|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:590-596
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Cardiopulmonary Support and Physiology |
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
Received for publication November 21, 2007; revisions received February 2, 2008; accepted for publication March 7, 2008. * Address for reprints: Hiroki Hasegawa, MD, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan. (Email: hirokih{at}med.nagoya-u.ac.jp).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: A temporary edge-to-edge repair model was created. The mitral valve motion was assessed by using a high-speed digital video camera, and the motion of the mitral annulus was measured by means of sonomicrometric analysis with or without performing edge-to-edge repair (n = 5). The left ventricular volumetric measurements were also measured with a conductance catheter. One cardiac cycle was divided into 4 phases: the mitral valve open phase, the isovolumic contraction phase, the aortic valve open phase, and the isovolumic relaxation phase.
Results: The mitral valve was divided into 2 orifices by using the edge-to-edge technique, and the mitral valve area decreased by approximately 30%. The ratio of mitral valve open phase significantly decreased (31.9% ± 3.4% vs 41.4% ± 3.7%, P = .04). There were no significant differences in the diameter and the changes of anteroposterior dimensions of the mitral annulus. The stroke volume and the peak positive and negative dp/dt values showed no obvious change, but dv/dt values increased slightly without significance after removing the edge-to-edge suture (118 ± 25 vs 130 ± 17 mL/s, P = .14).
Conclusions: The mitral valve area decreased slightly; however, edge-to-edge repair did not create symptomatic mitral stenosis and showed no adverse affects on cardiac function.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Edge-to-edge (EtoE) repair technique was first introduced by Fucci and colleagues1
in 1995 as a simple method of mitral valve plasty. It has since been performed in patients with mitral valve prolapse because of its technical simplicity.2,3
Satisfactory early and midterm results have been reported for this technique.4-6
There is concern that the mitral valve area (MVA) might be reduced after performing EtoE repair because of the double orifices, and symptoms of mitral stenosis (MS) can develop. Functional MS after performing EtoE repair has not yet been described in previous reports. In those reports the MVA was evaluated by means of echocardiographic analysis.4,5,7,8
Mitral valve motion after EtoE repair has been discussed; however, there have been no direct observations or evaluations of mitral valve motion after EtoE repair. The changes in mitral valve status, including leaflet motion and the timing of opening and closing, should therefore be clarified.
Our group developed an isolated and working swine heart model using crystalloid perfusate to examine the valve motion with a high-speed digital video camera system in 2005.9,10
This model enables the direct observation or examination of mitral valve motion in a working heart.
The present study was designed to clarify the motion of mitral valve leaflets and annulus before and after performing EtoE repair and to detect any changes in the MVA or the development of MS symptoms as well.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The motion of the mitral valve leaflets and annulus was evaluated in 5 swine hearts (protocol 1). After the pressure study, a high-speed digital video camera was introduced to the left ventricle through the apex. The mitral valve motion was directly observed with this camera, and the anteroposterior dimension of mitral annular diameter was consecutively measured by means of sonomicrometric analysis. All measurements were performed on a temporary EtoE model first, and then the EtoE suture was released. The normal mitral valve was restored, and the motion of normal mitral valve leaflets and annulus was observed. These results were compared before and after removing the EtoE suture.
In protocol 2 the LV volumetric measurements were carried out by using a conductance catheter in the other 5 swine hearts. The measurements were performed before and after removing the EtoE suture to evaluate the LV filling pattern and any adverse affects of the EtoE repair on the MVA.
The research protocol was approved by the Nagoya University Laboratory Research Animal Care and Ethics Committee. The investigation conforms to the "Principles of laboratory animal care" formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the "Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals" published by the National Institute of Health and revised in 1996.
Working Heart Apparatus
The details of the working heart apparatus was described in a previous report.9,10
It is designed to perfuse the isolated heart either in a working heart mode or in Langendorff mode. The afterload column was placed 100 cm higher than the heart to maintain a constant afterload in the working heart mode.
Instrumentation
A high-speed digital video camera (Fastcam-PCI; Photron, Inc, Tokyo, Japan) was connected to a 10-mm-diameter rigid endoscope (Olympus Corp, Tokyo, Japan). The images were recorded at 250 fps (4-ms increment) with 512 x 480 resolution. Sonomicrometry (10Mz; Sonometrics Corp, London, Ontario, Canada) was used to continuously measure the distance between the probes.
Animal Preparation
Ten Landrace and Yorkshire swine weighing about 40 kg were used for this study. The procedure regarding the extraction of the swine heart has been previously described.9,10
A temporary EtoE suture was created in the middle portion of the leaflet edge. For protocol 1, sonomicrometric crystals were placed at the midportion of the anterior and posterior mitral valve annulus. Then the isolated heart was connected to the perfusion system.
A 5F micromanometer-tipped catheter was introduced to the left ventricle through the apex, to the aorta, and to the left atrium through the appendage. A tube for preloading was positioned in the left atrium.
After all cannulae were applied, the heart was reperfused for the Langendorff mode. After steady cardiac beats were confirmed, the perfusion mode was changed to the working heart mode. The heart was paced at 100 beats/min with AAI pacing, and LAP was controlled from 10 to 13 mm Hg. In protocol 2 a 7F conductance catheter was introduced to the left ventricle.
Data Analysis
Protocol 1
The recorded images were analyzed every 4 ms. The timing of the motion of the mitral and aortic valves was counted at every 4 ms during 10 consecutive cardiac cycles. The average was recorded as the representative value of each run.
One cardiac cycle was divided into 4 phases: mitral valve open phase (MVOP), isovolumic contraction phase, aortic valve open phase, and isovolumic relaxation phase. MVOP was divided into the following 3 intervals to clarify which interval of MVOP changed: M1, the beginning of the mitral valve decoaptation to the time the valve was fully open; M2, fully open; And M3, the beginning of mitral valve close to the time of completely close.
The isolated hearts were paced at 100 beats/min with AAI pacing. Therefore the time of 1 cardiac cycle should be 600 ms in all cases, but the counted times actually ranged from 580 ms to 607 ms. The ratios for one cardiac cycle of each phase were calculated, and the ratios after performing EtoE repair were compared with those after removing the EtoE suture to correct the effects of this margin of error.
The MVA was measured before and after removing the EtoE suture. The MVA of the EtoE repair was the sum of the 2 orifices. The images of the mitral valve at the full opening were obtained before and after removing the EtoE suture. The mitral effective orifice area was traced and measured in these images. The ratio of the MVA was calculated by using the following formula:
.
The changes in the anteroposterior dimension of the annular diameter were measured by means of sonomicrometry. The rate of change (
) was calculated as follows:
, where DL is defined as the average of 5 of the maximum distances in each cardiac cycle and DS is defined as the average of 5 of the minimum distances in each cardiac cycle.
Protocol 2
The averages of the recorded stroke volume (SV) in 5 consecutive cardiac cycles were calculated. The recorded data of the ventricular volume were differentiated by time, and these differentiated values were defined as dv/dt. The averages of the maximum dv/dt value in each cardiac cycle were calculated, and the averages of the EtoE values were compared with those of the NM values.
Statistical Analysis
All data are summarized as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences between the 2 groups were analyzed by means of a paired t test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ratios of each phase in one cardiac cycle were summarized in Figure 2 . The ratios of the MVOP increased after removing the EtoE suture. The ratios of each phase were varied among each case. However, the ratios of the MVOP significantly increased after removing the EtoE suture (EtoE, 31.9% ± 3.4%; NM, 41.4 ± 3.7%; P = .04). The ratios of M1 significantly increased in the NM group (EtoE, 9.7% ± 2.2%; NM, 14.2% ± 1.5%; P = .04). The ratios of M2 also increased in the NM group, although they were not significantly different (EtoE, 9.1% ± 3.4%; NM, 15.8 ± 2.9%; P = .08). M2 ratios decreased the most of the 3 parts of the MVOP (Table 1 ).
|
|
|
|
|
Therefore both the systolic and diastolic LV function revealed no significant changes by performing the EtoE repair. The SV also showed no significant changes after removing the EtoE suture (EtoE, 11.1 ± 0.7 mL; NM, 10.7 ± 0.6 mL; P = .23). The dv/dt increased slightly after removing the EtoE sutures, but the difference was not significant (EtoE, 118.4 ± 25.4 mL/s; NM, 130.0 ± 17.2 mL/s; P = .14).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ratio of each cardiac phase in a cardiac cycle was evaluated. The echocardiographic assessment might also provide reliable results. However, evaluation with a high-speed video camera was more precise in time-related analysis of the valve motion because the images were recorded at high frame (250 fps). MVOP ratios were significantly decreased by using the EtoE technique. The ratio of M1 was remarkably decreased, and the M2 ratio was also decreased. The M2 ratio was decreased most of the 3 periods of the MVOP.
The cause of this change is not clear. The EtoE technique divided the mitral orifice and created a double orifice. Each orifice is smaller than the original mitral orifice. It allows for the easy and quick opening of the mitral valve. This suggests that the reason for shortening the MVOP by using the EtoE procedure is the small size of the double orifice of the mitral valve. The mechanism regarding the M2 decrease was not clarified. The video clip (videoclip) shows that the anterior and posterior leaflet was sutured by using the EtoE technique, which pulled both leaflets in a manner similar to pulling sails. During M2, the EtoE technique divides the orifice into 2 small orifices, and both leaflets were retracted by the EtoE technique. The EtoE technique makes the leaflets small, thus producing a large amount of traction on the leaflets. The small leaflets might therefore restrict the valve's ability to open, and such traction might make the leaflets close too early.
MVA after EtoE repair is still a major concern for cardiac surgeons. Previous reports using echocardiography have shown that the EtoE repair did not create MS; however, there are no reports describing the direct observation of the mitral valve after EtoE repair. In the current study we directly observed mitral valve motion before and after the EtoE technique.
In this study the MVA was decreased by about 30% after performing the EtoE technique. Jimenez and colleagues11
demonstrated that EtoE repair alone decreased the effective orifice area by approximately 16%. Our results showed slightly greater decrease than their observation. We observed the mitral valve through the LV apex and took a nearly frontal view of it and calculated the MVA using a tracing method. The mitral valve view was not a right frontal view, and it provided only 2-dimensional information without depth. This mode of observation might underestimate the MVA. However, the MVA after performing the EtoE technique maintained at least 70% of the normal MVA, and the MVA decrease of this magnitude did not cause functional MS.
In addition, MS after performing the EtoE technique was evaluated from the viewpoint of the SV and the dv/dt. The dv/dt has not been previously used to evaluate MS, whereas the negative dv/dt has been used to evaluate the cardiac output in one report.12
In unpublished data from a previous study, the dv/dt and the SV showed no significant changes when creating mild MS and decreased significantly only when critical MS was created.
In this study the SV did not change before or after performing the EtoE technique. It indicated that the inflow volume of the left ventricle thus did not change because of the EtoE technique. The dv/dt showed a tendency to decrease after the EtoE technique but without significance. These results indicated that the EtoE technique does not create mitral obstruction. This observation supports the echocardiographic findings reported in previous reports.4,5,7,8
Our study shows that the EtoE technique decreases the MVOP by 10% and the MVA by 30%. In addition, the rate of LV filling (dv/dt) was observed to be lower after the EtoE technique, although there is no significant difference. However, the SV was unchanged. These observations might suggest that the left ventricle was ejecting at a smaller end-diastolic volume, and the ejection fraction also increased. One the other hand, in this study the end-diastolic volume showed no significant difference (P = .35) and the ejection fraction also showed no significant difference, although there was a tendency for this value to increase in the EtoE group (P = .10).
Mitral annular contraction coincident with mitral valve motion has been reported.13–15
The effect of the EtoE technique on mitral annular contraction was evaluated, but there were no significant differences in the distance and change rate of the anteroposterior dimension of annular diameter before or after removing the EtoE suture. Therefore the EtoE technique has no adverse affect on the mitral annular dynamics.
In summary, the EtoE technique using one stitch had a low risk of creating MS and did not affect the cardiac output, although the EtoE technique slightly affected the inflow volume of the ventricle. Under clinical circumstances, concomitant annuloplasty or additional valve repair techniques might therefore reduce the MVA. The diseased valves often become thicker, and these valves might thereafter further decrease the MVOP. Atrial fibrillation without atrial kick also decreases the MVOP. These situations together lead to a decrease in the dv/dt value, thus resulting in adverse affects on the cardiac function.
Limitations
First, the present study is designed in a swine working heart model, and it does not fully resemble a human heart in a living body. The heart is circulated with a crystalloid perfusion, the pulmonary vasculature is eliminated, and the geometry of the heart is not physiologic.
Second, a temporary EtoE model was created that achieves a quick conversion from the EtoE technique to the NM without any functional damage to the heart. However, the EtoE technique is first and the NM is second. This swine working heart model maintains a steady and reliable function over 4 hours; however, the order used in this study might have had an adverse affect on the results.
Third, the function of a normal swine heart was examined. It is different from a diseased heart with mitral regurgitation. The mitral valve motion was also examined on the normal valve, which might be different from the diseased one. Under clinical circumstances, more aggressive EtoE repair, concomitant annuloplasty, or other valve repair procedures might therefore be required because of the redundant and degenerative valve or the dilated annulus. The results indicated in this study might be different from those in the diseased heart when the EtoE technique is applied clinically. MVA might thus become smaller, and MS might therefore be observed, depending on the situation.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The MVA decreased by approximately 30% after performing the EtoE technique. The SV does not change, and the dv/dt value decreased slightly without significance after performing the EtoE technique. However, the EtoE technique did not create symptomatic MS and showed no adverse affects on the cardiac function.
| Supplementary data |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |