JTCS KCI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Willem Flameng
Bart Meuris
Paul Herijgers
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flameng, W.
Right arrow Articles by Herregods, M.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Flameng, W.
Right arrow Articles by Herregods, M.-C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:274-282
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Durability of mitral valve repair in Barlow disease versus fibroelastic deficiency

Willem Flameng, MD, PhDa,*, Bart Meuris, MD, PhDa, Paul Herijgers, MD, PhDa, Marie-Christine Herregods, MD, PhDb

a Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
b Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Received for publication February 2, 2007; revisions received June 12, 2007; accepted for publication June 14, 2007.

* Address for reprints: Willem Flameng, MD, PhD, Cardiac Surgery, University Clinic Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. (Email: willem.flameng{at}med.kuleuven.ac.be).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Objective: Durability assessment of mitral valve repair for degenerative valve incompetence is limited to reoperation as a primary indicator and valve-related risk factors for late death as a secondary indicator. We assessed serial echocardiographic follow-up of valve function as an indicator of the durability of mitral valve repair.

Methods and Results: In 348 patients having undergone mitral valve repair for degenerative valve incompetence, clinical outcome was excellent: 10 years after repair, survival was 80.1% and freedom from reoperation 94.4%. However, freedom from mitral regurgitation (>2/4), 98.7% at 1 month, decreased to 82.2% at 5 years and 64.9% at 10 years. The linearized recurrence rate of mitral regurgitation (>2/4) was 3.2% per year. Recurrence rate was higher in patients with Barlow disease (6.0%) and lower in those with fibroelastic deficiency (2.6%) (P = .01). Performing chordal shortening, the nonuse of sliding plasty and the nonuse of an annuloplasty ring were determined to be factors predicting recurrence of mitral regurgitation. In reconstructions avoiding these risk factors, recurrence rate decreased to 2.4%. There was no difference between Barlow disease and fibroelastic deficiency: 2.9% versus 2.2% (P > .05). Recurrent regurgitation is characterized by leaflet prolapse, thickening, and calcification.

Conclusion: When optimal surgical techniques are used, the residual recurrence rate of mitral valve regurgitation remains between 2% and 3% per year and is related to progressive degeneration of the chordae and the leaflets. Long-term results of mitral valve repair in Barlow disease are essentially the same as in fibroelastic deficiency.



Abbreviations and Acronyms NYHA = New York Heart Association; SAM = systolic anterior motion



    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In a recent report, we1Go demonstrated that the linearized recurrence rate of recurrent mitral regurgitation greater than 2/4 after surgical repair was 3.7% per year in patients with degenerative valve disease. Inadequate surgical techniques could only partially explain this recurrence of regurgitation. In patients receiving optimal repair techniques, the recurrence rate of regurgitation dropped to 2.5% per year. We suggested that the progression of the degenerative disease of the valve was responsible for this small but constant recurrence rate. Recurrence rates of regurgitation were not previously reported because most studies so far were focusing on survival and reoperation rates, which were found to be excellent.2-9Go In our study, survival was also high (80.1% at 10 years), as was freedom from reoperation (94% at 10 years). Diseased valves can be successfully repaired by a variety of surgical techniques, and our results confirmed this high immediate operative success: 98.3% of the patients was free of significant (>2/4) regurgitation 1 month postoperatively as defined by echocardiography.1Go However, as recent studies have demonstrated, myxomatous valve leaflets are structurally, biochemically, physically, and mechanically abnormal10Go and a certain progression of the disease can be expected after repair. Therefore, we were not surprised to find that 7 years postoperatively only 71% of the patients were still free of greater than 2/4 regurgitation.1Go This finding was confirmed by David and associates9Go in a more recent study. They found that 12 years postoperatively, only 73% of the patients were free from moderate or severe mitral insufficiency of more than 3/4, a result is even worse than that of our study.

In patients with degenerative mitral valve disease, Carpentier and colleagues11Go distinguished two different forms: Barlow disease and fibroelastic degeneration. These two diseases may not have the same outcome, because Barlow disease is a more generalized degeneration of the valve.

The goal of the present study was to analyze the recurrence of mitral regurgitation in terms of incidence and degree in a series of patients undergoing mitral valve repair for degenerative disease, with special reference to Barlow disease. All patients were operated on in the same institution, by the same surgeon, with standard repair techniques.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient Population
During the period from July 1989 through December 2005, 1596 mitral valve operations were performed by the same surgeon (W.F.), 945 replacements and 651 repairs. Four hundred fifty-two patients had degenerative mitral valve disease: 104 underwent replacement and 348 (77%) repair. The repair rate increased from 43% in 1989 to 95% in 2005. The indications to prefer mitral valve replacement above repair were as follows: Barlow disease (62%), nonsinus rhythm (41%), anterior mitral leaflet involvement (30%), severe calcification of the mitral annulus (20%), concomitant aortic valve replacement (12%), and systolic anterior motion (SAM) (3%).

Mitral Valve Characteristics
On the basis of the preoperative echocardiogram and a detailed drawing of the operative findings, valve pathologic status was identified and coded at the end of the operation. We differentiated between Barlow disease and fibroelastic deficiency on the basis of gross appearance of the valve, according to Carpentier,11Go Fornes,12Go and their associates. The following criteria were used to classify the patients into these two groups:

• Barlow disease: myxoid appearance of the whole valve with excess tissue and a dilated annulus.
• Fibroelastic deficiency: restriction of thickening to the prolapsed area(s), the remaining valve tissue being more transparent, not thickened, without excess tissue, and the annulus being dilated or not.

Eighty-three patients were classified as having Barlow disease (24%) and 265 (76%) as having fibroelastic deficiency. Demographic data and mitral valve characteristics are listed in Go Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Demographic data and mitral valve characteristics
 
Surgical Techniques
Overall in our institution, the average repair rate was 77%, and this rate increased continuously from 43% in 1989 to 95% in 2005. The repair rate for Barlow disease was 33% in 1989, 33% in 1995, 77% in 2000, and 85% in 2005. For fibroelastic deficiency it was 50% in 1989, 88% in 1995, 88% in 2000, and 100% in 2005. For repair, classic techniques described by Carpentier and others were used. Prolapse of the posterior leaflet was preferentially corrected by quadrangular resection when the prolapsing segment was billowing and in most cases combined with chordal rupture or elongation, to remove this diseased part of the valve as much as possible. When the remaining part of the posterior leaflet showed excess tissue (as in Barlow disease), the resection was combined with a sliding leaflet procedure including two triangular resections of the remnants of the nonprolapsing posterior leaflet. When there was no excess tissue in the remaining portion of the posterior leaflet (as in fibroelastic deficiency), a sliding procedure was performed, but without removal of tissue of the remaining posterior leaflet. The size of the annulus was adjusted by mattress sutures passed through the annulus, which is a procedure focused rather on an adequate reduction of the dilated annulus and is altered from Carpentier's described techniques. This was done to obtain an evenly distributed reduction of the size of the posterior annulus without deformation of the normal parts of the posterior leaflet. When the annulus showed no or mild dilatation, the prolapse was preferentially corrected by artificial chordae. Prolapse of the anterior leaflet was never corrected by leaflet segment resection but by chordal transfer or artificial chorda implantation. Prolapse induced by chordal elongation was treated by chordal shortening. This was done by either chordal burring or papillary muscle repositioning. The latter procedure was mostly used for anterior leaflet prolapse or commissural prolapse of both leaflets. Mitral ring annuloplasty was performed in most cases to complete the repair, except in extreme situations either when the annulus was not or only slightly dilated or when the anterior leaflet was so large that SAM could be expected after ring annuloplasty.

In every patient, the specific surgical repair techniques used were identified and coded at the end of the operation: intervention at the leaflet (none, quadrangular resection, triangular resection, plication, cleft closure), intervention at the annulus (none, sliding plasty, plication, decalcification), at the chordae (none, shortening, transposition, artificial chordae), at the papillary muscles (none, shortening), and the placement of an annuloplasty ring (yes or no). The frequency with which these different techniques were used is listed in Go Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Surgical data in mitral valve repair
 
Follow-up
Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were performed shortly before hospital discharge, at 1 month, and then every 6 months by the referring cardiologist. Survival, reoperation, cerebrovascular accidents, bleeding complications, anticoagulation therapy, New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class, and cardiac rhythm were registered. On the echocardiogram, mitral regurgitation was classified from grade 1 to 4.

Statistical Analysis
The Cox proportional hazards methods were used to analyze the data on recurrence of mitral regurgitation in time. For survival and follow-up of events, Kaplan–Meier techniques were used with log–rank testing. For recurrence of mitral regurgitation, a classic Kaplan–Meier technique was used with the first echocardiographic follow-up date demonstrating the recurrence of regurgitation as date of the event. Since the mitral regurgitation did in fact recur between the last echocardiogram without regurgitation (or the date of the operation if the echocardiogram before hospital discharge showed mitral regurgitation) and the first echocardiogram with regurgitation, an interval-censored survival curve using the Turnbull algorithm was constructed additionally. For plotting the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimate on the basis of interval-censored data, the mass was always placed at the at rightmost limit of the interval.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Survival and Reoperation Rate
Hospital mortality was 1.6%. Survival at 5 years was 93.1% ± 1.5% and 80.1% ± 3.7% at 10 years (Go Figure 1, A). Survival was identical between patients having Barlow disease and patients having fibroelastic deficiency (P > .05). Survival did not differ significantly between patients with or without associated coronary artery bypass graft procedures (P > .05). Freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 95.4% ± 1.4% and 94.4% ± 1.6% at 10 years for all patients (Figure 1, B). Freedom from reoperation for fibroelastic deficiency was better (96.6% at 10 years) than for Barlow disease (86.1% at 10 years) (P = .002).


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. A, Survival of the whole patient group. B, Freedom from reoperation for the whole patient group and for the two subgroups (fibroelastic deficiency and Barlow disease; P = .002).

 
Clinical Outcome and Morbidity
No patient was lost to clinical follow-up. At least one echocardiographic examination was obtained in every patient. In 19 patients, the only echocardiogram was the discharge echocardiogram. The remaining patients received several follow-up echocardiograms with a mean of 4.6 echocardiograms per patient, ranging from 2 to 16. In total, the clinical follow-up represents 1836 patient-years, with a mean follow-up of 5.9 ± 3.4 years (range 0.5–15.3 years).

During the most recent postoperative follow-up period, NYHA class was recorded. Corresponding to the mean follow-up time of the entire population, 91.3% of the patients improved by at least one NYHA functional class. Seventy-five percent of the patients were in class I, 19% in class II, 5% in class III, and 1% in class IV. Postoperatively, 71% of the patients had sinus rhythm, 22% had atrial fibrillation, and 7% had a pacemaker. Anticoagulation therapy using coumarin was given during the follow-up period in 35% of the patients. Freedom from thromboembolic events and/or major anticoagulant-related bleeding was 93.5% ± 1.5% at 5 years and 86.7% ± 2.7% at 10 years for the whole group.

Immediate Surgical Result of Mitral Valve Repair
Operative success of the mitral valve repair was assessed by the echocardiographic examination of mitral valve function within the first 4 weeks postoperatively. At 1 month postoperatively, 98.7% of all patients had no or trivial mitral regurgitation (0/4 or 1/4). In patients having fibroelastic degeneration, this was 99.8% and in Barlow disease 97.1%. Suture dehiscence of the ring annuloplasty was encountered in 2 patients. Endocarditis of the repaired valve did not occur in this series.

Recurrence of Mitral Regurgitation
Postoperative echocardiography was performed serially at 6-month intervals. According to the classic Kaplan–Meier approach, freedom from failing repair (regurgitation > 2/4) was 98.7% ± 1.2% at 1 month, 82.2% ± 3.7% at 5 years, and 64.9% ± 5.6% at 10 years (Go Figure 2). When the interval-censored Turnbull approach is used to calculate the freedom from recurrence of mitral incompetence, similar results are obtained. Freedom from failing repair is better in fibroelastic deficiency and worse in Barlow disease (P = .01). Remarkable is the constant rate of recurrence of mitral regurgitation after the first 6 months postoperatively. When the classic Kaplan–Meier curves are restricted to the period from 6 months until 7 years postoperatively, a linear regression can be made, allowing calculation of recurrence rates per year. Recurrence of mitral regurgitation of greater than 2/4 occurs at a constant rate of 3.2% per year for the whole patient group ( Table 3). The linearized curves are shown for the patients with fibroelastic disease and Barlow disease separately in Go Figure 3, A and B.


Figure 2
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) of greater than 2/4 for the whole patient group and for the two subgroups (fibroelastic deficiency and Barlow disease; P = .01).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Linearized recurrence rates (in percent per year) for recurrent mitral regurgitation greater than 2/4
 

Figure 3
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Linearized recurrence curves for patients with fibroelastic deficiency (A) and patients with Barlow disease (B). Separate curves are shown for patients having surgical risk factors (nonuse of annuloplasty ring, nonuse of sliding plasty, or performance of chordal shortening) and for patients not having these factors. The concomitant slopes of these curves are shown in Table 3. MR, Mitral regurgitation.

 
Predictive Factors of Recurrent Mitral Valve Regurgitation After Repair
During the follow-up period, a subpopulation of 55 patients was identified as showing recurrence of significant mitral valve regurgitation (>2/4) and could be compared with the remaining 293 patients who did not. Cox proportional hazard analysis (Go Table 4) revealed that the subpopulation showing recurrence of regurgitation was mainly characterized by a higher incidence of Barlow disease (P = .01). Bileaflet mitral valve degeneration as such showed a trend toward higher recurrence of regurgitation (P = .06). The absence of ruptured chordae (P = .01) as well as the presence of elongated chordae (P = .003) predicts also recurrence of regurgitation. Specific surgical repair techniques had a predictive value for recurrence of regurgitation: the nonuse of a sliding annuloplasty (P = .002), the use of chordal shortening (P = .01), and the nonuse of an annuloplasty ring in general (P = .001) predict inferior outcome.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Factors predictive for mitral regurgitation greater than 2/4
 
We separated the study populations into subgroups. The first bears the surgical risk factors as determined above (ie, absence of a stiff annuloplasty ring and/or presence of chordal shortening and/or no use of sliding annuloplasty) and the second does not. We could define two significantly different recurrence rates of mitral regurgitation (Table 3): patients having the surgical risk factors had a recurrence rate of regurgitation greater than 2/4 of 4.7% per year. However, patients not having these surgical risk factors still had a recurrence rate of 2.4% per year.

When we divided the patient population into patients having Barlow disease and patients having fibroelastic deficiency, the risk factors became more focused (Table 4). In fibroelastic deficiency, the nonuse of a quadrangular resection predicts recurrence of regurgitation (P = .02) as well as the nonuse of an annuloplasty ring (P = .04) and the nonuse of a sliding annuloplasty (P = .01). In Barlow disease, the presence of abnormal or elongated chordae (P = .02) is the main predictor of regurgitation, as well as the use of chordal shortening (P = .04), the nonuse of polytetrafluoroethylene chordae (P = .02), and the nonuse of an annuloplasty ring (P = .004). When the two populations bear the corresponding risk factors, recurrence rates are 3.6% per year for fibroelastic deficiency and 14.9% per year for Barlow disease (P < .05) (Table 3, Figure 3, A and B). When the correction for the corresponding surgical risk factors is made for these two patient populations (Table 3), the following linearized recurrence rates are found: 2.9% per year for Barlow disease and 2.2% per year for fibroelastic deficiency. The difference between the two rates is not statistically significant (P > .05).

Echographic Characteristics of Recurrent Mitral Valve Regurgitation
The echocardiograms from the patients showing recurrence of greater than 2/4 mitral regurgitation were analyzed in an attempt to define possible mechanisms of valve incompetence. We found that 42% of these patients had a leaflet prolapse that was mostly an anterior leaflet prolapse (in 81% of cases). In the group with fibroelastic deficiency, 41% of the patients had a leaflet prolapse (80% anterior), and about the same results were seen in the group with Barlow disease: 43% showed leaflet prolapse (83% anterior). Chordal rupture or elongation was found in 24% of the patients. Leaflet thickening was diagnosed in 50% of the patients (50% with fibroelastic deficiency and 43% with Barlow disease), and leaflet calcifications were detected in 25% of the patients (29% of patients with fibroelastic deficiency and 7% of those with Barlow disease). These calcifications were pre-existent in only 4% of the patients. Left ventricular function was described as reduced in 55% of the patients, and 59% had a nonsinus rhythm.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
From the early days of mitral valve repair, Carpentier and associates11Go made a clear distinction between Barlow disease and fibroelastic deficiency. In later work, Fornes and colleagues12Go investigated the histologic differences but were unable to obtain a clear distinction between the two entities on this basis. They concluded "obviously the surgeons' diagnosis based on clinical examination, echocardiographic findings and operative macroscopical findings of the mitral valve apparatus should remain the gold standard." We followed their macroscopic criteria to separate Barlow disease from fibroelastic deficiency.

Our results are in concordance with the available clinical reports showing good clinical outcome and low reoperation rates after repair.2–9Go We also found a low reoperation rate at 10 years (94.4% freedom) and an excellent clinical outcome. On the other hand, the present article confirms our previous findings that recurrence of mitral valve insufficiency based on echocardiographic studies is more frequent than the reoperation rate indicates.1Go Obviously, reoperation rate is not an optimal predictor of recurrent mitral valve regurgitation and is not the best parameter to estimate durability of valve repair. However, long-term results (over 20 years) after repair for mitral valve prolapse were reported in 2001,13Go and they suggest that the durability of mitral valve repair will be limited but that the therapeutic consequences remain delayed. Reoperation rate after repair constantly increases: at 5 years it is 7%, at 10 years 11%, at 15 years 16%, and at 19.5 years 20%. Survival at 19.5 years is 30%.

As mentioned earlier, our immediate postoperative echocardiographic results were excellent: 98.7% of the patients had no or trivial (0/4 or 1/4) mitral valve regurgitation. In fibroelastic deficiency this was 99.8% and in Barlow disease 97.1%. However, despite such highly successful repair, recurrence of mitral valve incompetence occurs at a constant rate during the following years. Causes of recurrence of regurgitation after mitral valve repair may be classified as procedure-related or valve-related.

Concerning procedure-related or surgical factors, our study revealed nothing new: the nonuse of an annuloplasty ring, nonuse of a sliding plasty, and the use of chordal shortening instead of transposition or artificial chordae were factors of recurrence of mitral valve incompetence, as already shown by others.6Go In a larger study, Gillinov and coworkers5Go demonstrated that the instantaneous risk of reoperation consists of two hazard phases: a peaking early hazard phase in the first year after the operation followed by a slow-rising late hazard phase of reoperation. They showed that patients with an isolated anterior leaflet prolapse had an increased early risk of reoperation. Also, chordal shortening increased the risk of early repair failure and the use of ring annuloplasty and leaflet resection decreased the risk of reoperation in the late hazard phase. Nevertheless, most of these surgical factors are indirectly related to the process of valve degeneration, mainly in the chordae, which are severely structurally altered by the degenerative process. Therefore, besides overall progression of the valve disease, specific repair techniques may influence recurrence of regurgitation. For example, quadrangular resection of the billowing and degenerated portion of a posterior leaflet may fully exclude the diseased part of the valve and can be expected to be more durable than shortening of elongated and severely affected chordae, which are shortened but left in place. Obviously, the degeneration of the chordae progresses after repair, which is shown by the postoperative echocardiographic studies. More than 40% of the patients showing significant recurrence of regurgitation have a new leaflet prolapse, mainly from the anterior leaflet. This may originate either from progressive degeneration of the valve or from retraction of the repaired posterior leaflet segment, resulting in relative prolapse. The high incidence of chordal rupture or elongation suggests the first mechanism. Furthermore, half of these valves have leaflet thickening and one third have new calcifications. These findings suggest that the chordae elongate and the leaflet degenerates further. This explains also why implantation of artificial chordae is associated with superior results.14Go Maybe the use of artificial chordae should be promoted and even used as a standard technique in every repair as a prevention of recurrence of regurgitation. Regarding the risk for SAM, the use of large annuloplasty rings (sizes 36 to 40) has recently been advocated instead of avoiding the use of an annuloplasty ring.15Go

Myxomatous degeneration of the valve affects the leaflets as well as the subvalvular apparatus, and the extent of structural and mechanical changes differs between them.10Go Although histologic alterations in myxomatous valves have been well described in the past,16-20Go only recently have the mechanical properties of myxomatous mitral valves been extensively studied,10Go and it is shown that myxoid leaflets are more extensible and less stiff than normal valves. It is also demonstrated16Go that cells of the chordae of myxomatous valves produce more glycoaminoglycans, giving them their characteristic thickening and gelatinous nature, which may account for their mechanical weakness.21Go All these pathophysiologic findings may help to explain why a progressive incidence of mitral valve incompetence is found after initial adequate repair. When patients bearing the surgical risks (ie, use of chordal shortening, nonuse of an annuloplasty ring, and nonuse of sliding plasty) are excluded from the analysis, recurrence rate drops from 3.2% per year to 2.4% per year. This residual rate of 2.4% per year can be attributed to the phenomenon of valve degeneration. However, two distinct forms of valve degeneration were described: fibroelastic deficiency and Barlow disease.11,12Go Because Barlow disease is a more generalized form of valve degeneration, the progression of the degenerative process in these valves can be expected to be more pronounced and reflected in the recurrence rates of mitral regurgitation. At first glance this is correct: the recurrence rate in Barlow disease is 6.0% per year and in fibroelastic deficiency 2.6% per year. However, the impact of the surgical risk factors is so high that after correction for these techniques, the residual recurrence rate decreases to almost that of fibroelastic deficiency (2.9 vs 2.2% per year).

It can be concluded that the long-term result of mitral valve repair in Barlow disease is essentially the same as in fibroelastic deficiency provided optimal surgical techniques are used. A constant recurrence rate of regurgitation (2%–3% per year) remains present owing to progression of the degenerative process in the native valve.


    Footnotes
 
Read at the Eighty-seventh Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Washington, DC, May 5–9, 2007.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Flameng W, Herijgers P, Bogaerts K. Recurrence of mitral valve regurgitation after mitral valve repair in degenerative valve disease. Circulation 2003;107:1609-1613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Tajik AJ, Bailey KR, Frye RL. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation: a multivariate analysis. Circulation 1995;91:1022-1028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Tribouilloy CM, Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ, et al. Impact of preoperative symptoms on survival after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation: rationale for optimizing surgical indications. Circulation 1999;99:400-405.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Perier P, Stumpf J, Götz C, Lakew F, Schneider A, Clausnizer B, et al. Valve repair for mitral regurgitation caused by isolated prolapse of the posterior leaflet. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:445-450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gillinov AM, Cosgrove DM, Blackstone EH, Diaz R, Arnold JH, Lytle BW, et al. Durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:734-743.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. David TE, Omran A, Armstrong S, Sun Z, Ivanov J. Long-term results of mitral valve repair for myxomatous disease with and without chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:1279-1286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Smedira NG, Selman R, Cosgrove DM, McCarthy PM, Lytle BW, Taylor PC, et al. Repair of anterior leaflet prolapse: chordal transfer is superior to chordal shortening. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:287-292.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Phillips MR, Daly RC, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, Mullany CJ, Orszulak TA. Repair of anterior leaflet mitral valve prolapse: chordal replacement versus chordal shortening. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:25-29.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. David TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Christie D, Rakowski H. A comparison of outcomes of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease with posterior, anterior, and bileaflet prolapse. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:1242-1249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Barber JE, Kasper FK, Ratliff NB, Cosgrove DM, Griffin BP, Vesely I. Mechanical properties of myxomatous mitral valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:955-962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Carpentier A, Chauvaud S, Fabiani JN, Deloche A, Relland J, Lessana A, et al. Reconstructive surgery of mitral valve incompetence: ten-year appraisal. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980;79:338-348.[Abstract]
  12. Fornes P, Heudes D, Fuzellier JF, Tixier D, Bruneval P, Carpentier A. Correlation between clinical and histologic patterns of degenerative mitral valve insufficiency: a histomorphometric study of 130 excised segments. Cardiovasc Pathol 1999;8:81-92.[Medline]
  13. Mohty D, Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, Avierinos JF, Tajik JA, Enriquez-Sarano M. Surgery for valvular heart disease: very long-term survival and durability of mitral valve repair for mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 2001;104(suppl I):I1-I7.[Medline]
  14. Phillips MR, Daly RC, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, Mullany CJ, Orszulak TA. Repair of anterior leaflet mitral valve prolapse: chordal replacement versus chordal shortening. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:25-29.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Adams DH, Anyanwu AC, Rahmanian PB, Abascal V, Salzberg SP, Filsoufi F. Large annuloplasty rings facilitate mitral valve repair in Barlow's disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:2096-2101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Svensson EC, Huggins GS, Lin H, Clendenin C, Jiang F, Tufs R, et al. A syndrome of tricuspid atresia in mice with a targeted mutation of the gene encoding Fog-2. Nat Genet 2000;25:353-356.[Medline]
  17. Whittaker P, Boughner DR, Perkings DG, Canham PB. Quantitative structural analysis of collagen in chordae tendineae and its relation to floppy mitral valves and proteoglycan infiltration. Br Heart J 1987;57:264-269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Baker PB, Bansal G, Boudoulas H, Kolibash AJ, Kilman J, Wooley CF. Floppy mitral valve chordae tendineae: histopathologic alterations. Hum Pathol 1988;19:507-512.[Medline]
  19. Wooley CF, Baker PB, Kolibash AJ, Kilman JW, Sparks EA, Boudoulas H. The floppy, myxomatous mitral valve, mitral valve prolapse, and mitral regurgitation. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1991;33:397-433.[Medline]
  20. Tamura K, Fukuda Y, Ishizaki M, Masuda Y, Yamanaka N, Ferrans VJ. Abnormalities in elastic fibers and other connective-tissue components of floppy mitral valve. Am Heart J 1995;129:1149-1158.[Medline]
  21. Barber JE, Ratliff NB, Cosgrove DM, Griffin BP, Vesely I. Myxomatous mitral valve chordae. I: Mechanical properties. J Heart Valve Dis 2001;10:320-324.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
U. Bortolotti, A. D. Milano, and R. W. M. Frater
Mitral Valve Repair With Artificial Chordae: A Review of Its History, Technical Details, Long-Term Results, and Pathology
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2012; 93(2): 684 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
J. Chikwe, D. H. Adams, K. N. Su, A. C. Anyanwu, H.-M. Lin, A. B. Goldstone, R. M. Lang, and G. W. Fischer
Can three-dimensional echocardiography accurately predict complexity of mitral valve repair?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 4, 2012; (2012) ezr040v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Shimokawa, H. Kasegawa, Y. Katayama, S. Matsuyama, S. Manabe, M. Tabata, T. Fukui, and S. Takanashi
Mechanisms of Recurrent Regurgitation After Valve Repair for Prolapsed Mitral Valve Disease
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2011; 91(5): 1433 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. M. Lawrie, E. A. Earle, and N. Earle
Intermediate-term results of a nonresectional dynamic repair technique in 662 patients with mitral valve prolapse and mitral regurgitation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2011; 141(2): 368 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. H. Adams, R. Rosenhek, and V. Falk
Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation: best practice revolution
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2010; 31(16): 1958 - 1966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. H. Drake
Invited Commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2010; 90(2): 495 - 496.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. R. Johnston, A. M. Gillinov, E. H. Blackstone, B. Griffin, W. Stewart, J. F. Sabik III, T. Mihaljevic, L. G. Svensson, P. L. Houghtaling, and B. W. Lytle
Surgical Repair of Posterior Mitral Valve Prolapse: Implications for Guidelines and Percutaneous Repair
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2010; 89(5): 1385 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. D. Gillam and A. Schwartz
Primum Non Nocere: The Case for Watchful Waiting in Asymptomatic "Severe" Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation
Circulation, February 16, 2010; 121(6): 813 - 821.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. A. Daneshmand, C. A. Milano, J. S. Rankin, E. F. Honeycutt, M. Swaminathan, L. K. Shaw, P. K. Smith, and D. D. Glower
Mitral Valve Repair for Degenerative Disease: A 20-Year Experience
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2009; 88(6): 1828 - 1837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
F. Chenot, P. Montant, D. Vancraeynest, A. Pasquet, B. Gerber, P. H. Noirhomme, G. E. Khoury, and J.-L. Vanoverschelde
Long-term clinical outcome of mitral valve repair in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation,
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, September 1, 2009; 36(3): 539 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Feldman, S. Kar, M. Rinaldi, P. Fail, J. Hermiller, R. Smalling, P. L. Whitlow, W. Gray, R. Low, H. C. Herrmann, et al.
Percutaneous Mitral Repair With the MitraClip System: Safety and Midterm Durability in the Initial EVEREST (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge REpair Study) Cohort
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 18, 2009; 54(8): 686 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Padala, S. N. Powell, L. R. Croft, V. H. Thourani, A. P. Yoganathan, and D. H. Adams
Mitral valve hemodynamics after repair of acute posterior leaflet prolapse: quadrangular resection versus triangular resection versus neochordoplasty.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2009; 138(2): 309 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. M. Gillinov, K. Tantiwongkosri, E. H. Blackstone, P. L. Houghtaling, E. R. Nowicki, J. F. Sabik III, D. R. Johnston, L. G. Svensson, and T. Mihaljevic
Is Prosthetic Anuloplasty Necessary for Durable Mitral Valve Repair?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 88(1): 76 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. H. Adams, A. C. Anyanwu, J. Chikwe, and F. Filsoufi
The Year in Cardiovascular Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 23, 2009; 53(25): 2389 - 2403.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. H. Rahimtoola
The Year in Valvular Heart Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2009; 53(20): 1894 - 1908.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. E. Newcomb, T. E. David, V. S. Lad, J. Bobiarski, S. Armstrong, and M. Maganti
Mitral valve repair for advanced myxomatous degeneration with posterior displacement of the mitral annulus.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2008; 136(6): 1503 - 1509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
I. Szentkiralyi, A. Peterffy, and Z. Galajda
Importance of stabilization of the mitral annulus in mitral valve repair.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2008; 136(4): 1102 - 1103.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. H. Adams and A. C. Anyanwu
Seeking a Higher Standard for Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair: Begin with Etiology
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2008; 136(3): 551 - 556.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L. P. Ryan, B. M. Jackson, T. J. Eperjesi, T. J. Plappert, M. St John-Sutton, R. C. Gorman, and J. H. Gorman III
A methodology for assessing human mitral leaflet curvature using real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2008; 136(3): 726 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Willem Flameng
Bart Meuris
Paul Herijgers
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flameng, W.
Right arrow Articles by Herregods, M.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Flameng, W.
Right arrow Articles by Herregods, M.-C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS