|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:765-771
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease |
a Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kerala, India
b Department of Biostatistics, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kerala, India
c Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kerala, India
d Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kerala, India
e Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, and Lucile Packard Childrens Hospital, Palo Alto, Calif.
Received for publication March 19, 2007; revisions received April 12, 2007; accepted for publication April 23, 2007. * Address for reprints: Balu Vaidyanathan, MD, DNB, (Pediatrics), DM (Cardiology), Pediatric Cardiology, Amrita Institute of Medical sciences, Elamakkara P.O., Kochi, Kerala, India Pin: 682 026. (Email: baluvaidyanathan{at}aims.amrita.edu; baluvaidyanathan{at}gmail.com).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Hospital records of 330 consecutive neonates who underwent surgical intervention between January 1999 and April 2006 were reviewed, and perioperative variables were recorded. Main outcome measures were 30-day mortality, postoperative bloodstream infection, and hospital stay of longer than 10 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.
Results: Overall mortality was 8.8%. Mortality significantly decreased from 21.4% before 2002 to 4.3% after 2002 (3.2% for corrective operations, P < .0001). The prevalence of postoperative bloodstream infection remained the same, whereas surgical site infection and hospital stay significantly increased after 2002. Predictors of outcomes on multivariate analysis were as follows: (1) mortality—operation before 2002 (odds ratio, 5.5), age less than 7 days (odds ratio, 3.8), preoperative antibiotic use (odds ratio, 5.6), and postoperative exchange transfusion (odds ratio, 14.9); (2) postoperative bloodstream infection (21.2%)—use of cardiopulmonary bypass (odds ratio, 2.0), reintubation (odds ratio, 7.7), and surgical site infection (odds ratio, 4.1); and (3) hospital stay of longer than 10 days (61.2%)—use of cardiopulmonary bypass (odds ratio, 2.8), delayed sternal closure (odds ratio, 3.6), reintubation (odds ratio, 12.1), surgical site infection (odds ratio, 13.8), and postoperative antibiotic use (odds ratio, 4.4).
Conclusions: With increasing experience, neonatal cardiac surgery can be performed with excellent outcomes in developing countries with resource limitations. Infectious complications contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality, and improvements in infection-control practices should be emphasized to improve outcomes further.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, the situation in the developing world is strikingly different. Congenital cardiac abnormalities are the second most important cause of childhood mortality in high-income countries but rank only sixth or lower in middle- and low-income countries.16
Delayed recognition of CHD is common, and most critical CHD is detected after newborns are discharged from the hospital. The problem is compounded by the lack of a structured system for referral and transport of sick neonates with suspected CHD to a tertiary cardiac care center. As a result, most newborns present to referral centers in a suboptimal preoperative state, and significant attrition occurs before hospital presentation.17
Most centers in developing countries, such as India, work with the inherent limitations in trained manpower, infrastructure, and equipment for postoperative care that accompany fewer economic resources.16
Furthermore, significant financial constraints are imposed by the absence of health insurance coverage. All of these factors present a significant challenge for the surgical management of neonates with CHD. Despite these limitations, a growing number of centers in the developing world have started performing corrective operations for neonates with critical CHD in the past decade.18,19
In this study we report the early results and an analysis of the determinants of outcomes of corrective and palliative neonatal cardiac surgery in 330 patients in a tertiary care pediatric cardiac program in the State of Kerala in southern India.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Setting
The data were obtained from a tertiary care pediatric cardiac facility that caters to a population of approximately 30 million in the State of Kerala in southern India. The program started in 1999 with significant limitations in physician and nursing staff and intensive care beds. Over the next 4 years, efforts were made to improve the infrastructure and manpower. Additional personnel were recruited, and a separate step-down intensive care unit (ICU) was created. Collaboration with a well-established pediatric cardiovascular program (Childrens Hospital Boston) was obtained to improve standards of nursing care and establish ICU protocols. There were no formal attempts to establish systems for neonatal transport in the region because of economic limitations, and few prenatally diagnosed patients were transported in utero during the study period. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and ventricular assist devices were not available. Although all personnel were encouraged to follow standardized infection-control guidelines,20
attempts to establish formal infection-control systems were only made toward the end of the study period.
Patients
All neonates (age, <30 days) who underwent corrective and palliative operations for CHD at our center during the study period were included. Surgical intervention for hypoplastic left heart syndrome and severe Ebstein anomaly was not performed. The diagnosis of CHD was established by means of echocardiography in all patients except one, a patient with total anomalous systemic venous connection whose diagnosis was made on the basis of cardiac catheterization. During the study period, several neonates presented to our center but did not undergo surgical intervention because of logistic constraints, financial constraints, or both or because of family preferences; these patients were not included in the analysis.
Outcome Variables, Definitions, and Determinants
The main outcome variables analyzed included mortality, hospital stay, and postoperative bloodstream infection. The causes of mortality were determined from hospital records. Patients were divided into 2 eras, before and after January 1, 2002, for the purpose of analysis in accordance with the evolution of the neonatal cardiac surgery program at our center. Mortality was defined as in-hospital death or death within 30 days of cardiac surgery. Prolonged hospital stay was defined as a hospital stay of longer than 10 days after cardiac surgery. A positive blood culture was required to establish bloodstream infection (preoperative or postoperative). Wound infection was defined as superficial if the sternum was stable and deep if there was bony involvement and sternal instability.21
Transport to the hospital was classified as monitored if the infant was transported in an ambulance accompanied by a doctor/paramedic staff and unmonitored if the family brought the patient without monitoring or professional assistance. Table 1
summarizes all the variables analyzed as possible determinants of outcome after neonatal cardiac surgery.
|
Statistical Analysis
The main outcome variables (early mortality, prolonged hospital stay, and postoperative bloodstream infection) were stratified into 2 groups for the purpose of analysis. For continuous variables, the independent-samples t test was performed, and discrete variables were analyzed by using the
2 test. All variables found to be significant on the univariate analysis were then stratified into groups with a reference group for comparison and entered into a logistic regression model for multivariate analysis. The results of the multivariate analysis were expressed as an odds ratio for risk of association with the outcome variables. Comparison of prevalence of mortality, postoperative bloodstream infection, surgical site infection, and proportion of patients having prolonged hospital stay between the 2 eras (ie, before and after 2002) was performed by using
2 analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
.001). There were only 5 premature neonates in the total study population. Two of these 5 died after surgical intervention. Eleven patients had a weight at the time of the operation of less than 2 kg, with the smallest weighing 1.9 kg. Because of the small number of premature/low birth weight patients, we did not attempt to perform a separate analysis for these patients.
Table 4 summarizes the variables significantly associated with mortality, prolonged hospital stay, and postoperative bloodstream infection on multivariate logistic regression analysis.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On multivariate analysis, the earlier period of surgical intervention (before 2002), age of less than 7 days, need for preoperative antibiotics, and requirement of exchange transfusion for postoperative sepsis emerged as significant predictors of mortality. Improvement in outcomes with growing experience has been reported by other centers and is associated with the initial learning curve of new programs.3,5
Our study design does not allow us to determine the specific reasons that contributed to improvements in outcomes. It is possible that a number of factors might have contributed.
The adverse effect of age of less than 7 days at operation on mortality is a significant finding. Although the proportion of palliative procedures was greater in younger patients (47.5% of operations performed in the first week of life were palliative compared with 21.3% performed after 1 week), the type of operation (palliative vs corrective) did not affect mortality on multivariate analysis. In a previous report on neonatal Blalock–Taussig shunts, we reported an immediate postoperative mortality of 10%.26
It was a routine practice in our center to perform corrective operations, such as the arterial switch operation, if feasible, in the second week of life after initial stabilization with interventions such as a balloon atrial septostomy.
The other predictors of mortality were directly or indirectly related to infectious complications. Preoperative bloodstream infections were present in 2.7% of patients, and 4.2% required preoperative antibiotics. These rates remained constant throughout the study period and could have resulted from delays in diagnosis and referral and frequent (60%) unmonitored transports.17
Postoperative bloodstream infections and surgical wound infections were observed in approximately one quarter of our patients. Double-volume exchange transfusion (performed for neonates with multidrug-resistant gram-negative sepsis with neutropenia and severe thrombocytopenia) was the other predictor for mortality in our study. This could be a reflection of the overall suboptimal physiologic state of the patients caused by severe sepsis because these patients tended to have more hemodyanamic instability and multiorgan dysfunction. We think the underlying indication for exchange transfusion, rather than the procedure itself, produced the increased risk of mortality.
Despite a significant reduction in mortality, the occurrence of bloodstream infections did not decrease during the study period. Furthermore, the frequency of surgical site infections and the proportion of patients requiring a hospital stay of longer than 10 days increased significantly after 2002. Analysis of predictors of prolonged hospital stay revealed use of CPB, delayed sternal closure, postoperative antibiotics, presence of wound infection, and reintubation as significant factors. Delayed sternal closure as a strategy was adopted when the patient showed cardiopulmonary compromise during an attempt at primary sternal closure.23
Such patients generally required longer and more intense ventilatory and inotropic support and were more vulnerable to infectious complications caused by an open chest wound and the presence of indwelling catheters for longer periods of time.23
Reuse of disposable equipment was not practiced in the operating room (except for aortic and venous cannulae, which were reused after sterilization with ethylene oxide) or in the postoperative unit; therefore it is unlikely that contaminated equipment could have contributed to the high incidence of infectious complications.16
The results of this study are of particular relevance to new pediatric cardiac programs that are being established in emerging economies. Many countries in the developing world are now experiencing a demographic shift in pediatric diseases as their human development indices improve. As neonatal and infant mortality from readily preventable conditions decrease, CHDs are likely to require increasing attention. Because of resource limitations and several logistic issues, there are many challenges to establishing and maintaining a neonatal cardiac surgery program in these countries. Our results show that with experience, in-hospital mortality, especially for corrective surgical interventions, can be reduced to levels comparable with those of developed countries. Few published reports on the outcomes of neonatal cardiac surgery are available from the developing world.18,19,26
These studies relate to specific conditions and not to the full spectrum of CHD in neonates.
Our study indicates that despite a reduction in mortality, morbidity from infectious complications appears to be considerable, and this might be a major stumbling block for further progress. Development and strict enforcement of infection-control policies (eg, hand washing before any direct patient contact, sterile technique for invasive catheter insertion, and early removal of invasive catheters) is therefore highly relevant.27
Pediatric cardiac programs in developing countries that attempt neonatal cardiac surgery should include attention to infection-control policies and procedures when establishing their clinical practice. Most infection-control practices can be introduced at relatively low cost and have the potential to improve outcomes significantly.
There are inherent limitations resulting from the retrospective nature of our study. We were not able to analyze and adjust the risk factors with respect to underlying organ function, and objective measures, such as blood lactate level or mixed venous oxygen saturation, were not analyzed as markers of hemodyanamic compromise. Another important limitation is the exclusion of highly complex lesions, such as hypoplastic left heart syndrome and severe Ebstein anomaly; excluding these would be expected to improve the outcomes reported in this study.28,29
During the study period, several neonates were admitted to our center who did not undergo operations because of logistic issues or reluctance on the part of their families; this also could have introduced a selection bias.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. T. Pezzella Global Aspects of Cardiothoracic Surgery with Focus on Developing Countries Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2010; 18(3): 299 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Barker, S. M. O'Brien, K. F. Welke, M. L. Jacobs, J. P. Jacobs, D. K. Benjamin Jr, E. D. Peterson, J. Jaggers, and J. S. Li Major Infection After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Risk Estimation Model Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2010; 89(3): 843 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R K Kumar and S Shrivastava Paediatric heart care in India Heart, August 1, 2008; 94(8): 984 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |