|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1051-1058
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
Department of Surgery and Clinical Science, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Received for publication September 25, 2006; revisions received December 8, 2006; accepted for publication December 13, 2006. * Address for reprints: Tao-Sheng Li, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery and Clinical Science, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan. (Email: litaoshe{at}yamaguchi-u.ac.jp).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Myocardial infarction was induced in C57BL/6 mice by ligating the left anterior descending artery. After 60 minutes, either the infarcted heart was transplanted heterotopically into a healthy recipient C57BL/6 mouse to remove the ventricular hemodynamic loading (unloading group) or it was left as an infarcted heart under normal hemodynamic loading conditions in the same mouse (loading group). The infarcted hearts were dissected for histologic analysis after 3, 7, 14, and 28 days.
Results: Histologic analysis showed that the wall thickness of the infarcted left ventricle was significantly greater and the area of infarction was significantly smaller in the unloading group than in the loading group. Immunostaining analysis revealed significantly more Ki-67-positive cells and significantly fewer apoptotic cells in the infarcted myocardium in the unloading group than in the loading group. There were also significantly more c-kit- and Sca-1-positive stem cells in the infarcted myocardium in the unloading group than in the loading group.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that hemodynamic unloading assists self-regeneration of the injured heart by increasing cell proliferation, inhibiting cell apoptosis, and inducing stem-cell recruitment.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Unlike the skin, liver, muscle, and other organs, it is still thought that the heart cannot regenerate because of the loss of proliferative potential of adult cardiomyocytes and the lack of cardiac stem cells in the adult mammalian heart.1
However, recent investigations have provided evidence that adult cardiomyocytes do retain limited cell cycle activity2,3
and that there are in fact cardiac stem cells in the adult heart.4-7
Furthermore, an increase in either mitotic cardiomyocytes or cardiac stem cells has been identified in failing and infarcted hearts.2,3
These findings suggest that the injured heart may potentially have regenerative function; however, obvious myocardial regeneration has never been observed clinically after heart injury.
The process of repairing the damaged heart is thought to be related to the balance between regeneration and loss of myocytes. Although the increased number of mitotic cardiomyocytes and cardiac stem cells in the infarcted heart will accelerate the regeneration of new myocardium, an excessive loss of cardiomyocytes may also be induced by the ventricular mechanical stresses and severe milieu in the infarcted heart.8,9
Because the frequency of mitotic cardiomyocytes in humans is very low (about 0.015% in the failing heart and 0.08% in the acute infarcted heart),2,3
a negative balance between regeneration and loss of myocytes might provide a reasonable explanation of why self-repair of the damaged heart does not occur clinically.
Interestingly, substantial recovery of cardiac function has been achieved by the implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in some patients with end-stage heart failure, and the device has even been explanted successfully in some of these patients.10-12
A beneficial effect of LVAD support after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary occlusions has also been reported.13
Although the precise mechanism of self-repair of the injured heart under LVAD support is unclear, we speculate that the reduction in ventricular mechanical stress achieved by LVAD support inhibits the loss of myocytes, resulting in a positive balance between the regeneration and loss of myocytes.
In this study, we placed the left ventricle of infarcted hearts under hemodynamic unloading conditions by heterotopic transplantation and then investigated the role and relative mechanisms of hemodynamic loading in myocardial repair.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Myocardial Infarction Model and Experimental Protocol
A myocardial infarction model was established in C57BL/6 mice as described previously.14
Briefly, after inducing general anesthesia with pentobarbital and performing tracheal intubation with a 20-gauge intravenous catheter, the mice were artificially ventilated with room air at 80 breaths per minute. We performed a left thoracotomy through the fourth intercostal space and ligated the left anterior descending artery completely with 80 polypropylene under direct vision.
To estimate how the left ventricular (LV) hemodynamic loading effects myocardial regeneration, the infarcted hearts were randomly subjected to an unloading condition or a normal loading condition 60 minutes after ligation of the left anterior descending artery. The normal LV hemodynamic loading condition (loading group, n = 29) was created simply by leaving the infarcted heart in the same mouse and performing a sham laparotomy. The LV hemodynamic unloading condition was created by heterotopic transplantation of the infarcted heart into another healthy C57BL/6 mouse (unloading group, n = 27). Briefly, 60 minutes after left anterior descending artery ligation, the infarcted heart was flushed with 1 mL of cold cardioplegic solution (Na 85.3 mmol/L, K 25.0 mmol/L, Cl 85.5 mmol/L, Mg 10.0 mmol/L, and glucose 25 g/L; pH 7.38) via the inferior vena cava and harvested routinely as a donor heart. Then, the infarcted donor heart was transplanted immediately into the abdomen of another normal C57BL/6 mouse, with anastomosis of the donor ascending aorta to the recipient abdominal aorta and of the donor pulmonary artery to the recipient inferior vena cava, as described previously.15
The infarcted heart resumed vigorous contraction within 3 minutes of reperfusion. Similar to LVAD support, this donor heart provided hemodynamic unloading to the infarcted left ventricle but coronary perfusion was sustained.
Sample Collection and Morphologic Observation
All the mice were killed and the infarcted hearts were harvested 3, 7, 14, and 28 days after the operation (n = 59 at each time point for both groups). The infarcted hearts were flushed thoroughly with saline solution. After excising the atrium and other tissues, we recorded the ventricular weight of each heart. The ventricle was cut into 5 pieces for macromorphologic observation of cross sections (about 1.5 mm thick). Samples were embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Histologic analysis was done on 5-µm-thick frozen sections.
Histologic Analysis
Hematoxylineosin staining and Azan staining was done to estimate the LV wall thickness and infarction area, respectively. Using Image-Pro image analysis software (version 5.1.2, Media Cybernetics Inc, Carlsbad, Calif), the LV wall thickness and fibrotic area in each digital picture were measured quantitatively by a single observer blind to the treatment regimen. The mean wall thickness was measured from 3 equidistant points, and the infarction area was calculated as the area stained blue. Measurements were done in at least 5 separated sections of each heart, and the averages of each heart were used for statistical analysis.
Measurement of the Proliferation and Apoptosis of Cells in the Infarcted Hearts
The cell proliferation was identified by immunostaining with phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled Goat anti-mouse Ki-67 antibody (1:20 dilation, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc, Santa Cruz, Calif). The apoptosis of cells was detected by a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) method, using Apoptosis Detection Kits (R&D System Inc, Minneapolis, Minn). Sections were also stained with DAPI (4', 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) to visualize the nuclei. The number of positive cells was counted under 400-fold magnification by a single observer blind to the treatment regimen, and 20 different fields on 3 independent slides from different cross sections were randomly selected for each heart. We calculated the mean number of positively stained cells per field in the infarcted myocardium for statistical analysis.
Detection of Cardiac Stem Cells and Stromal Cell-derived Factor Expression in the Infarcted Hearts
To measure the number of stem cells in the infarcted hearts, 5-µm-thick frozen sections were stained with PE-labeled rat anti-mouse c-kit antibody (1:20 dilation, eBioscience, San Diego, Calif) and rabbit anti-mouse Sca-1 antibody (1:20 dilation, R&D Systems). The number of positive cells was counted under 400-fold magnification by a single observer blind to the treatment regimen, and 20 different fields on 3 independent slides from different cross sections were randomly selected for each heart. We calculated the mean number of positively stained cells per field in the infarcted myocardium for statistical analysis.
We also examined the expression of stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1), one of the most important factors for mediating stem cells recruitment and homing. Frozen sections were stained with rat polyclonal antibody against SDF-1
then a universal LSAB2 alkaline phosphatase kit and fuchsin (Dako) for color reaction were used to visualize the immune reaction.
Statistical Analysis
Results of quantitative studies are expressed as means ± SD. Statistical comparisons between groups were performed by the unpaired Student t test using StatView software (version 5.0). Values of P < .05 were considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we investigated how hemodynamic loading affects self-repair of the injured heart and examined the relative cellular and molecular mechanisms. To establish an LV hemodynamic unloading model in mice, we transplanted heterotopically an acute infarcted heart into the abdomen of another healthy mouse, with anastomosis of the donor ascending aorta to the recipient abdominal aorta and the donor pulmonary artery to the recipient inferior vena cava.15
In the donor heart, blood from the abdominal aorta of the recipient mouse retroperfused into the coronary arteries of the donor heart, then drained into the right atrium, and entered the right ventricle of the donor heart, finally being ejected into the inferior vena cava of the recipient mouse. Thus, there was no hemodynamic loading in the infarcted left ventricle, but coronary perfusion was sustained. This condition is similar to that created by LVAD support.26,27
We found a smaller area of infarction and greater wall thickness in the unloading heart than in the normal loading heart. Moreover, we observed distinctly that layers of cardiomyocytes remained in the endocardium of the unloading heart 28 days after infarction, but this was not observed in the loading infarcted heart. The ventricular weight was also increased significantly in the loading heart 28 days after infarction. Although we did not measure or compare the size of the cardiomyocytes, the increased ventricular weight might be related to the hypertrophy of the cardiomyocytes in response to heart failure. All of these findings suggest that the self-repair of the infarcted hearts was better under hemodynamic unloading conditions than under loading conditions.
The fact that more proliferating cells but fewer apoptotic cells were observed in the unloading heart than in the loading heart 3 and 7 days postinfarction indicates that hemodynamic unloading increases the proliferation activity but decreases the apoptosis of cells in the infarcted heart. There were also more proliferating cells than apoptotic cells in the unloading heart, at a ratio of about 2 proliferating cells to 3 apoptotic cells per high-power field, but it was reversed in the loading heart, with a ratio of about 3 proliferating cells to 1.5 apoptotic cells per high-power field. According to our data, the balance between proliferation (regeneration) and apoptosis (loss) of cells was positive in the unloading heart but negative in the loading heart. Although many other factors need to be taken into consideration in the balance of regeneration and loss of myocytes, self-repair of the injured heart may occur under hemodynamic unloading conditions. This evidence may explain why obvious self-regeneration was not observed clinically in the injured heart under LV hemodynamic loading but cardiac function recovered frequently in the failing heart under LVAD support.9-13
However, we counted about 300 nuclei per high-power field, so the proportion of Ki-67-positive cells would be about 1.0%. The proportion of Ki67-positive cells was comparable with the acute infarcted human heart.3
As the level of proliferating cells is relative low, the increased proliferation and the decreased apoptosis of cells under LVAD support should contribute in a limited manner to repair the heart after infarction.
We also found significantly more c-kit- and Sca-1-positive stem cells in the unloading heart than in the loading heart, although we could not identify the origination and fate of these stem cells, so we were unable to ascertain if they were heart-specific endogenous precursors or bone marrowderived stem cells. We do not know if these stem cells will differentiate and mature into myocytes for functional myocardial repair, although we previously found evidence that c-kit- and Sca-1-positive stem cells in the heart originate from bone marrow (data not shown). Thus, it is possible that the increased expression of SDF-1 in the unloading heart will induce the recruitment of stem cells from bone marrow into the injured heart for myocardial repair.28
Although we focused only on the mechanisms of myocardial repair in the turnover of myocytes and cardiac stem cells in the present study, previous investigations have found complex changes in the milium of the heart after LVAD support. These changes include a decrease in wall tension (pressure stress),29
improvement of coronary flow,30
reduction in lymphocyte infiltration and inflammatory cytokines,31
and normalization of the extracellular matrix.23
Thus, it is possible that the friendly milium in the unloading heart favors the survival and proliferation of myocytes and improves the survival, proliferation, differentiation, and maturation of cardiac stem cells for myocardial repair.
The limitation of this study lies in the fact that the unloading model we used is not the same as that used for LVAD implantation. Moreover, we did not compare the recovery of LV function in the loading and unloading hearts; therefore, our data need to be confirmed in a large-animal model and in clinical trials. Nevertheless, the results of this study provide the first evidence that hemodynamic unloading creates a positive balance between the regeneration and loss of myocytes in the injured heart by increasing cell proliferation, inhibiting cell apoptosis, and improving stem-cell recruitment. Accordingly, reducing hemodynamic loading may be a new strategy to assist self-regeneration of the injured heart.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Ibrahim, C. Rao, T. Athanasiou, M. H. Yacoub, and C. M. Terracciano Mechanical unloading and cell therapy have a synergistic role in the recovery and regeneration of the failing heart Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, August 1, 2012; 42(2): 312 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhou, J.-L. Yun, Z.-Q. Han, F. Gao, H. Li, T.-M. Jiang, and Y.-M. Li Postinfarction healing dynamics in the mechanically unloaded rat left ventricle Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2011; 300(5): H1863 - H1874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-S. Li, R. Suzuki, and K. Hamano Reply to the editor. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2007; 134(4): 1096 - 1096. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stamm, B. Nasseri, and R. Hetzer Rescue versus regeneration. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2007; 134(4): 1095 - 1096. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |