|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:257
© 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Letter to the Editor |
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Ariz
To the Editor:
Tsukashita et al1
have performed an excellent experimental study to show that spironolactone alleviates remodeling after left ventricular restoration.
When experimental studies are translated into clinical practice, great caution should be maintained. Previous clinical studies on spironolactone showed a major impact on the prescribing patterns of the doctors. After the publication of the RALES study, there was an enormous increase in the prescription and usage of spironolactone in the late 1990s, leading to increased hospitalizations mostly due to hyperkalemia.2
This was attributed to lack of clinical and laboratory monitoring, increased doses in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, left ventricular ejection fraction < 20%, and elderly patients.2
Approximately 7.5 million of the elderly patients in the United States have a glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min, and in these patients, spironolactone causes increased adverse reactions.3
Microalbuminuria is a risk factor for heart failure with previous myocardial ischemia, and spironolactone has been demonstrated to reduce microalbuminuria when added to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.4,5
Although spironolactone improves heart failure symptoms and decreases microalbuminuria, it should be used in a selected group of patients. We need further clinical studies that evaluate the side effect profile to show the same benefit in humans for alleviating remodeling following the success of the experimental study by Tsukashita et al.1
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |