JTCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Stefano Benussi
Simona Nascimbene
Ottavio Alfieri
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benussi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alfieri, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Benussi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alfieri, O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias
Right arrowRelated Article

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1683-1684
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Letter to the Editor

Reply to the Editor

Stefano Benussi, MD, PhD1, Simona Nascimbene, MD, Ottavio Alfieri, MD

Division of Cardiac Surgery, S Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy

Dr Patwardhan complains that two seminal papers describing his pioneering experience in surgical ablation with bipolar coagulation1,2Go were not given due consideration in articles published by us3Go and by others.

We recognize that Patwardhan’s intuitions opened the way to the modern scenario of surgical ablation. Nevertheless, only 2 of 74 articles among PubMed-listed clinical papers focusing on atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with bipolar radiofrequency (RF) (by matching AF with bipolar RF) quote Patwardhan’s works.

There are different possible reasons for this reiterated omission:

First of all, Patwardhan and colleagues reported using a standard electrocautery in the bipolar mode to ablate the atrial myocardium. This is not perceived by us (and probably by most surgeons) as being in accordance with some fundamental safety issues: Power-based RF can lead to charring and to excessive endocardial trauma, potentially leading to an increased risk of thromboembolism. Furthermore, also due to the absence of any feedback controlling energy delivery, electrocoagulation can cause excessive tissue weakening, possibly leading to bleeding. Re-exploration for bleeding occurred in 20% of survivors in Patwardhan’s initial series.1Go Temperature and impedance feedback, featured by commercially available bipolar devices, are actually meant to address such problems.

It is then not irrelevant that bipolar electrocautery, despite sharing the same physical principles of commercially available RF ablation devices, is not CE- or Food and Drug Administration–marked for cardiac ablation. As a result, most surgeons, including our group, would rather avoid the "off-label" use of a bipolar electrocautery and indulge in the use of more recognized commercially available alternatives.

Furthermore, Patwardhan’s spot-by-spot ablation without tissue feedback can admittedly lead to the creation of incomplete ablation lines, rendering the ablation procedure not reproducible and clinical result possibly suboptimal.

It is finally worth mentioning that Pathwardhan’s electrocautery ablation is an open-heart procedure. Electrocautery forceps, in fact, despite being bipolar, do not share the epicardial clamping feature that makes modern bipolar devices more appealing and, to our advice, the real breakthrough in the arena of AF surgery. Such a characteristic is actually the greatest aspect of modern bipolar devices since, by clearing out the convective cooling of circulating blood on the target area, it allows an effective and reproducible ablation of a double layer of atrial wall epicardially, on the beating heart.

This notwithstanding, we respectfully acknowledge Patwardhan’s contribution to innovation in this field. We express our empathy with his feelings at not being quoted in the context of bipolar RF. It is the same feeling we experience every time an author writes about epicardial ablation (be it bipolar or not) without mentioning our initiating clinical report4Go or when we realize that most authors reporting on surgical ablation—including Patwardhan in his later experience2Go—describe administering amiodarone prophylactically, but nobody seems to be aware that such pharmacologic strategy was first proposed for AF surgery by our group.4,5Go

We tend to blame the omission on a poor "conceptual copyright" protection policy on our side rather than suspecting the scientific accuracy of highly respected colleagues with whom we share the passion for finding new solutions to challenging clinical situations.

Footnotes

1 Stefano Benussi reports consulting fees from Atricure and Estech and lecture fees from St Jude Medical, Medtronic, and Cryocath. Back

References

  1. Patwardhan AM, Dave HH, Tamhane AA, Pandit SP, Dalvi BV, Golam K, et al. Intraoperative radiofrequency microbipolar coagulation to replace incisions of maze III procedure for correcting atrial fibrillation in patients with rheumatic valvular disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;12:627-633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Lad VS, Patwardhan AM. Maze III replication using radiofrequency microbipolar coagulation. Heart Lung Circ 2004;13:139-144.[Medline]
  3. Benussi S, Nascimbene S, Calori G, Denti P, Ziskind Z, Kassem S, et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation with a novel bipolar radiofrequency device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:491-497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Benussi S, Pappone C, Nascimbene S, Oreto, Caldarola A, Stefano PL, et al. A simple way to treat atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery: the epicardial radiofrequency approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:524-529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Benussi S, Nascimbene S, Alfieri O. Reply to Veloso. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:233-234.[Free Full Text]

Related Article

Intraoperative ablation of atrial fibrillation using bipolar output of surgical radiofrequency generator (diathermy) and reusable bipolar forceps
A.M. Patwardhan
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2007 133: 1683. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Stefano Benussi
Simona Nascimbene
Ottavio Alfieri
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benussi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alfieri, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Benussi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alfieri, O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS