|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:1397-1405
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease |
a Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
b Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Received for publication May 4, 2007; revisions received July 17, 2007; accepted for publication July 24, 2007. * Address for reprints: Tain-Yen Hsia, MD, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, CSB 409, Charleston, SC, 29425. (Email: hsiaty{at}musc.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Doppler ultrasound was used to evaluate flows in the hepatic vein, portal vein, and subhepatic inferior vena cava under respiratory monitoring and with a tilt table. Twenty-nine patients with biventricular circulation were studied: 19 with normal diaphragms and 10 after diaphragm plication. Twenty-eight patients with total cavopulmonary connections after the Fontan procedure were also studied: 19 with normal diaphragms and 9 with plicated diaphragms. Inspiratory/expiratory flow ratios in supine and upright positions were calculated to investigate respiratory effects, and upright/supine flow ratios were calculated to assess gravity effects.
Results: In patients with biventricular circulation and normal diaphragms, hepatic venous flow was augmented by inspiration; this effect was reduced in patients with a plicated diaphragm (upright inspiratory/expiratory flow ratios: 2.4 vs 1.4, respectively; P = .01). Portal venous flow was higher during expiration; this effect was lost in patients with a plicated diaphragm (supine inspiratory/expiratory flow ratios: 0.8 and 1.0; P < .05). In Fontan patients with normal diaphragms, hepatic venous flow depended heavily on inspiration. This effect was blunted in patients with a plicated diaphragm (supine inspiratory/expiratory flow ratios: 3.2 vs 2.3; P < .05). Expiratory augmentation of portal flow was absent in Fontan patients with normal diaphragms and reversed in patients a plicated diaphragm (supine inspiratory/expiratory flow ratios: 1.0 vs 1.6; P = .02). Gravity reduced Fontan portal venous flow; having a plicated diaphragm did not alter this effect (upright/supine flow ratios: 0.7 vs 0.7).
Conclusions: In patients with biventricular and those with Fontan circulation with a paralyzed diaphragm, plication does not completely restore normal subdiaphragmatic venous hemodynamics. In Fontan patients with a plicated diaphragm, important inspiration-derived hepatic venous flow is suppressed, and portal venous flow loses its normal expiratory augmentation. These flow dynamics share similarities with those observed in patients with failing Fontan circulation. This suboptimal splanchnic circulation may contribute to early problems of prolonged pleural effusions and ascites and potentially may promote late Fontan failure. Phrenic nerve injury should consequently be avoided at all costs before or at the time of the Fontan operation.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two retrospective case-control analyses of patients with Fontan circulation have shown that diaphragm paralysis significantly increases postoperative morbidity, including prolonged pleural effusions, longer hospital stay, chronic ascites, and higher rate of hospital readmission.8,9
Both studies suggested that early diaphragm plication would improve and reoptimize Fontan flow dynamics and potentially avoid late complications.
In children with biventricular circulation, early surgical plication has been recognized to limit the morbidity associated with diaphragm paralysis and its resultant respiratory disturbance.10-12
However, it remains unknown whether diaphragm plication restores venous flow dynamics to normal. The purpose of this study is to examine whether the effects of respiration and gravity on subdiaphragmatic flow dynamics are normalized in patients with biventricular and Fontan circulation after diaphragm plication for phrenic nerve palsy.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twenty-eight patients were studied 1 to 13 years (mean 7 ± 4 years) after a total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC: lateral tunnel or extracardiac conduit). Nine had previously undergone a unilateral diaphragm plication (group TCPC-DP) for diaphragm paralysis (8 right and 1 left); 5 were in NYHA class I, 1 in class II, and 3 in class III. The remaining 19 TCPC patients with no diaphragm plication were in self-reported NYHA functional class I (group TCPC); none had clinical signs of congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, major pulmonary arteriovenous malformations, protein-losing enteropathy, or other known complications of the Fontan circulation. Six patients in the TCPC-DP group had a fenestrated inferior pathway and 5 in the TCPC group.
For both BV-DP and TCPC-DP groups, the diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis was confirmed by either ultrasonongraphic or fluoroscopic interrogation in the immediate postoperative period or before hospital discharge. Diaphragm plications were used before discharge or to assist mechanical ventilatory weaning. In all cases, the surgical method used involved a limited lateral thoracotomy on the affected side and the diaphragm was plicated by the standard central pleating technique. There was no formal interval study of diaphragm function.
All subjects underwent hepatic venous, portal venous, and infrahepatic inferior vena caval (IVC) Doppler ultrasonographic interrogation under simultaneous dynamic respiratory and electrocardiographic monitoring. A tilt table was used to allow measurements in the supine and upright (85°-90° from horizontal plane) positions. In addition, ultrasonographic examination of bilateral diaphragmatic excursion was performed in all subjects to document diaphragm function. The study protocol was approved by the hospital research ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained for all subjects.
Doppler Ultrasound Recordings
The methodology, mathematical background, and flow rate calculations used in this study were described in detail previously.5-7
In brief, pulsed-wave Doppler recordings in the hepatic vein, portal vein, and IVC were made with each subject breathing quietly in the supine and then the upright position. Recordings were made in the left or middle hepatic vein (approximately 1 cm proximal to the junction with the IVC) and the infrahepatic IVC (1–2 cm proximal to the junction with the hepatic vein). The portal flow signal was obtained in the main portal trunk before its division into the right and left branches, following previously published protocols.13
Volumetric flow rates in hepatic vein, portal vein, and IVC were calculated from velocity time integrals and the measured vessel diameters from the Doppler recording.
Gravity Effect
The effect of gravity on net flow rate was evaluated. Net flow rate was defined as the absolute total flow during a complete respiratory cycle obtained by subtracting the retrograde velocity time integral from the antegrade velocity time integral. The effect of gravity on flow rate was represented as the ratio of flow rate in the upright position over that in the supine position, Qup/Qsup. A ratio of less than 1 signifies reduced flow in the upright position.
Respiratory Effect
The Doppler signal was evaluated during inspiration, during expiration, and throughout a complete respiratory cycle.5-7
Flow rates during the inspiratory phase, Qin, of the respiratory cycle were determined, as well as during the expiratory phase, Qex. The effect of respiration on flow was expressed as a ratio of Qin/Qex and was measured in both supine and upright positions for all 3 venous regions of interest. When Qin is higher than Qex, Qin/Qex ratio is greater than 1, and vice versa.
Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons of (1) normal against biventricular patients with plicated diaphragms (BV vs BV-DP) and (2) TCPC patients against those with plicated diaphragms (TCPC vs TCPC-DP) were performed with 2-tailed t tests. To evaluate the influence of upright posture on Qin/Qex, we conducted intragroup examinations of Qin/Qex in the supine versus Qin/Qex in the upright position using paired t tests.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There were no differences in room air oxygen saturation between (1) BV-DP and BV subjects (98% ± 1%, vs 97% ± 2%) and between (2) TCPC-DP and TCPC patients (89% ± 5% vs 89% ± 4%).
All BV and TCPC patients had normal bilateral diaphragm excursion under ultrasonographic interrogation. Patients with a previous diaphragm plication all had severely limited or absent diaphragm mobility on the affected side(s) throughout the respiratory cycle. None had paradoxical diaphragm movement.
Flow Dynamics
Gravity effects on flow: Qup/Qsup
The results of the Doppler flow rate calculations for gravity effects on flow are summarized in Table 1. In the BV patients, gravity reduced hepatic and portal venous flows by 20% and had no significant influence on IVC flow. Diaphragm plication did not alter these effects significantly. In TCPC patients, gravity reduced flows in the hepatic and pulmonary veins and in the IVC. TCPC-DP patients showed similar effects (Table 1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coupled gravity and respiratory effects: Upright (Qin/Qex) versus supine (Qin/Qex) biventricular patients (Table 2)
In BV patients, upright posture enhanced inspiratory hepatic venous flow augmentation (Qin/Qex: 1.7 ± 0.5 supine vs 2.4 ± 1.2 upright) (Figure 4). In BV-DP patients, this accentuation of the respiratory effect by the upright posture is lost (Qin/Qex: 2.0 ± 0.9 supine vs 1.4 ± 0.3 upright) (Figure 1). In the portal vein, upright posture appeared to partially restore expiratory augmentation toward normal (Qin/Qex: 1.0 ± 0.4 vs 0.9 ± 0.3), but this did not reach statistical significance (P =.09). Postural change did not affect the respiratory effect on IVC flow in either BV or BV-DP patients.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diaphragm paralysis owing to phrenic nerve injury has long been known to be a serious complication of cardiac surgery in children.10,11,18
The resulting respiratory insufficiency can lead to prolonged mechanical ventilation and its associated comorbidities: pulmonary infection, longer intensive care unit and hospital stay, and potentially higher mortality. Consequently, it has been recognized that early surgical plication can reverse some of these risks and prevent related morbidity.12,18,19
Subdiaphragmatic venous return, especially the portal–hepatic venous axis, is constantly affected by the dynamic interactions among the liver, diaphragm, and intrathoracic pressure changes. It remains unknown whether surgical plication of a paralyzed diaphragm restores the systemic venous flow dynamics.
This question is particularly relevant in patients undergoing the Fontan operation. The negative intrathoracic pressure generated by normal respiration is responsible for a majority of splanchnic venous drainage; hepatic venous flow during inspiration is more than 3 times that during expiration.7
Therefore, Fontan patients would be expected to poorly tolerate the impaired respiratory mechanics resulting from a paralyzed diaphragm, a maladaptation that is likely to be most evident within the hepatic–portal circulation. Unfortunately, perhaps owing to the necessity of multiple operations, up to 9% of Fontan patients have diaphragm paralysis as a result of inadvertent phrenic nerve injury during surgery.9
In 2 recent series, diaphragm paralysis increased the risk of early and midterm complications, including prolonged hospital stay, pleural effusions, readmission rates, and incidence of ascites.8,9
Although definitive conclusions could not be made, both articles reported anecdotal experience of improved outcomes and reversal of ascites with diaphragm plication. On the basis of these observations, the authors advocated heightened suspicion for diaphragm paralysis after a Fontan operation and early surgical plication once the diagnosis is made. However, the question remains of whether diaphragm plication can restore optimal Fontan hemodynamics.8
Patients With Biventricular Circulation
In a series of investigations, we5-7
have reported that respiration and gravity are two important factors affecting subdiaphragmatic venous flow in patients with normal and Fontan circulation. Normally, gravity and respiration are associated intimately in their influence on the subdiaphragmatic venous circulation. By adopting diaphragm plication as a proxy for a deranged respiratory mechanic, the current study established a clinical model that decouples respiratory and gravity influences and examined their effects individually and together.
The present investigation found that biventricular patients with a plicated diaphragm (group BV-DP) have altered venous flow dynamics. This is the first study of which we are aware that has reported this finding. Our data demonstrate that when diaphragm function is normal, the negative intrathoracic pressure created by inspiration augments hepatic venous return, and upright posture accentuates this phenomenon. Two synergistic mechanisms are responsible for this observed postural effect. First, in the supine position and during quiet tidal breathing, the lower rib cage behaves as if it is driven by transabdominal rather than intrathoracic pressure.14
Thus, in the supine position, most breathing is abdominal; in the upright position, rib cage motion is greater.16
The consequence is that lung volume change is higher and the negative intrathoracic pressure generation is more pronounced in the upright position. Second, in the upright position, other accessory muscles are recruited to aid inspiration. For example, abdominal muscle contraction actively raises and stretches the diaphragm to maximize its caudal displacement and pressure generation during inspiration. This ventilatory mechanical advantage only operates in the upright position, where gravity aids passive diaphragmatic descent.14
Studies in normal subjects have shown that vital capacity drops by 20% in the supine position.14
This figure corresponds closely to the 29% loss of hepatic venous respiratory effect calculated from our data (BV hepatic venous Qin/Qex: 2.4 upright to 1.7 supine). In biventricular patients with a plicated diaphragm, augmentation of hepatic venous flow by the "respiratory pump" has lost this upright postural advantage.
Having a plicated diaphragm also alters the portal venous flow characteristics. As reported previously, normal portal venous flow decreases during inspiration, as the descending diaphragm compresses the compliant hepatic sinusoids and portal venules to displace portal inflow.3,5
The hepatic sinusoids are the site of both resistance and compliance in the portal–hepatic circulation, and normal portal flow is augmented during expiration.20
The loss of expiratory portal flow augmentation in biventricular patients with a plicated diaphragm implies a decreased hepatic compressibility and reserve, a finding that is similar to our previous observation in Fontan patients.5,20-22
Patients With Fontan Circulation
In patients with the Fontan circulation, pulmonary vascular resistance and systemic venous resistance are in series. This circulatory arrangement amplifies respiratory and gravitational modulations of venous return in Fontan patients.23
We have previously demonstrated in TCPC patients that hepatic venous flow is primarily driven by inspiration. This phenomenon is observed whether the patient is well or in a failing state, is independent of Fontan pressure levels, and is enhanced by fenestration in the TCPC pathway.5-7
Our current findings demonstrate that the inspiratory drive of hepatic venous return in TCPC patients is significantly blunted after diaphragm plication, despite a greater proportion of TCPC-DP patients having a fenestrated pathway. Therefore, the present study not only confirms the importance of the "respiratory pump" in TCPC patients but also points out that altered respiratory mechanics, exemplified in patients with a plicated diaphragm, can suppress this major energy source for hepatic venous drainage. Such a deficit can potentially further impair a splanchnic physiology that is already abnormal in Fontan patients. For example, the suppression of hepatic venous respiratory effect by upright posture is exacerbated in TCPC-DP patients (Qin/Qex: 2.3 supine vs 1.7 upright).
The consequences of suboptimal respiratory mechanics on the splanchnic circulation are also seen in the portal venous flow, which is vulnerable to upstream disturbances in the hepatic venous or central caval systems.21,24
Our data show that even in TCPC patients with functioning diaphragms, portal flow has lost its normal expiratory augmentation. Furthermore, in TCPC-DP patients with a plicated diaphragm, portal flow is reversed from normal, so that flow is higher during inspiration than during expiration. This is a phenomenon that we have previously observed in Fontan patients in poor functional status or with elevated Fontan pressures, and it is a reflection of increased hepatic congestion and decreased hepatic compliance and reserve.5
In such patients, congested hepatic sinusoids become dilated and are recruited into an open tube system, which allows portal flow to occur during the same phase of respiration as the hepatic venous flow.3,22,25
The fact that portal dynamics in TCPC patients with a plicated diaphragm are similar to those in patients with failing Fontan circulation suggests that, despite improving ventilatory mechanics, surgical plication does not completely restore splanchnic flow dynamics. Therefore, even with surgical plication, diaphragm paralysis is not completely compensated in TCPC patients and may increase the risk of late complications, such as ascites and protein-losing enteropathy, both of which have been linked to splanchnic venous congestion.26
The initial research question of this study was to find out the impact of diaphragmatic paralysis in the Fontan circulation. Unfortunately, we could not answer this question because, similar to other groups,9,18
our institution adopted a proactive approach of performing early surgical plication in Fontan patients when a paralyzed diaphragm was diagnosed. Therefore, we do not have data from Fontan patients with a paralyzed diaphragm before plication. However, our data suggest that disturbances in ventilatory mechanics may have a more detrimental effect on the splanchnic venous return in Fontan patients than in biventricular patients. It is also evident that patients with a plicated diaphragm have some generalized defects in their splanchnic venous return that are present in either biventricular or Fontan physiology. In other words, even with a biventricular circulation, some of the splanchnic flow dynamics are abnormal and resemble those seen in Fontan patients.
The current study shed light on subdiaphragmatic venous flow anomalies that persist despite diaphragmatic plication, which is a consequence of phrenic nerve injury. Therefore, protection of the phrenic nerve before and during the Fontan operation is paramount. Because of its long course from the neck to the diaphragm, the phrenic nerve is susceptible to inadvertent damage during operations for congenital cardiac disease owing to topical cold injury, traction injury resulting from tension, vena caval annulations, and direct trauma from electrocute dissection.11,27-29
The necessity of multiple reoperations in patients with single ventricle likely increases their risk of phrenic nerve injury.9
The left phrenic nerve is vulnerable during aortic arch reconstruction for the stage I Norwood operation or when a left modified Blalock–Taussig shunt is dissected before its closure. The right phrenic nerve is at risk during dissection and cannulation of the superior vena cava or IVC for the stage II cavopulmonary anastomosis or TCPC completion. One can speculate that surgical strategies that minimize operative dissection during these 2 latter stages of single ventricle palliation, such as deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, may be beneficial in reducing the incidence of iatrogenic phrenic nerve injury. It is more important to prevent diaphragmatic paralysis than to treat it.30
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We thank the consultants and staff of the Cardiothoracic Unit at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children for their support and cooperation.
| Earn CME credits at http://cme.ctsnetjournals.org
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Read at the Eighty-seventh Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Washington, DC, May 5-9, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. P. Graham Jr The Year in Congenital Heart Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 28, 2008; 52(18): 1492 - 1499. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |