|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:648-655
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
General Thoracic Surgery |
a Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Hospital, Houston, Tex
b Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
c Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz
Received for publication June 19, 2007; revisions received August 20, 2007; accepted for publication September 24, 2007. * Address for reprints: Faisal Bakaeen, MD, Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd. OCL (112), Houston, TX 77030. (Email: fbakaeen{at}bcm.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing thoracotomy (n = 294) between January of 1999 and January of 2005.
Results: The median age was 62 years. Detailed preoperative cardiac testing was performed on 184 patients (63%) and went beyond a thorough history, physical examination, and electrocardiogram to include at least one of the following: dobutamine stress echo (n = 116), nuclear stress test (n = 66), treadmill test (n = 8), and coronary angiogram (n = 40). Evidence for coronary disease was detected in 43% of tests (99/230) performed. Revascularization was performed in 10% of all patients (4/40) who underwent coronary angiography. Postoperative myocardial infarction occurred in 7 patients (2.4%) with 4 myocardial infarction-related mortalities. No significant difference was found in the incidence of myocardial infarction in patients with (n = 184) or without (n = 110) detailed preoperative cardiac testing (3.3% vs 0.9%, P = .29). Of the 4 patients (1.4%) who underwent revascularization to treat coronary lesions identified during prethoracotomy workup, 2 had a myocardial infarction, 1 of which was caused by thrombosis of a coronary stent. In the subset of patients who underwent lobectomy (n = 149), detailed cardiac testing was performed on 107 patients (72%). The incidence of myocardial infarction was similar in tested and untested patients (2.8% vs 2.4% respectively, P = 1.0).
Conclusion: Selective use of detailed preoperative cardiac testing refines risk stratification and identifies patients for corrective cardiac interventions; however, it did not prove fully protective against myocardial infarction after thoracotomy in our study.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is a growing body of evidence that in this era of optimal medical treatment, noninvasive cardiac testing should be reserved for patients at a qualifying level of risk.1,2
Moreover, preoperative revascularization in patients being evaluated before noncardiac surgery is controversial. The theme of the recent literature is that preoperative cardiac intervention is rarely necessary simply to decrease the risk of surgery unless such intervention is indicated irrespective of the preoperative context.2,3
In fact, preoperative coronary revascularization does not seem to reduce perioperative risk in patients with significant but stable coronary artery disease (CAD).4,5
There are conflicting issues that drive preoperative cardiac evaluation today. The current medico-legal environment is intolerant of adverse outcomes, whereas commonsense medical practice and economic pressures in health care would minimize unnecessary testing. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines1,2
consider thoracic procedures as medium risk. There is little information in the literature regarding the actual risks in the population undergoing thoracic surgery, the impact of preoperative noninvasive cardiac testing, and the benefits of corrective preoperative coronary revascularization.
Our institution serves as a tertiary referral center, and our patients tend to have multiple comorbidities. Until recently, the bias has been to perform detailed preoperative myocardial ischemia testing on the majority of patients undergoing elective thoracotomy. Our objective was to assess the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients undergoing thoracotomy, including the subset of patients undergoing lobectomy, and to evaluate the impact of detailed preoperative cardiac testing. We also sought to determine whether revascularization performed because of CAD identified during prethoracotomy workup was protective against postoperative MI.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients underwent a rigorous clinical evaluation that included a full history and physical examination. Preoperative electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained routinely for all patients. Transthoracic echocardiography was occasionally performed to evaluate the cardiac valves if a murmur was detected or to measure the ejection fraction. Patients were classified as having a positive history of CAD when there were clear documentations of such in the medical records, symptoms consistent with CAD, or an abnormal ECG.
For the purposes of this study, detailed cardiac testing was defined as 1 or a combination of the following procedures: dobutamine stress echocardiogram (DSE), Persantine thallium stress test (Pthal) or exercise treadmill stress test (EST), or coronary angiogram. At our institution the bias was to perform noninvasive testing (DSE, Pthal, and EST) on the majority of patients undergoing a thoracotomy. The decision for testing was not always guided by the magnitude of the cardiac risk level determined by the clinical evaluation (history, physical, and ECG). More than 1 test was performed in patients because of inconclusive test results or the presence of an indication for a definitive diagnostic cardiac catheterization. The most common indication for coronary angiography was a large area of the heart at risk with more than moderate ischemia on noninvasive testing.
Cardiac interventions were defined as any invasive therapeutic procedure, including percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), percutaneous stenting, and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The criteria for postoperative MI were elevation in cardiac enzymes associated with ischemic manifestations, including chest pain, congestive heart failure, or hemodynamic changes, or elevation in enzymes associated with electrocardiographic changes occurring within 30 days of surgery. Isolated transient postoperative atrial fibrillation or other self-limiting arrhythmia were not tracked for the purposes of this study unless they were associated with or led to MI.
Perioperative beta-blockers were routinely administered to all patients with known cardiovascular disease. Postoperative tachycardia and hypertension were treated aggressively with beta-blockers as the first-line medications. In the absence of bleeding concerns, aspirin was often added postoperatively, and a deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis regimen of either subcutaneous heparin or sequential compressive devices was instituted. Epidural analgesia is sparingly used in the practice of our anesthesia department and was not used in this study cohort.
Unless otherwise specified, we presented the quantitative data as mean ± standard deviation and categoric data as percentages. For parametric variables, we used the Student t test to compare the differences between the patients who underwent detailed preoperative cardiac testing and the patients who did not. For categoric variables, Fisher's 2-tailed exact test was used to compare between the tested and nontested groups. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 13.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Cardiac Workup
A comprehensive history and physical examination with an ECG were performed in all patients undergoing a thoracotomy (n = 294). Detailed testing was performed on 184 patients (63%) (
Figure 1). Detailed cardiac testing (n = 230 tests) included 1 or a combination of DSE (n = 116), Pthal (n = 66), EST (n = 8), and coronary angiogram (n = 40). Abnormal findings were reported in 99 (43%) of those tests.
|
|
|
Evidence of ischemia was detected in 45 patients (30%) who underwent a lobectomy by DSE, Pthal, or EST. Coronary angiography was performed in 21 of those patients: 9 with a significant coronary lesion, 9 with a nonhemodynamically significant lesion, and 3 with a totally normal coronary anatomy. Five additional angiograms were performed because of a concerning history and ECG findings, and 2 of those angiograms were significantly abnormal. Coronary stenting was performed in 2 patients.
Myocardial Infarction
Postoperative MI occurred in 7 patients (2.4%) undergoing a thoracotomy, 6 of whom had a history of CAD. Two of the patients who had a postoperative MI underwent revascularization preoperatively with angioplasty and coronary stenting.
Table 2 summarizes the circumstances and details of the adverse cardiac events. No significant difference was found in the incidence of MI in patients with (n = 184) or without (n = 110) detailed preoperative cardiac workup (3.3% vs 0.9%, P = .29). Patients who underwent detailed preoperative testing were older (mean age 64.0 ± 10.3 years vs 58.4 ± 11.7 years, P = .0001) and had a higher prevalence of a history of CAD (54% vs 7%, P = .001).
|
Mortality
There were 4 cardiac fatalities, 2 of whom had preoperative coronary interventions (Table 2). One death was secondary to acute occlusion of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery stent. This patient had a preoperative angiogram that showed restenosis of the LAD stent and 100% right coronary artery occlusion. Angioplasty of the LAD stent was performed, and perioperative beta-blockers and aspirin were administered. On postoperative day 2, the patient was reintubated for respiratory failure. On postoperative day 4, sudden cardiac death occurred. An autopsy indicated rethrombosis of the LAD stent.
The hospital stay was a median of 13 days (range 2–220 days). Two patients had extended hospital stays (158 and 220 days) because of multiple complications, including sepsis and multisystem organ failure. The 30-day mortality was 5.8% (17/294) with 7 deaths related to MI. Other causes of death included hemorrhage (1), sepsis (5), pulmonary embolism (2), multiorgan failure (1), acute respiratory distress syndrome (3), and tension pneumothorax (1).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several indices have been successfully used to assess a patient's cardiac risk.10-13
Simple and economic assessments, such as taking a good history and reviewing the symptoms, symptom-limited stair climbing, and resting ECG, can often identify most patients with symptoms of unstable CAD, left main CAD, critical aortic stenosis, or severe left ventricular dysfunction.13-15
Until recently, those simple, yet time-tested, clinical evaluations were marginalized in favor of elaborate stress testing, such as DSE, Pthal, and EST. Such noninvasive evaluations were regarded as the gold standard for cardiac risk stratification. Furthermore, if we move beyond the decision to submit a patient for a detailed ischemia-sensitive cardiac workup, the need for coronary intervention to remedy the cardiac stigmata before noncardiac surgery remains controversial.
In our patient cohort there was no difference detected in the incidence of postoperative MI in patients who underwent a detailed preoperative cardiac testing that went beyond a thorough clinical evaluation (history and physical examination with ECG) and those who did not. In the subset of patients with no cardiac disease elicited by careful clinical evaluation, the results of the majority of the detailed cardiac testing (DSE, Pthal, EST, or coronary angiogram) were unremarkable or negative (Figures 2 and 3), and none required a coronary intervention. Therefore, the yield of such testing in this patient subset is low and not generally indicated. On the other hand, in patients with cardiac disease determined by careful clinical evaluation, further risk stratification by detailed cardiac testing resulted in a higher yield of positive findings for CAD and in some cases led to corrective revascularization.
It is significant that 2 of the patients who had a post-thoracotomy MI underwent revascularization preoperatively with angioplasty or coronary stenting. McFalls and colleagues5
recently evaluated the utility of preoperative cardiac evaluation and intervention before elective major vascular surgery in a Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Patients with clinically significant but stable CAD were randomly assigned to undergo preoperative coronary revascularization (PTCA or CABG) versus optimized medical therapy followed by the planned vascular operation. There were no postoperative differences of in-hospital death or MI between the 2 groups. These results indicate that coronary revascularization does not provide an additional benefit in reducing the incidence of perioperative cardiac death or MI provided optimal medical management is instituted in patients undergoing vascular surgery.
In our series, the risk of MI in all patients undergoing a procedure involving a thoracotomy was 2.4% and 2.7% if a lobectomy was performed. This should be balanced against the risk of coronary revascularization. Accepted operative mortality associated with CABG is 1% to 2%, and percutaneous coronary interventions have an age-dependent risk of MI, stroke, and death ranging from 0.5% to 4%.16
Given that revascularization is not completely protective, the mortality risk of coronary revascularization may compound the risk of thoracotomy. A higher risk of coronary events and mortality in the setting of noncardiac surgery shortly after coronary intervention has been reported.17,18
The obligatory antiplatelet therapy requirements following today's drug-eluting stents will significantly delay the treatment of the underlying thoracic disease.
Currently, there is a trend that is leading away from routine detailed preoperative cardiac testing and invasive interventions and instead focusing on medical therapy, including beta-blockers, to reduce the risk of perioperative cardiac events, especially in those with known stable CAD.3
The DECREASE trial showed a nearly 85% reduction in the combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death from cardiac causes after elective vascular surgery, owing to effective preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative beta-blockage.19
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines were recently updated to reflect the growing body of evidence regarding the importance of perioperative beta-blockers in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.20
The modern era of intraoperative beta-blockade, aspirin, and statin use has significantly affected the coronary risks of surgical patients. In addition, there is some evidence that postoperative epidural analgesia, especially thoracic epidural analgesia, significantly reduces the rate of postoperative MI.21
We believe that detailed cardiac testing is rarely indicated in patients who according to a careful clinical assessment are deemed to be at low cardiac risk for a thoracotomy. In the presence of a history of CAD or significant risk factors, noninvasive cardiac testing can help quantify the degree of severity of ischemia and determine the need for invasive coronary angiography and intervention. Prophylactic revascularization before thoracotomy has limited indications and is not fully protective against postoperative adverse cardiac events. Indeed, careful clinical risk assessment and optimal perioperative medical management can avoid unnecessary treatment delays by avoiding unnecessary cardiac testing in many patients needing a thoracotomy.
There are several limitations relating to this study. Given its retrospective nature, it is difficult to factor out the individual biases in the decision to test for or treat preexisting cardiac disease. Surgical judgment undoubtedly influenced decision-making at different stages in the patient care plan, and surgeons with different levels of experience were involved in patient care during the study period. In addition, although the subject of the study was surgery involving a thoracotomy incision, there was a significant degree of heterogeneity in the nature and extent of the surgeries performed. However, similar results regarding the role and impact of detailed cardiac testing were encountered with a more focused analysis addressing the lobectomy subset.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The authors have no financial issues or conflict of interest relevant to this article.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. T. Karapanos, P. J. Wettstein, Z. Li, M. Huebner, S. J. Park, C. Deschamps, and S. D. Cassivi Does lung ischemia and reperfusion have an impact on coronary flow? A quantitative coronary blood-flow analysis with inflammatory cytokine profile Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2012; 41(1): 154 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Weinstein and R. Steingart Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Preoperative Risk Stratification J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2011; 52(5): 750 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Amar, D. Munoz, W. Shi, H. Zhang, and H. T. Thaler A Clinical Prediction Rule for Pulmonary Complications After Thoracic Surgery for Primary Lung Cancer Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2010; 110(5): 1343 - 1348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |