JTCS Medtronic Endurant
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Daniel Pop
Nicolas Venissac
Jerome Mouroux
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pop, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mouroux, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pop, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mouroux, J.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:267-268
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Brief Communication

Video-assisted mediastinoscopy improved radical resection for cancer in transhiatal esophagectomy

Daniel Pop, MD*, Nicolas Venissac, MD, Jerome Mouroux, MD

Thoracic Surgery Department, Pasteur Hospital, Nice, France.

Received for publication June 24, 2006; revisions received August 10, 2006; accepted for publication August 25, 2006.

* Address for reprints: Daniel Pop, MD, Thoracic Surgery Department, Pasteur Hospital—Building H1, 30 Avenue de la Voie Romaine, 06002 Nice, France. (Email: danielpopch{at}yahoo.com).

Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE), popularized by Orringer and Sloan,1Go was proposed to decrease postoperative morbidity and mortality. The major inconvenience is the mediastinal lymphadenectomy that guarantees radical oncologic surgery. Recently, Bumm and associates2Go used an endodissector that eliminated the "blind" mediastinal dissection. Furthermore, the advent of video-assisted technology provided increasing visualization and allowed bimanual maneuvers.3,4Go This is our preliminary report using video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM) during THE, including technical details.

Patients and Techniques

Between October 1, 2001 and January 31, 2003 (a 15-month period), we operated on our first 5 patients. The usual pretherapeutic staging and preoperative assessment were done. One patient had neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. All 5 patients’ characteristics are noted in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Patients’ characteristics
 
The surgical procedures were done by the same team (surgeon with two assistants). The patients were supine with one roll beneath the scapulae (for maximal cervical extension). The abdominal and cervical phases were done by the standard technique.1Go Care must be taken to avoid arrhythmia or hypotension because of cardiac displacement during abdominal upward dissection of the esophagus. The mediastinal phase is done by VAM only through a cervicotomy (Figure 1). The equipment and the instruments have been previously described.4Go First, along the left side of the esophagus, the video-mediastinoscope allows clear visualization of the left recurrent nerve to the aortopulmonary window level. With bimanual blunt dissection and hemostatic clips, the lymph nodes situated next to the nerve can be easily separated without hurting the nerve. The video-mediastinoscope can be pushed farther into the mediastinum until the full length is reached. Next the anterior side is dissected. The back surface of the trachea, the carina, and the lymph nodes can be safely detached. Then the posterior side of the esophagus can be easily dissected from the prevertebral fascia. The thoracic duct can be identified and endoclips can be used generously for lymphostasis. Finally, the right side of the esophagus can be dissected by passing behind or in front of the esophagus, avoiding injury to the azygos system. Normally, the mediastinal pleurae are not opened. When the superior mediastinal phase is accomplished, the video-mediastinoscope provides the light to reach the upward abdominal dissection of the esophagus. We prefer a gastric substitute. One patient needed a left colon graft because of total gastrectomy for synchronous antral cancer, which lengthened the intervention. The mean operative time for the remainder was about 280 minutes. The mean hospital stay was 21 days. There was no 30-day mortality. Two major complications arose: myocardial ischemia in a patient with known coronary stenosis and pneumonia in a patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome that required ventilatory support. The living patients had no recurrences; one patient died of a myocardial infarction, but was free of cancer.


Figure 1
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Mediastinal phase of THE: The mediastinoscope is inserted in the inferior pole of the standard cervicotomy. The VAM dissection is done around the esophagus behind the trachea.

 
Discussion

Use of a vein stripper to avulse the esophagus from the posterior mediastinum was first described by Denk (1913) in cadavers and experimental animals.1Go After several attempts by different teams, Orringer and Sloan1Go (1978) reported on 26 patients with THE with gastric or colonic replacement in the same operative stage. The anticipated benefit was to avoid the morbidity of thoracotomy and to lessen the disastrous effect of an anastomotic fistula. Critics of this approach have warned of inadequate hemostasis and oncologic surgery.

Recently, a meta-analysis5Go showed that perioperative blood loss was significantly higher after transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) but that THE resulted in more severe bleeding. The postoperative outlook gave potential benefits for THE in terms of pulmonary complications, chylous leakage, and in-hospital mortality. To the contrary, THE resulted in more cardiac complications, vocal cord paralysis, and anastomotic leakage. The use of mediastinoscopy2Go helps dissection at or above the trachea and reduces the postoperative complications of standard THE. The advent of the video camera substantially improves visualization. We4Go have proved the benefit in resecting paratracheal mesothelial cysts. None of our patients treated by THE had significant bleeding or recurrent nerve injury.

The primary goal of cancer surgery remains radical resection. Partial esophagectomy and 2-field lymphadenectomy done by TTE is the most currently used technique. Theoretically, it offers a better, but not significantly better, 5-year survival.5Go The new VAM technique and the possibility of bimanual handling allow true lymphadenectomy.3Go For our patients, the mean number of lymph nodes was 7 (limits 2-22). This technique enables a truly en bloc esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy.

Despite our limited experience with THE and VAM, the results are promising. With careful handling, VAM is superior to standard mediastinoscopy and it reduces the complications linked to the surgical maneuvers (inadequate hemostasis and recurrent nerve injury). In our opinion, VAM allows not only controlled lymph node biopsy in the mediastinum but true lymphadenectomy around the esophagus.

References

  1. Orringer MB, Sloan H. Esophagectomy without thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1978;76:643-654.[Abstract]
  2. Bumm R, Hölscher AH, Feussner H, Tachibana M, Bartels H, Siewert JR. Endodissection of the thoracic esophagus: technique and clinical results in transhiatal esophagectomy. Ann Surg 1993;218:97-104.[Medline]
  3. Hürtgen M, Friedel G, Toomes H, Fritz P. Radical video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA)—technique and first results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:348-351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pop D, Venissac N, Leo F, Mouroux J. Video-assisted mediastinoscopy: a useful technique for paratracheal mesothelial cysts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:690-691.[Free Full Text]
  5. Hulscher JBF, Tijssen JGP, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJB. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:306-313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Daniel Pop
Nicolas Venissac
Jerome Mouroux
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pop, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mouroux, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pop, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mouroux, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS