|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:1398-1403
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Clinic Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt, Germany.
b Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Read at the Eighty-sixth Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Philadelphia, Pa, April 29-May 3, 2006.
Received for publication April 19, 2006; revisions received July 7, 2006; accepted for publication July 12, 2006. * Address for reprints: Paul Urbanski, MD, Herz- und Gefaess-Klinik, Salzburger Leite 1, 97616 Bad Neustadt, Germany. (Email: p.urbanski{at}kardiochirurg.de).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Between July 2002 and October 2005, 100 patients underwent aortic surgery using carotid artery cannulation by a side graft for arterial return with a mean flow rate of 4.6 ± 0.5 L/min. There were 27 patients with acute and 2 with chronic type A aortic dissection. Sixteen patients had had prior cardiac surgery. During circulatory arrest, the arterial line was used for unilateral cerebral perfusion in moderate hypothermia (mean rectal temperature 28°C ± 1.6°C) with a mean flow rate of 0.85 ± 0.2 L/min.
RESULTS: Carotid artery cannulation offered adequate arterial return in all patients. In no case was a switch to another cannulation site necessary for arterial return. Furthermore, no complications related to the cannulation site were observed. One patient with acute dissection and 1 with chronic aneurysm died during the early postoperative course. Thus, 30-day mortality was 2.0% for the whole group and 3.7% for the dissection group. Two patients with severe calcification of the aortic valve had strokes. There were no strokes in the dissection group, although there were preoperative signs of cerebral malperfusion in 4 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery cannulation is a fast, safe, and efficient method of arterial cannulation even in very obese patients. In addition, it simplifies the procedure of unilateral cerebral perfusion through the arterial line during circulatory arrest, making it completely unnecessary to interrupt cerebral perfusion.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
There are two methods for cerebral protection in cardiovascular surgery requiring circulatory arrest: deep hypothermia, which may also be complemented by retrograde cerebral perfusion (CP), and selective antegrade CP. Because the choice of cannulation site in the first method does not seem to play a role,1-3
the cannulation of one arch artery in the second method results in an antegrade perfusion of the aorta and, in particular, in simplified handling of antegrade CP for which brain perfusion need not be interrupted. Meanwhile, cannulation of the axillary artery for arterial return and for CP is a well-established method.4,5
Initially, the carotid artery was only cannulated to establish an additional arterial line for CP, mainly in connection with the second line in the femoral artery.6,7
However, single cannulation of the carotid artery is also a simple and safe approach for arterial return during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).8,9
The aim of this study was to evaluate this techniques clinical usefulness and efficiency in terms of postoperative and particularly neurologic outcomes after the first 100 procedures.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main indication for surgery in this series was chronic degenerative or atherosclerotic aneurysm followed by aortic dissection. Detailed information on aortic disease is presented in Table 1, and the preoperative patient data are given in Table 2.
|
|
| Surgical Technique |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In all patients, after heparinization, the exposed segment of the carotid artery was crossclamped, a longitudinal incision was made, and an 8- or 10-mm vascular sealed polyester graft was anastomosed to the artery with a continuous 5-0 polypropylene suture. If additional cannulation of the femoral artery was considered necessary, it was done simultaneously in the usual manner, and both arterial lines were connected with a Y-shaped tube for arterial return from one pump.
After connection of the arterial line and cannulation of the right atrium, CPB was started with a mean flow of 4.6 ± 0.5 L/min, range 3.6 to 6.0 L/min (2.4 L · min1 · m 2 of body surface). The perfusion pressure at the arterial line was limited to not more than 260 mm Hg and amounted to 200 ± 27 mm Hg on average.
In all but 2 patients, circulatory arrest for arch repair was necessary. The arch arteries were crossclamped and unilateral CP was set up by simply reducing the arterial flow to a mean flow of 0.85 ± 0.2 L/min in moderate hypothermia with a mean rectal temperature of 28.0°C ± 1.5°C. By modulation of the flow, average pressure in the arterial line was maintained at about 100 mm Hg, resulting in a mean pressure of 37.0 ± 10.2 mm Hg and 33.5 ± 9.8 mm Hg in the right and left radial arteries, respectively. The drop in flow velocity in the right middle cerebral artery varied considerably, but the flow never ceased. We administered thiopental for additional pharmacologic brain protection; thus, topical cooling of the head (apart from a few patients at the beginning of the study) was not performed. Acid-base balance was managed by the
-stat method. The arterial line included a Y-shaped cannula, which can be used to perfuse the other brain hemisphere for realization of bilateral CP during circulatory arrest, if necessary. Nevertheless, we never had to make use of this additional CP. After the distal aortic anastomosis had been completed, and in total or subtotal arch replacements after reimplantation of the arch arteries, this Y-shaped cannula can also be used to switch the arterial perfusion from the carotid artery to an aortic graft. Because this manipulation is neither complicated nor time-consuming, we used it in all 75 patients in whom aortic grafts with side branches ("InterGard Hemabridge" with one side branch or "InterGard Aortic Arch" with four side branches; InterVascular, La Ciotat, France) were used. It leads to omission of reperfusion through the carotid artery during rewarming and shortens the overall perfusion time through the carotid artery. The vascular graft initially anastomosed with the common carotid artery was severed near the anastomosis and oversewn during reperfusion or after terminating CPB.
The most frequent surgical procedure was ascending aortic replacement with an open distal anastomosis to the aortic arch (hemiarch) followed by total or subtotal aortic arch replacement. The surgical procedures are shown in Table 3 and the operative data in Table 4.
|
|
There were 2 deaths during the 30 days after surgery. One patient (male, 47 years) with acute type A aortic dissection and preoperative multiorgan malperfusion died of peritonitis as a result of ischemic colon perforation despite surgical intervention on the 14th day after complete ascending and arch replacement, making the early mortality in the dissection group 3.7%.
The other patient (male, 79 years) with chronic atherosclerotic aneurysm and aortic valve insufficiency died suddenly on the seventh day after valve-sparing ascending aortic and complete arch replacement caused by malignant arrhythmia resulting in cardiac arrest after an uneventful postoperative course. At autopsy, no pathologic conditions were found apart from severe left ventricular hypertrophy.
All patients regained consciousness postoperatively. Eight patients required prolonged primary postoperative ventilation, and 15 patients had to be reintubated owing to respiratory insufficiency, the most frequent postoperative complication. Eleven patients required tracheotomy (4 after prolonged primary ventilation and 7 after reintubation). Among those patients with pulmonary complications, there were 3 deaths that occurred in hospital, but after the 30-day time range; they were due to multiple organ failure or sepsis. Because none of these patients had acute aortic dissection, the in-hospital mortality remained 3.7% in that group.
The neurologic morbidity, that is, permanent or temporary focal deficit, was 2% for the overall series and none for the dissection group, although there were preoperative signs of cerebral malperfusion in 4 patients. One patient had a major stroke with right-sided hemiparesis and another patient had a minor stroke with complete resolution of neurologic symptoms within 30 days postoperatively. Both patients had undergone hemiarch replacement with brief unilateral CP (9 and 10 minutes, respectively). However, both patients had severe calcification of the aortic valve and aortic annulus, which had to be decalcified during replacement. We assume that this explains the postoperative CT evidence of intracranial embolization in both patients. Correlating with the mild clinical symptoms, the embolization was very discrete in the second patient. Moreover, 14 patients who were not extubated within 24 postoperative hours underwent a cranial CT. There were no pathologic findings in any of them.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast, in unilateral CP with cannulation of one of the arch arteries, neither interruption in CP nor manipulation of the arch arteries for perfusion cannula placement is necessary. After crossclamping of arch arteries, unilateral CP is maintained by simply reducing the flow in the arterial line. Because cerebral oxygen consumption drops to about 50% during moderate hypothermia,12
unilateral CP under this condition usually provides adequate brain protection resulting in very good neurologic outcome, as verified in recent clinical studies.8,9,13-15
Some authors have proposed filtering out those patients in whom unilateral CP might not suffice to adequately protect the brain, suggesting several preoperative diagnostics and intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.16,17
Yet, the importance of these tests in clinical use remains undetermined. On the basis of our initial experience, we have recommended various tests for routine use in elective patients, but there are limitations that should be addressed. Most preoperative tests only provide anatomic information about the vessels supplying the brain. Nevertheless, Doppler ultrasonography of extracranial arteries should be the basis for choosing the proper cannulation site, even though in our series it proved effective in only 1 patient whose right carotid artery had to be cannulated. The role of cranial CT angiography remains unclear, as there is scant difference between normal and hypoplastic posterior communicating arteries. The intention of such examinations could be to detect extremely uncommon incompleteness of the arterial circle in both the anterior and posterior regions. We did not carry out carotid compression tests to functionally evaluate cerebral crossover perfusion in this study, as proposed by others,16,17
because the same information can be obtained during carotid crossclamping for cannulation. Electroencephalograms, somatosensory evoked potentials, and transcranial Doppler were used to monitor carotid artery crossclamp intolerance, which did not occur in any of our patients examined. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography for evaluating intracranial flow is not always possible because of the absence of ultrasound windows.17,18
It is also unclear, even in normothermia, how great a drop in blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery is clinically significant.18
We have accepted even very low flow during unilateral CP in moderate hypothermia, but a complete stop did not occur in any patient. We consider the arterial pressure measurements in both radial arteries, and especially contralaterally to the cannulated carotid artery, as very reliable, although only as indirect parameters for monitoring the crossover flow during unilateral CP. They can serve as a substitute for the surgeons estimation of returning blood, as proposed by Kücüker and associates,14
which is a subjective value in any case. The pressure measurement is feasible in almost all patients and in emergencies. However, for this assessment, proximal crossclamping of all arch arteries, including the left subclavian artery, is necessary. On the basis of the findings mentioned above, we have not observed any patients in whom it was necessary to additionally perfuse the contralateral arch artery.
Numerous experiences with cannulation of the right axillary or brachial artery for arterial return have been reported recently.4,5,14,19
This access has also been used for unilateral CP during circulatory arrest.13-15
Yet, the surgical approach is time-consuming, especially in obese patients. Local complications with a rate of up to 14% and even dissections of the arterial system with lethal outcome have been reported.20-22
Owing to axillary walls of thin caliber or particular fragility, a switch to other cannulation sites is necessary in up to 11% of cases.22
Conversely, the common carotid artery wall is not as delicate or as easily damaged. In our series, we observed no local vessel alterations, and no switch to another cannulation site was necessary in any patient. The arterial return was sufficient in each case with isolated cannulation of the carotid artery. The 14 additional femoral cannulations in our series were mainly performed because of underlying pathologic conditions alone. Furthermore, the common carotid artery is easily accessible in the neck, and when appropriate, the left carotid artery can even be approached intrathoracically without an additional incision. For this reason, cannulation of the left carotid artery has become our routine; however, cannulation of the right carotid artery can provide additional antegrade perfusion of the right vertebral artery during CP. In turn, there is the potential risk of cerebral "luxury perfusion" during CPB. Our strategy to prevent this overperfusion is to reduce the arterial pressure during CPB to about 50 to 60 mm Hg, because cerebral blood flow is determined mainly by the arterial pressure and not the CPB flow rate.23
Unilateral CP was performed with a mean pressure of about 100 mm Hg in the arterial line, which corresponds to 50 to 60 mm Hg of pressure in the carotid artery at a flow rate of about 1.0 L/min. Thus, we noted no symptoms of cerebral overperfusion in our series. Our neurologic results correlate equally well with the cranial CT findings from 14 patients after surgery in whom no disease was found, in particular, no signs of cerebral edema.
In conclusion, carotid artery cannulation makes simple installation of CPB possible with antegrade flow. The approach is safe, efficient, and quick in its execution and, therefore, suitable in emergencies and in obese patients. Carotid artery cannulation simplifies the unilateral CP procedure through the arterial line during circulatory arrest, meaning that there is no need to interrupt CP, thus minimizing the risk of embolism and preventing the drawbacks associated with deep hypothermia.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. P. Urbanski, A. Lenos, P. Bougioukakis, I. Neophytou, M. Zacher, and A. Diegeler Mild-to-moderate hypothermia in aortic arch surgery using circulatory arrest: a change of paradigm? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2012; 41(1): 185 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Bonser, A. M. Ranasinghe, M. Loubani, J. D. Evans, N. M. A. Thalji, J. E. Bachet, T. P. Carrel, M. Czerny, R. Di Bartolomeo, M. Grabenwoger, et al. Evidence, Lack of Evidence, Controversy, and Debate in the Provision and Performance of the Surgery of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2011; 58(24): 2455 - 2474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zierer, F. Detho, O. Dzemali, T. Aybek, A. Moritz, and F. Bakhtiary Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion With Mild Hypothermia for Aortic Arch Replacement: Single-Center Experience in 245 Consecutive Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2011; 91(6): 1868 - 1873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Urbanski, A. Lenos, M. Zacher, and A. Diegeler Unilateral cerebral perfusion: right versus left, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, June 1, 2010; 37(6): 1332 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pocar, D. Passolunghi, A. Moneta, and F. Donatelli Recovery of severe neurological dysfunction after restoration of cerebral blood flow in acute aortic dissection Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, May 1, 2010; 10(5): 839 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Diegeler and P. P. Urbanski Are There General Contraindications for Conventional Surgery of Aortic Valve Stenosis? Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2010; 89(4): 1343 - 1343. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Urbanski Basal cusp enlargement for repair of aortic valve insufficiency J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2010; 139(1): 98 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. O. Conzelmann, N. Kayhan, U. Mehlhorn, E. Weigang, M. Dahm, and C. F. Vahl Reevaluation of Direct True Lumen Cannulation in Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2009; 87(4): 1182 - 1186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Urbanski Arterial Shunt for Bilateral Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2008; 86(6): 2024 - 2024. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Khaladj, M. Shrestha, S. Peterss, M. Strueber, M. Karck, M. Pichlmaier, A. Haverich, and C. Hagl Ascending aortic cannulation in acute aortic dissection type A: the Hannover experience Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, October 1, 2008; 34(4): 792 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Khaladj, M. Shrestha, S. Meck, S. Peterss, H. Kamiya, K. Kallenbach, M. Winterhalter, L. Hoy, A. Haverich, and C. Hagl Hypothermic circulatory arrest with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion in ascending aortic and aortic arch surgery: A risk factor analysis for adverse outcome in 501 patients. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2008; 135(4): 908 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Urbanski, A. Lenos, J. C. Blume, V. Ziegler, B. Griewing, R. Schmitt, A. Diegeler, and M. Dinkel Does anatomical completeness of the circle of Willis correlate with sufficient cross-perfusion during unilateral cerebral perfusion? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, March 1, 2008; 33(3): 402 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bakhtiary, S. Dogan, A. Zierer, O. Dzemali, F. Oezaslan, P. Therapidis, F. Detho, T. Wittlinger, S. Martens, P. Kleine, et al. Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection in 120 Consecutive Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 465 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pocar, D. Passolunghi, A. Moneta, and F. Donatelli Immediate surgery in aortic dissection with cerebral malperfusion J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1684 - 1685. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.K. Koray and S. Dogan Carotid artery cannulation in aortic surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2007; 133(5): 1392 - 1392. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Urbanski Reply to the Editor J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2007; 133(5): 1392 - 1393. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |