JTCS KCI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Sanjay Asopa
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asopa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asopa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:1503-1504
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Letter to the Editor

Bonnano’s catheter: A less invasive and cost-effective alternative for drainage of pleural effusion

Sanjay Asopa, MD, Anish Patel, MD

Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom

(Email: v.asopa{at}soton.ac.uk).

To the Editor:

We read with interest the article by Chetty and colleagues.1Go Bonnano’s catheter has been proposed as a less invasive and cost-effective alternative for drainage of a pleural effusion. We congratulate them for their cost-effective and innovative approach of using a suprapubic catheter to drain the pleura.

Pigtail catheters using the modified Seldinger technique have been found to be well tolerated by the patient and are highly effective in drainage of pleural serous and chylous effusions but less efficacious in drainage of hemothorax or pneumothorax and empyema with acceptable risk of complications.2Go

We agree that akin to small catheters using the Seldinger technique,3,4Go Bonnano’s catheter can be used. However, with the length of the trocar and the mounted catheter being approximately 30 cm, one can lose track of the distance traveled in the thoracic cavity because there are no obvious markings on the catheter itself, and one can injure vital organs in the chest cavity, as in our institution’s experience (unpublished report), in which a misplaced Bonnano’s catheter pierced the left ventricle, and the tip of the catheter was found in the aortic root.

Before introduction of Bonnano’s catheter into general medical and surgical use to drain the pleura, this technique needs to be validated, and the results of a prospective trial are awaited. We suggest that modifications to the catheter should include surface markings, thereby allowing the distance traveled to be gauged, and reduction of the length of the trocar, thereby reducing the risk of untoward complications.

These catheters might be useful for drainage of simple pleural effusions after surgical intervention. Complications might be related to the misplacement of the trocar because of a lack of surface markings and unfamiliarity with chest anatomy. We therefore recommend this procedure to be performed by those with a detailed knowledge and appreciation of the thoracic cavity to avoid undue complications.

References

  1. Chetty GK, Elahi MM, Siddagangaiah V, Leverment JN. Bonanno’s catheter: a less invasive and cost-effective alternative for drainage of pleural effusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:219-220.[Free Full Text]
  2. Roberts JS, Bratton SL, Brogan TV. Efficacy and complications of percutaneous pigtail catheters for thoracostomy in pediatric patients. Chest 1998;114:1116-1121.
  3. Fuhrman BP, Landrum BG, Ferrara TB, Steinhorn DM, Connell AP, Smith-Wright DL, et al. Pleural drainage using modified pigtail catheters. Crit Care Med 1986;14:575-576.[Medline]
  4. Gammie JS, Banks MC, Fuhrman CR, Pham SM, Griffith BP, Keenan RJ, et al. The pigtail catheter for pleural drainage: a less invasive alternative to tube thoracostomy. JSLS 1999;3:57-61.[Medline]

Related Article

Bonanno's catheter: A less invasive and cost-effective alternative for drainage of pleural effusion
Annabel Sharkey
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2010 139: 1357. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. Sharkey
Bonanno's catheter: A less invasive and cost-effective alternative for drainage of pleural effusion
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2010; 139(5): 1357 - 1357.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. Asopa, S. Iyenger, C. T. Lloyd, I. Brown, and C. W. Barlow
Accidental perforation of the left ventricle with a Bonanno catheter
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2009; 137(4): 1023 - 1024.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Sanjay Asopa
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asopa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asopa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS