|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:1554-1561
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
a Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla
b Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla
c Division of Nephrology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla
d Division of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.
Read at the Eighty-seventh Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Washington, DC, May 5–9, 2007.
Received for publication May 4, 2007; revisions received August 7, 2007; accepted for publication August 15, 2007. * Address for reprints: Thomas M. Beaver, MD, MPH, Associate Professor, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Florida, PO Box 100286, Gainesville, FL 32610-0286. (Email: beavetm{at}surgery.ufl.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study of 267 patients undergoing aortic arch surgery with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was conducted between July 2001 and October 2005. Known predictors (age, chronic kidney disease, surgery status, redo, diabetes, hypertension, blood transfusion, bypass, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time) were used in multivariate logistic regression models for acute kidney injury, renal replacement therapy, and mortality.
Results: Mean age was 64 years (range 23–89 years) with 166 men (62%). Seventy-five (28%) had RIFLE scores of I or F, and 22 (8%) required dialysis. Risk factors for acute kidney injury were hypertension (odds ratio [OR] = 2.17; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.14–4.15), chronic kidney disease (OR = 9.04; 95% CI, 1.97–41.59), packed red blood cells greater than 5 units (OR = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.20-4.69), and admission creatinine/Modification of Diet in Renal Disease predicted creatinine ratio greater than 1 (OR = 3.54; 95% CI, 1.95–6.45). Risk factors for mortality were age (per 10 years) (OR = 2.35; 95% CI, 1.35–4.06), AKI (RIFLE class R, I, or F) (OR = 4.60; 95% CI, 1.34–15.77), and cerebrovascular accident (OR = 19.1; 95% CI, 4.96–73.58). Mortality increased with each RIFLE stratification (RIFLE class 0 = 3%, R = 9%, I = 12%, and F = 38%).
Conclusions: Acute kidney injury as defined according to the RIFLE classification is a risk factor for mortality and will be useful in future studies of renal dysfunction in thoracic aortic surgery.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several studies have examined AKI after DHCA, with multiple definitions including the following: 50% increase in serum creatinine above baseline5,14
; 25% reduction in calculated creatinine clearance6
; and need for dialysis.15
The variety of definitions hinders comparison between studies of kidney injury.14
Accordingly, the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Workgroup set forth a new international consensus definition for renal injury (RIFLE criteria), which stratifies renal failure into three grades of increasing severity of acute kidney injury (R = risk, I = injury, F = failure) and two outcome classes (L = loss, and E = end-stage kidney disease) (Table 1). The three grades of severity for AKI are based on changes in either serum creatinine or urine output from baseline.16
|
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Demographic and operative variables previously reported to be associated with postoperative renal dysfunction were compiled into the cardiac surgery database, which was managed by an experienced research nurse.19,20
Demographic variables included age, gender, previous history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension (defined as patients with a documented history of hypertension previously being treated with an antihypertensive agent), cerebrovascular disease (defined by history of stroke or transient ischemic attack or known carotid occlusive disease > 50%), peripheral vascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; predicted serum creatinine according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula,21
history of CKD (defined above), primary operation versus reoperation ("redo"), use of aprotinin (Trasylol; Bayer, West Haven, Conn) or epsilon aminocaproic acid (Amicar; Xanodyne, Florence, Ky), and surgical status (elective versus emergency). Operative variables measured were: cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, aortic crossclamp time, DHCA time, and need for more than 5 units of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) intraoperatively and/or first 7 days postoperatively. Patients were classified according to the maximum RIFLE (RIFLEmax) class (risk = R, injury = I, or failure = F) reached during the first 7 days after the operation. The RIFLE class was determined on the basis of the lowest GFR criteria by using the change in serum creatinine levels (Table 1).17
End Points
The primary outcomes analyzed were AKI, need for postoperative RRT, and in-hospital mortality. Need for reoperation during the same hospitalization and postoperative cerebrovascular accident (CVA) as determined by a formal neurologic evaluation were recorded as well.
Operative Procedure
Elective ascending and aortic arch operations were performed through a standard median sternotomy with dual-stage venous cannulation of the right atrium. Epiaortic scanning was used in ascending aortic aneurysms before aortic cannulation to confirm the absence of mural thrombus or calcification. Acute ascending aortic dissections were cannulated via an axillary or femoral artery. Before cannulation, heparin was administered (350 IU/kg). CPB was initiated only after assuring kaolin-activated clotting times were greater than 480 seconds. Almost all patients received aprotinin, typically "full dose" (2 x 106 units intravenous load, 2 x 106 units in the pump prime, and 5 x 105 units/h); a minority of patients in our early experience received epsilon aminocaproic acid. Cardioplegic arrest was obtained with handheld antegrade cardioplegia catheters in the coronary ostia and with retrograde cardioplegia catheters in the coronary sinus; cardioplegic solution was redosed at 20-minute intervals via the retrograde catheter. Patients were monitored with cerebral oximetry and intraoperative electroencephalography. Temperature monitoring included nasopharyngeal, rectal, and bladder probes. Circulatory arrest was initiated after confirming no cerebral activity on the electroencephalogram with nasopharyngeal temperature at 18°C. Retrograde cerebral perfusion via a snared superior vena cava cannula was used when circulatory arrest times were greater than 20 minutes.
Data Analysis
A trained registered nurse database manager reviewed records of demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables, which were subsequently assembled in our institutional Microsoft Excel database (Microsoft, Redmond, Wash). Data were then exported to Statistica for analysis (StatSoft, Inc, Tulsa, Okla). Demographic and operative variables were compared among four groups (RIFLE classes 0, R, I, and F) using analysis of variance and the
2 or Fisher exact tests where appropriate for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Risk factors of AKI (defined by RIFLE classes R, I, or F) were determined by univariate logistic regression. Known risk factors for renal dysfunction and univariate predictors with P values < .05 in the present analysis were then entered into a logistic regression model to identify independent risk factors for AKI. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The same methods were used to identify variables independently associated with RRT and mortality. The model for RRT did not include AKI, as by definition all patients who require RRT are considered to be in RIFLE class F. To determine an independent effect with regard to mortality, we incorporated AKI into the mortality logistic regression model in addition to other significant variables (Table 2).
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Mortality rates increased with worsening severity of renal injury according to RIFLEmax classification: 4 of 138 (3%) RIFLEmax class 0, 5 of 54 (9%) RIFLEmax class R, 4 of 33 (12%) RIFLE class I, and 16 of 42 (38%) RIFLEmax class F patients died, respectively (Figure 1). Breakdown of patients according to RIFLE severity score and mortality data are presented in Table 4.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The logistic regression model identified hypertension, chronic kidney disease, pRBCs greater than 5 units, and ratio admission creatinine/MDRD predicted creatinine greater than 1 as independent risk factors for renal injury, all of which are in accordance with earlier reports.6,19
Predictors for RRT also included CKD, pRBCs greater than 5 units, and ratio admission creatinine/MDRD predicted creatinine greater than 1. Assuming a GFR between 75 and 100 mL/min, the MDRD formula can be used to predict a normal baseline creatinine. Patients whose admission creatinine was greater than MDRD predicted creatinine were at increased risk for AKI and RRT, suggesting that even subtle abnormalities in creatinine values may portend adverse outcomes with respect to renal function. Total pRBCs greater than 5 units was found by Mora Mangano and associates6
to be independently associated with renal dysfunction. In their discussion, they concluded, however, that there was no direct causality between blood transfusion and renal dysfunction; rather this finding was a reflection of hypovolemia, thought to be the cause for renal dysfunction.6
Similarly, we concur that increased total pRBCs, while used as a lifesaving measure, can be a surrogate marker for the very critically ill nature of the patients requiring such volume of blood products. However, there is evidence from a nonrandomized trial that increased RBC transfusion may worsen morbidity and mortality rates in a population of patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Postulated explanations for adverse outcomes related to transfusion include proinflammatory end-organ damage and an adverse immunomodulatory effect on T-cell function.24
Interestingly, the present series found redo surgical status associated with a decreased need for postoperative RRT, which is not consistent with other large series.19
We propose the following explanation for this inconsistency. Patients in this series predominantly required the use of DHCA for one of two disease processes: (1) acute aortic dissection and (2) aneurysmal aortic disease. Patients who had redo operations were more likely to undergo elective aneurysm repair. In comparison, patients with acute aortic dissection less frequently had redo operations and more frequently were operated on in an emergency setting, occasionally in profound shock.
We found that 22 (8%) patients required postoperative RRT (either hemodialysis or continuous venovenous hemofiltration), similar to other large series of patients undergoing aortic arch reconstructions.25-27
Among patients requiring RRT postoperatively, 13 (59%) died. This figure underscores the bleak prognostic implications of RRT after cardiovascular surgery, and postoperative RRT has previously been found to independently predict mortality.11
Others have reported similar mortality rates in patients requiring RRT postoperatively, ranging from 28% in a routine coronary bypass population28
to 57% in patients undergoing DHCA for aortic arch aneurysm repair.27
AKI, advanced age, and postoperative CVA all represent an independent association with mortality in this series. Advanced age is a widely known risk factor for perioperative mortality. RRT is a documented risk factor for mortality, and in this series 8% of the patients required RRT. To avoid confounding, we included AKI but not RRT in the logistic regression model for mortality. Given the findings in this study, we conclude that even less severe renal dysfunction as defined by AKI (RIFLE classes R, I, or F) is independently associated with mortality. Considering that 48% of this cohort met criteria for AKI using the RIFLE definition, this suggests that a large number of patients in the setting of DHCA are at jeopardy for adverse outcomes including mortality. Increasing mortality was noted with progressive RIFLE class as patients with no detectable renal dysfunction (RIFLE class 0) experienced a mortality of 3%; however, this increased proportionately in RIFLE classes R (9%), I (12%), and F (38%), respectively. Others have documented increased mortality with increasing RIFLE classification in noncardiac surgery patients29
and in more routine cardiac surgery populations.17
We have shown a similar result in a more homogeneous population of patients, who all underwent DHCA for aortic arch repair.
The safety of aprotinin in cardiac surgery remains controversial.30,31
Aprotinin was incorporated into the logistic regression model as a variable, but no association was identified. Because a majority of patients in this series received aprotinin and only a small number did not receive it, we had low power to detect any significant effect of aprotinin in regard to renal dysfunction or mortality.
The RIFLE classification system also includes a differentiation between RIFLE outcome categories L (loss, temporary dialysis) and E (end-stage permanent dialysis), which were not included because this information was not available in our retrospective database. This is a limitation of the study, because it is not readily known whether these two outcomes represent a different long-term risk for mortality. In addition, it is unclear whether increasing severity of RIFLE score corresponds to a lower likelihood of recovery of renal function. Some patients whose elevation in creatinine qualifies them for AKI according to the RIFLE definition have a return to baseline on hospital discharge, whereas in others creatine levels remain slightly elevated. It is unclear whether those who only partially recover from their episode of AKI have worse long-term outcomes than do patients with complete recovery, a question that merits further study. The urine output criteria, which also can be used to calculate the RIFLE class (see Table 1), pose another difficulty with using the RIFLE system during retrospective analysis inasmuch as these data are not readily available. Future prospective studies that use the RIFLE system will be able to identify patients who meet the urine output criteria for improved RIFLE classification, as well as to identify patients with temporary (L loss) or permanent (E end stage) requirements for RRT.
In summary, we found the RIFLE criteria to be a useful classification system for renal failure in patients undergoing DHCA for aortic arch surgery. Future clinical trials designed to study renal protective interventions in aortic surgery should incorporate the RIFLE criteria.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Matalanis, R. S. Koirala, W. Y. Shi, P. A. Hayward, and P. R. McCall Branch-first aortic arch replacement with no circulatory arrest or deep hypothermia J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2011; 142(4): 809 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Arnaoutakis, T. J. George, K. K. Wang, M. A. Wilson, J. G. Allen, C. W. Robinson, K. A. Haggerty, E. S. Weiss, M. E. Blue, C. C. Talbot Jr., et al. Serum levels of neuron-specific ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase-L1 predict brain injury in a canine model of hypothermic circulatory arrest. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2011; 142(4): 902 - 910.e1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mariscalco, R. Lorusso, C. Dominici, A. Renzulli, and A. Sala Acute Kidney Injury: A Relevant Complication After Cardiac Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2011; 92(4): 1539 - 1547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Englberger, R. M. Suri, K. L. Greason, H. M. Burkhart, T. M. Sundt III, R. C. Daly, and H. V. Schaff Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is not a risk factor for acute kidney injury in thoracic aortic surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2011; 141(2): 552 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zavada, E. Hoste, R. Cartin-Ceba, P. Calzavacca, O. Gajic, G. Clermont, R. Bellomo, J. A. Kellum, and for the AKI6 investigators A comparison of three methods to estimate baseline creatinine for RIFLE classification Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2010; 25(12): 3911 - 3918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. Pisimisis, A. Khoynezhad, K. Bashir, M. J. Kruse, C. E. Donayre, and R. A. White Incidence and risk factors of renal dysfunction after thoracic endovascular aortic repair J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2010; 140(6_suppl): S161 - S167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Rajagopal, S. M. Emani, N. Roy, L. Westgate, and E. A. Bacha Acute kidney injury and regional abdominal perfusion during neonatal aortic arch reconstruction J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2010; 140(2): 453 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Olsson EACTS/ESCVS best practice guidelines for reporting treatment results in the thoracic aorta Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, March 1, 2010; 37(3): 744 - 744. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Haase, R. Bellomo, G. Matalanis, P. Calzavacca, D. Dragun, and A. Haase-Fielitz A comparison of the RIFLE and Acute Kidney Injury Network classifications for cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: A prospective cohort study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2009; 138(6): 1370 - 1376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Bagshaw, S. Uchino, D. Cruz, R. Bellomo, H. Morimatsu, S. Morgera, M. Schetz, I. Tan, C. Bouman, E. Macedo, et al. A comparison of observed versus estimated baseline creatinine for determination of RIFLE class in patients with acute kidney injury Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2739 - 2744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Hobson, S. Yavas, M. S. Segal, J. D. Schold, C. G. Tribble, A. J. Layon, and A. Bihorac Acute Kidney Injury Is Associated With Increased Long-Term Mortality After Cardiothoracic Surgery Circulation, May 12, 2009; 119(18): 2444 - 2453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kim, T. D. Martin, W. A. Lee, P. J. Hess Jr., C. T. Klodell, C. G. Tribble, R. J. Feezor, and T. M. Beaver Evolution in the management of the total thoracic aorta. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2009; 137(3): 627 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G.T. Augoustides RIFLE criteria in aortic arch surgery: The further role of surgical subgroup J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2008; 136(1): 233 - 233. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Beaver, A. Bihorac, and A. A. Ejaz Reply to the Editor: J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2008; 136(1): 233 - 233. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |