|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:1073-1076
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Brief Communication |
Rim Hospital and São Paulo Hospital of the Division of Cardiovascular Surgery of the Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Received for publication March 23, 2007; revisions received May 9, 2007; accepted for publication May 31, 2007. * Address for reprints: Luís Roberto Gerola, MD, PhD, Rua dos Otonis 880/apto 81 Vila Clementino CEP:04025-002, São Paulo, Brazil. (Email: gerola{at}uol.com.br).
In this study we propose a new surgical approach to correct ventricular septal rupture based on juxtaposition of the left and right ventricular free walls of the ruptured region to reinforce patch closure and avoid residual shunt.
From May 2002 through August 2006, 5 patients with diagnoses of myocardial infarction who had ventricular septal ruptures were submitted to surgical treatment with this new surgical approach, 4 with anterior myocardial infarction and 1 with posterior myocardial infarction. Two patients were in cardiogenic shock at the time of the operation, 1 was hemodynamically stable, and the other 2 were in New York Heart Association functional class III with severe pulmonary edema. Other important preoperative data are presented in Table 1.
|
Surgical procedures were done with cardiopulmonary bypass, cold blood antegrade cardioplegia, and topical cooling. After making a left ventriculotomy in the infarcted area and localizing the ventricular septal rupture, a pericardial patch was placed over the rupture region, and sutures were made more distally to reach the normal myocardial wall.
An interrupted suture started on the right ventricular free wall (which was closed) around 1.5 cm from the anterior interventricular sulcus (or projection of the left anterior descending artery) passing behind the rupture, stitching the pericardial patch in the most inferior portion of septum, and then passing through the base of the anterior papillary muscle of the mitral valve and going to the free wall of the left ventricle, which was also supported with other Teflon bars. We applied 4 to 5 stitches in the same manner.
When these stitches were tied, the free wall of the right ventricle and the free wall of the left ventricle were put close together over the rupture region and over the pericardial patch, closing the ventricular septal rupture by means of juxtaposition of the ventricular free walls over the pericardial patch.
A second line of sutures was executed, stitching the edge of the ventriculotomy and exteriorizing the pericardial patch. In this way we closed the left ventricle with separate stitches supported by Teflon bars. Finally, a running suture with 4-0 Prolene sutures was placed over the ventriculotomy to guarantee good hemostasis.
This technique is characterized by 2 suture lines: one superficial line to close the left ventriculotomy and the superior part of the pericardial patch and another deeper line that juxtaposes the right and left ventricular free walls over the rupture region and pericardial patch (Figures 1 and 2).
|
|
Echocardiograms were obtained for all the patients in the postoperative period, which demonstrated the absence of residual shunt. One of them (our second operation) had little blood flow passing between juxtaposed ventricular walls in the direction of the apex. This image was identified by means of echocardiography as a pseudoaneurysm, but in fact, this corresponded to the juxtaposition area (Figures 3 and 4).
|
|
In the present study it was possible to close ventricular septal ruptures in all cases. If we consider only the 4 patients in whom this new approach was applied as the first surgical technique, there was no hospital mortality, and none presented with residual shunt.
Despite the evolution of surgical treatment, we observed heterogeneous surgical results ranging from 10% to 13.8% to 38% in hospital mortality.1
For this reason, looking for a new surgical approach that reduces hospital mortality continues to be a great challenge.
There is a consensus among the majority of the authors that some concepts are very well defined, such as a left ventriculotomy over the infarcted area, the use of a prosthetic patch on the left side of the septum, suturing in noninfarcted myocardial regions, and the absence of resection of the infarcted area.2
Another important advance was that of David and colleagues,3
when they proposed exclusion of the infarcted area with a pericardial patch, avoiding resection of the infarcted area.
This new proposition represents an additional reinforcement over the patch exclusion. The use of patch exclusion closure of a ventricular septal rupture is the real advance in the treatment of this complication; however, almost all studies indicate a percentage of residual shunt that could represent a future problem. In addition, when there is a great myocardial infarction, extension to support the suture in the noninfarcted area could be difficult, and this juxtaposition of the right and left free walls could represent a good alternative. In fact, it was this situation that we experienced in the reoperation of the first patient. When we had a residual shunt, all tissues were friable, and then we thought of this surgical procedure as the last alternative to resolve this severe surgical problem.
Normally, the infarcted area had dilatation, and this exclusion represents reestablishment of ventricular geometry. Dilatation correction determines benefits over left ventricular function.3
The same concept was proposed for the treatment of ventricular aneurysms.4
Our proposition goes beyond the closure of the ventricular septal rupture by correcting ventricular dilatation and reducing the left ventricle to normal size, during which the reduction of the left ventricular diameter exhibits benefits in recovering left ventricular function in accordance with the concept proposed by Batista.5
The possibility of compromise ventricular stroke volume is always present. However, if we consider the base of the papillary muscle as a mark to limit our ventricular reduction, this risk becomes very low, as demonstrated in the echocardiographic results of our latest patient obtained 7 months postoperatively, which present a normal ventricular cavity and normal ventricular ejection fraction.
Although this study involved few patients, this simple technical variation could be used to close the ventricular septal rupture without any residual shunt and could represent one more alternative to resolve a difficult surgical problem.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Pocar, D. Passolunghi, and F. Donatelli New technique for postinfarction ventricular septal rupture J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2008; 136(1): 234 - 235. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |