| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:1533-1539
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Saarland Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Read at the Eighty-seventh Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Washington, DC, May 5–9, 2007.
Received for publication April 6, 2007; revisions received August 9, 2007; accepted for publication August 27, 2007. * Address for reprints: H.-J. Schäfers, MD, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Saarland, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany (Email: h-j.schaefers{at}uniklinikum-saarland.de).
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Methods: From October 1995 to December 2006, 604 patients (aged 3–86 years) underwent aortic valve repair. Cusp prolapse was found in 427 patients (246 tricuspid, 181 bicuspid). Prolapse was corrected by central plication (n = 275) or triangular resection (n = 80). A pericardial patch was implanted for pre-existing cusp defects or after excision of calcium (n = 72). One cusp was repaired in 198 patients; the remaining patients underwent repair of 2 (n = 189) or 3 cusps (n = 40). In 102 patients more than one technique was used, and the patients were allocated to the group of the assumedly more complex repair (central plication < triangular resection < pericardial patch plasty). Cumulative follow-up was 1238 patient-years (mean 35 ± 27 months).
Results: Hospital mortality was 2.6% (11/427). Actuarial freedom from aortic regurgitation of grade II or more at 5 years was 92% (central plication), 90% (triangular resection), and 90% (pericardial patch plasty). Thirteen patients were reoperated on, with prolapse as the most common reason for failure (n = 7); 6 underwent re-repair. Freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 95% (central plication), 94% (triangular resection), and 94% (pericardial patch plasty). Freedom from valve replacement at 5 years was 97% (central plication), 99% (triangular resection), and 98% (pericardial patch plasty).
Conclusions: In aortic valve repair, cusp prolapse can be treated reliably by central plication. In the presence of more complex disease, triangular resection or pericardial patch plasty may be used without compromising midterm durability.
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
The success with valve-sparing aortic replacement has revived the interest in aortic valve (AV) repair. The traditional application of valve-sparing surgery has been in patients with normal aortic cusps. Cusp prolapse, however, may be present in conjunction with aortic dilatation1-3
and cusps may actually be deformed owing to chronic aortic dilatation.4
Cusp prolapse is also a frequent cause of aortic regurgitation (AR) without dilatation of the aortic root,5 in both bicuspid and tricuspid AV anatomy. In these patients, correction of cusp geometry is the primary goal of AV repair. Plication of the free cusp margin has been performed in the paracommissural zone.6-8 We have preferred central plication (CP) of the free cusp margin for correction of prolapse in both bicuspid and tricuspid anatomy. We have consistently applied this technique in the presence of normal root dimensions and in conjunction with valve-preserving aortic replacement.3,9
Triangular resection (TR) of cusp tissue was described by Carpentier10 and systematically used by others for repair of regurgitant bicuspid and tricuspid AVs.6,7, 11 A later analysis, however, identified TR as a risk factor for secondary failure and reoperation.12
Pericardial patch (PP) insertion for AV repair was first used by Ross13 in 1963 and has been used for cusp replacement or extension in rheumatic and congenital AV disease.14-17 Few long-term results have been published, but glutaraldehyde-treated pericardium appears to be a stable substitute for aortic cusps.18 Pericardium can also be used to stabilize aortic cusps that prolapse in the presence of congenital fenestrations, and it may also be used for correction of defects after excision of a calcified raphe in prolapsing bicuspid valves.
Of these techniques, CP of the cusp margin appears to be the least complex technique, and it allows for stepwise adjustment of cusp geometry. TR involves a higher level of surgical judgment regarding extent of resection, and it carries the risk of suture line dehiscence. Partial replacement of cusp tissue includes, by definition, a longer suture line, and there are possible concerns regarding midterm stability and freedom from calcification of the implanted pericardium.
Currently there are no data from any single surgical group comparing these techniques of cusp repair. We therefore analyzed our results with these techniques.
|
Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In 140 of these patients root dimensions were normal, and in 287 individuals dilatation of the aorta was present. Aortic dilatation was corrected by supracommissural aortic replacement (n = 91) or root replacement (n = 196) by either root remodeling (n = 186) or AV reimplantation (n = 10).
Preoperative AR was grade II in 25%, grade III in 59%, and grade IV in 16%. The primary indication for the operation was acute dissection in 28 patients, ascending aortic aneurysm in 119 patients, AR in 266 patients, mitral regurgitation in 10, and coronary artery disease in 4 patients.
Surgical Technique
The ascending aorta was opened by a transverse aortotomy or completely transsected 5 to 10 mm above the commissures. The aortic root was placed under radial tension by stay sutures placed in each commissure. The cusps were carefully inspected for congenital fenestrations or postendocarditic defects or the presence of fibrosis or calcification. The relative lengths of the different free cusp margins were compared with each other. In the most recent 2 years, we additionally measured the height difference between the central free margin and the lowest point of the aortic insertion of each cusp (ie, effective height).19
Prolapse was initially defined as a difference in the central height of a free margin relative to the other margin(s) of 2 mm or more. In the past 2 years, an effective height of less than 7 mm has been considered as an indicator of prolapse. Prolapse was common in the congenitally fused cusp of bicuspid AVs (n = 61). Another frequent finding of prolapse was prolapse in conjunction with correction of aortic dilatation (bicuspid AVs, n = 120; tricuspid AVs, n = 167). Prolapse associated with cusp fenestrations was seen in tricuspid (n = 28) and in bicuspid AVs (n = 8). Concomitant cusp fibrosis or calcification was found in 116 valves (bicuspid, n = 101; tricuspid, n = 15).
For correction of prolapse, plication of the central portion of the free margin (CP) was performed as the preferred technique with single 5–0 or 6–0 Prolene sutures (Ethicon, Inc, Hamburg, Germany). Depending on the extent of prolapse, 1 to 5 plication stitches were placed in a stepwise fashion until an adequate cusp configuration was achieved.
In the presence of marked tissue redundancy (>10 mm) or dense fibrosis/calcification in the raphe of a bicuspid AV, a TR was chosen. A limited central resection of cusp tissue was performed, and the remaining tissue was readapted by interrupted stitches (6–0 Prolene sutures).
If the resulting tissue defect after TR was too large to allow for direct readaption, a PP patch was inserted. Autologous pericardium for cusp reconstruction was also used in the presence of congenital fenestrations (n = 36). A piece of pericardium was fixed on a piece of cardbord with hemoclips, pretreated for 2 to 3 minutes in 1% glutaraldehyde solution, and rinsed in saline for 5 minutes. A patch of adequate size was cut and sutured into the defect with a running suture.
Independent of the type of cusp repair used, we aimed to achieve an identical height of the free margins, and in the past 2 years an effective height of 7 to 8 mm in tricuspid and 8 to 10 mm in bicuspid AVs.
Twenty-eight patients were operated on under emergency conditions for type A dissection. Sixteen patients had previous cardiac surgery, and 10 patients had Marfan syndrome. Eighty-seven patients had concomitant coronary artery disease, and 39 had mitral regurgitation. Of 287 patients with aortic dilatation, 106 had concomitant dilatation of the aortic arch. Additional procedures were coronary artery bypass surgery (n = 87), mitral valve repair (n = 39), and partial (n = 87) or total (n = 19) arch replacement.
All patients were studied intraoperatively by transesophageal echocardiography. The degree of AR was determined primarily by the size of the regurgitant jet assessed by color Doppler and the downward slope of the continuous-wave Doppler.20 All patients were studied at least once before discharge, that is, between postoperative days 5 and 7. Further transthoracic echocardiograms were performed at 6 and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Follow-up was complete in 97% of patients and ranged from 1 to 133 months (mean 35 ± 27 months) for a cumulative follow-up of 1238 patient-years.
Study Groups
The patients were divided into three groups according to the used repair technique (i.e. CP, TR, and PP). If different techniques were used in one valve at different cusps, the more complex repair procedure determined the group allocation according to the complexity of the repair (CP < TR < PP).
Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis included comparison of parametric and continuous variables between the groups by 1-way analysis of variance. Kaplan–Meier curves were calculated for freedom of relevant regurgitation, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from valve replacement with a commercially available software package (Prism; GraphPad Inc, San Diego, Calif). The curves were compared between the groups by the Mantel–Haenszel log–rank test.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The groups were not directly comparable with respect to several of the clinical data analyzed (Table 1). Patients were older in the CP group (58 ± 17 years) compared with the TR (49 ± 16 years) or PP groups (52 ± 18 years; P < .001). Concomitant procedures were more frequent in CP (aortic root replacement, P < .001; coronary artery bypass grafting, P < .01). Most important, the techniques required for valve reconstruction included significantly less frequent use of TR and more CP for cusp repair in tricuspid AVs. Cardiopulmonary bypass time and ischemia were longer for PP insertion than for CP or TR (P = .017; P < .0001).
|
No patient died after PP plasty, and no death was related to dysfunction of the reconstructed AV.
Survival at 5 years was 91% after CP, 99% after TR, and 89% after PP (P = .06). There were 2 episodes of thromboembolism (CP 1, PP 1) within 6 weeks postoperatively in conjunction with intermittent atrial fibrillation. Endocarditis developed early postoperatively in 2 patients (CP 1, PP 1), resulting in a linearized incidence of endocarditis of 0.16%/patient-year.
Thirteen patients required reoperation (CP 6, TR 5, PP 2) for suture dehiscence (n = 2), secondary root dilatation (n = 1), and cusp retraction (n = 1). The 2 individuals who had endocarditis were reoperated on within the first postoperative year after healing of endocarditis. In all other patients (n = 7) prolapse was the reason for reoperation. In 6 patients the valve was re-repaired, including the 2 with suture dehiscence. Freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 95% (CP), 94% (TR), and 94% (PP; P = .3; Figure 1). Freedom from valve replacement at 5 years was 97% (CP), 99% (TR), and 98% (PP; P = .9).
|
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Cusp prolapse can occasionally be visualized by 2-dimensional echocardiography, but its recognition by color flow Doppler jet is probably more reliable. Pure annular dilation or cusp restriction is associated with central jet direction and origin, whereas any eccentric regurgitant jet suggests cusp prolapse.21,22
Cusp geometry is also difficult to judge intraoperatively. Cusp dimensions in relation to sinus dimensions determine the configuration of the AV, and the exact dimensions are difficult to measure.4 To find an easier parameter, we introduced measurement of the effective height, as the height difference between the central free margin and the aortic insertion lines.19 A caliper allows easy and reproducible measurement of the effective height of the cusps. We have found this approach particularly helpful in patients with prolapse of more than one cusp.
In case of limited cusp prolapse, we used plication stitches in the central portion of the free edge of the cusp (CP technique). The concept of paracommissural plication has been used particularly in AR associated with ventricular septal defects.23,24 Trusler and associates25 reported a series of 70 patients with a 10-year freedom from valvuloplasty failure and freedom from reoperation of 76% and 85%, respectively. In contrast, we always use CP sutures, which were possibly first used in 1961 by Spencer, Bahnson, and Neill.26 The differential stress distribution at the cusp free edge shows maximal stress near the commissure and minimal stress near the central portion of the free edge and therefore favors CP.27 Compared with the paracommissural approach, our results for CP show better valve stability with 90% freedom from AR grade II or more and 95% freedom from reoperation at 10 years. In addition, the stepwise placement of plicating sutures appears reasonable, because overcorrection can be reversed easily by removal of the last suture. We have not encountered late sequelae of these sutures, such as calcification in plicated areas of the free margin or torn out sutures after CP.
In the presence of a more extensive prolapse, we have performed a triangular resection (TR) to avoid excessive bulging of plicated cusp tissue. Its advantage over simple plication in this setting is unclear. TR is definitely necessary in case of dense fibrosis or calcification, where plication cannot be performed. This is rare in tricuspid AVs, but common in bicuspid AVs with a fibrosed or calcified median raphe. Haydar and colleagues,6 who performed TR in 11 patients, found recurrent AR in 3 patients with the need for reoperation (27%). No details about valve anatomy and reasons for failure are given in this publication.6 TR of cusp tissue appeared as a risk factor for repair failure in bicuspid AVs in an analysis from the Cleveland Clinic, with 14% (9/66) of patients requiring reoperation.12 We observed a low failure rate of 6% (5/80) after TR. A reason for this difference may be that we frequently corrected prolapse of both cusps in bicuspid AVs (112/181 = 62%), whereas Casselman and colleagues12 apparently corrected only one cusp and therefore may have underestimated existing cusp pathology.
We used pericardial patch (PP) insertion for closure of congenital fenestrations that had led to cusp prolapse to provide better stress distribution in the paracommisural zone. Others have used a polytetrafluoroethylene suture (Gore-Tex suture; W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, Ariz) placed in the free margin for stabilization.28 Currently, no data on durability of the latter approach are available. Inasmuch as almost all of our valves repaired in such a way have remained stable, our current approach appears to be a good and reproducible option.
Another indication for PP insertion has been partial cusp replacement after TR if the resulting tissue defect was too large for direct readaption. Cusp replacement by pericardium has been performed before for several indications. Alsoufi and associates17 used cusp extension with pericardium for congenital AV disease and reported a 5-year freedom from valve replacement of 75%. Pretre and colleagues29 used pericardium for tricuspidalization of regurgitant bicuspid AVs with a follow-up of less than 4 years. Tolan and associates30 also used pericardium for tricuspidalization in stenotic bicuspid AVs, but again the follow-up was short with a maximum of 60 months. Al-Halees and associates18 used a single strip of pericardium for extension or replacement of all three aortic cusps in mixed AV disease and reported a good durability of autologous pericardium with freedom from structural valve degeneration of 80% at 10 years. With our limited follow-up—72 months of longest follow-up and a mean of 22 ± 18 months—our results are similarly good with a freedom from reoperation at 5 years of 94%. Further follow-up will determine the role of pericardium in AV reconstruction.
Despite the overall encouraging good results of cusp repair, we encountered 13 failures requiring reoperation. In most patients (n = 7) a residual prolapse was already seen early postoperatively in conjunction with improved but persisting AR. Its degree increased over time and ultimately led to reoperation. In retrospect, these valves were undercorrected and failure may have been prevented by more aggressive surgery at the time of initial cusp repair. The initial reoperations were performed as valve replacement (n = 3). More recently, and with better recognition of prolapse, we have been able to re-repair these valves (n = 4). Actual repair failure, for example, suture breakdown, was rare (n = 2: 2 hours postoperatively and 9 days). In both instances, TR with direct suture had been performed initially. Possibly, restricted cusp motion and excessive tension contributed to suture dehiscence in both instances. In both patients the valve could be re-repaired by implantation of a pericardial patch, and both continue to have stable function in the follow-up. Partial cusp replacement thus may reduce tension on the suture line.
The major limitation of the current investigation is the fact that the three techniques for cusp repair are not directly comparable, and they were used for different pathologic conditions. In a calcified cusp, for example, simple CP is not possible, whereas in the presence of pliable cusp tissue, nobody would consider PP insertion. With pliable cusp tissue and a larger prolapse, one can consider either CP or TR, but it appears advisable to decide for the least complex technique. Consequently, the three patient groups are not similar and comparable. On the other hand, it was not our goal to compare patient-related variables, but simply relative durability of the repair techniques. In addition, our definition of prolapse changed over time. To improve reproducibility and decrease the influence of subjective surgical judgment, we introduced the measurement of the effective height.19 Most important, the intraoperative determination of this surrogate of cusp configuration has allowed us to avoid the generation of symmetric prolapse, which was a reason for reoperation in 7 patients. We have found this particularly helpful in the last 140 repairs.
Finally, this is a retrospective and nonrandomized analysis. From a scientific standpoint, a prospective randomized trial comparing different cusp repair procedures would be preferable. Longer follow-up will be necessary to confirm the present results.
Correction of cusp prolapse is possible by different techniques, such as plication of the free margin and TR of redundant cusp tissue. All techniques have worked similarly well in our hands with comparable midterm results. Even more complex cusp repair is possible with autologous pericardial tissue, allowing for correction of congenital or acquired defects or resection of limited calcifications. This has been feasible without compromising midterm valve stability. All techniques can be used, provided that adequate cusp configuration can be achieved. Longer follow up will be necessary to judge the long-term results of the different techniques.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Giebels, D. Aicher, T. Kunihara, S. Rodionycheva, W. Schmied, and H.-J. Schafers Causes and management of aortic valve regurgitation after aortic valve reimplantation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2013; 145(3): 774 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Liebrich, M. K. Kruszynski, D. Roser, C. Meisner, K.-N. Doll, W. B. Hemmer, and T. Weimar The David Procedure in Different Valve Pathologies: A Single-Center Experience in 236 Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2013; 95(1): 71 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Mazzitelli, C. Nobauer, J. S. Rankin, C. C. Badiu, M. Krane, P. S. Crooke, W. E. Cohn, A. Opitz, C. Schreiber, and R. Lange Early Results After Implantation of a New Geometric Annuloplasty Ring for Aortic Valve Repair Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2013; 95(1): 94 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. S. Rankin, J. L. Conger, E. Tuzun, J. A. Winkler, K. M. Harms, L. A. Beavan, T. Fossum, and W. E. Cohn In vivo testing of an intra-annular aortic valve annuloplasty ring in a chronic calf model Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, July 1, 2012; 42(1): 149 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Mayer, D. Aicher, S. Feldner, T. Kunihara, and H.-J. Schafers Repair versus replacement of the aortic valve in active infective endocarditis Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, July 1, 2012; 42(1): 122 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. D'Ancona, A. Amaducci, J. Prodromo, F. Pirone, M. Follis, C. Falletta, and M. Pilato Midterm follow-up dynamic echocardiography evaluation after aortic valve repair for aortic valve insufficiency Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, June 1, 2012; 14(6): 721 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Boodhwani and G. El Khoury Aortic valve repair: a glimpse into the future Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2012; 41(1): 2 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Oka, Y. Okita, M. Matsumori, K. Okada, H. Minami, H. Munakata, T. Inoue, A. Tanaka, T. Sakamoto, A. Omura, et al. Aortic Regurgitation After Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement: Modes of Failure Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2011; 92(5): 1639 - 1644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Carrel Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2011; 92(5): 1644 - 1645. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Rankin, L. A. Beavan, and W. E. Cohn Technique for aortic valve annuloplasty using an intra-annular "hemispherical" frame J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2011; 142(4): 933 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Boodhwani, L. de Kerchove, C. Watremez, D. Glineur, J.-L. Vanoverschelde, P. Noirhomme, and G. El Khoury Assessment and repair of aortic valve cusp prolapse: Implications for valve-sparing procedures J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2011; 141(4): 917 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Lansac, I. D. Centa, E. A. Crozat, O. Bouchot, F. Doguet, T. Daroca, and J. Nijs An external open ring for isolated aortic valve repair MMCTS, January 1, 2011; 2011(0214): mmcts.2009.004119 - mmcts.2009.004119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Lansac, I. Di Centa, E. Arnaud-Crozat, O. Bouchot, F. Doguet, R. Hacini, R. Demaria, D. Chatel, G. Sleilaty, and M. Debauchez Remodeling of the aortic root combined to an expansible aortic ring annuloplasty MMCTS, January 1, 2011; 2011(0401): mmcts.2006.001958 - mmcts.2006.001958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Boodhwani and G. El Khoury Principles of aortic valve repair J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2010; 140(6_suppl): S20 - S22. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Lansac, I. Di Centa, G. Sleilaty, E. A. Crozat, O. Bouchot, R. Hacini, D. Blin, F. Doguet, J.-P. Bessou, B. Albat, et al. An aortic ring: From physiologic reconstruction of the root to a standardized approach for aortic valve repair J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2010; 140(6_suppl): S28 - S35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Aicher and H.-J. Schafers Reply to Kestelli et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, December 1, 2010; 38(6): 815 - 816. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. O. Bierbach, D. Aicher, O. A. Issa, H. Bomberg, S. Graber, P. Glombitza, and H.-J. Schafers Aortic root and cusp configuration determine aortic valve function Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, October 1, 2010; 38(4): 400 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Lansac, I. Di Centa, G. Sleilaty, O. Bouchot, E. Arnaud Crozat, D. Blin, C. Acar, and M. Debauchez An aortic ring to standardise aortic valve repair: preliminary results of a prospective multicentric cohort of 144 patients Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, August 1, 2010; 38(2): 147 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Van Dyck, C. Watremez, M. Boodhwani, J.-L. Vanoverschelde, and G. El Khoury Review Articles: Transesophageal Echocardiographic Evaluation During Aortic Valve Repair Surgery Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2010; 111(1): 59 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Ashikhmina, T. M. Sundt III, J. A. Dearani, H. M. Connolly, Z. Li, and H. V. Schaff Repair of the bicuspid aortic valve: A viable alternative to replacement with a bioprosthesis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2010; 139(6): 1395 - 1401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Boodhwani, L. de Kerchove, D. Glineur, and G. El Khoury A simple method for the quantification and correction of aortic cusp prolapse by means of free margin plication J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2010; 139(4): 1075 - 1077. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-J. Schafers, F. Langer, P. Glombitza, T. Kunihara, R. Fries, and D. Aicher Aortic valve reconstruction in myxomatous degeneration of aortic valves: Are fenestrations a risk factor for repair failure? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2010; 139(3): 660 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Kerendi, R. A. Guyton, J. D. Vega, P. D. Kilgo, and E. P. Chen Early Results of Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in High-Risk Clinical Scenarios Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2010; 89(2): 471 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. P. Urbanski Basal cusp enlargement for repair of aortic valve insufficiency J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2010; 139(1): 98 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Aicher, R. Fries, S. Rodionycheva, K. Schmidt, F. Langer, and H.-J. Schafers Aortic valve repair leads to a low incidence of valve-related complications Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2010; 37(1): 127 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. B. Pettersson and R. M. Ramankutty Repair of bicuspid aortic valve with severe regurgitation MMCTS, January 1, 2010; 2010(1012): mmcts.2009.004168 - mmcts.2009.004168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. de Kerchove, M. Boodhwani, D. Glineur, A. Poncelet, J. Rubay, C. Watremez, J.-L. Vanoverschelde, P. Noirhomme, and G. El Khoury Cusp Prolapse Repair in Trileaflet Aortic Valves: Free Margin Plication and Free Margin Resuspension Techniques Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2009; 88(2): 455 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Boodhwani, L. de Kerchove, D. Glineur, A. Poncelet, J. Rubay, P. Astarci, R. Verhelst, P. Noirhomme, and G. El Khoury Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: Impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2009; 137(2): 286 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Boodhwani, L. de Kerchove, D. Glineur, P. Noirhomme, and G. El Khoury Repair of aortic valve cusp prolapse MMCTS, January 1, 2009; 2009(0702): mmcts.2008.003806 - mmcts.2008.003806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
