|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:88-93
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease |
a Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
b Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
c Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tokyo, Japan
d Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
Received for publication July 31, 2007; revisions received November 20, 2007; accepted for publication November 26, 2007. * Address for reprints: Alexander J. C. Mittnacht, MD, Mount Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1010, New York, NY 10029. (Email: alexander.mittnacht{at}msnyuhealth.org).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The goal of this study was to identify perioperative factors associated with not proceeding with planned operating room extubation.
Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 224 patients (aged 1 month to 18 years, median 20 months) undergoing surgery for congenital heart defects requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients mechanically ventilated preoperatively were excluded. A stepwise logistic regression model was used to test for the independent influence of various perioperative factors on extubation in the operating room.
Results: Overall, 79% of patients were extubated in the operating room. Younger age and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time were the strongest predictors for not extubating. Each step down to a younger age group (<2, 2–4, 4–6, 6–12, >12 months) reduced the chance of extubation in the operating room by 56%. Cardiopulmonary bypass time for more than 150 minutes was associated with an 11.8-fold increased risk of not being extubated.
Male gender and high inotrope requirement after cardiopulmonary bypass were also significantly associated with fewer children being extubated.
Conclusion: Extubation in the operating room after surgery for congenital heart disease was successful in the majority of patients. The strongest independent risk factors for failure of this strategy included younger age and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immediate extubation after CHD surgery was common practice in the early days of pediatric cardiac surgery. In 1980, Barash and colleagues1
published their experience with early extubation in 197 patients aged less than 3 years, including neonates; 61% were successfully extubated in the OR. More recently, several studies have shown that this practice can be performed safely.2,3
However, the definition of "early extubation" has not been consistent, and studies have included children extubated within 24 hours of surgery.4
Furthermore, the success rate of tracheal extubation is variable and dependent on inclusion and exclusion criteria, such as patient age and case complexity.
After early encouraging results with extubation in the OR and excellent patient and parent satisfaction, we instituted a policy of attempting OR extubation in all patients undergoing CHD surgery who were aged more than 1 month and not mechanically ventilated preoperatively.
We provide a detailed analysis of perioperative factors that were present when extubation in the OR was not attempted. Determining independent predictive factors of successful extubation in the OR in a multiple regression analysis will assist practitioners in adopting an early extubation strategy in children after CHD surgery.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
After administration of heparin 300 U/kg, the ascending aorta, inferior vena cava, and superior vena cava were cannulated and full CPB was established. At the end of the surgical procedure, after discontinuation of CPB, modified ultrafiltration was performed in all patients. Heparin was reversed with protamine on the basis of a protamine-titration assay.
All patients included in this analysis were eligible for extubation in the OR on the basis of the above-mentioned criteria. However, the final decision to attempt extubation in the OR was made by the attending surgeon and anesthesiologist. At the end of the procedure, patients were considered for extubation if they were hemodynamically stable without excessive inotropic support, were normothermic, had no signs of upper airway edema, and showed no evidence of early surgical complications, such as bleeding requiring the administration of blood products. For the purpose of this analysis, inotrope use was quantified using a previously reported scoring system.5
Standard extubation criteria6
and satisfactory arterial blood gas results (appropriate for specific CHD lesion) were included in the decision process.
In patients in whom these criteria were met, residual neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine and glycopyrrolate. Once the patient was breathing spontaneously with adequate respiratory parameters, the endotracheal tube was removed and oxygen was administered via nasal cannulae. Morphine was intravenously administered to patients with signs of inadequate analgesia before transfer to the pediatric ICU. Patients in whom the attending anesthesiologist made the decision not to proceed with extubation were converted to a high-dose opioid technique and transferred to the ICU intubated.
Statistical Methods
Practice standard was to extubate all included patients in the OR. The primary outcome was defined as not proceeding with planned immediate OR extubation. Each potential perioperative risk factor was screened individually to determine any association with not proceeding, using the chi-square, Fisher exact, or Cochran-Armitage test for trend, as appropriate. If the P value was less than .2, the variable was retained for further analysis in a stepwise logistic regression model, testing for the independent influence of the various perioperative factors on outcome. The following perioperative factors were tested: age; weight; weight percentile; gender; preoperative pulmonary hypertension (PHT), defined as pulmonary vascular resistance > 2 Wood Units or systolic right-sided pressures greater than half systemic at preoperative cardiac catheterization or echocardiographic studies; congestive heart failure (CHF), as diagnosed by the attending pediatric cardiologist or the preoperative use of medications typically prescribed to relieve symptoms of CHF (diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, digoxin); trisomy 21; CPB time, aortic crossclamp time; procedure length; coagulopathy persisting after protamine administration; inotrope use, procedure type (palliative simple, palliative complex, complete repair simple, and complete repair complex); and previous open surgery (reoperation).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
CPB time was another independent factor associated with early extubation. Initial analyses failed to reveal a linear association; rather, failure to extubate in the OR remained low for CPB times less than 150 minutes (28/192 = 15%) and increased markedly thereafter (18/32 = 56% for CPB times
150 minutes).
Figure 1 shows the percentage of patients extubated in the OR in intervals of 30 minutes of CPB time. By multiple logistic regression, patients who underwent surgery with a CPB time
150 minutes had an 11.8-fold increased risk of not being extubated in the OR compared with a CPB time < 150 minutes. Aortic crossclamp time was not found to be an independent predictor of extubation in the OR.
|
Approximately half the patient population (49.6%) had no inotropes or an inotrope score less than 5, 27.7% of patients had scores between 5 and 9, and 22.77% of patients had an inotrope score of 10 to 15. We considered an inotrope score less than 5 to minimally influence the decision to extubate in the OR. Thus, in the multiple logistic regression model, high inotrope score (10–15) and moderate inotrope score (5–9) were each compared with the group with inotrope score less than 5. The significance of inotrope use in the multivariate analysis (P = .03) was due primarily to the increased risk of not extubating in the OR among patients with a high score (OR = 3.74 [CI 1.24–9.2]) compared with those with a score less than 5.
The remaining factors associated with not extubating in the OR when considered in univariate analyses did not contribute significant independent information beyond that of the 4 factors described above. Fewer patients with preoperative PHT or CHF were extubated in the OR. However, neither PHT or CHF was independently associated with outcome.
Table 4 shows the probability of not proceeding with planned extubation in the OR with various combinations of factors and the 95% confidence intervals. Young male patients with longer CPB time and high inotrope score had the least probability of extubation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Longer CPB time is consistently associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation after CHD surgery.1,7-10
This is not surprising, because longer CPB time is required for more complex cases or if unexpected difficulties occur. Despite this, the complexity of the cases alone did not predict successful extubation in the OR in our analysis. Furthermore, longer CPB time is associated with an increased risk of inflammatory response syndrome with generalized edema, decreased respiratory compliance, acute lung injury, and coagulopathy, all of which affect the ability to extubate a patient immediately after surgery.
Younger age is consistently associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation after CHD surgery.11,12
Often it is the preference of the anesthesiologist, surgeon, intensivists, or institutional policy not to extubate children after CHD surgery below a certain age. This is despite numerous publications of successful early extubation strategies in all age groups, including neonates.13
Inotropic support after CPB is typically required in patients with compromised ventricular function. In our analysis, low levels of inotropic and vasoactive drugs did not prevent extubation in the OR. Increasing doses were an independent factor associated with not extubating in the OR. Obviously, patients who require high doses of inotropic support are usually too hemodynamically unstable to allow for safe early extubation.
An interesting finding of our analysis is that after adjusting for all other factors, including the complexity of the procedure, gender was an independent predictor of extubation in the OR. There are conflicting data in the literature on the impact of gender on outcome measures in patients with CHD. Although decreased survivals in male patients have been reported,14-16
increased mortality rates have been noted in female patients.17,18
The overall incidence of CHD is higher in female patients;19
however, more severe forms of CHD associated with increased mortality may be more prevalent in the male population.20
Therefore, it may be that female patients may undergo lower-risk surgical procedures compared with male patients. The underlying reason(s) why more male patients required postoperative mechanical ventilation in our population is not immediately obvious.
We also attempted to determine how the combination of 2 or more independent variables could predict the probability of extubation in our retrospective series. We found an additive effect of risk factors, with younger male patients with long CPB time and high inotropic support having the least likelihood of being extubated in the OR. This reflects our clinical experience, in which it is rarely only 1 factor that determines the decision to proceed or not to proceed with planned extubation in the OR, but rather the cumulative effect of several factors.
PHT and CHF, both generally accepted risk factors for adverse events (eg, prolonged mechanical ventilation) in children undergoing surgery for CHD,4,21
were not associated with extubation in the OR in our multiple regression model. However, in this analysis only data about preoperative PHT were available to us. PHT after CPB (eg, greater half systemic right-sided pressures) would be considered by most practitioners as a contraindication for an early extubation strategy.
Why should early extubation be attempted, in particular extubation in the OR? One may argue that there should not be a significant difference between extubation in the OR versus extubation shortly thereafter in the ICU. At our hospital (The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York), before the institution of an early extubation protocol, patient extubation after CHD surgery was determined by factors other than objective patient-focused parameters. They included nursing preferences, established practice, and preferences of individual ICU attendings, anesthesiologists, and surgeons. The majority of patients were sedated and not extubated until the following day. Consequently, discharge from the ICU (and hospital) was unnecessarily delayed.
Potential advantages of early extubation include 1) less airway irritation and ventilator-associated complications, such as accidental extubation, laryngotracheal trauma, pulmonary hypertensive crisis during endotracheal tube suctioning, mucous plugging of endotracheal tubes, barotrauma secondary to positive airway pressure ventilation, and ventilator-associated pulmonary infections and atelectasis; 2) reduced parental stress; 3) reduced requirements of sedatives (and associated hemodynamic compromise);22
4) more rapid patient mobilization; 5) earlier ICU discharge; 6) decreased length of hospital stay; and 7) reduced costs (ventilator-associated and length of ICU/hospital stay). Controlled mechanical ventilation is generally considered mandatory or beneficial in all patients who are hemodynamically unstable, coagulopathic patients, or patients who do not meet the above-mentioned extubation criteria.
In regard to cost-savings, it is difficult to compare one clinical setting with another. If a child is extubated within the first few hours after ICU admission (The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York), no real difference exists with respect to cost.23
However, at our institution, with the establishment of an early extubation policy, we reduced the ICU resource use and length of hospital stay, and thereby decreased overall costs.
The question remains: What is different today compared with 1979 when Glenn and colleagues24
and Barash and colleagues1
collected data on early extubation in children undergoing CHD surgery? It is our belief that extubating a child after CHD surgery is safer today compared with 28 years ago. Glenn and colleagues reported that 13% of patients who were extubated early required reintubation (14/18 cases for respiratory related reasons).24
In our series of 224 patients, none of the patients who were extubated in the OR required reintubation for respiratory distress or as a direct consequence of early endotracheal tube removal. We attribute this to improved surgical techniques, CPB refinements such as minimal priming volumes, the use of modified and conventional ultrafiltration techniques reducing the amount of lung water and edema, the availability of drugs with favorable pharmacokinetics (short plasma half-life), and fewer cardiorespiratory depressant anesthetic agents compared with drugs previously available.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prospective randomized studies that address patient outcome in an early extubation versus a conservative model with mechanical ventilation continuing into the postoperative period are warranted.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Kin, C. Weismann, S. Srivastava, S. Chakravarti, C. Bodian, S. Hossain, M. Krol, I. Hollinger, K. Nguyen, and A. J. C. Mittnacht Factors Affecting the Decision to Defer Endotracheal Extubation After Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease: A Prospective Observational Study Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2011; 113(2): 329 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Pagowska-Klimek, M. Pychynska-Pokorska, W. Krajewski, and J. J. Moll Predictors of long intensive care unit stay following cardiac surgery in children Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, July 1, 2011; 40(1): 179 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |