JTCS Medtronic Endurant
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, B.J.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Evans, B.J.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:999-1006
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Cardiopulmonary Support and Physiology

The inflammatory effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on leukocyte extravasation in vivo

B.J. Evans, MRCSa, D.O. Haskard, DMb, J.R. Finch, MRCSa, I.R. Hambleton, PhDc, R.C. Landis, PhDc,*, K.M. Taylor, MDa

a British Heart Foundation, the Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
b Cardiovascular Medicine Units, Eric Bywaters Centre, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
c Edmund Cohen Laboratory for Vascular Research, Chronic Disease Research Centre, UWI, Bridgetown, Barbados

Received for publication March 16, 2007; revisions received August 22, 2007; accepted for publication August 30, 2007.

* Address for reprints: Dr. Clive Landis, Edmund Cohen Laboratory for Vascular Research, Chronic Disease Research Centre, UWI, Jemmotts Lane, Bridgetown BB 11115, Barbados (Email: clive.landis{at}uwichill.edu.bb).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Objective: Extravascular trafficking of leukocytes into organs is thought to play a major role in the pathophysiologic mechanisms of the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass, yet leukocyte extravasation is difficult to study clinically. Here we have tested the hypothesis that leukocyte emigration into skin blisters can provide a way to monitor the inflammatory effect of cardiopulmonary bypass that allows testing of anti-inflammatory interventions (exemplified by aprotinin).

Methods: Patients undergoing primary elective coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 14) were randomized into 2 equal groups to receive saline infusion during cardiopulmonary bypass (control group) or high-dose aprotinin. Experimental skin blisters (in duplicate) were induced on the forearm by means of topical application of the vesicant cantharidin, and blister fluid was sampled at 5 hours postoperatively. Inflammatory leukocyte subsets in blister fluid were analyzed by means of flow cytometry by using expression of CD11b and CD62L as a phenotypic marker of activation.

Results: In the control group of patients, cardiopulmonary bypass surgery triggered a 381% increase in leukocyte extravasation into the skin compared with reference blisters carried out before surgical intervention, with neutrophil (P = .014), monocyte (P = .014), and eosinophil (P = .009) levels all statistically significantly increased. In the aprotinin group there was no statistically significant increase during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in any inflammatory leukocyte subset. The activation phenotype of extravascular leukocytes was not significantly altered between surgical groups.

Conclusions: This study introduces the cantharidin blister technique as a powerful new research tool for analyzing the inflammatory effect of cardiopulmonary bypass in vivo. It has provided detailed molecular insight into the extravascular leukocyte population during cardiopulmonary bypass. Although aprotinin blocked cardiopulmonary bypass–dependent extravasation of leukocytes, there was no change in their CD11b/CD62L activation status. The cantharidin skin test thus represents a novel research tool for evaluating future anti-inflammatory interventions in cardiothoracic surgery.



Abbreviations and Acronyms BAL = bronchoalveolar lavage; CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IL = interleukin; TNF = tumor necrosis factor



    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Inflammation is the physiologic response to localized injury or infection and is characterized by vasodilation, increased permeability, and extravasation of inflammatory leukocytes into the affected tissue. However, a pathologic inflammatory response is triggered systemically during cardiothoracic surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) because of contact activation of blood components by the artificial bypass circuit and can result in leukocyte infiltration and harmful cytokine secretion within susceptible organs, including the lung, kidney, and brain.1Go There is increasing evidence that neurocognitive deficit after surgical intervention is linked to systemic inflammation,2-4Go with a causal relationship between leukocyte infiltration and central nervous system injury demonstrated in animals.5,6Go

Measurement of inflammatory markers in blood or urine provides little insight into the population of leukocytes that migrates extravascularly. Leukocyte extravasation in human subjects is difficult to study, with no controlled in vivo model for monitoring this process. The literature has relied mainly on animal studies of induced peritonitis or microscopic analysis of leukocytes trafficking into animal tissues by means of intravital microscopy. However, cantharidin skin blisters have been recently described as a way to study leukocyte trafficking into an organ supplied by the systemic circulation and might thus provide a useful translational tool for monitoring the clinical inflammatory response to surgical intervention.7Go

Cantharidin has been in clinical use since the 1970s and is used as a topical treatment for molluscum cantagiosum and warts. It is a protein phosphatase 1 and 2 {alpha} inhibitor.8Go When applied to skin, it causes acantholysis and blister formation.9Go No serious adverse reactions for topical use of cantharidin have been reported in the literature.10,11Go The experimental use of cantharidin as a model to study leukocyte trafficking involves topical application of cantharidin at one seventh the clinical dose to the forearm, causing a blister (median volume, 0.5 mL) to form.7Go Blister fluid sampled at 24 hours exhibits the hallmarks of acute inflammation, with infiltration of inflammatory leukocytes and accretion of inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL) 8 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) {alpha}. We have further refined this technique to allow comprehensive analysis of the surface phenotype on emigrated leukocytes to be performed by means of flow cytometry.12,13Go

Aprotinin (Trasylol; Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp, West Haven, Conn) is the only US Food and Drug Administration–licensed pharmacologic agent for limiting transfusion requirement in cardiothoracic surgery and is reported to possess clinical anti-inflammatory properties.14-18Go In vitro and animal work has suggested that its anti-inflammatory properties might be mediated, at least in part, through blockade of leukocyte extravasation.19-22Go In the present study we have used aprotinin as a model anti-inflammatory regimen to address the hypothesis that cantharidin skin blisters can be used to monitor anti-inflammatory intervention in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery with CPB.

Our approach was to randomize patients undergoing primary elective CABG surgery with CPB into 2 groups: a control group receiving saline and an anti-inflammatory intervention group receiving full-dose aprotinin ("Hammersmith dose") during surgical intervention. Skin blisters in duplicate were sampled at 5 hours after the operation and compared between treatment groups. Further comparisons were made to reference blisters carried out before that operation, which were identical in all respects except for the absence of surgical intervention. This study design allowed us to test the hypothesis that CPB causes enhanced leukocyte extravasation into skin and that cantharidin blisters can be used to monitor anti-inflammatory intervention in cardiothoracic surgery.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reagents
Cantharidin (Cantharone) was purchased from Dormer Laboratories Inc (Rexdale, Ontario, Canada). Anti-CD62L–fluorescein isothiocyanate, anti-CD11b–R-phycoerythrin, control IgG– fluorescein isothiocyanate, and control IgG–R-phycoerythrin were purchased from BD Biosciences (Oxford, United Kingdom). Anti-CD14–phycoerythrin-Texas red conjugate and control IgG–phycoerythrin-Texas red conjugate were purchased from Beckman Coulter (High Wycombe, United Kingdom).

Patients
Institutional review board approval for the study protocol was gained from the Hammersmith, Queen Charlottes, and Chelsea Research Ethics Committee. Patients referred for elective CABG were enrolled after providing informed consent, and the study was registered with www.Clinicaltrials.gov (identification number: NCT00131040). Exclusion criteria were emergency cases, combined valvular procedures or redo operations, unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 6 weeks before surgical intervention, cerebrovascular accident within 3 months preoperatively or more than 75% carotid artery obstruction (as shown by carotid Doppler scanning), serum creatinine level in excess of 177 µmol/L, coagulopathy, or previous use of anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents within the week before surgical intervention. Patients who satisfied the exclusion criteria were randomized in a double-blind study design to receive saline infusion during bypass (group 1, n = 7) or high-dose ("Hammersmith dose") aprotinin (2 x 106 KIU loading dose, 2 x 106 KIU in the pump prime, followed by 0.5 x 106 KIU/h CPB; group 2, n = 7). CPB was performed with aortic and right atrial cannulation. The extracorporeal circuit consisted of a roller pump (Stockert Instruments, Munich, Germany), a Bard William Harvey HF-750 membrane oxygenator (C.R. Bard, Crawley, England), and polyvinyl chloride tubing (non-albumin coated). Pulsatile extracorporeal circulation was used at 2.2 to 2.4 L · m–2 · min–1 to maintain a mean blood pressure of 50 to 60 mm Hg. Moderate hypothermia of 32°C to 34°C was applied in all patients. Patients received heparin (Monoparin; CP-Pharmaceuticals, Wrexham, United Kingdom) to achieve an activated coagulation time of greater than 480 seconds (Hemochron Jr, [International Technidyne Corporation, Edison, NJ] using kaolin).

Cantharidin Skin Blisters
The cantharidin skin blister technique has been described in detail previously.7Go Skin blisters in duplicate were induced by means of topical application of a 0.1% solution of Cantharone (Dormer Laboratories) in acetone to the volar aspect of the forearm according to the timeline depicted in Go Figure 1. Each blister was allowed to develop for 24 hours, with perioperative blisters timed for harvest at 5 hours after the initiation of CPB. Blister fluid was collected with siliconized pipette tips (Sigma Aldrich, Poole, United Kingdom) and stored on ice in siliconized microcentrifuge tubes before flow cytometric analysis. Cell counts were performed with Kimura's stain and counting in a hemocytometer. Cell-free supernatants, collected after microcentrifugation, were stored at –70°C for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis.


Figure 1
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the study timeline. Reference blisters (in duplicate) were carried out preoperatively to establish the normal leukocyte extravasation response to cantharidin (pre-op blister). These were compared with perioperative skin blisters (in duplicate) to gauge the effect of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on leukocyte extravasation (peri-op blister). In total, 4 blisters were applied to each patient. Blisters were allowed to develop for 24 hours, with blister harvest postoperatively taking place 5 hours after the initiation of CPB.

 
Flow Cytometric Analysis
CD11b and CD62L expression was monitored on gated neutrophil and monocyte populations in whole blood and blister infiltrated cells, according to the gating scheme depicted in Go Figure 2. Flow cytometric analysis of blister leukocytes was performed immediately after centrifugation of blister samples, with all incubation (15 minutes) and washing steps being carried out in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, as previously described.13Go Whole-blood samples were prepared for staining by using the Immunolyse whole-blood lysing technique (Beckman Coulter, Luton, United Kingdom), as previously described.23Go Primary antibody incubations were carried out in phosphate-buffered saline at room temperature for 15 minutes, as per the manufacturer's recommendations. Results are expressed as mean fluorescent staining intensities.


Figure 2
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Flow cytometric dot plot of blister fluid illustrating the gating strategy used to discern extravascular neutrophil and monocyte subpopulations. Neutrophils were identified and gated based on their characteristic side-scatter profile. Monocytes were identified in the mononuclear cell (MNC) gate based on expression of CD14 in the fluorescence (FL) 3 channel. Representative flow histograms depict CD11b and CD62L expression perioperatively on neutrophils and monocytes present in blister fluid (solid line) versus the circulation (filled histograms). SS, side scatter; FS, forward scatter; LIN, linear.

 
ELISAs
IL-8 and TNF-{alpha} levels in blister fluid were measured in triplicate by means of capture ELISA (R&D Systems, Abingdon, United Kingdom), according to the manufacturer's recommendations. TNF levels showed wide interpatient variability, and results were normalized for each individual by using preoperative blisters. IL-8 levels were expressed as the mean concentration (in nanograms per milliliter) ± the standard error.

Statistical Analysis
Power studies based on a previous investigation24Go of leukocyte extravasation into skin blisters in healthy donors indicated that a minimum sample size of 5 in each group would have a greater than 90% power to detect a difference in means of 7.50 x 105 cells per blister (the difference between a group 1 mean of 15.00 x 105 cells per blister and a group 2 mean of 7.50 x 105 cells per blister), assuming that the common standard deviation was 2.8 by using a 2-group t test with a .05 2-sided significance level.

Differences in perioperative patient characteristics between treatment groups were analyzed by using distribution-free univariate tests: the Fisher exact test for 2-level categorical data, such as sex and diabetes prevalence; the Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney test for 3-level categorical data, such as Canadian Cardiovascular Society class and number of grafts; and a permutation test for continuous data, such as age and blood loss.

All leukocyte components were log-transformed before analyses to improve the normality of the data. After averaging results from duplicate blisters (there were 2 blisters per person at each time point), differences between preoperative and perioperative leukocyte components were assessed by using paired t tests. Treatment group differences in perioperative leukocyte components were analyzed by using unpaired t tests. The average values of leukocyte components were presented as geometric means.25Go Because of the small sample size, all parametric tests were verified by using an equivalent distribution-free test (the Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test for a paired t test and the Mann–Whitney U test for an unpaired t test).

Exact P values are presented at all times to clarify the strength of the statistical relationships. Statistical analysis was performed with Stata 9 statistical software (Stata Corp, College Station, Tex).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study Design and Group Characteristics
The study design is outlined in Figure 1. Patients scheduled for primary elective CABG with CPB were enrolled into the study during the presurgery clinic with institutional review board approval and after providing informed consent. Patients who satisfied the exclusion criteria were randomized into control (saline) and aprotinin treatment groups. Study participants were invited to book into the presurgical ward 2 days before the operation and had reference skin blisters, in duplicate, carried out on their forearm ("pre-op blister" in Figure 1). These blisters would serve as an internal control to establish each person's baseline response to cantharidin. Perioperative skin blisters were then induced on the day before the operation and timed such that collection of blister fluid would take place postoperatively 5 hours after the initiation of CPB ("peri-op blister" in Figure 1).

Experimental cantharidin skin blisters were well tolerated by patients. No statistically significant differences in patient demographics or preoperative characteristics were noted between the aprotinin and saline treatment groups (Go Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of grafts performed, bypass time, or crossclamp time. At follow-up, there was significantly less blood loss (P = .02) and red cell transfusion (P = .01) in the aprotinin group. No statistically significant differences were noted for platelet transfusion, serum creatinine level, or atrial fibrillation. No serious adverse events after surgical intervention were reported in either group (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Perioperative patient characteristics
 
Leukocyte Extravasation into Skin Blisters
In the saline control group leukocyte extravasation into perioperative skin blisters increased from 4.84 (95% CI, 2.14–0.92) to 24.48 (95% CI, 10.30–58.16) compared with reference blisters harvested preoperatively (P = .013, Go Table 2), which represents a 381% increase in leukocyte emigration induced by surgical intervention. Inflammatory cells recovered from blisters were analyzed flow cytometrically by using the gating strategy shown in Figure 2 (upper panel). Neutrophils were resolved on the basis of their characteristic side-scatter profile, as previously described,13Go and comprised 94.6% ± 3.96% (mean ± standard deviation) pure neutrophils (CD16+/very late antigen 4 negative) plus a residual population of CD16+/very late antigen 4–positive eosinophils. Monocytes were resolved in the mononuclear cell gate based on expression of the LPS receptor CD14. CD14 cells in the mononuclear cell gate were considered lymphocytes. Analysis of leukocyte subsets recovered from blister fluid (Table 2) revealed a significant increase in neutrophils (P = .014), monocytes (P = .014), and eosinophils (P = .009) trafficking into the skin perioperatively in the saline-treated control group of patients undergoing CPB. In contrast, none of these inflammatory leukocyte subsets was statistically significantly increased during surgical intervention in the aprotinin-treated group (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Extravasation of leukocytes into skin blisters
 
Phenotypic Analysis of Emigrated Leukocytes
The activation phenotype of neutrophils and monocytes infiltrating into blisters was investigated further by comparing CD11b/CD62L expression with the corresponding leukocyte phenotype in blood. Representative flow cytometric histograms (Figure 2, lower panels) depict the upregulation of CD11b (CR3; Mac-1) and shedding of CD62L (L-selectin) receptor on neutrophil and monocyte subpopulations seen during their emigration from blood into blisters. These phenotypic changes, considered a hallmark of leukocyte activation during extravasation,15,23Go were significant on both neutrophil and monocyte subsets, regardless of treatment group or preoperative versus perioperative time points (Go Table 3). Thus whereas anti-inflammatory intervention with aprotinin prevented operation-induced neutrophil and monocyte trafficking into the skin, the activation status of emigrated leukocytes at 5 hours after the operation was not changed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Fluorescent intensity of CD11b and CD62L on neutrophil and monocyte subsets
 
Inflammatory Mediators in Blister Fluid
IL-8 and TNF-{alpha} are examples of inflammatory cytokines that are implicated in organ injury after CPB.26,27Go Levels of both cytokines were significantly reduced in perioperative skin blisters in the aprotinin versus saline groups (P = .044 for IL-8 and P = .004 for TNF-{alpha}, Go Figure 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Interleukin (IL) 8 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) {alpha} levels in perioperative blister fluid. TNF-{alpha} levels were normalized for each individual relative to preoperative blisters. Results are expressed as the means ± standard deviation.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study establishes the cantharidin skin blister technique as a novel translational tool capable of monitoring the inflammatory effect of cardiothoracic surgery on leukocyte extravasation. By combining the technique with flow cytometric analysis, we have been able to demonstrate for the first time that CPB induces significant extravascular migration of each of the major inflammatory leukocyte subsets: neutrophils, monocytes, and eosinophils. Aprotinin attenuated leukocyte extravasation and inflammatory cytokine (IL-8 and TNF-{alpha}) accumulation in blister fluid, thus validating the cantharidin technique as a tool for analyzing anti-inflammatory interventions in cardiothoracic surgery.

Despite the importance of extravascular leukocytes in the pathogenesis of organ injury after CPB, this has been a difficult area to study clinically. Although multiple studies have examined systemic markers of leukocyte activation and systemic inflammatory mediators, these have provided no real insight into the extravascular pool of leukocytes likely to be involved in organ injury. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid is an accessible and clinically relevant extravascular compartment for study but is complicated by the fact that emigrated leukocyte populations can be masked by large resident pools of cells. Studies of BAL fluid have reported accumulation of emigrated neutrophils after CPB.26,28Go The present study confirms and extends this work. We demonstrate that neutrophils after surgical intervention (as a percentage) comprise 65.2% ± 19.5% of total leukocytes in blister fluid. This is greater than previously reported in BAL fluid after surgical intervention (30.5% ± 12.5% and 11.3% ± 12.2%),26,28Go but the smaller neutrophil component in BAL fluid might have been due to the presence of contaminating resident cells in lavage fluid. Our study reinforces the belief that neutrophils play a central role in the pathophysiology of inflammatory organ injury.29Go

Monocytes were the next most abundant tissue-infiltrating cell type (24.1% ± 6.6% of total leukocytes in the saline group perioperatively), with the remainder consisting of eosinophils (6.5% ± 2.0%) and lymphocytes (4.2% ± 1.0%). Monocytes are known to be activated systemically after bypass,30Go but the observation that these cells emigrate in significant numbers into tissues provides new evidence for a pathogenic role after CPB. Trafficking of activated monocytes, which are a primary source of TNF-{alpha}, might be of particular relevance to neurologic injury after cardiac surgery because TNF-{alpha} causes focal ischemic brain injury through inducing apoptosis.31Go

The present study has also validated cantharidin skin blisters as a tool for monitoring a given anti-inflammatory intervention in cardiothoracic surgery. We present the first in vivo evidence that aprotinin prevents on-pump operation-induced leukocyte extravasation, a mechanism previously imputed from in vitro and animal studies.19-22Go Inflammatory cytokine (IL-8 and TNF-{alpha}) accumulation was also significantly inhibited by aprotinin. These findings are in agreement with observations in BAL fluid, which reported reduced IL-8 levels in patients receiving aprotinin during CPB surgery.26Go The combined reduction of inflammatory leukocyte trafficking and proinflammatory cytokine accumulation in skin suggests that these properties of aprotinin might contribute to its neuroprotective mechanism of action demonstrated in placebo-controlled trials.17,18,32Go

The present study was not powered to investigate possible adverse clinical reactions caused by aprotinin administration.33,34Go Nevertheless, we report no serious adverse events in either treatment group. One patient in the aprotinin group and 2 patients in the saline group had peak serum creatinine values of greater than 200 µmol/L, but no patient required dialysis. Patients in the aprotinin group had significantly reduced blood loss and red cell transfusion requirement, confirming the hemostatic efficacy of aprotinin. The failure of aprotinin to suppress leukocyte activation in the present study appears at odds with other studies showing inhibition of CD11b by aprotinin on neutrophils examined at earlier time points (15–30 minutes after initiation of bypass).15,23Go Differences might have been due to the relatively late time point (5 hours postoperatively) of sampling here or the fact that cantharidin skin blisters are intrinsically inflammatory.

The intrinsic inflammatory nature of topical cantharidin is a limitation of the study. What is being sampled postoperatively is a composite of a systemic inflammatory response caused by surgical intervention and a local inflammatory response caused by cantharidin. Nonetheless, surgical intervention with CPB triggered a robust increase in extravasated leukocytes (381% compared with reference blisters carried out preoperatively), and this increment was ablated with anti-inflammatory intervention. Because this is the first study to use the cantharidin technique in a surgical setting, it is too early to say whether leukocyte infiltration or cytokine accumulation is correlated with clinical events. Further studies adequately powered to address clinical outcomes would be needed to address this issue. Another limitation is the question of how valid it is to extrapolate anti-inflammatory effects observed in the skin to organs affected by the inflammatory response to CPB. Ideally, one would want a technique for monitoring leukocyte infiltration directly into, for example, the human brain, lung, and kidneys. The value of the cantharidin skin test is that it provides novel molecular insight into the pool of leukocytes migrating extravascularly during the operation, which is poorly understood at present.

In conclusion, we have established a new technique for monitoring the extravascular leukocyte population in cardiothoracic surgery. This technique might be a useful research tool to evaluate future anti-inflammatory interventions in cardiothoracic surgery.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr Pete Anning at Scienceposters.co.uk for expert assistance with the figures.


    Footnotes
 
This study was supported by grants from the British Heart Foundation (D.O.H. and K.M.T) and the Hammersmith Hospitals Trustee's Research Committee (B.J.E. and R.C.L.).

R. C. Landis reports lecture fees and Grant support from Bayer.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Day JRS, Taylor KM. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome and cardiopulmonary bypass. Int J Surg 2005;3:129-140.[Medline]
  2. Kalman J, Juhasz A, Bogats G, Babik B, Rimanoczy A, Janka Z, et al. Elevated levels of inflammatory biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid after coronary artery bypass surgery are predictors of cognitive decline. Neurochem Int 2006;48:177-180.[Medline]
  3. Ramlawi B, Rudolph JL, Mieno S, Feng J, Boodhwani M, Khabbaz K, et al. C-reactive protein and inflammatory response associated to neurocognitive decline following cardiac surgery. Surgery 2006;140:221-226.[Medline]
  4. Shann KG, Likosky DS, Murkin JM, Baker RA, Baribeau YR, DeFoe GR, et al. An evidence-based review of the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults: a focus on neurologic injury, glycemic control, hemodilution, and the inflammatory response. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:283-290.[Free Full Text]
  5. Clark WM, Madden KP, Rothlein R, Zivin JA. Reduction of central nervous system ischemic injury in rabbits using leukocyte adhesion antibody treatment. Stroke 1991;22:877-883.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Mori E, del Zoppo GJ, Chambers JD, Copeland BR, Arfors KE. Inhibition of polymorphonuclear leukocyte adherence suppresses no-reflow after focal cerebral ischemia in baboons. Stroke 1992;23:712-718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Day RM, Harbord M, Forbes A, Segal AW. Cantharidin blisters: a technique for investigating leukocyte trafficking and cytokine production at sites of inflammation in humans. J Immunol Methods 2001;257:213-220.[Medline]
  8. Honkanen RE. Cantharidin, another natural toxin that inhibits the activity of serine/threonine protein phosphatases types 1 and 2A. FEBS Lett 1993;330:283-286.[Medline]
  9. Pierard-Franchimont C, Pierard GE. Cantharidin-induced acantholysis. Am J Dermatopathol 1988;10:419-423.[Medline]
  10. Tromovitch TA. Cantharadin. JAMA 1971;215:640.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Moed L, Shwayder TA, Chang MW. Cantharidin revisited: a blistering defense of an ancient medicine. Arch Dermatol 2001;137:1357-1360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Philippidis P, Mason JC, Evans BJ, Nadra I, Taylor KM, Haskard DO, et al. Hemoglobin scavenger receptor CD163 mediates interleukin-10 release and heme oxygenase-1 synthesis: antiinflammatory monocyte-macrophage responses in vitro, in resolving skin blisters in vivo, and after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Circ Res 2004;94:119-126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Evans BJ, McDowall A, Taylor PC, Hogg N, Haskard DO, Landis RC. Shedding of lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) in a human inflammatory response. Blood 2006;107:3593-3599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Gott JP, Cooper WA, Schmidt Jr. FE, Brown III WM, Wright CE, Merlino JD, et al. Modifying risk for extracorporeal circulation: trial of four antiinflammatory strategies. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:747-753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hill GE, Alonso A, Spurzem JR, Stammers AH, Robbins RA. Aprotinin and methylprednisolone equally blunt cardiopulmonary bypass-induced inflammation in humans. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:1658-1662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wachtfogel YT, Kucich U, Hack CE, Gluszko P, Niewiarowski S, Colman RW, et al. Aprotinin inhibits the contact, neutrophil, and platelet activation systems during simulated extracorporeal perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:1-9.[Abstract]
  17. Buziashvili YI, Ambat'ello SG, Aleksakhina YA, Pashchenkov MV. Influence of cardiopulmonary bypass on the state of cognitive functions in patients with ischemic heart disease. Neurosci Behav Physiol 2006;36:107-113.[Medline]
  18. Harmon DC, Ghori KG, Eustace NP, O'Callaghan SJ, O'Donnell AP, Shorten GD. Aprotinin decreases the incidence of cognitive deficit following CABG and cardiopulmonary bypass: a pilot randomized controlled study. Can J Anaesth 2004;51:1002-1009.[Medline]
  19. Asimakopoulos G, Thompson R, Nourshargh S, Lidington EA, Mason JC, Ratnatunga CP, et al. An anti-inflammatory property of aprotinin detected at the level of leukocyte extravasation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:361-369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Asimakopoulos G, Lidington EA, Mason J, Haskard DO, Taylor KM, Landis RC. Effect of aprotinin on endothelial cell activation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:123-128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Pruefer D, Makowski J, Dahm M, Guth S, Oelert H, Darius H, et al. Aprotinin inhibits leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions after hemorrhage and reperfusion. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:210-215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Anttila V, Hagino I, Iwata Y, Mettler BA, Lidov HG, Zurakowski D, et al. Aprotinin improves cerebral protection: evidence from a survival porcine model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:948-953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Asimakopoulos G, Kohn A, Stefanou DC, Haskard DO, Landis RC, Taylor KM. Leukocyte integrin expression in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1192-1197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Yagnik DR, Evans BJ, Florey O, Mason JC, Landis RC, Haskard DO. Macrophage release of transforming growth factor beta1 during resolution of monosodium urate monohydrate crystal-induced inflammation. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:2273-2280.[Medline]
  25. Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC. Transformations. Essential medical statistics. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2003p. 118-28.
  26. Hill GE, Pohorecki R, Alonso A, Rennard SI, Robbins RA. Aprotinin reduces interleukin-8 production and lung neutrophil accumulation after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg 1996;83:696-700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Nakamura K, Ueno T, Yamamoto H, Iguro Y, Yamada K, Sakata R. Relationship between cerebral injury and inflammatory responses in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Cytokine 2005;29:95-104.[Medline]
  28. Alat I, Yuksel M, Buket S, Nalbantgil S, Askar F, Bayindir U, et al. The side-effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on the lungs: changes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids. Perfusion 2001;16:121-128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Eppinger MJ, Jones ML, Deeb GM, Bolling SF, Ward PA. Pattern of injury and the role of neutrophils in reperfusion injury of rat lung. J Surg Res 1995;58:713-718.[Medline]
  30. Rinder CS, Rinder HM, Johnson K, Smith M, Lee DL, Tracey J, et al. Role of C3 cleavage in monocyte activation during extracorporeal circulation. Circulation 1999;100:553-558.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Barone FC, Arvin B, White RF, Miller A, Webb CL, Willette RN, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha. A mediator of focal ischemic brain injury. Stroke 1997;28:1233-1244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Levy JH, Pifarre R, Schaff HV, Horrow JC, Albus R, Spiess B, et al. A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of aprotinin for reducing blood loss and the requirement for donor-blood transfusion in patients undergoing repeat coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 1995;92:2236-2244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Mangano DT, Tudor IC, Dietzel C. The risk associated with aprotinin in cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2006;354:353-365.[Medline]
  34. Mangano DT, Miao Y, Vuylsteke A, Tudor IC, Juneja R, Filipescu D, et al. Mortality associated with aprotinin during 5 years following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 2007;297:471-479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. de Prost, C. El-Karak, M. Avila, F. Ichinose, and M. F. Vidal Melo
Changes in cysteinyl leukotrienes during and after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2011; 141(6): 1496 - 1502.e3.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
T.-L. Hwang, Y.-C. Su, H.-L. Chang, Y.-L. Leu, P.-J. Chung, L.-M. Kuo, and Y.-J. Chang
Suppression of superoxide anion and elastase release by C18 unsaturated fatty acids in human neutrophils
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2009; 50(7): 1395 - 1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, B.J.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Evans, B.J.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS