits, whereas control vector or saline was given to the control animals. Five days later, spinal cord ischemia was induced by means of infrarenal aortic occlusion for 30 minutes. Hind-limb motor function was assessed during a 14-day recovery period with Tarlov criteria.
Results: Human hepatocyte growth factor was detected in the cerebrospinal fluid 3 days after gene transfer, and the level peaked on day 5. Compared with the control animals, hepatocyte growth factor gene transfer significantly increased the capillary density in the gray matter and decreased the spinal cord edema. All rabbits pretreated with saline or control vector had hind-limb paraplegia (Tarlov score = 0) 14 days after spinal cord ischemia. However, previous transfection of the hepatocyte growth factor gene remarkably enhanced the Tarlov scores, and 8 of the 9 rabbits showed normal motor function (Tarlov score = 5) after a 14-day recovery period. Histologic examination showed that the intact motor neurons were preserved to a much greater extent in the rabbits transfected with the hepatocyte growth factor gene.
Conclusion: Gene transfer of hepatocyte growth factor attenuates neurologic injury after spinal cord ischemia.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Paraplegia that results from spinal cord ischemia remains a major devastating and unpredictable complication after surgical repair of descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Regardless of the progress with surgical techniques and pharmacologic interventions, this complication still cannot be prevented completely.1,2
Therapeutic angiogenesis has been considered to be an effective way to treat ischemic disorders of the central nervous system (CNS). Neurons are highly sensitive to ischemia, and transient ischemia can induce delayed neuronal death, even after recirculation. Therefore the simple effect of stimulation of angiogenesis might not be enough to treat CNS ischemia. An ideal therapeutic strategy to treat ischemic neurologic injury should have both aspects of enhancement of collateral formation and prevention of neuronal death. Recently, it has been demonstrated that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) functions as a powerful angiogenic factor,3,4
as well as a potent neurotrophic factor,5,6
although HGF was originally identified from plasma and serum as a molecule that could stimulate DNA synthesis in rat and human hepatocytes.7
HGF has been reported to induce versatile neuroprotective effects both in vitro and in vivo,8–13
which has led to the hypothesis that HGF can be beneficial in treating neurologic disorders of spinal cord ischemia. The aim of the present study was to determine whether prophylactic gene transfer of human HGF into the subarachnoid space by using hemagglutinating virus of Japan (HVJ) envelope vector can attenuate neurologic injuries of spinal cord ischemia in a well-characterized rabbit model.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
expression vector plasmid to produce an HGF expression vector. A pcDNA 3.1(–) plasmid DNA vector with the same structure but not containing HGF cDNA was used as a control vector.11
Preparation of HVJ Envelope Vector
HVJ envelope vector was prepared as described previously.14
Briefly, HVJ was purified by means of centrifugation and inactivated by UV irradiation, which abolished the replication of the virus completely but did not affect the cell membrane–fusing capability of the envelope. HVJ envelope (20 AU) was mixed with 200 µg of plasmid DNA and 0.3% Triton-X. After centrifugation, the mixture was washed with 1 mL of balanced salt solution to remove the detergent and unincorporated DNA. Then the envelope vector was suspended in 400 µL of phosphate-buffered saline, and the suspension was stored at 4°C until use.
Animal Care and Surgical Procedure
Japanese white rabbits weighing 1.8 to 2.4 kg were used in the study. The animal protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee for Animal Experimentation of Hamamatsu University School of Medicine and was in accordance with the National Institutes of Health "Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals." Spinal cord ischemia was induced by infrarenal aortic occlusion, according to the method described previously.15
In Vivo Gene Transfer and Experimental Protocol
The intervertebral space between L5 and L6 was punctured with a 16-gauge needle, and polyethylene-10 tubing was inserted through it into the subarachnoid space. The desired position of the catheter was confirmed by means of cautious aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).16
After removal of 400 µL of CSF, saline (400 µL), HVJ envelope vector (400 µL) containing pcDNA 3.1(–), or human HGF plasmid DNA was carefully injected into the saline group (n = 7), control vector group (n = 7), or HGF group (n = 9), respectively. The animals were included in the study only if they had normal hind-limb motor function after intrathecal injection. Five days later, all rabbits were subjected to 30 minutes of spinal cord ischemia.
Measurement of Human HGF Concentration in CSF
One hundred microliters of CSF was collected before gene transfer and 3, 5, 12, and 19 days after gene transfer. The concentration of HGF in the CSF was determined by means of enzyme immunoassay with an anti-human HGF antibody (Institute of Immunology, Tokyo, Japan), which reacts only with human HGF but not with rabbit HGF.10,12
Neurologic Assessment
During a 14-day recovery after ischemia, hind-limb motor function was assessed by 2 blinded observers using the modified Tarlov scale17
: 0, no movement; 1, slight movement; 2, sit with assistance; 3, sit alone; 4, weak hop; 5, normal hop.
Quantification of Capillary Density
Additional rabbits (n = 5 for each group) were killed just before spinal cord ischemia to analyze the angiogenic effect of HGF gene transfer in the spinal cord. Alkaline phosphatase staining was used as a specific marker of endothelial cells in paraffin-embedded sections (10 µm).10
The number of microvessels in the ventral gray matter was counted by a blinded investigator. Three individual sections from the lumbar spinal cord (L4-L6) were analyzed.
Evaluation of Spinal Cord Edema After Transient Ischemia
In a parallel series of experiments (n = 5 for each group), spinal cords were collected from rabbits 24 hours after ischemia. Spinal cords were divided into ischemic segments (lumbar spinal cords, L4-L6) and nonischemic segments (thoracic spinal cords, T8-T10). The wet weight was measured quickly, and then the spinal cord was dried in an oven at 110°C for 24 hours. The water content was calculated as follows:
|
|
Histologic Study
All animals of the 3 groups were killed 14 days after the transient ischemia. Paraffin-embedded sections (4 µm) of lumbar spinal cords (L4-L6) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. In cases in which the cytoplasm was diffusely eosinophilic, the large motor neuron cells were considered to be necrotic or dead. When the cells demonstrated basophilic stippling (containing Nissl substance), the motor-neuron cells were considered to be viable or alive.18
The intact motor neurons in the ventral gray matter were counted by a blinded investigator in 3 sections for each rabbit, and the results were then averaged.
Statistical Analysis
Values were expressed as means ± standard deviation. The Kruskal-Wallis test for nonparametric values and analysis of variance with the subsequent Duncan test for parametric values were used.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HGF is a well-known pleiotropic cytokine that exhibits mitogenic and morphogenic activities toward a variety of cells, including endothelial cells.19
The mitogenic activity of HGF in endothelial cells was reported to be even more potent than that of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).20
Therefore, HGF has been identified as a potential angiogenic factor. In vivo evidences demonstrate that HGF stimulates angiogenesis with increase of blood flow in various tissues, such as myocardium,21
skeletal muscle,17
and brain.10,12
Moreover, HGF also plays a role as a neurotrophic and survival factor to maintain the physiologic structure and function of the nervous system. Both HGF and c-Met, an HGF receptor of membrane-spanning tyrosine kinase, are expressed in various regions of the brain5
and peripheral neurons.22
Functional coupling between HGF and c-Met enhances the survival of hippocampal neurons in primary culture and induces neurite outgrowth in neuronal development in vitro.23
Sensory and sympathetic neurons and their precursors respond to HGF with increased differentiation, survival, and axonal outgrowth.24
HGF is expressed in the brain in the early phase after cerebral ischemia25
and induces a neuroprotective effect against postischemic delayed neuronal death in the hippocampus.26
In cerebral artery occlusion models HGF has been reported to induce therapeutic angiogenesis, improve blood flow, reduce the infarct volume, and attenuate neurologic injuries,10,12,13
which demonstrates that HGF possesses a potential therapeutic value for CNS ischemia. It is plausible that HGF secreted from transfected cells induces the powerful neuroprotective effects observed in the current study through its angiogenic and neurotrophic activities.
However, the short serum half-life of the recombinant protein limits the therapeutic value of HGF. Gene transfer appears to have advantages over the administration of single- or multiple-bolus doses of a recombinant protein because it can achieve an optimally high local concentration of protein within the nervous system.10–12
In the study by Yoshimura and colleagues,10
gene transfer of HGF markedly increased the cerebral blood flow in the ischemic brain, whereas single injection of recombinant HGF failed to do so. For gene transfer to the spinal cord, a nonviral HVJ envelope–mediated method was used in the current study. Although viral vectors are always used to transfer gene into nervous system for their high transfection efficiency, these vectors are potentially hazardous because of cointroduction of genetic elements from parent viruses, leaky expression of viral genes, immunogenicity, and changes in the host genome.27
Nonviral vectors are less toxic and less immunogenic. HVJ envelope is a purified vesicle prepared from HVJ, the replication activity and infectivity of which have been completely inhibited, whereas the activities of the 2 envelope proteins (hemagglutinating neuroaminidase and fusion protein) are maintained almost at the same levels as those of live HVJ. This vector has been used to transfer gene into various tissues successfully, including nervous system tissue.12,14
Another difficulty for gene transfer to the spinal cord is the presence of the blood-brain barrier, which makes the spinal cord relatively inaccessible to circulating proteins and peptides. Intrathecal injection through lumbar puncture might be a feasible method to overcome this limitation. Our previous study shows that lumbar puncture can be readily performed without severe invasion.16
In the present study the human HGF gene was transferred into rabbit spinal cords by means of intrathecal injection. Secretion of HGF from the transfected cells was still detected in the CSF more than 2 weeks after transfection. On the other hand, the blood-brain barrier might also ensure that other organs except CNS are not transfected when gene transfer is performed through intrathecal injection.
VEGF, another important angiogenic factor, also has neuroprotective effects. However, administration of recombinant VEGF to the ischemic brain has been reported to increase cerebral edema, which was provoked in part by enhanced cerebrovascular permeability.28
Similarly, lower-limb edema was reported as a side effect after gene transfer of VEGF into the ischemic limb.29
In contrast to these findings, gene transfer of HGF did not augment spinal cord edema in the current study. Indeed, the water content of the ischemic spinal cord was decreased after transfection of the HGF gene. Consistent with our data, overexpression of HGF did not exacerbate cerebral edema and destruction of the blood-brain barrier in the ischemic brain.12
The difference in effects of HGF and VEGF on vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) might be the explanation for the divergent edema formation between HGF and VEGF. HGF stimulates the migration of VSMCs without their multiplication,20
whereas VEGF has no effect on either the migration or the proliferation of VSMCs because of the lack of VEGF receptors on VSMCs.30
Thus angiogenesis induced by VEGF is featured as a delay in the maturation of blood vessels. However, because HGF simultaneously stimulates the migration of both endothelial cells and VSMCs, the blood vessels might mature in a well-coordinated way at an earlier time, thereby avoiding the release of blood-derived cells into the extracellular space.30
To this point, HGF might be better to treat CNS ischemia.
In conclusion, our study demonstrates for the first time that intrathecal injection of nonviral HVJ envelope–based vector is efficient in transferring the gene of interest into the spinal cord and that prophylactic gene transfer of HGF induces powerful neuroprotective effects against spinal cord ischemia. Our observations expand the understanding of the neuroprotective properties of HGF. Although the current data are not advanced enough for human gene therapy, the proofs still suggest that gene transfer of HGF might be a novel therapeutic strategy to prevent neurologic injury after thoracic aneurysm surgery.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
* Enyi Shi and Xiaojing Jiang contributed equally to this work. ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Sakurai Which cell is transferred hepatocyte growth factor gene? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2007; 133(4): 1120 - 1120. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Shi Reply to the Editor J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2007; 133(4): 1120 - 1121. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |