JTCS KCI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jian Wang
Tadashi Ikeda
Masashi Komeda
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsukashita, M.
Right arrow Articles by Komeda, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tsukashita, M.
Right arrow Articles by Komeda, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - pharmacology
Right arrow Congestive Heart Failure
Right arrow Myocardial infarction

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:58-64
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Spironolactone alleviates late cardiac remodeling after left ventricular restoration surgery

Masaki Tsukashita, MDa,*, Akira Marui, MD, PhDa, Takeshi Nishina, MD, PhDa, Eiji Yoshikawa, MDa, Hideo Kanemitsu, MD, PhDb, Jian Wang, MDa, Tadashi Ikeda, MD, PhDa, Masashi Komeda, MD, PhDa

a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
b Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan

Received for publication May 16, 2007; revisions received September 13, 2007; accepted for publication November 13, 2007.

* Address for reprints: Masaki Tsukashita, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawara, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. (Email: mtsuka{at}kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
Objective: Although left ventricular restoration is effective for treating ischemic cardiomyopathy caused by left ventricular remodeling and redilation, the initial improvement in left ventricular function is not always sustained. We have reported that the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers is effective in preventing late remodeling after left ventricular restoration. However, the effects of spironolactone—an aldosterone blocker—after left ventricular restoration have not been elucidated.

Methods: Myocardial infarction was induced by ligating the left anterior descending artery. The rats developed left ventricular aneurysms and underwent left ventricular restoration by the plication of the left ventricular aneurysm 4 weeks after the ligation. Thereafter, the rats were randomized into a left ventricular restoration (vehicle) group and left ventricular restoration with spironolactone (100 mg/kg/d, by mouth) group.

Results: Echocardiography revealed that in the left ventricular restoration with spironolactone group, late cardiac redilation was significantly attenuated (left ventricular end-diastolic area: 0.51 ± 0.03 cm2 vs 0.63 ± 0.03 cm2, P < .05) and late left ventricular function was preserved (fractional area change: 48.8% ± 3.0% vs 35.8% ± 2.4%, P < .01). Hemodynamically, rats in the left ventricular restoration with spironolactone group exhibited improved systolic function (maximal end-systolic pressure-volume relationship: 0.38 ± 0.03 mm Hg/µL vs 0.11 ± 0.04 mm Hg/µL, P < .01) and diastolic function ({tau}: 18.5 ± 1.5 sec vs 23.1 ± 1.4 sec, P < .05) than those in the LVR group. Histologically, interstitial fibrosis in the remote area was significantly reduced (5.6% ± 1.3% vs 12% ± 1.0%, P < .01), and fibrosis around the pledgets (near area) was also attenuated in the left ventricular restoration with spironolactone group. The myocardial messenger ribonucleic acid expressions of transforming growth factor-β1 and brain natriuretic peptide measured using the real-time polymerase chain reaction were lower in the left ventricular restoration with spironolactone group (transforming growth factor-β1: 0.13 ± 0.02 vs 0.28 ± 0.02, P < .01; brain natriuretic peptide: 0.99 ± 0.14 vs 1.54 ± 0.18, P < .05). The systemic blood pressure and heart rate did not differ between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: Spironolactone reduced the gene expression of transforming growth factor-β1 and brain natriuretic peptide and alleviated not only cardiac redilation but also the deterioration of left ventricular function late after left ventricular restoration without inducing hypotension, a major side effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker. Spironolactone is a promising therapeutic option for alleviating remodeling after left ventricular restoration.



Abbreviations and Acronyms ACEI = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; BNP = brain natriuretic peptide; BW = body weight; Emax = maximal end-systolic pressure-volume relationship; FAC = fractional area change; GADPH = glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; LV = left ventricular; +LV dP/dt = maximal rate of LV pressure development; –LV dP/dt = maximal rate of LV pressure relaxation; LVEDA = left ventricular end-diastolic area; LVESA = left ventricular end-systolic area; LVR = left ventricular restoration; LVR-Sp = left ventricular restoration with spironolactone; LVW = left ventricular weight; MI = myocardial infarction; mRNA = messenger ribonucleic acid; RAAS = renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; TGF = transforming growth factor



    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
Left ventricular restoration (LVR) surgery after myocardial infarction (MI) is effective as a surgical treatment for left ventricular (LV) aneurysm or ischemic cardiomyopathy.1-5Go However, LV redilation and functional deterioration after LVR are serious problems.6-8Go

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has been reported to play an important role in LV remodeling after MI. We have demonstrated that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and atrial natriuretic peptide are effective in preventing LV remodeling and improving LV function after LVR in a rat MI model.9-11Go However, in the clinical setting immediately after LVR, the systemic hypotension and renal damage caused by these anti-RAAS drugs are detrimental, particularly in high-risk patients with severe LV dysfunction.12Go

Spironolactone—a mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonist—competes with aldosterone, which plays an important role in the RAAS. Spironolactone prevents the detrimental effect of aldosterone and, at the same time, rarely influences the blood pressure.13Go Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that spironolactone alleviates cardiac remodeling and functional deterioration late after LVR without inducing hypotension.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
Animals
In this study, we used 7-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, Ind). All procedures performed here conformed to the "Guideline for Animal Experiments" of Kyoto University. All rats were fed with standard rat chow, given water ad libitum, and housed in a single room of the animal facility with a 12-hour light/dark cycle with independent ventilation, temperature, and humidity control.

Surgical Induction of Myocardial Infarction
Murine acute MI was established as previously described.14Go Briefly, under general anesthesia, anterior wall MI was induced by the ligation of the left anterior descending artery using a 6-0 polypropylene suture near the main pulmonary artery. Rats with an infarction size of less than 30% of the LV circumference as observed on 2-dimensional echocardiography were excluded from the study.

Left Ventricular Restoration Surgery
Four weeks after the ligation of the left anterior descending artery, LVR surgery was performed in the rats as previously described.14Go Briefly, rats with a large MI area underwent rethoracotomy. The border between the aneurysm and the intact myocardium was identified, and the aneurysm was plicated with 2 pledgets. Polypropylene sutures (5-0 Prolene) were passed through the pledget, through the aneurysm at its border, through the opposite pledget in a horizontal mattress fashion, and then tied. An additional continuous over-and-over suture was added to plicate the LV aneurysm completely.

Study Group Profiles
After LVR surgery, the rats were randomly treated with the oral administration of spironolactone (100 mg/kg/d, dissolved in 1 mL of 2% ethanol: LVR-Sp group, n = 14) or vehicle (2% ethanol 1 mL only: LVR group, n = 14) with a metallic gastric tube. The rationale of the drug dose depended on previous studies concerning spironolactone.15,16Go Concomitantly, we confirmed that 1 mL of 2% ethanol had no hemodynamic or morphologic influence on the rats. To provide appropriate frames of reference, echocardiographic data of normal rats (n = 12) and rats with MI (n = 12) were also evaluated.

Systolic Blood Pressure and Heart Rate
Systolic blood pressure and heart rate were measured with a noninvasive computerized Softron tail-cuff system (Softron, Kanagawa, Japan) without anesthesia, as previously described.7Go

Echocardiography
Echocardiography was performed before LVR, 1 day after LVR, and 4 weeks after LVR. Before all echocardiographic procedures, the rats were lightly anesthetized with ether and placed in a supine position. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed with a 12-MHz transducer and 2-dimensional echo Doppler system (Sonos 4500; Hewlett Packard, Andover, Mass). M-mode and 2-dimensional measurements were performed as previously described.10Go

Hemodynamic Evaluation
All of the rats underwent cardiac catheterization for the measurement of functional parameters 4 weeks after LVR surgery, as previously described.10Go Briefly, general anesthesia was administered to the rats, and they were ventilated. A micromanometer-tipped catheter (Millar Instruments, Houston, Tex) was inserted into the right carotid artery. The catheter was advanced into the aorta and then into the left ventricle. A 3-French Fogarty balloon catheter (Edwards Life Science Corp, Irvine, Calif) was inserted via the right femoral vein into the inferior vena cava for caval occlusion. The maximal rate of LV pressure development (+LV dP/dt), maximal rate of LV pressure relaxation (–LV dP/dt), LV end-diastolic pressure, maximal end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (Emax), and time constant of isovolumic LV relaxation (tau, {tau}) were calculated as previously described.17,18Go

Histopathology
The rats were sacrificed 1 day after cardiac catheterization. Hearts and lungs were excised and weighed. LVs were sliced into 2-mm cross sections, perpendicular to the ventricular long axis at the base of the papillary muscles, and were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, mounted on glass slides, and stained using Picrosirius red. Except for the area that was plicated using pledgets, the LV wall was divided into 4 areas. The 2 areas adjacent to the pledgets were called the "near areas," and the other 2 areas were called the "remote areas."7Go The images were viewed using an Eclipse E600 Nikon (Tokyo, Japan) microscope. The digitally acquired images were analyzed using the IPLab imaging software (Version 3.71 for Windows; Scanalytics Inc, Rockville, Md). The results of the planimetry of myocardial fibrosis were analyzed as previously described.10Go The histopathologic results were analyzed in a blind manner.

Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
The remaining LV muscles were stored at –80°C until use. The extraction of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) from tissue samples and polymerase chain reaction were performed as previously described.10Go

The nucleotide sequence for primers and TaqMan probes were as follows: brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), forward primer: 5'-GATCCAGGAGAGACTTCGAAA-3'; reverse primer: 5'-CGGTTATCTTCTGCCCAA-3'; TaqMan probe: 5'-TCCAAGATGGCACATAGTTCAAGCTG-3'; transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, forward primer: 5'-GGCAGTGGCGAACCAAG-3'; reverse primer: 5'-CTGTCACAAGAGCAGTGAGCA-3'; TaqMan probe: 5'-AGACGGAATACAGGGCTTTCGCTTC-3'. The TaqMan rodent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) control reagents were used to detect rat GAPDH as the internal standard. The expression levels of the target genes were normalized to the GAPDH level in each sample.

Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as means ± standard deviation. To analyze echocardiographic data, multiple group comparisons were performed using 1-way analysis of variance. In multiple comparisons among independent groups in which analysis of variance indicated significant differences, the statistical value was determined according to the Bonferroni/Dunn post hoc test. All data comparing LVR group and LVR-Sp group were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Statistical analyses were performed with StatView for Windows (version 5.0; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
All of the rats survived LVR surgery. There was no difference in systolic blood pressure levels between the 2 groups at 4 weeks after LVR (109.5 ± 5.8 mm Hg vs 111.3 ± 8.6 mm Hg). The heart rate was higher in the LVR-Sp group than in the LVR group (367 ± 39 beats/min vs 400 ± 38 beats/min, respectively). However, this difference was not statistically significant.

Echocardiography
The 2-dimensional echocardiography data before LVR and 1 day and 4 weeks after LVR are summarized in Go Table 1. Before LVR and 1 day after LVR, no differences were observed between the echocardiographic data of the 2 groups. The akinetic area was 35% ± 6% in the LVR group and 33% ± 4% in the LVR-Sp group. One day after LVR, the left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA) decreased compared with the preoperative values in both groups (from 0.92 ± 0.02 cm2 to 0.32 ± 0.04 cm2 in the LVR-Sp group [P < .05] and from 0.91 ± 0.03 cm2 to 0.34 ± 0.03 cm2 in the LVR group [P < .05]). The left ventricular end-systolic area (LVESA) also decreased in both groups (from 0.70 ± 0.02 cm2 to 0.11 ± 0.04 cm2 in the LVR-Sp group [P < .05] and from 0.66 ± 0.03 cm2 to 0.12 ± 0.05 cm2 in the LVR group [P < .05]).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Echocardiographic data
 
Four weeks after LVR, the LVEDA and LVESA values demonstrated an increase in comparison with the values recorded immediately after surgery in the LVR group (LVEDA: from 0.34 ± 0.03 to 0.63 ± 0.03 cm2 [P < .05] and LVESA: from 0.12 ± 0.05 to 0.40 ± 0.08 cm2 [P < .05]). Although the LVEDA and LVESA values also increased in the LVR-Sp group, the LVEDA value was lower in the LVR-Sp group than in the LVR group at 4 weeks after LVR (0.51 ± 0.03 cm2 vs 0.63 ± 0.03 cm2, P < .05).

Immediately after LVR, the fractional area change (FAC) demonstrated an increase (from 24.2% ± 1.0% to 65.7% ± 3.1% in the LVR-Sp group [P < .05] and from 26.6% ± 1.6% to 66.5% ± 2.6% in the LVR group [P < .05]). The time course of the FAC is shown in Go Figure 1. The FAC decreased gradually after LVR in both groups. However, the FAC at 4 weeks after LVR was significantly higher in the LVR-Sp group than in the LVR group (48.8% ± 3.0% vs 35.8% ± 2.4%, respectively; P < .01).


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. The time course of FAC calculated from the echocardiographic data obtained from LVR (closed circles) and LVR-Sp (closed squares) groups. * P < .05 versus LVR. Values are represented as mean ± standard deviation. LVR, Left ventricular restoration; LVR-Sp, left ventricular restoration with spironolactone.

 
Hemodynamic Evaluation
The results of cardiac catheterization 4 weeks after LVR are summarized in Go Table 2. The LV end-diastolic pressure values did not differ between the 2 groups (12.7 ± 5.9 mm Hg vs 13.4 ± 8.1 mm Hg). In the LVR-Sp group, however, the Emax, +LV dP/dt, and –LV dP/dt values were higher than those in the LVR group; the {tau} value was lower than that in the LVR group (Emax: 0.38 ± 0.03 mm Hg/µL vs 0.11 ± 0.04 mm Hg/µL, P < .01; +LV dP/dt: 6568.7 ± 1096.3 mm Hg/sec vs 5212.4 ± 590.1 mm Hg/sec, P < .01; –LV dP/dt: 4011.9 ± 554.6 mm Hg/sec vs 3368.9 ± 706.2 mm Hg/sec, P < .05; and {tau}: 18.5 ± 1.5 sec vs 23.1 ± 1.4 sec, P < .05; LVR-Sp vs LVR, respectively).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Results of cardiac catheterization 4 weeks after left ventricular restoration
 
Heart and Lung Weight
Four weeks after LVR, the body weight (BW) of the rats in the LVR-Sp group (407.2 ± 52.8 g) was similar to that of the rats in the LVR group (390.3 ± 44.3 g). The left ventricular weight (LVW) and lung weight normalized to BW were lower in the LVR-Sp group compared with the LVR group (LVW/BW: 2.14 ± 0.1 g/kg vs 2.96 ± 1.2 g/kg, P < .05; lung weight/BW: 8.6 ± 3.1 g/kg vs 10.9 ± 1.7 g/kg, respectively, P < .05) (Go Figure 2). Right ventricular weight/BW did not differ between the 2 groups (1.1 ± 0.3 for LVR-Sp vs 1.3 ± 0.3 for LVR).


Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. LV weight (A) and lung weight (B) normalized to the BW (gray bar: LVR group, white bar: LVR-Sp group). {dagger}P < .05 versus LVR. Values are represented as mean ± standard deviation. LV, left ventricular; LVR, left ventricular restoration; LVR-Sp, left ventricular restoration with spironolactone.

 
Histopathology
Representative photographs of histopathologic findings are shown in Go Go Figures 3 and 4. The interstitial fibrosis in the remote area was attenuated in the LVR-Sp group (Figure 3). A lower percentage of myocardial fibrosis in the remote area was observed in the LVR-Sp group compared with the LVR group (5.6% ± 1.3% vs 12% ± 1.0%, respectively, P < .05). In the LVR group, interstitial fibrosis was thick and partially composed of a reticular structure surrounding the myocardial fibers. On the other hand, the fibrosis was thin and scattered among the myocardial fibers in the LVR-Sp group. Severe fibrosis developed around the pledgets (near area) in the LVR group (Figure 4). However, the fibrosis around the pledgets was attenuated in the LVR-Sp group.


Figure 3
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Histologic findings. High-power photomicrographs (x200) of Picrosirius red-stained LV cross-section obtained from LVR (A) and LVR-Sp (B) rats. In the LVR group, the interstitial fibrosis (arrows) partially forms a reticular structure surrounding the myocardial fibers. In the LVR-Sp group, the fibrosis is thin and scatters among the myocardial fibers.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Low-power photomicrographs (x40) of Picrosirius red-stained LV cross-section obtained from LVR (A) and LVR-Sp (B) groups. Dense collagen fiber (arrows) develops around the pledgets (asterisks) in the LVR group. Spironolactone attenuated fibrous accumulation.

 
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
The results of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction are shown in Go Figure 5. Spironolactone inhibited the expressions of TGF-β1 and BNP mRNA (TGF-β1/GAPDH: 0.13 ± 0.02 vs 0.28 ± 0.02, P < .005; BNP/GAPDH: 0.99 ± 0.14 vs 1.54 ± 0.18, P < .05; LVR-Sp vs LVR, respectively).


Figure 5
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Myocardial expression of BNP mRNA (A) and TGF-β1 mRNA (B) in the LVR and LVR-Sp groups 4 weeks after LVR. Data are normalized to the GAPDH expression. {dagger}P < .05 vs LVR. {ddagger}P < .01 versus LVR. Values are represented as mean ± standard deviation. BNP, Brain natriuretic peptide; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; TGF, transforming growth factor; LVR, left ventricular restoration; LVR-Sp, left ventricular restoration with spironolactone.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
Major Findings
By using hemodynamic, histologic, and molecular methods, we showed that spironolactone attenuated cardiac remodeling and preserved systolic and diastolic function late after LVR. LVEDD and LVEDA values were lower; FAC, Emax, and +LV dP/dt values were higher; and the {tau} value was lower in the LVR-Sp group than in the LVR group. Lower values of LVW/BW and lung weight/BW in the LVR-Sp group indicate that spironolactone attenuated LV hypertrophy and lung congestion induced by LV dysfunction. Histopathologically, spironolactone prevented the accumulation of connective tissue in both the near and remote areas. The expressions of TGF-β1 mRNA, which is related to adverse remodeling, and BNP mRNA, which indicates LV wall stress, were inhibited. One of the most impressive results of this study was that spironolactone did not induce severe hypotension in the rats exposed to such a critical condition after LVR surgery.

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System and Cardiac Remodeling After Left Ventricular Restoration
LVR is an effective treatment for LV aneurysm and ischemic cardiomyopathy after MI.1-5Go However, several clinical and experimental studies have reported cardiac redilation and functional deterioration late after LVR.6-8Go Although the precise mechanism of LV redilation after LVR has not been fully elucidated, we and others have demonstrated that progressive fibrosis in areas both near and remote from the plicated region is one of the key factors responsible and that the RAAS plays an important role in an autocrine/paracrine manner.19Go Therefore, the inhibition of the RAAS may be important in preventing persistent remodeling after the exclusion of the aneurysm by LVR and in reducing postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Spironolactone
A number of clinical and experimental studies have demonstrated the efficacy of spironolactone in the treatment of heart failure.16,20-23Go Nonetheless, other RAAS inhibitors, such as ACEI and/or ARB (rather than spironolactone), are chosen in the clinical setting for the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure because these drugs are effective against hypertension, which induces cardiac hypertrophy and plays an important role in the vicious cycle of heart failure. However, these antihypertensive drugs may not be as well tolerated in acute and unstable settings after LVR surgery as they are in chronic heart failure.

One of the rationales behind the choice of spironolactone as a treatment option after LVR was that it does not act as a vasodilator and rarely induces hypotension.13Go In this study, treatment with spironolactone for 4 weeks did not induce hypotension. Although the higher heart rate observed in the rats treated with spironolactone could be caused by the differences in the LV output, these differences were not statistically significant.

Further, recent studies have indicated that the once-inhibited production of aldosterone often increases and that the anti-remodeling effects of ACEI and ARB therapy decrease during their long-term administration (aldosterone escape phenomenon).24Go Although the precise mechanism of this phenomenon has not been well elucidated, the induction of angiotensin-converting enzyme, the conversion of angiotensin II from angiotensin I through enzymatic pathways other than angiotensin-converting enzyme (eg, chymase), or both may play important roles. Therefore, some investigators have suggested that ACEI or ARB treatment is not adequate, and a combination of ACEI and ARB with an agent that inhibits aldosterone could be effective in preventing remodeling.25Go The important point in this study is that spironolactone inhibited the expression of the gene that was related to adverse remodeling and the severity of heart failure (TGF-β1 and BNP). Moreover, spironolactone inhibited connective tissue aggregation both in the near and remote areas, and further attenuated LV redilation and preserved LV function without inducing hypotension.

Clinical Implications
As shown in this study, spironolactone may be well tolerated in critical and unstable settings immediately after surgery. In addition, spironolactone can be administered intravenously in patients who are unable to take drugs orally. We recommend the following with respect to spironolactone therapy. Spironolactone is the first choice immediately after LVR because these patients are often in low cardiac output states and hypotension. ACEIs and/or ARBs should be administered and titrated after patients recover from such severe conditions and are able to take drugs orally. The proper drug dose and timing of administration of each drug should be considered individually.

Study Limitations
There were several study limitations in the present study. First, the LVR method used in this study is similar to that of linear closure but not identical. In the clinical setting, the endoventricular circular patch plasty technique (first described by Dor and colleagues) is more widely performed than the linear closure methods. However, the aneurysm was completely excluded by plication, and we think that this method adequately simulated clinical LVR because the LV size decreased and LV function improved.

Second, we used the dose of 100 mg/kg/d according to the previous studies that used spironolactone for an animal MI model. However, in the surgical settings used in the present study, the plasma renin level might be higher than that in the MI model. Therefore, if we had used a larger amount of spironolactone, LV redilatation would have been alleviated more.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
Spironolactone (an aldosterone blocker) attenuated the expression of mRNA responsible for cardiac fibrosis, LV remodeling, and the deterioration in LV function after LVR without hypotension. Spironolactone is a possible therapeutic option after LVR.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Komeda M, David TE, Malik A, Ivanov J, Sun Z. Operative risks and long-term results of operation for left ventricular aneurysm. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:22-29.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Mickleborough LL, Maruyama H, Liu P, Mohamed S. Results of left ventricular aneurysmectomy with a tailored scar excision and primary closure technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:690-698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kesler KA, Fiore AC, Naunheim KS, Sharp TG, Mahomed Y, Zollinger TW, et al. Anterior wall left ventricular aneurysm repair. A comparison of linear versus circular closure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;103:841-848.[Abstract]
  4. Di Donato M, Barletta G, Maioli M, Fantini F, Coste P, Sabatier M, et al. Early hemodynamic results of left ventricular reconstructive surgery for anterior wall left ventricular aneurysm. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:886-890.[Medline]
  5. Dor V, Saab M, Coste P, Kornaszewska M, Montiglio F. Left ventricular aneurysm: a new surgical approach. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;37:11-19.[Medline]
  6. Dor V, Sabatier M, Di Donato M, Montiglio F, Toso A, Maioli M. Efficacy of endoventricular patch plasty in large postinfarction akinetic scar and severe left ventricular dysfunction: comparison with a series of large dyskinetic scars. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:50-59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Nishina T, Nishimura K, Yuasa S, Miwa S, Nomoto T, Sakakibara Y, et al. Initial effects of the left ventricular repair by plication may not last long in a rat ischemic cardiomyopathy model. Circulation 2001;104:I241-I245.[Medline]
  8. Sinatra R, Macrina F, Braccio M, Melina G, Luzi G, Ruvolo G, et al. Left ventricular aneurysmectomy; comparison between two techniques; early and late results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;12:291-297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Nomoto T, Nishina T, Miwa S, Tsuneyoshi H, Maruyama I, Nishimura K, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor helps prevent late remodeling after left ventricular aneurysm repair in rats. Circulation 2002;106:I115-I119.[Medline]
  10. Tsuneyoshi H, Nishina T, Nomoto T, Kanemitsu H, Kawakami R, Unimonh O, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide helps prevent late remodeling after left ventricular aneurysm repair. Circulation 2004;110:II174-II179.[Medline]
  11. Nomoto T, Nishina T, Tsuneyoshi H, Miwa S, Nishimura K, Komeda M. Effects of two inhibitors of renin-angiotensin system on attenuation of postoperative remodeling after left ventricular aneurysm repair in rats. J Card Surg 2003;18(Suppl 2):S61-S68.[Medline]
  12. White HD, Aylward PE, Huang Z, Dalby AJ, Weaver WD, Barvik S, et al. Mortality and morbidity remain high despite captopril and/or Valsartan therapy in elderly patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, heart failure, or both after acute myocardial infarction: results from the Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (VALIANT). Circulation 2005;112:3391-3399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999;341:709-717.[Medline]
  14. Nishina T, Nishimura K, Yuasa S, Miwa S, Sakakibara Y, Ikeda T, et al. A rat model of ischemic cardiomyopathy for investigating left ventricular volume reduction surgery. J Card Surg 2002;17:155-162.[Medline]
  15. Matsumoto R, Yoshiyama M, Omura T, Kim S, Nakamura Y, Izumi Y, et al. Effects of aldosterone receptor antagonist and angiotensin II type I receptor blocker on cardiac transcriptional factors and mRNA expression in rats with myocardial infarction. Circ J 2004;68:376-382.[Medline]
  16. Silvestre JS, Heymes C, Oubenaissa A, Robert V, Aupetit-Faisant B, Carayon A, et al. Activation of cardiac aldosterone production in rat myocardial infarction: effect of angiotensin II receptor blockade and role in cardiac fibrosis. Circulation 1999;99:2694-2701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Suga H, Sagawa K. Instantaneous pressure-volume relationships and their ratio in the excised, supported canine left ventricle. Circ Res 1974;35:117-126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Weiss JL, Frederiksen JW, Weisfeldt ML. Hemodynamic determinants of the time-course of fall in canine left ventricular pressure. J Clin Invest 1976;58:751-760.[Medline]
  19. Pitt B, Poole-Wilson PA, Segal R, Martinez FA, Dickstein K, Camm AJ, et al. Effect of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomised trial—the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II. Lancet 2000;355:1582-1587.[Medline]
  20. Mill JG, Milanez, MDa C, de Resende MM, Gomes, MDa G, Leite CM. Spironolactone prevents cardiac collagen proliferation after myocardial infarction in rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2003;30:739-744.[Medline]
  21. Hayashi M, Tsutamoto T, Wada A, Tsutsui T, Ishii C, Ohno K, et al. Immediate administration of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone prevents post-infarct left ventricular remodeling associated with suppression of a marker of myocardial collagen synthesis in patients with first anterior acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2003;107:2559-2565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lal A, Veinot JP, Leenen FH. Critical role of CNS effects of aldosterone in cardiac remodeling post-myocardial infarction in rats. Cardiovasc Res 2004;64:437-447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Modena MG, Aveta P, Menozzi A, Rossi R. Aldosterone inhibition limits collagen synthesis and progressive left ventricular enlargement after anterior myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2001;141:41-46.[Medline]
  24. Jorde UP, Vittorio T, Katz SD, Colombo PC, Latif F, Le Jemtel TH. Elevated plasma aldosterone levels despite complete inhibition of the vascular angiotensin-converting enzyme in chronic heart failure. Circulation 2002;106:1055-1057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Katada J, Meguro T, Saito H, Ohashi A, Anzai T, Ogawa S, et al. Persistent cardiac aldosterone synthesis in angiotensin II type 1A receptor-knockout mice after myocardial infarction. Circulation 2005;111:2157-2164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
W. Kosmala, M. Przewlocka-Kosmala, H. Szczepanik-Osadnik, A. Mysiak, T. O'Moore-Sullivan, and T. H. Marwick
A Randomized Study of the Beneficial Effects of Aldosterone Antagonism on LV Function, Structure, and Fibrosis Markers in Metabolic Syndrome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., December 1, 2011; 4(12): 1239 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
E. Yoshikawa, A. Marui, M. Tsukashita, T. Nishina, J. Wang, H. Muranaka, T. Ikeda, and M. Komeda
Carvedilol may alleviate late cardiac remodelling following surgical ventricular restoration
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, February 1, 2010; 37(2): 362 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
T. Bove, Y. Van Belleghem, G. Vandenplas, F. Caes, K. Francois, J. De Backer, M. De Pauw, and G. Van Nooten
Short-term systolic and diastolic ventricular performance after surgical ventricular restoration for dilated ischemic cardiomyopathy
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, June 1, 2009; 35(6): 995 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. Ramaraj
Spironolactone alleviates late cardiac remodeling after left ventricular restoration.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2009; 137(1): 257 - 257.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Tsukashita
Reply to the Editor:
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2009; 137(1): 257 - 258.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jian Wang
Tadashi Ikeda
Masashi Komeda
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsukashita, M.
Right arrow Articles by Komeda, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tsukashita, M.
Right arrow Articles by Komeda, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - pharmacology
Right arrow Congestive Heart Failure
Right arrow Myocardial infarction


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS