JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mario Gaudino
Gianfederico Possati
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaudino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Possati, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaudino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Possati, G.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:9-12
© 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Chronic compensatory increase in ulnar flow and accelerated atherosclerosis after radial artery removal for coronary artery bypass

Mario Gaudino, MD a , * , Michele Serricchio, MD b , Paolo Tondi, MD b , Laura Gerardino, MD b , Angela Di Giorgio, MD b , Paolo Pola, MD b , Gianfederico Possati, MD a

a Departments of Cardiac Surgery and Angiology, Rome, Italy
b Catholic University, Rome, Italy.

Received for publication October 18, 2004; revisions received January 18, 2005; accepted for publication February 10, 2005.

* Address for reprints: Mario Gaudino, MD, Divisione di Cardiochirurgia, Policlinico Universitario, A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy. (Email: mgaudino{at}tiscali.it).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Only scant information is available on the chronic consequences of radial artery removal for coronary artery bypass surgery on forearm circulation.

METHODS: Twenty-five patients submitted to radial artery removal for coronary artery bypass were submitted to serial Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the flow and morphology of the forearm arteries.

RESULTS: The peak systolic velocity of the ulnar artery of the operated side was significantly higher than that of the control site. The intimal-medial thickness of the ulnar artery was always significantly higher on the operated side, and this difference reached statistical significance at 10 years’ follow-up. There was a significantly higher prevalence of atherosclerotic plaques in the ulnar artery of the operated versus control arm (7/25 vs 0/25, P = .03).

CONCLUSION: Radial artery removal for coronary artery bypass surgery leads to a chronic increase in ulnar flow accompanied by increased intimal-medial thickness and accelerated atherosclerotic disease. These findings might have potentially important implications for surgical indications and patient management.



    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The radial artery (RA) is gaining increasing popularity as an alternative arterial conduit for surgical myocardial revascularization, and several groups have reported excellent clinical and angiographic midterm to long-term results with this conduit. 1,2 Go However, removal of the RA cuts forearm blood supply in half, leaving it completely dependent on the collateral circulation from the ulnar artery (UA).

Although acute ischemic forearm complications caused by insufficient ulnar flow have been minimized with the adoption of various methods of preoperative assessment of the adequacy of UA compensation, 3–6 Go only scant information is available on the long-term consequences of RA removal on the forearm circulation, 7 Go and no data on the effect of the long-term flow increase on the UA have to date been reported.

This study examines the midterm to long-term modifications of UA flow and structure in a series of 25 nonconsecutive patients at a mean interval of 10 years after RA removal for coronary artery bypass grafting.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient Population
Our institutional experience with the use of the RA as a coronary artery bypass conduit started in 1993; a detailed description of the operative technique used in the operation, perioperative management, follow-up methods, and midterm to long-term clinical and angiographic results has been previously published. 1,6–10 Go

Bilateral RA harvesting was never performed in our series, and the artery was always harvested from the nondominant arm. 8 Go

This study includes the first 25 nonconsecutive patients who have reached the 10-year follow-up point at the time of enrollment and agreed to forearm examination. All these patients had already undergone a similar study protocol 5 years after the operation, and detailed results of that study have been published. 7 Go The main clinical data of these cases are depicted in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Main preoperative and intraoperative features of the patients
 
Doppler Echocardiographic Evaluation
Doppler echocardiographic evaluation was performed according to a previously described method. 6,7 Go The peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, resistance index, time average mean velocity (in meters per second), and the diameter and intimal-medial thickness (IMT) of the brachial artery and the UA and RA on the nonoperated arm were calculated. The time average mean velocity was defined as the area between the line traced on the Doppler wave and the baseline, and represents the mean velocity corrected for the duration of the velocity curve, as electronically calculated by the computer, by tracing the area of the curve.

Echogenic foci in the arterial wall with posterior acoustic shadowing were recorded as calcification. Those without posterior acoustic shadowing were recorded as atherosclerotic plaques. Stenosis was defined as a focal increase in peak systolic velocity compared with that seen in the proximal arterial segment.

Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as means ± 1 standard deviation. For statistical analysis, the paired and unpaired t test was used.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
No patient reported having forearm ischemic symptoms at any time during the follow-up.

Detailed results of the Doppler echocardiographic examination are summarized in Table 2. The peak systolic velocity of the UA of the operated side was higher than that of the control arm, testifying to the ulnar compensation to RA removal. The IMT of the UA was always significantly higher on the operated side, and this difference reached statistical significance at 10 years’ follow-up (Table 2 and Figure 1 ). Moreover, there was a significantly higher prevalence of atherosclerotic plaques in the UA of the operated versus control arm (7/25 vs 0/25, P = .03; Figure 2), whereas no difference in atherosclerotic involvement was found between the brachial arteries of the 2 sides (2/25 vs 1/25, P = .97).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Ten-year Doppler echocardiographic results
 

Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Variations of IMT with time in the operated versus control arm.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Atherosclerotic plaques in the UA of the operated arm 10 years after surgical intervention.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The reintroduction of the RA in coronary artery surgery in the early 1990s was accompanied by major theoretical concerns related to both the intrinsic characteristics of this artery and the consequences of RA removal on the forearm blood supply. 11,12 Go

Actually, the good clinical and angiographic results reported have ruled out the perplexities related to the long-term durability of this conduit, 1,2 Go and the immediate consequences of RA harvesting on the forearm blood supply and the methods to minimize the incidence of acute hand ischemia have been clearly established. 3–6 Go However, to date, only limited information is available on the long-term modifications of the forearm vasculature and circulation after RA harvesting.

After RA removal, the forearm blood supply becomes totally dependent on the UA. This compensation leads to the significant increase in flow of the UA of the operated site that is evident from the early postoperative period and, according to our data, remains unchanged at 5 and 10 years of follow-up. 7 Go

Surprisingly, we found that in the years after surgical intervention, the IMT of the UA of the operated arm become progressively higher than that of the control side (Table 2). This difference was already evident at midterm follow-up and increased until reaching significance in the successive years (Figure 1).

Although it is not possible to exclude that the increase in IMT is the result of a remodeling of the arterial wall of the UA in response to the chronic flow increase without any detrimental consequences, the alarmingly high incidence of overt atherosclerosis reported in the UAs of the operated side seems to deny this favorable hypothesis and to suggest that the UA of the operated arm is more susceptible to the development of atherosclerosis compared with the nonoperated site (Table 2). This observation is concordant with the reported value of IMT as a marker of early atherosclerosis in other vascular districts. 13–15 Go

These findings remain to be confirmed in the longer term and in studies with larger sample sizes but open a new and alarming perspective on the possible chronic ischemic consequences of RA removal on the forearm circulation.

For the moment, our data must be kept in mind when selecting the appropriate arterial conduits for surgical myocardial revascularization and have particular relevance in young patients with a long life expectancy (to whom total arterial coronary revascularization is most often offered).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Possati G, Gaudino M, Prati F, Alessandrini F, Trani C, Glieca F, et al. Long-term angiographic results of radial artery grafts used as coronary artery bypass conduit. Circulation 2003;108:1350-1354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Acar C, Ramsheyi A, Pagny JY, Jebara V, Barrier P, Fabiani JN, et al. The radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. clinical and angiographic results at five years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:981-989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sullivan VV, Higgenbotham C, Shanley CJ, Fowler J, Lampman RM, Whitehouse Jr WM, et al. Can ulnar artery velocity changes be used as a preoperative screening tool for radial artery grafting in coronary artery bypass?. Ann Vasc Surg 2003;17:253-259.[Medline]
  4. Rodriguez E, Ormont ML, Lambert EH, Needleman L, Halpern EJ, Diehl JT, et al. The role of preoperative radial artery ultrasound and digital plethysmography prior to coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:135-139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Abu-Omar Y, Mussa S, Anastasiadis K, Steel S, Hands L, Taggart DP. Duplex ultrasonography predicts safety of radial artery harvest in the presence of an abnormal Allen test. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:116-119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Pola P, Serricchio M, Flore R, Manasse E, Favuzzi A, Possati GF. Safe removal of the radial artery for myocardial revascularization. a Doppler study to prevent ischemic complications to the hand. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:737-744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Serricchio M, Gaudino M, Tondi P, Gasbarrini A, Gerardino L, Santoliquido A, et al. Hemodynamic and functional consequences of radial artery removal for coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:1353-1356.[Medline]
  8. Manasse E, Sperti G, Suma H, Canosa C, Kol A, Martinelli L, et al. Use of the radial artery for myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1076-1082.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Gaudino M, Glieca F, Trani C, Lupi A, Mazzari MA, Schiavoni G, et al. Mid-term endothelial function and remodeling of radial artery grafts anastomosed to the aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:298-301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gaudino M, Alessandrini F, Pragliola C, Cellini C, Glieca F, Luciani N, et al. Effect of target artery location and severity of stenosis on mid-term patency of aorta-anastomosed vs. internal thoracic artery-anastomosed radial artery grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:424-428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Van Son JAM, Smedts F, Vincent JG, van Lier HJ, Kubat K. Comparative anatomic studies of various arterial conduits for myocardial revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:703-707.[Abstract]
  12. Manabe S, Tabuchi N, Toyama M, Yoshizaki T, Kato M, Wu H, et al. Oxygen pressure measurement during grip exercise reveals exercise intolerance after radial harvest. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:2066-2070.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, Rosamond W, Szklo M, Sharrett AR, et al. Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors. the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. 1987–1993 Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:483-494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Jensen-Urstad K, Rosfors S. A methodological study of arterial wall function using ultrasound technique. Clin Physiol 1997;17:557-567.[Medline]
  15. de Groot E, Hovingh GK, Wiegman A, Duriez P, Smit AJ, Fruchart JC, et al. Measurement of arterial wall thickness as a surrogate marker for atherosclerosis. Circulation 2004;109(suppl):III33-III38.[Medline]

Related Article

Chronic compensatory increase in ulnar flow and accelerated atherosclerosis after radial artery removal for coronary artery bypass
Mario Gaudino, Michele Serricchio, Paolo Tondi, Laura Gerardino, Angela Di Giorgio, Paolo Pola, and Gianfederico Possati
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2005 130: 9-12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. M. Vukovic, S. S. Radak, M. S. Peric, D. G. NeSic, and A. M. KneSevic
Radial Artery Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Stepwise-Made Decision
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 828 - 831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. J. Gomes
Invited Commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 894 - 895.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. G. Nezic, A. M. Knezevic, P. S. Milojevic, B. P. Dukanovic, M. D. Jovic, M. D. Borzanovic, and A. N. Neskovic
The fate of the radial artery conduit in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 30(2): 341 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
S. S. Shah, J. R. Sadaba, T. J.P. Batchelor, P. Coughlin, M. T. Burniston, M. Barnfield, and C. M. Munsch
Tissue perfusion in non-donor and donor forearm/hand after radial artery harvest: 1- and 5-year follow-up
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2006; 5(4): 353 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MMCTSHome page
M. Gaudino, F. Prati, and G. Possati
Radial artery grafting
MMCTS, January 9, 2006; 2006(0109): 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Gaudino, F. Glieca, N. Luciani, G. Losasso, P. Tondi, M. Serricchio, P. Pola, and G. Possati
Ten-year Echo-Doppler evaluation of forearm circulation following radial artery removal for coronary artery bypass grafting
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 29(1): 71 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H. B. Barner
Vascular remodeling as a biologic principle: Is the ulnar artery an exception?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2005; 130(1): 7 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mario Gaudino
Gianfederico Possati
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaudino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Possati, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaudino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Possati, G.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS