|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:74-81
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease |
a Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
b Division of Cardiology, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
c Hospital for Sick Children, Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Received for publication June 13, 2006; revisions received January 2, 2007; accepted for publication January 8, 2007. * Address for reprints: Dr John G. Coles, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, M5G 1X8, Canada. (Email: john.coles{at}sickkids.ca).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Right ventricular samples were serially acquired during surgical repair of ventricular septal defect.
Results: Expression profiling revealed 3 patterns of gene expression: (1) increased expression above control levels within 1 hour of cardioplegic arrest, with further amplification during early reperfusion; (2) increased expression limited to the reperfusion phase; and (3) reduced expression during reperfusion. Functional annotation and network mapping of differentially expressed genes indicated activation of multiple signaling pathways regulated by phosphatidylinositide 3'-OH kinase convergent on cellular growth and reparative programs. Also observed was increased expression of genes regulating hemoglobin synthesis, suggesting a novel cardioprotective pathway evoked during ischemia-reperfusion.
Conclusion: Reversible myocardial ischemia-reperfusion during cardiac surgery is associated with an immediate genomic response that predicts a net cardioprotective phenotype.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design and Sample Collection
Experimental design, sampling, hybridization, data analysis, and presentation were done in compliance with revised Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME) guidelines (www.mged.org).3
All myocardial samples were taken from the RVOT through the tricuspid valve. The first sample was taken immediately after cardiac arrest following administration of cold blood cardioplegic solution (30 mL/kg), which was repeated (20 mL/kg) every 20 minutes. The second sample was taken at 50 minutes of cardiac arrest. The third sample was taken at 5 minutes after reperfusion prior to right atrial closure. After aortic crossclamp removal, there was spontaneous restoration of normal heart function in all patients, and none of the patients required defibrillation.
RNA Isolation
Total RNA (TRNA) was isolated from 15 myocardial samples utilizing Trizol Reagent (GIBCO/BRL, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif) following the manufacturers protocol. The quality of TRNA was assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (version A.02.01S1232, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, Calif). Only RNA with the OD ratio of 1.99:2.0 at 260/280 was used for microarray analysis.
Affymetrix GeneChip Hybridization and Scanning
A total of 16 hybridizations were performed on the Human HG-U133A GeneChip Set (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Calif), including 15 TRNAs from myocardial samples of 5 patients at the 3 different time points and 1 reference TRNA (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif) as a universal control. Samples were prepared for hybridization according to standard Affymetrix instructions and performed at the Genomic Core Facility at the Hospital for Sick Children.
Affymetrix GeneChip Data Analysis
We have previously reported the details of the microarray data analysis methodology used in this study.4,5
Scanned raw data were processed with Affymetrix Microarray Suite version 5.0 software. The average intensity value for each probe set, which directly correlates with mRNA abundance, was calculated as an average of fluorescence differences for each perfectly matched versus single-nucleotide mismatched probe. To test the integrity of the starting RNA, we examined the signal intensity ratio for the 3' probe set over the 5' probe set for the housekeeping genes,
-actin and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). For the 15 arrays used in this study, the 3' to 5' ratios were 1.3 ± 0.07 and 0.97 ± 0.06 for
-actin and GAPDH, respectively. Once sample quality was demonstrated, those genes with consistently present calls were considered. To monitor the expression of genes over the different experimental time points, data obtained from MAS 5.0 absolute analyses of all the individual arrays were analyzed and clustered using GeneSpring software 7.0 (http://www.agilent.com).
Statistical filtering was used to find the set of genes that show statistically significant differences in the mean normalized expression levels across all the groups. This comparison is performed for each gene, and the genes with the most significant differential expression (smallest P value) are returned. The parametric comparison for multiple groups used was a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Calculations without the assumption of equality of variances were done using Welchs approximate t test and ANOVA. Briefly, a stepwise process was followed, first using a per-gene normalization to facilitate direct comparison of biologic differences. The 50th percentile of all measurements was used as a positive control for each sample; each measurement for each gene was divided by this synthetic positive control. The bottom 10th percentile was used as a test for correct background subtraction. Each gene was normalized to itself by making a synthetic positive control for that gene and dividing all measurements for that gene by this positive control (Figure 1). This synthetic control was the median of the genes expression values over all the samples. Next, a second filter using Affymetrix data and P value with cutoff value of less than .005 in all conditions yielded 81 genes with differential expression.
|
The complete MIAME-compliant dataset (including all "description files") has been submitted and accepted by Gene Expression Omnibus at National Center for Biotechnology Information; accession number GSE6381.
Microarray Validation
Microarray results were confirmed by using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) on 5 randomly selected genes that demonstrated altered postinterventional expression. The principle of real-time qPCR has been described in detail.6
Predesigned FAM-labeled TaqMan primer sets were constructed against: hemoglobin beta (Hs00758889_s1), dual specificity phosphatase 1 (Hs00610256_g1), cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (Hs00155479_m1), early growth response 1 (Egr-1; Hs00152928_m1), and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1; Hs00153126_m1, Applied Biosystems, Branchburg, NJ). Amplicon abundance was determined in real time normalized against a GAPDH control. Fold changes were determined as a ratio of sample RNA to that of the average RNA expression in the initial biopsy following aortic occlusion.
The functional properties of significant genes were inferred from several sources, including standard Gene Ontologies (http://genome-www5.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/source/sourceSearch), PubMed citations as provided in the Discussion, and network mapping algorithms using Pathway Assist software version 2.53 (Ariadne Genomics, Inc., Rockville, Md). Pathway Assist is a software application for the graphical depiction of biologic pathways, focusing on cell signaling networks and based on information extracted from PubMed citations using a Natural Language Processing engine.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The expression profile of 81 genes exhibiting differential expression during the I/R phases is shown in Figure 1. This analysis indicates that samplewise self-organizing clusters (shown on the left of dendrogram) are highly coherent within each experimental time point (shown on the right of dendrogram). The clustering profile of gene expression intensities of the 81 differentially expressed genes is indicated at the top of Figure 1. Detectable changes in mRNA levels of several genes were evident within approximately 1 hour of induction of myocardial ischemia. The expression levels of almost all of the genes exhibiting ischemic induction increased significantly further during reperfusion. These genes clustered into several major functional groups, including those involved in the immediate early response to stress and the regulation of cellular hypertrophy, repair, and apoptosis. A small number of genes showed decreased expression during the reperfusion phase.
The changes in expression levels measured by qPCR and microarray analysis of the 5 randomly selected genes were found to be proportional and directionally identical in 9 of 10 time point comparisons (Figure 2).
|
|
, ß) hemoglobin genes during I/R is notable as this process is normally tightly controlled by upstream gene locus regulatory elements, and non-erythroid globin gene synthesis is unprecedented.11
Protein Network Mapping
To uncover potential regulatory network invoked during I/R, network maps were constructed using Pathway Assist software to reveal potential genes or proteins subject to regulation by the 10 genes showing the highest differential expression during reperfusion (Figure 3). We searched for interacting genes/proteins based on the filter that they represent literature-validated targets of at least 2 genes identified as exhibiting differential expression during reperfusion by microarray analysis. This in silico approach identified several transcription factors and interacting growth factor receptors, as well as PI3K signaling molecules, which have been broadly implicated in cytoprotection.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Egr-1 and other immediate early genes exhibited an increase in expression levels during reperfusion. Network maps based on an unbiased PubMed search algorithm reveals a number of interactions of Egr-1 with transcription factors, as well as a growth factors and growth factor receptors (Figure 3). Gene expression profiling experiments in animal models of myocardial ischemia have previously implicated increased expression of the Egr-1 gene as an element of the protective response associated with nonlethal ischemia (reviewed by Simkhovich et al12
).
Cardioplegic arrest activates growth factor signaling
Increased expression of growth factor signaling genes emerged as a dominant functional theme, which was especially marked during the reperfusion phase. This was evident by the increased expression levels of prototypical growth factors, IGF-1 and VEGF, and the IGF-1 receptor, as well as components of PI3K membrane lipid kinase signaling cascade. Activation of growth factor signaling is cardioprotective against I/R injury (reviewed by Hausenloy et al13
). IGF-1 peptide confers protection against I/R via mitochondria-dependent mechanisms.14
Myocardial IGF-1 gene expression is also increased by short- and long-term exercise.15
We have previously reported the transcriptional up-regulation of ventricular Erg-1, PTPA, and IGF genes during repair of congenitally obstructive right heart lesions.
Genetic up-regulation of the PI3K pathway resulting from PTEN deficiency,16
or expression of a constitutively active p110
17
or IGF-1 receptor18
transgene in the heart, results in compensated or physiologic forms of cardiac hypertrophy. Increased expression of VEGF message plays an important role in acute postischemic myocardial recovery,19
and VEGF-deleted mice exhibit impaired cardiac functional recovery following I/R evident as increased diastolic dysfunction.19
The finding of increased VEGF-B levels in the current study is also consistent with activation of PI3K/Akt signaling, which has been shown to result from the interaction of VEGF-B and its corresponding receptor in postischemic vascular endothelium.20
Thus, concerted elevation of PI3K, tie-1, RADD, VEGF-B, and the pleckstrin homology domain, TAPP1, suggests that activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway is a feature of the molecular response to I/R in human myocardium.
Cardioplegic arrest activates ischemic preconditioning pathways
PKB/Akt is a downstream target of PI3K.21
The PI3K/PKB pathway can be activated via toll-like receptors21
or growth factor receptors. The lipid product of PI3K, phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate, recruits PKB/Akt via its (PH) domains to the cellular membrane, where it is activated. PKB/Akt-mediated phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of the p65 subunit of nuclear factor kappa B22
has been implicated as a critical event in both the early and late phases of IPC23,24
and in cardioprotection during acute ischemia.25
An increase in phosphorylation of PKB/Akt during reperfusion is necessary for IPC-induced cardioprotection.26
The increased expression of several structural proteins that serve as molecular scaffolds suggests they also participate in the transduction of growth factor signaling,27
which suggests a novel control point regulating reperfusion survival pathways. The finding of rapid up-regulation of frizzled-related proteins, FRP and SFRP1, is of interest because they have been implicated in postischemia myocardial repair.28,29
These proteins are also agonists for the canonical Wnt pathway, which is subject to regulation by PI3K,30
and have been shown to play a critical role in self-renewal in human and mouse embryonic stem cells.31
Novel role for globin gene synthesis during cardioplegic arrest
Increased globin gene synthesis evident during ischemia before reperfusion rules out the trivial explanation that this finding results from an influx of erythroid cells during reperfusion. We reported a similar finding in isolated cardiomyocytes during simulated I/R,32
which is also indicative of ectopic (nonhematologic) origin of hemoglobin gene transcription. In addition to O2 and CO2 transport, hemoglobins play a role in minimizing nitrosative stress by sequestration of excess nitric oxide generated during ischemia through the formation of hemoglobin-NO adducts.33,34
Further studies will be required to understand the potential therapeutic significance of up-regulation of myocardial hemoglobin gene expression in response to I/R injury.
Limitations of the Study
This study is focused on the transcriptional profile in the human myocardium during I/R in the unique context of cardioplegic arrest and cardiopulmonary bypass. Although validation using polymerase chain reaction was performed in a limited number of genes, DNA microarray platforms have been shown to exhibit high correlation with quantitative gene expression values, as determined by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays.35
The inferences drawn from these data are subject to the caveat that functionally important changes in protein expression and/or posttranslational modification during I/R are unknown. However, it is reasonable to assume that the transcriptional profile is ultimately modulated by the corresponding proteomic response and, as such, faithfully represents an important element of the integrated molecular response to I/R. This limitation is also offset to some degree by the use of an unbiased network mapping approach, which utilizes PubMed citations relating to interactions among differentially expressed genes at both transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels of regulation.
This study is focused on the changes in myocardial gene expression induced by I/R. These changes are superimposed on those resulting from cardiopulmonary bypass, which cannot be ascertained from this study. Nevertheless, the changes in gene expression reflect the effects of incremental I/R with each patient serving as their own control. The human transcriptome associated with I/R in this study is based on measurements derived from the endocardial layer of the right ventricular outflow tract and may not be representative of that in the left ventricle given that genetic segmentation is known to occur during cardiac development. Our previous study showed that activation of signaling pathways measured from the right ventricular endocardium was highly similar to that observed from left ventricular endocardial tissue.36
The contributions from each of the various constituent myocardial cell types, which account the observed global myocardial expression profile, are unknown. It should be pointed out that expression of cardiogenic transcription factors governing ventricular trabeculation and compaction, such as NKx2.5, may be abnormal in patients with VSD,37
so that that the expression profile in response to I/R may be specific to this entity and differ from that of a structurally normal heart.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Appendix E1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brief General Information on Microarrays
A DNA microarray (also commonly known as genechip, DNA chip, or gene array) is a collection of microscopic DNA spots attached to a solid surface, such as glass, plastic, or silicon chip, forming an array to monitor expression levels for thousands of genes simultaneously, referred to as gene expression profiling. The affixed DNA segments are known as probes; thousands of probes can be placed in known locations on a single DNA chip.
In spotted microarrays (or 2-channel or 2-color microarrays), the probes are oligonucleotides, cDNA, or small fragments of polymerase chain reaction products corresponding to different mRNAs. This type of array is hybridized with cDNA from two samples to be compared (ie, diseased and normal), which are labeled with 2 different fluorophores (usually Cy3 and Cy5). The samples can be mixed and hybridized to 1 single microarray/chip that is then scanned, allowing the visualization of up-regulated and down-regulated genes on the chip. However, in this system, the absolute levels of gene expression cannot be measured.
In oligonucleotide microarrays (or single-channel or 1-color microarrays), the probes are designed to match parts of the sequence of known or predicted mRNAs. In this case, the individual sample is labeled (usually with biotin) and hybridized to the chip. This system provides mesurements of the absolute levels of gene but requires 2 chips for the comparison different time points or experimental conditions.
In this study we used Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome HG-U133A, a high-density in situ oligonucleotide array with a total of 22,282 probe sets that includes unique oligonucleotide features covering 13,900 of the best-characterized human genes and 18,720 of full-length transcripts. Sequences were selected from GenBank, dbEST, and RefSeq. Sequence clusters were created from Build 133 of UniGene.
Methods in Detail (Based on MIAME Standard)
Oligonucleotide arrays (hybridization and staining)
A total of 15 hybridizations were performed on the Human HG-U133A GeneChip Set (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Calif) with the 15 TRNA derived from 5 heart samples at 3 time points. Samples were prepared for hybridization according to Affymetrix instructions. Briefly, a primer encoding the T7 RNA polymerase promoter linked to oligo-dT17 was used to prime double-stranded cDNA synthesis from each mRNA sample using Superscript II RNase H– reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Rockville, Md). Each double-stranded cDNA sample was purified through adsorption to silica (Qiaquick kit, Qiagen) according to manufacturers instructions and then in vitro transcribed using T7 RNA polymerase (T7 kit; Enzo), incorporating biotin-UTP and biotin-CTP (Enzo Biochemicals, New York, NY) into the resulting copy RNA. These copy RNA transcripts were purified using RNEasy (Qiagen) and quantitated by measuring absorption at 260/280 nm. Samples were fragmented at 95°C for 35 minutes in 10 mmol/L MgCl2 to a mean size of
50 to 100 nucleotides, added to hybridization buffer, and hybridized to the Chip for 16 hours at 45°C. GeneChips were washed and stained with streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin. The chips were scanned using the GeneArray scanner (Affymetrix) and output files were visually inspected for hybridization artifacts. Arrays lacking artifacts were analyzed using GCOS (GeneChip Operating Software, Affymetrix) and then scaled to an average intensity of 150 per gene and analyzed independently. The expression value for each gene was determined by calculating the average of differences (perfect match intensity minus mismatch intensity) of the probe pairs in use for the gene. To determine whether the measured transcript is detected (Present, P) or not detected (Absent, A), a detection algorithm uses probe pair intensities to generate a Detection P value and assign Present or Absent call. Affymetrix default value of Tau = 0.015 was used for the calculation of a detection P value. The expression analysis files created by GCOS software were then transferred to GeneSpring (Silicon Genetics) for further analysis. Hybridization, staining, scanning, and scaling were performed at the core facility of the Hospital for Sick Children at University of Toronto.
Data analysis
Data analysis was performed using GeneSpring 7.0 software (Agilent). To identify differentially expressed transcripts, statistically significant genes (P < .05) were selected for further analysis. Briefly, a stepwise process was followed to achieve per-gene normalization to facilitate direct comparison of biologic differences. The 50th percentile of all measurements was used as a positive control for each sample; each measurement for each gene was divided by this synthetic positive control, assuming that this was at least 10. The bottom 10th percentile was used as a test for correct background subtraction. Each gene was then normalized to itself by making a synthetic positive control for that gene and dividing all measurements for that gene by this positive control, assuming it was at least 0.01. This synthetic control was the median of the gene-specific expression values over all the samples.
Brief description of hierarchical clustering
Hierarchical clustering generates a heat map that is a graphical representation of data values in a 2-dimensional color gradient map, often used to represent the level of expression of many genes across a number of comparable samples (eg, cells in different states, samples from different patients or time points; Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:14863-8).
Cluster analysis is used to visualize a set of samples or genes by organizing them into a phylogenetic tree, often referred to as a dendrogram. One way of analyzing microarray data is to look for the cluster (group) of genes with a similar pattern of expression across many experiments (time points). The coregulated genes within such groups are often found to have related function. The distance between 2 branches of a tree is a measure of the correlation between any 2 genes in the 2 branches. This is a powerful application that allows a researcher to find experimental conditions (eg, various drug treatments, classification of disease states) that have similar effects. All measurements of the gene expression data set were used for clustering analysis. After filtering genes based on a P value < .05, differentially expressed genes were clustered and ordered by a hierarchical clustering algorithm by using an average linkage method in GeneSpring. Briefly, the expression values for a gene across the all samples were standardized to have mean 0 and standard deviation 1 by linear transformation, and the distance between 2 genes was defined as 1 – r where r is the standard correlation coefficient between the standardized values of 2 genes. Two genes with the closest distance were first merged into a supergene and connected by branches with length representing their distance and were then deleted for future merging. The expression level of the newly formed supergene is the average of standardized expression levels of the 2 genes (average linkage) for each sample. Then the next pair of genes (supergene) with the smallest distance was merged, and the process was repeated to cover all genes. Additionally, K-means clustering, self-organization map, and principle component analysis were used for confirmation of the overall pattern of gene expression value relatedness identified by clustering analysis.
K-means clustering
K-means clustering divides genes into distinct groups based on their expression patterns. Genes are initially divided into a number (k) of user-defined and equally sized groups. Centroids are calculated for each group corresponding to the average of the expression profiles. Individual genes are then reassigned to the group in which the centroid is the most similar to the gene. Group centroids are then recalculated, and the process is iterated until the group compositions converge. A wide selection of similarity measures (parametric and nonparametric correlations, Euclidean distance, etc) is available in different software.
Self-organization maps
Self-organization map is a clustering technique similar to K-means clustering. However, self-organization maps illustrate the relationship between groups by arranging them in a 2-dimensional map in addition to dividing genes into groups based on expression patterns. Self-organization maps are useful for visualizing the number of distinct expression patterns in the data and determining which of these patterns are variants of one another.
The self-organization map algorithm in GeneSpring begins by creating a 2-dimensional grid of nodes in the space of gene expression. In each iteration, 1 gene is selected and all of the nodes within a user-defined "neighborhood" are moved closer to it. This process is repeated with each gene in the selected gene list until the maximum number of iterations has been reached. With each iteration, the "neighborhood radius" is incrementally reduced and nodes are moved by smaller and smaller amounts to produce convergence. In this way, the grid of nodes is stretched and wrapped to best represent the variability of the data while still maintaining similarity between adjacent nodes. After the iteration is complete, genes are assigned to the nearest node, and a display grid of gene expression graphs is generated, corresponding to the initial grid of nodes. As the iteration proceeds, the neighborhood radius decreases smoothly, so that points move more independently later in the process. The neighborhood radius is expressed in terms of Euclidean distance in grid units relative to the abstract grid of the expression patterns.
Statistical group comparison
GeneSpring uses a filter tool that statistically compares mean expression levels between 2 or more groups of samples. The object is to find the set of genes for which the specified comparison shows statistically significant differences in the mean normalized expression levels. This comparison is performed for each gene, and the genes with the most significant differential expression (smallest P value) are returned. The parametric comparison for multiple groups is performed using one-way ANOVA. Calculations without the assumption of equality of variances were done using Welchs approximate t test and ANOVA.
For each gene separately, GeneSpring calculates the following: Let i be the index over the G groups formed by distinct levels of the comparison parameter. Let Xik be the expression values, with k running over the replicates for each situation, interpreted according to the current interpretation (ratio, log of ratio, fold change). Let
N
i = the number of nonmissing data values for each group,
|
|
|
|
In all calculations here, missing (NaN) values are left out of the sums, not propagated. If any of the Ni are 0, that parameter level is dropped from the analysis, and G is readjust accordingly. If G is not at least 2, exit (P value = 1).
For the parametric test without assuming variances equal: First check that each group has Ni greater than or equal to 2 and SSi greater than 0; if not, remove it from consideration and recompute G again. If G is not at least 2, exit (P value = 1).
Then compute:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if d
2 is not greater than 0, then exit (P value = 1).
|
|
|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Tommila, C. Stark, A. Jokilammi, V. Peltonen, R. Penttinen, and E. Ekholm Hemoglobin expression in rat experimental granulation tissue J Mol Cell Biol, June 1, 2011; 3(3): 190 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Ghorbel, M. Cherif, E. Jenkins, A. Mokhtari, D. Kenny, G. D. Angelini, and M. Caputo Transcriptomic analysis of patients with tetralogy of Fallot reveals the effect of chronic hypoxia on myocardial gene expression J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2010; 140(2): 337 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Ghorbel, M. Cherif, A. Mokhtari, V. D. Bruno, M. Caputo, and G. D. Angelini Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with fewer gene expression changes in the human myocardium in comparison with on-pump surgery Physiol Genomics, June 1, 2010; 42(1): 67 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. J. Pomblum, B. Korbmacher, S. Cleveland, U. Sunderdiek, R. C. Klocke, and J. D. Schipke Cardiac stunning in the clinic: the full picture Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, January 1, 2010; 10(1): 86 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Y. Oudit and J. M. Penninger Cardiac regulation by phosphoinositide 3-kinases and PTEN Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2009; 82(2): 250 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nishi, R. Inagi, H. Kato, M. Tanemoto, I. Kojima, D. Son, T. Fujita, and M. Nangaku Hemoglobin Is Expressed by Mesangial Cells and Reduces Oxidant Stress J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2008; 19(8): 1500 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |