|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:1437-1441
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Congenital Heart Disease |
a Cardiac Morphology Unit, Imperial College London, National Heart & Lung Institute, London, UK
b Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, London, UK
Received for publication January 9, 2008; revisions received April 16, 2008; accepted for publication June 15, 2008. * Address for reprints: Siew Yen Ho, PhD, FRCPath, FESC, Reader in Cardiac Morphology/Honorary Consultant, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Guy Scadding Building, DoveHouse St, London SW3 6LY, UK. (Email: yen.ho{at}imperial.ac.uk).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: We examined 17 autopsied hearts with the malformation. Special attention was paid to the coronary blood supply of the right ventricular inferior wall, focusing on the course of the posterior descending branch and its relationship with the interventricular septum.
Results: The right coronary artery was dominant in 11 cases (65%); the remaining 6 had left dominance. In 6 right-dominant hearts, the right coronary artery gave rise to the branch before reaching the crux of the heart. This early takeoff caused the entire branch to be deviated rightward. Another 2 right-dominant hearts showed rightward deviation of the branch course after an initial short segment along the septum. In contrast, in 2 left-dominant hearts, the left circumflex artery ran beyond the crux and then gave rise to the branch, again resulting in rightward deviation of the branch. These deviations allowed the branch to run on the thin walled part of the right ventricular inferior wall where endocardial stitches are placed during typical vertical plication.
Conclusion: The posterior descending branch was frequently (10/17, 59%) deviated toward the right side relative to the interventricular septum in hearts with Ebstein malformation. Because of this and the thinness of the atrialized ventricular wall, care should be taken to the branch even with superficial endothelial stitches.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The major concern regarding vertical plication, however, is the risk of coronary arterial injury.8-10
Despite the critical importance of coronary arterial anatomy in this evaluation, the distribution of variant coronary arterial patterns in Ebstein malformation has not been well studied. With this in mind, we investigated the coronary arterial blood supply of the inferior wall of the right ventricle, with special emphasis on its surgical relevance to vertical plication procedures.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 6 hearts, a small component corresponding to the septal leaflet was recognizable. This septal component had short and thickened free edge, and its hinge point was moderately displaced distal to the true atrioventricular junction. In 4 hearts, the mural component was absent. In the remaining 2, the mural component was barely developed and appeared only as a small fibromuscular flap.
In the 6 most severe cases, the trifoliate arrangement of the valvular leaflets was totally effaced. The septal and mural components were smooth, devoid of tendinous cords or papillary muscles. There was no separation of leaflets from the ventricular walls apart from a small portion toward the ventricular apex. As a consequence, the inlet part appeared like a smooth sac. The anterosuperior component was the only tissue that resembled a valvular leaflet. It was hinged at the atrioventricular junction, but its distal margin was continuous with the mural and septal components. Single or multiple fenestrations were observed either between its medial free edge and the ventricular septum or in the anterosuperior leaflet itself as the communication between inlet and outlet portions of the right ventricle.
Coronary Arterial Anatomy
The results of the coronary arterial anatomy examinations are depicted in Figure 1
. A right-dominant coronary pattern was found in 11 hearts (65%). In 3 of these, the posterior descending branch ran exactly on the septum in the interventricular groove (R-1 group in Figure 1). In contrast, the remaining 8 showed rightward deviation of the branch. This deviation occurred in two ways. First, 2 hearts showed rightward deviation of the branch course after initial short segment along the septum (R-2 group in Figure 1). Second, in the other 6 the right coronary artery gave rise to the branch before reaching the crux of the heart (R-3 group in Figure 1). This early take-off displaced the entire epicardial course of the posterior descending branch to the inferior wall of the right ventricle.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Controversy still exists, however, regarding this kind of procedure. Some German groups have advocated repair techniques without right ventricular plication.8-10
One of their arguments regarding ventricular plication is the lack of hard evidence for improved right ventricular performance after exclusion of the atrialized chamber. Rather, Ullmann and colleagues10
have insisted that preservation of the atrialized portion is preferable after reimplantation of the tricuspid leaflets onto the true atrioventricular junction, according to the assumption that the atrialized portion would regain its wall thickness and strength once normal pressure load was imposed.11
Another argument for not using any plication procedure, one that is presumably more important, is the risk of interference with coronary circulation, particularly the posterior descending branch, as a result of either direct injury, stenosis, or kinking. Surgeons who have adopted vertical plication have described in their articles how coronary injury could be avoided by placing very superficial, endothelial stitches.4-7
The inferior wall of the atrialized portion, however, is usually thin. It is therefore questionable whether such superficial stitches, however meticulously placed, could entirely eliminate the risk of injury to vessels running along extremely thin atrialized walls. No article has mentioned the absence or presence of ischemic change of the myocardium during the early postoperative period. In these circumstances, it is the anatomy of coronary artery and its spatial relationship with the atrialized portion of the right ventricle that should provide insights into this important issue.
Our observation demonstrates unusual characteristic features of the coronary arterial system in hearts with Ebstein malformation. The high prevalence of the left-dominant coronary artery (35%) found in our series is consistent with that of a previous report3
that mainly used specimens from the same archive. This finding is in marked contrast to the estimated 10% anticipated in the population with normally structured hearts.12
We do not know the reason for higher prevalence of the left-dominant coronary artery in our population with Ebstein malformation. It does not seem to be associated with either the severity of the tricuspid lesion or the degree of right ventricular deformity.
Of particular note for surgeons, especially those who use vertical plication, is the finding that the posterior descending branch did not always run exactly on the interventricular septum. Rather, the branch frequently diverged from the septum toward either the right or left side. Among the hearts with a right-dominant pattern, rightward deviation was found in 73% (8/11 hearts). This occurred in two ways. In 2 hearts, the branch was deviated toward the right side after passing the crux of the heart. In the other 6 hearts, the branch took off before reaching the crux. In the former type, the deviated portion tended to be somewhat distant from the atrioventricular groove. In contrast, the early takeoff seen in the latter type affected not only the distal portion but also the proximal portion of the branch. The latter form of rightward deviation should be of critical importance in a plication procedure, because such procedures usually require stitches placed on the inferior wall of the right ventricle at a proximal area from the atrioventricular junction. Surprisingly, the rightward deviation of the branch was found fairly frequently (33%, 2/6 hearts), even in hearts with a left-dominant coronary pattern. In these hearts, the circumflex artery ran along the atrioventricular groove beyond the crux and then gave rise to the branch. In this setting, the proximal portion of the branch had rightward deviation, as in the case of the early takeoff right-dominant pattern, and thus would have been at risk during plication.
If the morphology of hearts with typical Ebstein malformation, in which both septal and mural components show downward displacement, is examined carefully, we can appreciate the fact that the atrialized chamber consists of two major components: the interventricular septum and the inferior wall of the right ventricle. A question that came to our mind is which structure should be plicated if plication is necessary. In the discussion of the original presentation of Carpentier and associates,4
Danielson commented that it is the free wall of the right ventricle, and not the septum, that should be plicated, because the septum cannot fold well as a result of its thick structure. We completely agree with his opinion. If we review the plication procedure in the Carpentier method or its modification in detail, however, we realize that the plication is not the simple folding of the right ventricular free wall; rather, the right ventricular free wall is folded against the septum. We term the latter adjacent plication (Figure 2
). If the posterior descending branch runs exactly on the septum, neither fold should pose a risk of the branch injury. If the rightward deviation of the proximal portion were present, however, compromise of the branch would be more likely in adjacent plication than in a free wall procedure (Figures 2 and 3, A
), especially since the rightward-deviated arteries that we saw tended to descend beside the septum. In this regard, a new method advocated by Wu and Huang13
and their coworkers14
is worth noting. Although it shares basic concepts with the Carpentier method, namely tricuspid valve repair with vertical plication, their method of accomplishing the plication is unique. They partially resect the inferior wall of the right ventricle from the epicardial side. This external approach would enable precise recognition of the location and course of the branch. In fact, they could preserve the rightwardly deviated posterior descending branch in some of their patients by leaving the atrialized ventricular wall containing the branch as a strip of muscle.13
Their remarkable results may be attributable to elimination of the risk of injury to the branch. In their large cohort of patients, neither death nor ventricular failure was observed,14
in stark contrast to the observation that some patients undergoing the plication with endocardial stitches have died of ventricular failure.4,5,7
Nevertheless, even if the branch injury is avoided, the right coronary artery itself would still be at risk of compromise, because vertical plication with concomitant reduction of the tricuspid annulus4-6
could distort the configuration of the atrioventricular groove (Figure 3, B).
|
|
In conclusion, approximately half of the hearts with Ebstein malformation studied showed rightward deviation of the proximal portion of the posterior descending branch. This deviation allowed the branch to run on the inferior wall of the right ventricle at a proximal area from the atrioventricular junction, where stitches are placed during typical vertical plication. To avoid injury of the branch when using endocardial stitches for vertical plication of the atrialized chamber, the surgeon should inspect the course of the branch from the epicardial surface.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Chauvaud Coronary blood supply of the inferior wall of the right ventricle in hearts with Ebstein malformation: relevance to vertical plication. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2009; 138(2): 514 - 515. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Adachi, S. Y. Ho, and H. Uemura Reply to the Editor J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2009; 138(2): 515 - 515. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |