JTCS KCI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Domenico Galetta
Lorenzo Spaggiari
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galetta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Spaggiari, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Galetta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Spaggiari, L.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:1601-1602
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Letter to the Editor

Reply to the Editor

Domenico Galetta, MDa, Lorenzo Spaggiari, MD, PhDa,b

a Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
b University School of Milan, Milan, Italy.

We thank Rea, Marulli, and Sartori1Go for their kind comments and insightful remarks in the February 2007 issue of the Journal concerning our report on superior vena cava (SVC) replacement with a heterologous (bovine) custom-made pericardial prosthesis.2Go

SVC surgery is becoming an interesting field of study, particularly with reference to indications for this kind of surgery and to resection and reconstruction techniques depending on the degree of venous infiltration and the surgeon’s attitude.

Regarding the first point, we agree with Rea, Marulli, and Sartori about the indications for SVC surgery being very limited. Candidates’ selection for this kind of operation remains the main factor to obtain good surgical results. From our experience,3Go these candidates should be less than 70 years old, with a predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second of more than 40%, no major cardiac comorbidity, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 1 or 2. From an oncologic point of view, patients with SVC involvement should be carefully selected: we have restricted surgical indications to patients with T4 N0/N1 disease after induction chemotherapy.

Concerning technical aspects of SVC surgery, we concur with Rea, Marulli, and Sartori about the type of SVC resection. As we3Go recently reported in our single-center experience with SVC surgery, we think that when vessel involvement is less than 50%, resection and direct repair (by tangential clamping and simple running polypropylene suture or vascular stapler) is preferred. When the SVC is not circumferentially resected, it may be crossclamped and repaired by an autologous pericardial patch.

When SVC infiltration involves more than 50% of the vessel circumference and a circumferential resection is performed, a prosthetic replacement by a crossclamp technique is required. Even though we3Go used a synthetic prosthesis (polytetrafluoroethylene graft) in our earlier report, we have abandoned this material for SVC reconstruction owing to its high risk of thrombosis.4Go We concur with Rea, Marulli, and Sartori that autologous pericardium represents an ideal material for the reconstruction of the SVC and we also congratulate them for their results in this very difficult group of patients.

Autologous pericardium has a number of advantages (biocompatibility, adequate resistance, cost free, availability), but it is difficult to handle. It shrinks and curls after suturing and stretches after venous pressure is restored, requiring trimming to the appropriate size. In addition, when a wide pericardial resection is required for oncologic reasons, the pericardium may be not sufficient for the conduit reconstruction and the pericardial defect may cause postoperative arrhythmias. Some authors5Go have treated autologous pericardium with glutaraldehyde to improve tissue stability and preserve the pericardial patch, but that has been shown to damage connective tissue, predisposing tissue to mineralization.

For these reasons, since 2003 we have adopted heterologous (bovine) pericardium for constructing an SVC prosthesis. This material has several advantages: it is fully biocompatible and stiffer than autologous pericardium, eliminating technical problems (shrinking and stretching), its patency remains satisfactory over time, and it carries a lower risk of infection and thrombosis.

In conclusion, we believe that the replacement of the SVC by a bovine pericardial conduit is an excellent solution in selected cases, even if its efficacy should be confirmed by a large study.

References

  1. Rea F, Marulli G, Sartori F. Superior vena cava replacement for lung cancer using a heterologous (bovine) prosthesis: preliminary results. (letter) J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:592.[Free Full Text]
  2. Spaggiari L, Galetta D, Veronesi G, Leo F, Gasparri R, Petrella F, et al. Superior vena cava replacement for lung cancer using a heterologous (bovine) prosthesis: preliminary results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:490-491.[Free Full Text]
  3. Spaggiari L, Leo F, Veronesi G, Solli P, Galetta D, Tatani B, et al. Superior vena cava resection for lung and mediastinal malignancies: a single-center experience with 70 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:223-230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Dartevelle PG, Chapellier AR, Pastorino U, Corbi P, Lenot B, Cerrina J, et al. Long-term follow-up after prosthetic replacement of the superior vena cava combined with resection of mediastinal-pulmonary malignant tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:259-265.[Abstract]
  5. D’Andrilli A, Ibrahim M, Venuta F, De Giacomo T, Coloni GF, Rendina EA. Glutaraldehyde preserved autologous pericardium for patch reconstruction of the pulmonary artery and superior vena cava. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:357-358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Superior vena cava replacement for lung cancer using a heterologous (bovine) prosthesis: Preliminary results
Federico Rea, Giuseppe Marulli, and Francesco Sartori
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2007 133: 592. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Domenico Galetta
Lorenzo Spaggiari
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galetta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Spaggiari, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Galetta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Spaggiari, L.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS